Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
@Indirect: Yes, who was saying back in September that the Clinton email thing was smoke and mirrors, other than the entire Democratic establishment? I don't know, you'd have to do an awful lot of searching to find information about that.
Back in September, there was a case to be made that the FBI was doing its job as an impartial federal law enforcement agency. It had not been revealed at the time that there was a cadre of #NeverHillary folks advocating for prosecuting her as a partisan action and threatening to leak information if they didn't get their way.
And, of course, the FBI has had plenty of opportunity to investigate the Trump organization for its multiple cases of fraud, flagrant violations of campaign laws, use of hate speech, tax fraud, and the like, but has apparently declined on the grounds of "not wanting to appear to influence the election". Uh huh.
Meanwhile, Russia's been brazenly interfering in U.S. politics with the overt goal of disrupting the NATO alliance so it can have unfettered influence over Eastern Europe. The FBI can't talk about that, because it might be "too partisan". Sure. And Trump's been his tacit ally by insisting that the U.S. needs to exort protection money from NATO if they want us helping out.
I saw that, too.
edited 4th Nov '16 8:48:23 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"No details yet, but I'm getting notifications that Chris Christie's aides were convicted in that Bridgegate scandal
EDIT: Here we go:
2 former Christie allies convicted in lane-closing scheme: http://bigstory.ap.org/711abcdbc9094802b461869c61c46668&utm_source=android_app&utm_medium=copy_to_clipboard&utm_campaign=share
edited 4th Nov '16 8:48:03 AM by sgamer82
@ HallowHawk: Obama's administration is still trying to push for its passing through a lame-duck Congress
. The Council of Economic Advisers put out a report
yesterday basically saying "if we don't, China will move in to pick up the pieces and US firms lose out" and trying to sway the more free-trade-ish members to pass it.
edited 4th Nov '16 8:49:12 AM by megarockman
The damned queen and the relentless knight.Re: Diabetes posts: is type 1/2 Diabetes a thing? Because when I was first diagnosed, I had the genetic material for both type 1 and 2 (requiring insulin and diabetes pills like Metformin), but after a while it slowly transitioned back into type 1 (sole reliance on insulin).
Also, The Washington Post created a system called the Four Pinocchio system, a measuring stick for the amount of lies versus truths they've stated over the campaign trail. It's interesting.
Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, ended up with an average Pinocchio rating of 2.2. That put her in about the same range as President Obama and former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney in 2012. (She had a total of seven Four-Pinocchio ratings.) If not for her statements about the email controversy, which earned her lots of Pinocchios, her average rating would have been much lower.
Some interesting highlights of the Pinocchios:
Trump repeatedly made claims that boggled the imagination. He said the unemployment rate was 42 percent when it was actually 5 percent. He claimed there were 92 million "jobless Americans," which included everyone who did not want to work, such as retirees and students. He even claimed that he could save $300 billion a year from a Medicare prescription drug program that only costs $78 billion.
Return to sender award
Hillary Clinton earned 24 Pinocchios over the course of the campaign for a series of misleading statements about her private email server arrangement when she was secretary of state. Among other claims, she falsely said the arrangement was permitted, that she had not sent or received classified information, and that the FBI director had said her answers were truthful.
Most imaginary history (GOP version)
Trump repeatedly claimed things that did not happen. He said he saw thousands of Muslims in New Jersey celebrate the collapse of the World Trade Center after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. He falsely claimed that Hillary Clinton started the "birther" movement that questioned whether Obama was born in the United States. He said Russian President Vladimir Putin called him a "genius" when in fact Putin called him "colorful." And he suggested that the father of Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) had a hand in John F. Kennedy's assassination.
Most imaginary history (Democratic version)
Hillary Clinton claimed that the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act was enacted to thwart an anti-gay constitutional amendment; hacked emails later showed that her staff immediately knew the statement was false. She also claimed that she tried to join the Marines on the eve of her marriage in 1975 but was turned down - a story that did not add up for a number of reasons. And she asserted that Trump opposed the auto bailout in 2009 - when in fact he supported government action.
I mean, what we have here is a case of FBI agents conspiring to bring down a Presidential nominee based on a fairly discredited book written by a Breitbart editor.
This is self-evidently not a good thing, and certainly points to major problems within the FBI.
Oh God! Natural light!"fairly discredited" — You are being overkind. The book is a hack job commissioned by the primary funder of Breitbart.com and many pro-Trump SuperPACs, a man who has committed his Wall Street fortune to taking down the liberal establishment. This man is named Robert Mercer.
edited 4th Nov '16 9:15:13 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Speaking of Breidbart, in their store, they're selling coffee mugs now- one that has a picture of Trump with the caption: "Caffinated: Bold. Distinct,", and one with Clinton with the caption of "Decaf: Weak, Bitter." and a popup ad of "Have your name on the Trump Donor Wall". I never knew of them before now, but from that alone, I take they're going the National Enquirer route of endorsing Trump.
edited 4th Nov '16 9:16:33 AM by Shippudentimes
Rachel Maddow has discussed the heritage and nature of Breitbart on many occasions; the latest was last night. See here, if you can watch MSNBC online.
