Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Some have said Elizabeth Warren. I have to confess I don't know too much about her but taking into account the results of this election and the probable causes, there are some things I say would be desirable:
- The candidate has to be charismatic and motivating. No in an ideal world people would care more about policies and competence than "feels" but as we've seen they care more about emotion than reason. It sucks but we need all the help we can get, so we need someone who has it all like Obama.
- It would be great if they were able to sell something that the midwestern voters and the rural voters that Clinton wasn't able to snag. From what you guys are telling me it's gonna be SUPER hard considering they've resisted attempts to help them for years but the Dems might lose again if they can't get them.
- It would also be good if they were able to give the appearance of not being overly tied to big business/the establishment/whatever. It wouldn't necessarily matter that they were, it would just be good if they couldn't hammer that as hard as they could with Clinton.
edited 10th Nov '16 10:20:44 AM by Draghinazzo
Has Hillary said anything about the possibility of her running for POTUS again in 2020?
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.![]()
A trade war doesn't mean a shooting conflict, it just means trade disputes over prices and restrictions. No matter how much I like to joke about it, the chance of an actual conflict between Canada and the US is close to 0. You'd still be able to move between the two (you are a duel citizen, right) and work in either one. And Congress is unlikely to sanction Trump screwing economically with America's largest trading partners.
Nothing either way, but she's probably done politically.
edited 10th Nov '16 10:25:52 AM by Rationalinsanity
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.From an outside perspective, it's almost like we're hoping things get bad economically - it's rather twisted in its result, unfortunately.
The thing I'm wondering is what if things actually get better (or just looks it Potemkin-village-style)? It's a damn near certainty it won't for minorities on the rights front, but I think this election has shown, at least, that economic security is a concern for the public at large.
I agree - I cannot see Clinton running again. Which is a shame, really.
edited 10th Nov '16 10:26:36 AM by megarockman
The damned queen and the relentless knight.Honestly, I really fucking hate how it is more important what a candidate makes the public feel rather than look objectively at their historic and their proposals under an analytic eye.
Welcome to the post-fact politics, where truth doesn't matter, feelings and reactions are more important than evidence and everything is subjective as long as you agree with it.
Inter arma enim silent legesIf things do get better economically chances of Trump being re-elected will be much higher I think. People aren't educated enough to properly understand cause and effect, they just blame the most visible target. If things are good under Trump for them, they'll vote for him again over someone else.
I really doubt they will especially for the anxious white middle class and rural voters. Nothing Trump and his cabinet will do will benefit them in any way, and in fact with the ACA some of those middle class voters might get fucked over even harder.
edited 10th Nov '16 10:31:32 AM by Draghinazzo
Booker's too corrupt. Like, actually corrupt and not just Clinton "feels" corrupt.
Seems my opinions on what to do with the deplorables were thump-worthy. Damn shame, but i'll take the critique and tone it down a little.
I like Al Franken, actually. He'll have 12 years in the Senate behind him in 2020, has a background as an entertainer but is also serious about politics, and is from the upper Midwest.
And if he got Stein to drop out to run as his VP they'd be Franken and Stein
edited 10th Nov '16 10:32:34 AM by xanderiskander
What do you guys think of the claims that if Sanders had gotten the nomination he would've crushed Trump? Sounds like a heap of wishful thinking from brogressives to me, but I'm not as informed on US ploitics as I could be.
Dopants: He meant what he said and he said what he meant, a Ninety is faithful 100%.Which means preparations must be made to counter Breibart and co's version of "facts". Trump already has disparaged the federal government's statistics on employment and questioned its accuracy - I don't think come Jan 20 the official data will start to become scuzzy because there are gap measures in place between political appointees and the actual datacrunching, but I'll bet such sites will start blaring about the "real unemployment rate".
The damned queen and the relentless knight.Things getting better is almost certainly impossible. Obamacare getting axed is going to see to that. If he makes good on ruining trade deals then prices will rise which should put the squeeze on middle class families. We might not be able to convince the majority to go back to the Democrats but enough should get turned off that a win is easier.
Edit: Running someone that's not Hillary should help. They won't have a knee-jerk hatred of them.
edited 10th Nov '16 10:38:15 AM by Kostya
The debate is centered around the idea that Clinton was a very unpopular candidate. Even a lot of would-be democratic-leaning voters had nothing but contempt and apathy for her.
I'm told that Sanders also polled better and had more appealing rhetoric to the middle class and rural voters who Hillary was not able to able to court.
I really can't say much outside of that.
If Trump actually does what he's said he will, the economic consequences will be so disastrous that there will be little chance of him winning reelection. The question will be how long it will take to put the pieces of our nation back together, and/or whether some of the damage, particularly around climate change, will be irreversible.
edited 10th Nov '16 10:39:24 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"

What about Kaine?
edited 10th Nov '16 10:22:35 AM by AngelusNox
Inter arma enim silent leges