Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
If Hillary wins this way she will lose the election in 2020 no contest. That also happens to be the year the House redistricts. I think our best hope is for Trump to screw up and cause a liberal backlash.
![]()
None of that matters. The EC is the law of the land. We've already dealt with enough claims about things being rigged. I really don't want Hillary to deal with this bullshit for four years. Heck, I doubt she even wants this to happen.
edited 15th Nov '16 7:41:06 AM by Kostya
How big is the popular vote gap currently? I haven't been keeping track of stuff since the election finished, since I decided to take some time away.
Also, I asked and was told before that the vote counts favoring Clinton weren't happening in state that might potentially flip or change the actual electoral result. Is that still true?
If such a thing did happen, if the fully counted popular vote is different from worry the electors did, would changing their vote at that time so be considered faithless?
edited 15th Nov '16 7:47:29 AM by sgamer82
This this this. Congress can't just deny deny deny replacements for four years. Hillary might be a shoe-out for 2020 if she wins by Electoral revolt now, but she can solidify Democratic hold on the Supreme Court. Playing defense here, since Congress is solid red.
The EC aren't required to vote by their mandate. They are free to revolt.
edited 15th Nov '16 7:48:05 AM by blkwhtrbbt
Say to the others who did not follow through You're still our brothers, and we will fight for youEdwards is like the definition of a 'safe' leftist candidate for a southern state. He swings to the left on a ton of common sense issues while avoiding staking his identity on hot-button topics that would make single-issue conservative voters turn away from him, like abortion and firearms. That makes him great for gently exploiting the current cracks in the right's hold on Louisiana based on his predecessor's impressive degree of incompetence. But it's not going to benefit him much on a national scale, where the issue is getting the left fired up so they'll actually turn out.
In a rational and just world, Bel Edwards would be representative of the 'conservative' side of politics because his policies are conservative in the very literal sense of the word. But unfortunately our national political landscape has degraded to the point where we need to do more than take baby steps.
"Congress can't just deny deny deny replacements for four years."
Can't they, though? What's actually stopping them from just refusing to do their jobs indefinitely until they get their way from now on, since it's proven such a successful strategy with Garland? For that matter, I don't see what's stopping them from applying the same strategy to basically everything until we find a way to punish them for it.
edited 15th Nov '16 7:50:54 AM by Karkadinn
Furthermore, I think Guantanamo must be destroyed.I doubt Clinton would accept the result of an EC revolt if it made her President. In a truly bizarro situation where the electoral college voted for her but she withdrew herself from contention, I think the job would go to Tim Kaine.
edited 15th Nov '16 7:49:51 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Paul Krugman believes that the economy will go well even under Trump and ithe effects of his policy might not be felt until after his first term which means that he'll only get the blame if he makes it to his second term lest his democratic successor receive all the blame
edited 15th Nov '16 8:27:18 AM by MadSkillz
I'd say it's a bad bet to simply say "No yeah, Conservatives will totally be done with the Republicans after 4 years of Trump"
Never bet on the other side burning out due to winning.
If there's any chance for Hillary to still get into the White House, prevent the awful cabinet that Trump is planing on bringing the White House, keep away the legislation that a Republican Senate and Congress will try to make law of the Land and gets to appoint Supreme Court Justices that are not ultra conservative, then by all means go for it.
Yeah, while Trump's proposed "policies" are predicted to have negative effects on the economy, we shouldn't take anything he proposed at face value because the guy flip-flops at the drop of a hat. It's possible that the economy will be doing ok by the end of his first term, depending on what the GOP actually does.
Hillary has conceded. She's been through the emotional roller coaster of realizing that she screwed up her messaging and was hated by enough Democrats to hand the election to Donald Trump. The media has been against her since day one. If I were in her shoes, I would be terrified of appearing to suborn democracy by acceding to an Electoral College revolt; there's no way she could expect to govern effectively. It would validate everything Trump said about the processing being rigged, the facts be damned.
edited 15th Nov '16 7:54:43 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Because she'd be considered illegitimate. You think Obama had a hard time winning running the country amongst the obstructionist Republicans and conspiracy theories? Think of those same people will be pushing back against a candidate that actually lost the election.
She'd get nothing done, and the people pissed off now would be even more pissed off in four years and vote for the next nutter. I can totally see her saying "no thank you" to that.

It really isn't. At the very least, Hillary will get a chance to prove her competence.
LGBT folks will continue to have healthcare and protection from being unreasonably fired or denied housing. None of my people die.
That's not "worse".
edited 15th Nov '16 7:38:07 AM by blkwhtrbbt
Say to the others who did not follow through You're still our brothers, and we will fight for you