If not, I'm sure you can find the clips on You Tube.
Breitbart is essentially the hate press of the alt-right. It has been responsible for seeding the vast majority of the anti-Clinton memes you see in the media today, and is directly promoting Donald Trump. Its primary backer is also the largest single contributor to Trump's campaign, and no less than four of his major employees now directly work for Trump, including Steve Bannon, editor-in-chief of Breitbart.com, and Kellyanne Conway, formerly director of the main pro-Trump SuperPAC.
Breitbart trades in the craziest conspiracy theories you can imagine. The Jewish conspiracy is running the world. Obama is a secret Muslim. The Clintons have orchestrated the mass murder of their political enemies. They started the "Clinton is sick" thing. They regularly call for the Republican base to evict long-time Congressmen who "aren't conservative enough" — Paul Ryan, for example, is, according to Breitbart, a Democratic plant.
Breitbart enjoys a comfy partnership with the infamous Infowars website, which also peddles nothing but extremist right-wing conspiracies. They're particularly big on attacking climate science.
Donald Trump appears to get most of his campaign platform and ideas directly from Breitbart.
edited 4th Nov '16 9:33:29 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"@Fighteer: I thought I might have been too charitable there, but I thought it was best to play it safe, rhetorically speaking.
I heard about that Trump "donor wall" thing - naturally, Trump would believe that what everyone desires most is to have their name emblazoned on a wall somewhere.
Speaking of Rachel Maddow, here's that Newsweek article we were discussing yesterday
.
In fairness the calls for a "purge" of the FBI isn't exactly helpful, we don't need a purge, a deep and thorough investigation into partisan use of official positions and powers, sure, a purge? Not so much.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranAnd if we're doing election playlists:
Hours leading to election resuls:
Mussorgsky's Night on Bald Mountain
A Trump victory:
Elvis Costello's "This Sad Burlesque"
Clinton victory:
Rayman Legends' "Mariachi Madness" (A mariachi cover of Survivor's Eye of the Tiger):
Also, don't know if anyone's posted this, but according to the NY Times, 161K new jobs have been added last month and there has been a 4.9% drop in the unemployment rate:
@Silasw-
I agree. Not to mention that purely for pragmatism reasons, it would look pretty awful for Obama to suddenly fire a lot of people prior to election day- and would probably hurt Clinton's chances- as it would for her to fire a bunch of people right after talking office.
If Coney and others (not purge but like anyone who was screwing around with that Twitter account) are to be fired, that's something you do a few months in on a day when other stuff is happening so it won't receive a lot of news coverage.
edited 4th Nov '16 9:33:32 AM by Hodor2
Yeah, a savage lopping of heads wouldn't accomplish much. But there's only so much of this cancer the body can tolerate before it starts to fail.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Really, I don't think you can deny at this point that the Trump camp has been colluding with the FBI.
Oh God! Natural light!Not sure if this was posted here already, but it looks like al Qaeda may be preparing a November Surprise of their own.
If the FBI was wasting time and effort on Clinton witch hunts instead of dealing with terrorist threats...
Disgusted, but not surprisedIn a bit of comedy, have Gary Johnson faking a heart attack after Ann Marie Buerkle (the former Congresswoman for my district) claims that marijuana creates a higher risk for a heart attack an hour after its usage.
edited 4th Nov '16 10:26:40 AM by ironballs16
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"I checked 538 just now. They've flipped Florida and North Carolina back to Democrat in Polls-Only. (Polls-Plus, which gives Republicans an edge because they're not the incumbent and the economy is not better than OK, still has NC a bit on the red side - but Florida is light blue.)
As I've mentioned before, 538 assumes that polls have fairly significant margins of error, and they make their predictions based on a huge number (in the tens of thousands) of simulations with the polls weighted according to various criteria. In Polls-Plus there are also some factors that are unrelated to the polls, such as demographics and the state of the economy and the way the state has tended to swing in the past.
If Clinton wins either of North Carolina or Florida and everywhere she's the clear favourite she's got this election.
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.

She's already said that there's nothing illegal in her emails. Several times. Which has nothing to do with whether or not the FBI has the authority to investigate them: If people could just say "no nothing's wrong here" and be left alone than the concept of investigation and law enforcement would have literally no meaning. And the reason no one was complaining in September is that the FBI hadn't yet pulled this stupid stunt. You don't complain about an action before it happens.