Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
![]()
Of all things in 2016 alone?
But in continental news.
State Deptartment, what's that? State Department was 'unaware' of Mexico visit
and Asylum seekers, border issues top agenda in Kelly meeting
Three issues in particular have been in the spotlight:
- The increase in asylum seekers crossing illegally at the Canada-US border
- Reports of Canadians facing a tough time crossing the border
- The flow of trade between both countries
edited 11th Mar '17 5:28:48 PM by CenturyEye
Look with century eyes... With our backs to the arch And the wreck of our kind We will stare straight ahead For the rest of our lives@Madskillz: and yet, still not enough of them turned out to help either Sanders or Clinton, so my point about turnout still stands. That count goes by percentage of the people who actually voted, so the numbers are naturally not including those who didn't. If you don't come out to vote, you have no effect on who gets the office, and we still have a problem with people under thirty simply not voting for whatever reason. People in the same age bracket that voted for Obama didn't come out for this election.
@math: It's also why people freaking out about the left in America are essentially enabling Trump in the same manner people on the left who refused to vote for Clinton out of some misguided principles helped get him elected: America's Overton window simply doesn't go far left enough to produce something radical to the point of being dangerous in the foreseeable future.
And it's quite possible those voters are now lost forever to apathy and nilhism. More and more people in my age-group seem to be drifting towards the mindset that makes Putin's rule in Russia possible; the kind of fatalism and unshakable cynicism towards power that makes people simply give up on the political process altogether.
edited 11th Mar '17 6:22:00 PM by CaptainCapsase
Well, if it's any consolation, England and France had their own homegrown fascist movements leading up to WWII. They failed in part due to resistance from the populace. A lot of US citizens have been marching, and we can still donate.
Oregon Rep. Earl Blumenauer introduces the 'No Taxpayer Revenue Used to Monetize the Presidency Act'
It's mostly symbolic, given the climate, but thought it worth a mention.
@Luigisan: the flipside of that is that the older people get, the more likely they are to vote. Probably because by then they realize that voting has consequences. And what can be done is already being done; Get Out the Vote and the like. Those probably need monetary support and volunteers to help people get registered and to the voting locations.
@Cap: there was an article linked earlier today talking about how the Gen Xers were now the people in power, which includes Paul Ryan. (And boy does it feel weird to think Gen Xers are that old now because at one point I thought of my sister as part of that group, but she might not be, or at least is on the tail end of it.) Which points more to the fact that cynicism aside, people do participate in the world more as they get older. What form that takes is anyone's guess right now. Hopefully not this tack to the far right that we're seeing now.
But in any event, let's not call a very broad group joined together only by their age as lost forever for any reason, yeah? This seems like your pessimism creeping in again; let's not fall into the pit of defeatism as regards getting folks to vote.
edited 11th Mar '17 7:44:00 PM by AceofSpades
It never seems to occur to them that their low voter turnout and the relative irrelevance the Left has in the USA might be related.
edited 11th Mar '17 7:44:52 PM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprisedHonestly the best way to snap millennials out of their self-righteous complacency is for the entire country to suffer under Trump. Sometimes what's need is the lash, and 2017 being possibly the disaster year for American liberalism might teach them a lesson.
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."You talk about complacency but I see it diferent, what it worry me is perish the idea the other group can be see as rival that you may disagree instead of a political enemy that you must kick around and never give the time of the day, the last election have many people pretty much voting because "fuck the other guy" which could be a bad precedent over time.
"My Name is Bolt, Bolt Crank and I dont care if you believe or not"To be honestly, I wouldn't mind it if Republicans suffered terribly; partisanship is something I'm not at all concerned about; the kind of gentility that bipartisanship requires means a lot of important issues go unaddressed. Though, after four years of Trump, pretty much every vulnerable group is going to have a personal story about how this administration fucked them, which can be translated into big Dem gains.
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."Ah, Republicans. Not content to be merely evil, they have to be Stupid Evil.
I mean, I guess they are mostly old fucks who won't be alive to see the consequences of their inaction. Fuck you, I got mine; one a species wide level.
edited 11th Mar '17 9:21:25 PM by Rationalinsanity
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.@Gilphon
No kidding. But this part of the danger of messianic thinking. You start from the premise that your guy has the magic power to fix everything, and that if only he were "given a chance" he would. The diehard Sanders fanboys have been playing this card since it became apparent he was going to lose the primaries.
This is in a large part why they have to push the "corruption in the Democratic Party" narrative. Because if Sanders lost fairly, or even close to fairly, then their wishful belief that he would have become president if he won the primary becomes is exposed as a delusion. There has to be something inherently and seriously unfair in the Democratic primary process to deny Sanders the nomination, so that the Unicorn Brigaders can go on insisting he'd have won the actual election. Never mind that the main election is crooked, in terms of voter suppression, the Electoral College, and this time around, the Russians.
