Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
![]()
![]()
That would be by design rather than by incompetence, I suspect. Military adventurism is a tried and true method of mitigating weak domestic legitimacy, and North Korea's nuclear program is probably the easiest Casus Belli for dragging the United States into another war. So long as things appear to be going well on election day, Trump would more or less clinch his reelection bid by going down that route.
![]()
Until tangible consequences start hitting them, I don't expect that to change.
edited 3rd Apr '17 9:08:32 AM by CaptainCapsase
Death Seeker incarnates then? Shame, maybe the whole pressure of the current events made so suicidal?
No, not Death Seekers. Just people so drunk on Toxic Masculinity that winning has become more important than succeeding.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.I'm hearing Democrats officially have the 41 votes needs to block Gorusch, so at least one nuclear option may be imminent.
A question, though, is it even remotely possible that Senate Democrats are actively trying to provoke the GOP into burning up the Nuclear Option? If so, what could the motivation be? To keep it from hanging over their heads? To force Republican ownership of anything the filibuster could have otherwise stopped?
![]()
![]()
The GOP's been like this for decades. Trump's just a symptom of a steadily-worsening problem.
edited 3rd Apr '17 10:50:27 AM by TobiasDrake
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Grouch isn't getting on the supreme court unless they nuke the filibuster. And multiple Senators have gone on record saying that they will oppose nuking it.
Once they nuke the filibuster, that means when Democrats take back Congress/White House, the GOP will be pretty much be completely powerless (even more so than Democrats right now).
Each of these Senators know that killing the Filibuster not only limits the minority party's power, but also their individual powers as a Senator.
This is NOT a sword they want to die on, but in case they do, Democrats will win, in the long term anyhow.
GOP is is a lose-lose situation.
New Survey coming this weekend!The other thing is that McConnell really doesn't want to be the fall guy for anything. If he nukes the filibuster, he's going to have to reconcile that with his constant use of it under Obama, and I don't think he'll have a good answer for it. He still hasn't given a good answer for the Garland thing.
There we a recent bit where he got grilled on Garland
This is pretty much what we discussed last week-the GOP wants to dangle the filibuster and 'cooperation' over the heads of the Democrats to try and string them along until a solution presents itself that lets them bypass the senate or shift blame to the Democrats; who, in turn, are having none of it and are putting the GOP front and center on the chocking block. 'Own it' and 'put up or shut up' is what we called it, I think.
Seeing McConnell fall apart under scrutiny makes my heart smile, because of all the terrible Republicans in Washington, he's the worst. I want him gone so badly, you guys.
edited 3rd Apr '17 11:02:45 AM by TobiasDrake
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Dont overthink this - the filibuster is worse than useless if only one side - the one with an R ever gets to use it. So the D's are deploying it because he's a fucking awful choice, end of. Any considerations along the lines of what it might prompt the republicans to do is a waste of cognitive effort - either they blow it up, or they do not, if they're inclined to do so, well, letting them have whatever they want in a futile effort to "preserve" it is very stupid indeed, and if it's a bluff it should be called.
Re: The overton window. Eh. It doesn't get moved by reasonable centrist people. If you feel it's too far to the right, attacking your own left - which this thread does a lot of! - is not a solid strategy.
Here is a solid strategy: Sit down, with the best minds you can find, and write up an amendment to kill citizens united. Spending limits on the canadian model or something equivalent. Then push it on ballot initiatives and in front of state legislatures. Because this is a thing massive majorities of the voters want, which is very hard to argue against, and which individual politicians will be very tempted by on a personal level because fundraising is hell.
edited 3rd Apr '17 12:52:15 PM by Izeinsummer
There are some Republicans who realize that they cannot count on holding both the White House and Senate permanently, and therefore that killing the filibuster for confirmations will come back to bite them.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Because it's only real importance is symbolic? Not wanting to start another argument on the electoral college, but while Clinton may have gotten the total popular vote, but the electoral win means Trump got the popular votes on a state by state basis.
Incidentally:
Steve Bannon is keeping a particular eye on the Georgia special election.
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/327018-bannon-closely-watching-ga-special-election-report
Orrin Hatch also got grilled about Merrick Garland on CNN.
edited 3rd Apr '17 1:08:29 PM by sgamer82
That is not so much a knock on Romney-I disagree with him on almost every issue, but I think he could have at least aspired to be an aggressively mediocre President. His loss made it clear the GOP had to shift-unfortunately, the direction it shifted was the opposite of where the party needed to go.
edited 3rd Apr '17 1:33:16 PM by ViperMagnum357

And Hollywood is a mix like most other groupings; Tim Allen might be the loudest of the tone deaf right wingers, but he is far from alone.