Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
I don't think the main center of the Democratic Party is actually pro-WWC because that's not who is control of their party nor their main constituents. Their party is based on the wealthy, minorities and the youth.
This is a pretty good article on how the Democratic Party actually abandoned the WWC.
I mean yeah they'll get a better deal with us
edited 23rd Mar '17 5:23:56 PM by MadSkillz
President Trump is literally forcing a Vote on Ryancare tomorrow.
Here comes the do-or-die moment for this Bill, and Trump's presidency in general...
From Madskillz article:
"...Rather than aggressively pursuing the firms that were engaged in systemic fraud, the Obama administration essentially applied a light tap on the wrist, all the while allowing the foreclosure crisis to persist with little resistance."
"...The president's aggressive push for the Trans-Pacific Partnership, an agreement that has far more to do with the rights of investors and massive corporations than the rights of workers, is yet another indication that the working class, in the view of his administration, ranks somewhere quite below corporate America. One can look also to Obamacare's failures, which have had more to do with the design of the program than with Republican obstructionism."
"It is true, of course, that the Republican Party is viciously anti-labor. But the Democratic Party has failed to mount anything that would qualify as effective resistance. Instead, Democrats have continued to support the working class in word, while often acting as their enemies in deed."
A bit on the extreme side, but there is an argument there.
I'm done trying to sound smart. "Clear" is the new smart.I'd wonder about that article. It contends that the Dems could've done alot more, while not specifying what more or taking into account that their political fortunes were (in hindsight) collapsing. Even with a Dem majority in Congress, We ARE Struggling Together was in full effect. Not to say the Dems are saints (though the GOP makes about anyone look good), but it would've benefited them more to break down the Vox article and throw out something practical.
Anyway, anyone want to come with ideas for our apology to well, the world in general, but Mexico first American spring breakers chant 'Build that wall' while vacationing in Mexico
Newlyweds Suly and Anaximandro Amable took to social media on March 6 after they said they attended a show on the “Pirate Ship” out of Puerto Juarez as part of their honeymoon, according to The Yucatan Times and social media posts.
Suly Amable wrote on Facebook that she and her husband were getting off the boat after the show when they heard the chants.
"In the face of such stupidity, one doesn't know how to immediately react," she wrote. "We were stunned. The whole thing seemed implausible."
Anaximandro Amable said the group who broke into the chant might have been intoxicated when they “began to sing the infamous ‘Build that wall’ chant louder and louder.”
The Yucatan Times reported that several Mexican tourists on the ship became annoyed and uncomfortable as the chants went on, but the Americans refused to stop chanting.
edited 23rd Mar '17 6:42:51 PM by CenturyEye
Look with century eyes... With our backs to the arch And the wreck of our kind We will stare straight ahead For the rest of our livesFortune's 'Greatest Leaders' list includes Samantha Bee, snubs Trump
. Well deserved, I say.
Some politicians considered more important leaders than Cheeto Benito by Fortune are:
- Tsai Ing-wen, president of Taiwan
- Sen. John Mc Cain (R-Ariz.)
- German Chancellor Angela Merkel
- Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R)
- Rep. John Delaney (D-Md.)
- former Vice President Joe Biden
- Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
- Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite
- London Mayor Sadiq Khan
- H.R. Mc Master, Trump's national security adviser.
Nvm.
Well if Trump builds the wall, should Mexico simply no longer allow US those types of tourists by asking if they voted for Trump or are republics or simply kicking out douchebags like those as a completely reasonable answer to them coming to Mexico.
edited 23rd Mar '17 7:06:34 PM by AngelusNox
Inter arma enim silent leges
They'll also have to tear down some fences.
Or at least, that would be something I'd like for them to do.
EDIT: Trump to Republicans: Vote for Ryancare, or Obamacare stays.
Let's see if that's enough to spook the House Republicans. That certainly won't scare the Senate Republicans in the slightest.
edited 23rd Mar '17 7:57:26 PM by DingoWalley1
Re: the NPR article about increasing mortality rates among white people.
