Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
![]()
![]()
Most of those politicians know that they are politically screwed, and that this may be the last 2 years they have (excluding Rubio, who's got 5+ and is just a gutless coward). So they'd rather do whatever the hell they want for these 2 years before losing everything, and not feel guilty about it until later.
It's 2010 all over again, except the Democrats had spines and at least attended their own Town Halls before running. Most of these Republicans are so cowardly.
edited 24th Feb '17 2:17:06 PM by DingoWalley1
And the American rejection and resistance to those noxious ideas are equally longstanding. If we think those ideas should be un-American, we've still got our work cut out for us.
However, of the ideas that are being imported by Republicans, it is extremely concerning that they are coming from 1930s Central and Eastern European nationalists.
edited 24th Feb '17 2:20:51 PM by Eschaton
The sheer incompetence of the Trump regime may prove to be its downfall. See, the thing about totalitarian movements is that they only stay in power if they deliver on their promises to make The Trains Run on Time and whatnot. Most importantly, it is crucial that the people who would resist their rule see the advantages (power, wealth, comfort) that accrue to those who go along, and a sufficient number either change sides or give up the resistance.
If Trump's policies work to deliver prosperity to the people who voted for him, then we'll be in real trouble. Fortunately, there is no sign that such will happen — quite the opposite, in fact.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"It'll be interesting to see if this fiasco will be enough to break American Hegemony. That'll be a bitter pill to swallow.
edited 24th Feb '17 2:34:03 PM by Lanceleoghauni
"Coffee! Coffeecoffeecoffee! Coffee! Not as strong as Meth-amphetamine, but it lets you keep your teeth!"Well again, I'm talking about foreign policy goals. Global hegemony at the end of a gun if need be is business as usual in America.
Trump's just a lot more aggressive about it.
There's a disturbing amount of continuity between Bush, Obama and Trump in terms of military foreign policy.
He lost the popular vote but he got nearly half the voters (over 40 million). That is damning imo.
And I mean if you look back on it, America has been flirting with fascism for over a century. FDR had a pretty good opinion of Mussolini as did most of America's business leaders. American companies like Ford, GM, General Electric, Chase etc. aided and abetted the Nazis. America at large were even fairly supportive of Hitler in the mid-30's.
And hell, we voted in the son and grandson of a man who helped the Nazis out. George Bush and George HW Bush.
Trump is a pseudo-fascist. Trump would need to have an actual ideology to be a real fascist. He's more incoherent than anything else.
The fascists are the people surrounding him namely Bannon and Miller but even then Bannon is just putting a racist coloring on neocon foreign goals. Clashing with China and the Muslim world.
There's something to be said about the world viewing America as the number one threat to global stability even before Trump was elected.
Well I don't think America is evil. It's frankly just corrupt and I am all for trying to fix it because it can be fixed.
Trump's chumps aren't aberrations though. They're extensions of the bitterness and anger that is aimed at a system that is shitting all over people.
When George W Bush was running, he successfully positioned himself as a candidate that would pull back on being the global police and not the type to nation build. He lied of course.
Obama positioned himself a candidate for hope and change. But he didn't do enough and his presidency was nearly neutered in the cradle.
And Trump positioned himself as a candidate for making America great again. It's just that he's lying about that too.
I don't think people are losing hope though. If anything people are getting angrier every election. They're trying every candidate out because they know there is something rotten in the system but they can't figure out what it is. They think Trump is going to be a bludgeon to wreck the whole thing down because they want something different.
On this discussion, seems a good time to break out this "rant" on the idea that Trump shows America's true colors. Something I had been thinking regard to Leftists mocking people saying that "we are not like that" as well as Clinton's slogan of "America is great because America is good".
So Trump undeniably is in line with the bad aspects of America, but at the same time, there is an idealistic "promise" of America and I think that various civil rights movements are all about making the country live up to its ideals as well as to include more people under the heading of American.
So, to that end, it feels kind of insulting to those people's efforts to insist that the country is fundamentally evil, in which case there was no point in trying. And I'd also say that the criticism misses the point that to some extent the kind of patriotic rhetoric used by Clinton and other Democrats is about trying to co-opt the language of patriotism in support of progressive ideals/to frame those ideals as in line with or even emblematic of American patriotism. It's not naive; it's just theoretically a more productive way of winning support than going on about America sucking.
If Trump's policies work to deliver prosperity to the people who voted for him, then we'll be in real trouble. Fortunately, there is no sign that such will happen — quite the opposite, in fact.
