Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Not strictly politics related, but Fake News is a subject that's come up here before so thought it might be interesting to post:
The Film Theory Youtube channel does a video about the Fake News phenomenon.
Is the administration using the word, are are the sources reporting on it using the word?
Re: Trump and the Bundys (Now there's a Married... with Children episode title...) is it at all ironic that for all that we were glad to avoid martyring Y'all Queda during these standoffs, the Republican candidate they'd otherwise wholeheartedly support is the one preaching aggressiveness?
edited 24th Dec '16 2:00:11 PM by sgamer82
![]()
![]()
So South Park was right last season?
Man, I didn't know the problem was worse then simply rebuilding neighborhoods so that only the Rich (ads) could live there.
In all seriousness, though, it sounds like Advertising needs to be seriously moderated now more then ever.
Not at all; that's all Trump's M.O. Be aggressive as hell towards anyone and everyone, be they a person, a corporation, or even an entire group of people. That is what Trump ran on; that is what he's still running on. So of course he would be aggressive towards those that challenge the Government's (especially his Government's) authority.
edited 24th Dec '16 2:02:45 PM by DingoWalley1
I believe president Trump will clash with the Republicans over the whole "small government" thing. I mean, while they may sell it to him as a good thing, he might take it as a personal affront because, well, who wouldn't want to be ruled by Donald J. Trump? Who would prefer one of those filthy governor peasants over the President of the United States of America!?
So yeah, if another Bundy rose against the government, it's probable that Trump would be against that.
![]()
Which, thanks to the Chaves-Maduro and Peron-Menem-Kirchner(x2) series we both know personally that it's far easier than it sounds.
Trump's old tweets demonstrate once again that not even Trump considers Trump to be fit to be president.
edited 24th Dec '16 2:24:25 PM by IFwanderer
1 2 We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be. -KV![]()
Well, Here Chavez manage to get afloat because unlike Maduro or Trump he knowed how to control himself while Maduro have the lowest suport EVER(a 25% last time I check) Trump is similar, he dosent have new fans and he is losing people even in a lost rate
edited 24th Dec '16 2:31:12 PM by unknowing
"My Name is Bolt, Bolt Crank and I dont care if you believe or not"The deal was that Carrier wouldn't close one of the Indianapolis plants and keep in the US one third of the jobs they were planning to move to Mexico. They will still move several hundreds jobs south of the wall and they'll still close a plant in the US. Also, some of the jobs they weren't going to move to Mexico will count as part of that one third of jobs they had to keep in the US, so... it's all just symbolic.
The company will get its tax breaks, it will lay off hundreds of employees in the US and it will move jobs to a country with cheaper labour. So, the only apparent win for Trump's government is that he can sell his people the illusion of keeping one of his promises.
I guarantee you that one of the primary objectives of Trump and his Death Eaters is to magnify the wave of misinformation and propaganda that he already rode into the White House. And all of the pieces are in place for him to do just that. Trump TV, with 24-hour White House access. Breitbart becoming a de facto state-run propaganda outlet (which is also expanding its influence into Europe). The loss of net neutrality making Internet censorship viable once more. Threatening journalists and major news outlets with lawsuits or loss of access to discourage unflattering coverage.note
Not to mention him telling his supporters that his personal messages to them are the only reliable source of information, and everything else is suspect. Another move straight out of the fascism playbook. "Believe only me. No one else."
"We'll take the next chance, and the next, until we win, or the chances are spent."Dude, you're talking with a Venezuelan (and an Argentine). As much as Trump may be a new thing for you, to us he is just doing Standard Operation Practices for government, and that's why he's so scary (to me at least).
edited 24th Dec '16 3:23:53 PM by IFwanderer
1 2 We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be. -KV![]()
So, kissinger is the american rasputin?
Bluefish: again, nothing new for us here, what you are saying is Party aproves news which happen because people are sure true FACTS are the one who valided their worldview(which isnt new on is on) again he is not gaining people, he dosent have the skill to mantain it
"My Name is Bolt, Bolt Crank and I dont care if you believe or not"Your biggest asset with Trump bound to be at best mediocre is that pretty much nobody but white supremacists will have any fond memories of this government.
To bring up an example from my own country again, when the military dictatorship was in power, people had no real idea what was going on in the government. They had full control over information, so people didn't find out about all the corruption, cronyism, incompetence, and wanton violence that existed in the government at that time because no news source was allowed to report it.
This, along with the people from the dictatorship getting away scott-free from their crimes means a lot of people who lived through the dictatorship actually want to go BACK to it because they have the illusion that things were better then, when the reality is it was WORSE and they just had no way to find out.
That's not going to happen to Trump. Even with his attempts to obscure the truth he won't be able to completely, and unless it gets to the point where the republicans invent fake figures of economic prosperity people are going to see things aren't getting better.
edited 24th Dec '16 4:25:30 PM by Draghinazzo

Just sounds like another example of Trump saying one thing and doing another.