I actually think ANA is—in all aspects, just a plot by the CN executives to snag rights for the fourth season of Total Drama...I mean, really. Why else would they continually air Sidekick, Johnny Test, and this show?
I'M GOING TO GET OUT OF THE U.S, WITH OR WITHOUT YOU!!!This show was flipped to when we had a two or three-year-old over. I futilly prayed that it was just a one-shot cartoon. I cannot believe this is an actual series.
Why? Why? Why?
Who comes up with this nonsense? Wouldn't they rather produce something decent? Something logical?
Why do networks accept cartoons pitched by stoners rather than sensible people with good ideas?
Also, why do even animals that shouldn't normally have hair have follicles?
edited 30th Jul '11 7:32:55 PM by Ruise
Loves feel-good animation a whole lot.
To answer your questions: I don't know. They must have some freaky contract. Why they picked it up? Possibly because they don't want to offend the ALMIGHTY CANADIAN MAPLE LEAF GOD by not airing it daily. Ben Jones did, and decent/logical/good ideas were flushed down the toilet after Chowder stopped airing. The follicle thing? They just didn't care and thought it was HILARIOUS, even though it defies nature laws. They think kids are morons and would eat up something like this turd.
What does Ben Jones have to do with any of this?
I don't really care for Almost Naked Animals. I don't hate it, but I don't like it. The whole premise puts me off, the theme song is annoying, and the main character's voice is too reminiscent of Johnny Test for me. However, I'm not going to blame Canada or think this was some shifty contract deal to acquire the fourth season of Total Drama. I'm just gonna go ahead and ignore the show now.
Oh...crap. I thought his name was Ben since I heard that name somewhere. I would ignore it and turn to something else, but I usually just leave it on because I'm too lazy to turn off the TV.
Why do some people like Almost Naked Animals anyway? Just to shut the people up who hate it? Or is there some other reason...is it actually good, in a shrill, grating, annoying theme-song-immune, contradictory way?
edited 31st Jul '11 7:10:21 AM by Frankiefoster
I'M GOING TO GET OUT OF THE U.S, WITH OR WITHOUT YOU!!!Yes, they do...wow. That was a pointless discussion.
I'M GOING TO GET OUT OF THE U.S, WITH OR WITHOUT YOU!!!I don't know...I guess it's less refined than Gumball, and it doesn't really have a set of 'rules' like Adventure Time and all the other shows do with their randomness that makes me hate it.
I'M GOING TO GET OUT OF THE U.S, WITH OR WITHOUT YOU!!!Ugh. The animation is so... unattractive. And the character's voices are hard to swallow. So are their personalities.
And everything just looks dirty. Like beach-bum dirty. It's really unappealing and none of the humor is that great. Duck has some weird moments that are almost kinda funny, but he isn't enough to save the show for me.
Also why is being a furry such an important factor in liking a show? I don't think that effects the quality of it.
I'm pretty sure the concept of Law having limits was a translation error. -WanderlustwarriorOK, someone says that the voice actors have mostly been recast on Wikipedia. I'm starting to doubt this for season 2, with Howie and Batty keeping their originals. Take a good hard look: [1]
-elongates neck- nope
edited 4th Nov '11 3:58:23 PM by truteal
http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/ http://sagan4.com/forum/index.php

I like it, I prefer it to Adventure Time and Regular Show
I'm suprised that this is hated more than Sidekick, because Total Drama has more of a hatedom than Fish Hooks
edited 27th Jun '11 7:38:27 PM by truteal
http://s1.zetaboards.com/Conceptual_Evolution/ http://sagan4.com/forum/index.php