63 million, actually. With a population of 318.9 million, this means that Trump represents 19.76% of America. And even that margin is turning on him.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.America does have a problem with continuously doing the wrong thing. Can't help but want to grab the Alphabet Soup agencies by the lapels and shake them while chanting "Stop Being Evil". America can be a lot better than we let it be.
"Coffee! Coffeecoffeecoffee! Coffee! Not as strong as Meth-amphetamine, but it lets you keep your teeth!"Well no. It's even larger than that. There's only 200 million registered voters. So 1/3 of America voted for him. And the other 1/3 didn't even bother trying to stop him.
edited 24th Feb '17 2:59:53 PM by MadSkillz
Yeah. Especially when you get people like Paul Ryan saying things that indicate that he literally doesn't understand the difference between wealth and freedom.
I quote: "Freedom is the ability to buy what you want to fit what you need." -Paul Ryan, spineless moron.
The "freedom" that the Republicans are trying to bring? It's oppression, the opposite of freedom. Yeah, you might not like that your tax revenue is going to pay for an unemployed woman in the Ozarks so she can not die from a horrible illness, but that tax revenue isn't infringing on your freedom any, and it's massively increasing hers. She now has the freedom to live her life the way she wants to, instead of dying in horrible agonizing pain.
Or do you think that people should die in agony just so your taxes are slightly lower? Because it doesn't matter how you justify it, that's what repealing the ACA will do.
Note, the "you" here is just hypothetical. I'm not referring to anyone specific.
edited 24th Feb '17 3:04:26 PM by Zendervai
Because Paul Ryan is a Rand-worshipping objectivist.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Here's an even better quote: "Americans will always do the right thing, after all other options have been exhausted."
But at least we finally do end up doing the right thing. Or trying to. Most of the time.
The basic problem is that the American working class sees this huge expensive government spending a lot of money trying to do nice things for everyone else but them. How accurate this perception is can be questioned, but from their point of view, the purpose of the American gov't is first of all to promote their interests (to what extent them includes minorities can also be argued). Being nice to the rest of the world is a secondary priority.
So to persuade a number of Trump voters to vote for a more progressive candidate next time, they have to be reassured that their interests as Americans will be protected, even while America pursues a progressive foreign policy.
I think that can be done.
edited 24th Feb '17 3:07:34 PM by DeMarquis
I'm done trying to sound smart. "Clear" is the new smart.The key obstacle is that the reactionary forces that drive the Republican Party don't want the lives of their own constituents improved by the Democrats. Allowing that to happen might steal their loyalty away, which is based to a large extent on the idea that Democrats use Big Government to take from them and give to "others".
Key to Republican ideology is the belief that government always reduces freedom.
edited 24th Feb '17 3:17:21 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Rep. Peter King (R-NY) won't do Town Halls because 'screaming sessions' 'diminish democracy'
.
The realistic Translation: his number is coming, and he knows it, so he might as well avoid his constituency (of all political colors) in order to screw them over before he's voted out in 2018.
edited 24th Feb '17 3:16:33 PM by DingoWalley1
@Fighteer: Yes, you are right about that, but one reason so many of them voted for Trump in the first place is because they are finally realizing that the Republican party has been lying to them. I've used that very phrase with many Trump supporters and conservatives, and so far no one has disagreed. There is an opening here, if only someone has the balls to take it.
edited 24th Feb '17 3:19:06 PM by DeMarquis
I'm done trying to sound smart. "Clear" is the new smart.Did Bush II really campaign on stepping back on America: World Police?
Because I'm unsure whether it's more accurate to say he lied about his intentions or that 9/11 caught everyone off guard and triggered a shift in priorities. Say what you will about his competence and the fact that Rumsfield and Cheney manipulated him, but by all accounts he took 9/11 personally and worked hard at being a leader through the aftermath. Even Obama likely recognized that: when Bin Laden was confirmed dead, Bush was the first person he called.
@Rationalinsanity: The two nastiest agencies, actually; in lieu of a damning piece of evidence that opens the door for the Judiciary, the NSA and CIA have the best chance by far of short-circuiting this regime without a coup or popular uprising. They are just about the only ones left with both the mandate and authority to take action, with the rest of the Alphabet agencies reporting to the Executive Branch or too narrowly focused to do much more than make noise outside their mandate.

I don't think I've ever hated a group of human beings than the GOP, Trump, and his cabinet.
New Survey coming this weekend!