If you've ever wondered why the diehards come off as madder at Clinton than at Trump, it's because they have to. The DNC has to have done more vote rigging than the Republicans. Otherwise their narrative—that Sanders was denied the nomination unfairly and would have totes won the election—is exposed as false.
@Mad Skillz
No it isn't. If two guys in a room have tattoos and the other ninety-eight do not, and I get both those guys to vote for me, I have won the tattoo vote. Unfortunately said vote constitutes two percent of the people in the room and is therefore statistically insignificant.
The youth vote is a statistical irrelevancy because not enough of them turn out to vote. Most of them, once again, couldn't be arsed to turn out for Sanders in the primaries. It doesn't matter how well he polled amongst young people, they couldn't or wouldn't get off their asses to actually go and make him the nominee.
The youth you're claiming are so significant treated Sanders rallies like parties. Places to go to meet people and hit on women by demonstrating their progressive credentials. When it came time to actually go and vote they didn't do it.
Decisions are made by those who show up. "The youth vote" didn't show up. They never do. And in doing so have damned themselves to electoral irrelevance.
More Carter bashing from someone who has previously demonstrated that they don't know anything about the Carter presidency. As for wanting a better candidate...you're kidding right? Ted Kennedy was a great Senator, sure, but when asked why he was primarying Carter he could not give an answer. He could not explain why he was doing what he was doing. Not usually a good sign from the candidate.
Ted Kennedy did not want to be president. Can't say I blame him after what happened to the rest of his family. And everything about his attempt to primary Carter speaks of a man who did not want to win. He was pushed into doing it by Unicorn Brigaders who were attracted to the name "Kennedy" and believed, like they always do, that if they could just get the messiah into the race, everything would be perfect. He was pressured to run, and ran accordingly. In the end he couldn't actually contest Carter's position—but he managed to make the Democrats look like raging incompetents and Reagan appear a genius by comparison.
But sure. Blame Carter. Blame the victim, rather than examining the utter disaster that was Kennedy's run and the motivations behind it.
That's nice. When you have a group of people who consistently rally around a figure and declare him to be the messiah apropos of nothing, then pitch a hissy fit and take their marbles home when things don't work out how they wanted, working with them becomes impossible to start with.
When these people stop the hunt for The Great Progressive Messiah (TM) and actually try to become part of the process, they will be worth working with.
I. Don't. Care.
And Sanders would have lost even worse. Seriously, Sanders' reaction when he thought Trump wanted to throw him a bone and debate him? The implosion that resulted from it, as Sanders proceeded to self-immolate by pretending to a relevance he no longer had, and essentially begging the Republican front runner to salvage his campaign? That's what a Sanders v Trump campaign would have looked like.
...You're joking right? Sanders is not a Democrat. His supporters constantly boast about his "strength with independents". He lost the primary in large part because his fanboys forgot to change their registration across numerous states.
He knew he wanted influence over the Democratic Party. Hint—you get that by joining it. Sanders has had years to join up. He chose not to.
Bullshit. He's been in politics for thirty years or more. He's got all the skeletons in his closet that one can expect of someone with that track record.
Not gonna bother responding to the "neoliberal" crap because as demonstrated previously, you use that as a slur rather than in any meaningful political sense.
After spending months whining about how it was rigged, man, and getting his fanboys stirred up against the DNC. I'm glad he saw the light and tried to fix things at the last moment, but his net impact on the party was awful.
And you've refuted yourself. Not enough of you got off your asses and voted. So you lost. Because that's how elections work.
@Zephyr: That's only going to make things worse. Go ahead and ask one of the Russian tropers over in their thread why they put up with all the shit their government does and the gist of the response is something along the lines of "at least it's not as bad as it was in the 90s."
Sanders had a better shot than Clinton or any democrat simply by virtue of being distant from the incumbent party what turned out to be a change election. Now if he'd won, it'd be the same circular firing squad that labor went into after Corbyn became the party leader followed by a cruhsing midterm loss, but Clinton's presidency would be just one impeachment attempt after another and annual government shutdowns followed by an equally devastating loss in the midterms.
Clinton was not a good choice by any stretch of the imagination; whatever her qualifications. Neither was Sanders, or any sitting democratic politician I can think of. The party is in a sorry state when a 74 year old socialist and part of the same foreign policy blob that marched us into a Forever War in the middle east is what's being offered.
edited 11th Mar '17 9:35:27 PM by CaptainCapsase
This is the part that gets me. They're literally leaving hundreds of billions, if not trillions of dollars on the table either out of spite, or just because they really are true believers.
New Survey coming this weekend!Well, if what we fear does come to pass, and any of these guys are still alive somehow...well, I expect some form of apology.
Or a trial. That might very from person to person.
Oh God! Natural light!

Can you not remind us of how much we suck right now, thanks
i'm tired, my friend