Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
r/BadEconomics goes over whether the Rust Belt working class actually voted for Trump
.
Those actually facing economic hardship in the Rust Belt voted overwhelmingly for Hillary. The flip was with middle class households feeling that Trump could reverse small town decay.
I have disagreed with her a lot, but comparing her to republicans and propagandists of dictatorships is really low. - An idiotOne coment in that reddit fourm call my atention.
"For both the avid and even passing by Bernie supporters it's a matter of trust. For several of us, we'd rather see the ship burn than surrender it to the captors who seized the ship."
I....just.....why.....AGHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I will be out for a while, otherwise I will saying things that I might regret, see you later
"My Name is Bolt, Bolt Crank and I dont care if you believe or not"![]()
![]()
So ultimately, nationalism and bigotry won the day for Trump. The fear of the "other", and the fear of losing privilege motivated just enough people to vote for Trump.
I mean, I kind of suspected that was the case, but damn that's disheartening. It means nothing Trump and his cronies do will dissuade his supporters as long as he treats the people they don't like worse.
Ironic that the GOP won by playing to white identity politics, when everyone on the right and left is chewing out HRC for supposedly focusing on identity politics. When in reality she was the candidate who spoke most often and most coherently about jobs and improving the economy.
edited 20th Dec '16 9:25:23 AM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprisedWhile I dont want bring more of this since is importing drama, there something it catch my atention:
"I mean there's alot of blaming 'racist white males' seen through some of the claims about these stats (not necessarily saying yourself here) which don't account for noticable statistics such as a larger amount of non-whites and females voting for Trump than did for Romney."
Is that true? and more important, how many minority actually vote for trump?
"My Name is Bolt, Bolt Crank and I dont care if you believe or not"![]()
Both the economy and racism are essential to understanding Trump, in the same way they were essential to understanding 20th century fascism.
Low income voters favored Clinton, that much is obvious, but that's not the whole picture; trajectory matters quite a lot, and Trump voters/no-show democrats are overwhelmingly people whose economic situation is worse now than it was 10 years ago, particularly when you're talking middle America rather than the south. The American middle class is dwindling, particularly in the rust belt.
edited 20th Dec '16 9:43:35 AM by CaptainCapsase
So I've heard at the time of the election. Trump's support from minorities was supposedly better than any recent Republican candidate.
edited 20th Dec '16 9:41:20 AM by Protagonist506
Leviticus 19:34He's world-famous. Some people voted for the man because "he's rich and that means hes successful".
I can say as a first-gen immigrant with first-gen immigrant parents that wealth alone is enough to earn a first-gen immigrant's respect.
Say to the others who did not follow through You're still our brothers, and we will fight for youFCC Republicans vow to gut Net Neutrality ASAP
"[W]e will seek to revisit [the disclosure] requirements, and the Title II Net Neutrality proceeding more broadly, as soon as possible," they wrote, referring to the order that imposed net neutrality rules and reclassified IS Ps as common carriers under Title II of the Communications Act. Pai and O'Rielly noted that they "dissented from the Commission's February 2015 Net Neutrality decision, including the Order's imposition of unnecessary and unjustified burdens on providers."
Good job America.
You played yourself.
New Survey coming this weekend!Yeah, I mean they have economic problems? sure but they decide "others" are the problem, so the belive Trump snake oil promises, it dosent help the whole "Trump anti-establishment" ilusion he cast around him.
But he make them belive it was, which it work for him in the end, and he didt without the "establishment" help like any good self made men therefore he is better.
see? that is how it works
edited 20th Dec '16 9:46:49 AM by unknowing
"My Name is Bolt, Bolt Crank and I dont care if you believe or not"![]()
![]()
There's at least some hope that the tech lobby will be able to outbid the ISP lobby; the only reason Net Neutrality survived this long was because of the powerful economic interests who benefit from it.
Trying to argue the importance of racial factors over economic factors or vice versa is in my point, a pointless exercise; both are critical to understanding Trump voters, and we have to work to address both if we want to avoid further slides into authoritarian modes of governance.
edited 20th Dec '16 9:47:12 AM by CaptainCapsase
![]()
Is not that dificult: much of them have economic problems but turn to cultural issues like racism or scapegoat to solve it, it happen in germany, it happen here in venezuela, it as bound to happen there in USA, specially with con men like him.
Because like Cap said, people are becoming more distrustful of mainstrain media while Trump have year to create this imagine of him being a self made men who is not bound to anyone, against that Hilary have a hard time for being the "establishment"
edited 20th Dec '16 9:54:00 AM by unknowing
"My Name is Bolt, Bolt Crank and I dont care if you believe or not"Given that Trump consistently attacks the media I figure it's more likely that at least some of them will "align" against him. The way he's handling things like these rallies, he doesn't really need any particular network to play nice with. Although he's guaranteed that Fox will play nice with him; they've been doing that from the start. They stood by while he tore into Megyn Kelly.
I don't see any reason for Trump to stop attacking the media, really, since he's clearly not going to change anything else about himself.
![]()
![]()
He's proven again and again and again that he cannot be trusted with other peoples' money. Hell, he can barely be trusted with his own money. Now he's in charge of the USA's economy. Which, given its size, means he effectively controls most of the global economy too.
We. Are. Fucked.
edited 20th Dec '16 10:17:12 AM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprisedTrump isn't so much an embodiment of the American Dream as he is the apotheosis of American mediocrity — short-sighted, vain, stupid, boorish, greedy, unqualified, careless, bloodthirsty, and vindictive. In our political sphere, he's the closest we'll ever have to a genuine Satan figure, someone who represents all of America's most terrible impulses, and then reaches out to people and encourage them to bring out the evilest part of themselves and reshape the country in his image.
It's so difficult to actually break his hold on the popular imagination because the people like to celebrate their own mediocrity, and they see in him a kindred spirit, as insane as that sounds.
edited 20th Dec '16 10:23:36 AM by CrimsonZephyr
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."![]()
![]()
Media tends to align with the state, even in nations with freedom of the press; that's a simple consequence of the profit incentives that drive corporate media, and the need for access to government records and government officials that is not legally guaranteed. Which is why American reporting about American activities overseas is often less reliable (and more prone to lies by omission) than say British or French reporting on America. In those countries on the other hand, the converse tends to be true.
Trump's mastery of social media, his rallies, and the force of the executive branch behind him gives him an almost unprecedented capacity to bypass the press, so anyone who isn't covering him on his own terms will be left out in the cold. Niche media will survive of course, but it will become increasingly difficult to report on the Trump administration without striking deals with the executive branch that compromises coverage.
We can only hope this is a short term trend rather than a permanent feature of the political landscape.
edited 20th Dec '16 10:25:30 AM by CaptainCapsase
"We can only hope this is a short term trend rather than a permanent feature of the political landscape."
Probably the latter. Once the genie's out of the lamp, there's no caging it again.
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."![]()
![]()
In a twisted way, he's a Hope Bringer to his supporters. "If someone like him can be rich and powerful, then I can make it too!" His narrative basically reassures them that they don't need to better themselves to be successful. They just need to beat down those other people.
edited 20th Dec '16 10:38:35 AM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprised

![[up] [up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png)
Ah, the time honored Republican tradition of small government and respecting the lower orders of government in action.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.