The underlying motive behind all those the smallest violin comments basically comes down to a general message going: "Why is that when white people suffer, they get pitied and their plight is called 'despair', 'economic anxiety', or 'concern', but when other ethnic groups must live amongst gerrymandering, racial profiling, sexism, and voter suppression, it's quietly assumed that all is normal as should be."
If a sane president ever follows Trump, at this rate he or she will be spending most of their foriegn capital on an apology tour covering every continent but Antarctica.
You know, assuming that the Russians and Chinese haven't overrun their respective neighborhoods.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.@ Fighteer
I continue to find it amusing how militantly Internet communities oppose companies having access to store and trade users' browsing history. There are so many slippery slope fallacy arguments being made that I legitimately cannot keep track of them.
Certainly, there is merit to an argument in favor of general consumer privacy, but the obvious solution: a universal online ID system that encrypts personal information and releases it only to entities authorized by the user, is dismissed out of hand. Instead, people seem to prefer an anarchistic view of the Internet where security is basically a shark pit that you jump into at your peril.
And this from the same people who scoff at the notion of a libertarian society in which everybody is exclusively responsible for their self-defense and vigilantism is the primary method of administering justice.
The Internet is not the Wild West anymore, no matter how the online hipsters keep yearning for the good ol' days. The enemy is not corporations and governments, but the outlaws who steal data, forge identities, and hold web-based companies ransom. The best way to ensure security is to force rigorous identity-tracking at the hardware level, preventing anyone from forging credentials without getting booted.
Pick one: control over your identity, or freedom from data collection.
Would downloading media from the Internet be counted?
Counted for what? Ideally, any transaction you make on the Internet, be it downloading a file or buying a product, would either be anonymous (no personal information is exchanged) or private (any personal information exchanged is maintained only for the scope of the transaction and may not be used for any other purpose without your express authorization). I'd like to stress that we declared this off-topic, so I don't want to get into the gritty details here.
note
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Regarding Trump's shot at Ryancare, losing this fight will not be "the make-or-break moment" for Trump's Presidency. Remember that, 1, nobody expects Donald Trump to keep his promises, and 2, the orangutan may not be the master dealmaker he pretends to be, but he does understand the basic principles of contract negotiations, and one of the first rules one learns in that business is "Know When To Walk Away From The Table."
Donald Trump has realized that repeal-and-replace is falling apart. Making his threat lets him throw the rest of his party under the bus when it inevitably collapses, and Obamacare surviving doesn't actually hurt Trump when he ultimately likes the idea of (white people having) affordable insurance.
At this point, I will be satisfied with the AHCA not being a thing. Regardless of whoever wins or loses politically, it's a horribly designed bill. If it passes, millions of Americans will be screwed.
If this ends with Trump and/or the GOP getting egg on their faces? So much the better.
edited 23rd Mar '17 10:00:40 PM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprisedI mean, consider the sizeable dip Trump's approval ratings took after AHCA was announced, I think it matters quite a bit- it seems people did in fact, expect him to keep his promises, and his reputation as a 'master dealmaker' makes it seem even worse; 'how will he manage to make good deals with other country if he can't even make a good deal with his own party,' they'll say. 'What kind of master dealmaker makes rushes into a complicated issue, barely gives it any time for discussion, and then walks away from the table when they don't accept the first offer?'
Remember that for lots of his supporters, what matters is that the president must look strong at all times. Putting his weight behind a mess of a bill that half of his own party doesn't like, and it ends up failing, is not him looking strong.
edited 23rd Mar '17 10:42:14 PM by Gilphon

@Tacitical: You seemed to have missed the context of this discussion. There were, in fact, 6 republicans elected to the Hawaiian house of representatives. This topic was prompted by the fact that one of those 6 just left the party because she couldn't stomach Trump.
edited 23rd Mar '17 4:56:58 PM by Gilphon