Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Do overly sensitive, my-very-specific-demands-or-screw-you Bernie or Bust types actually represent a significant voting block, or are they a very vocal minority? That's really going to determine how seriously I take all of this.
In any case, I get the feeling they're the leftists with the least amount to lose during an 8 year Trump presidency - so, not likely to be seriously hurt by an ACA repeal or killed in a hate crime...
538 says that Georgia's upcoming special election is important because it's exactly the kind of district the Dems need to flip if they want to regain control of Congress- a traditionally Republican leaning district full of college educated white people who don't really like Trump.
My takeaway is that they're in trouble if they can't win there.
If you're talking about the Sanders wing, I'd say they're a more significant voting bloc than the alt right is for Republicans.
Incorrect. Labour has been tearing itself apart ever since the party leadership election campaign when it first became clear that Corbyn had unexpectedly become a serious candidate for leader. The second he was announced as leader, party unity collapsed and then began to get progressively worse.
This should be a lesson for people who think Ellison's appointment would automatically solve the rift in the party. There's actually a possibility that the rift could have worsened, not improved.
If my post doesn't mention a giant flying sperm whale with oversized teeth and lionfish fins for flippers, it just isn't worth reading.![]()
![]()
![]()
Handel is also seen as "an uneducated religious fanatic" even by GA standards, and every comment I've seen has been of criticizing her past career. And yet she's the Republican frontrunner.
I would rather not lose here. How did you discover that flippable site?
edited 25th Feb '17 7:57:11 PM by CenturyEye
Look with century eyes... With our backs to the arch And the wreck of our kind We will stare straight ahead For the rest of our lives@Wyldchyld: Unlike Corbyn Ellison had very broad support from major figures in both the more centrist wing of the party and the left wing of the party; this rift was going to be a problem with or without him in charge, but we're already off to a rather tepid start in terms of party unity, especially if the party brass sideline Ellison in his new role and assume Trump's extreme unpopularity will ensure major gains in 2018.
edited 25th Feb '17 8:04:37 PM by CaptainCapsase
Way back in 2016, along with The Sixty-Five,
which has a bunch of telephone numbers. My last couple of weeks was spent calling the members of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security about getting Bannon off the NSC.
![]()
![]()
Yes.
There's a page on Wikipedia on it
.
See also this from Daily Kos
.
edited 25th Feb '17 8:05:09 PM by Hodor2
Corbyn has more support in the centre and left of the party than the media keeps portraying. It's the centre-'right' wing of the party (the 'Blairite' wing, and note the inverted commas - the 'right' of the Labour Party isn't 'right' by Tory standards.. although that's a discussion best left for the British politics thread) that's the problem — they've the wing with the money and the wing that's been in control of the party until Corbyn, which puts them in a very strong position but it would a (semi) equivalent to the 'Obama wing'.
edited 25th Feb '17 8:22:39 PM by Wyldchyld
If my post doesn't mention a giant flying sperm whale with oversized teeth and lionfish fins for flippers, it just isn't worth reading.We throwing tantrums over Perez winning? All we need now is that guy who finally started to get thumped, then we'll have a real party.
Seriously, the chair and deputy chair are friends, will be working together, and agree on the issues. Or did someone try to forget that a 50 state strategy would inevitably result in support for the campaigns of the Blue Dogs and "neoliberals" (should I add triple parentheses for this?) you despise so much?
I have disagreed with her a lot, but comparing her to republicans and propagandists of dictatorships is really low. - An idiotI'll second everything Jovian said about the Sanders crazies who frankly are, at this point, a massive disservice to the man whose name they appropriate. Their entire schtick relies on not being in power and whenever someone they support does get elected, they immediately brand them a sellout. Had Ellison won they'd have been happy for a week, then started calling him a sellout when he, gasp, gave money to Manchin or another "Blue Dog".
Oh, and since it came up again that "Perez is supported by a Jewish guy who doesn't like Muslims" (and why his being Jewish was mentioned at all I must question) I will remind you that one of Ellison's major cheerleaders was TYT, an organization headed by a (Turkish) genocide denier and named for the guys who carried it out. Should that colour our opinion of Ellison?
Perez and Ellison are friends and colleagues who plan to work together. If you can't handle that you've got problems. And if you look at Perez's record and denounce him as anything other than progressive, you're officially spouting off buzzwords with no concept of what they mean.
edited 25th Feb '17 8:31:13 PM by AmbarSonofDeshar
@Beary Scary: I've been waiting for an announcement on the Dinner, so I'm not surprised he's not going. He really doesn't handle situations like that well (where he's expected to take ribbing with good grace).
Looks like someone else was in charge of his Twitter account for the tweet he put out (wishing the Dinner all the best), given how sensible it is.
If my post doesn't mention a giant flying sperm whale with oversized teeth and lionfish fins for flippers, it just isn't worth reading.

Oh, good. Georgia's is coming up.