Discussion of religion in the context of LGBTQ+ rights is only allowed in the LGBTQ+ Rights and Religion Thread
.
Discussion of religion in any other context is off topic in all of the "LGBTQ+ rights..." threads.
Attempting to bait others into bringing up religion is also not allowed.
Edited by Mrph1 on Dec 1st 2023 at 6:53:59 PM
I agree, that is part of the problem. It's even more of an issue when those political statements find themselves running afoul of local laws on how businesses can operate. In Illinois, a public operator like Chick-Fil-A is not legally allowed to make a protected group feel unwelcome or discriminate against them. This includes gays in Illinois. So do the CEO's statements break Illinois law? Certain corporate policies of the chain certainly do and the alderman here asked that they be changed to get permits.
If he'd made the statements as a private individual and not as speaking for his company it would be one thing. That's obviously protected. It's more complicated when it's a corporation doing it and that corporation is held to certain laws.
edited 2nd Aug '12 9:09:04 AM by shimaspawn
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickI made the accusation, not Morven. I made the statement because I believed it was accurate, and I stand by it because I still believe it's accurate. You yourself admit you made the comparison. You are right in that I didn't point out your Godwin-ing of fundies; my apologies, but I don't seem to remember those instances. But maybe we shouldn't be comparing anyone to nazis if they're not an actual nazi.
@Vericrat: I believe that even the Citizens United ruling imposed certain restrictions on what is and is not "political speech" when coming from a business. It's hard to find out hard facts though, with the Occupy stuff and the Chick-fil-A stuff clogging up my search results.
"I don't know how I do it. I'm like the Mr. Bean of sex." -DrunkscriblerianI do not have a copy of the article with the actual policy the alderman wanted changed, but it was something from their corporate policies that was clearly discriminatory even if it isn't put into practice by all their franchises. It's just hard to find the exact policy because it's not something that's included in the more recent stories because it's not the bit that anyone is worked up over. It's much easier to show controversy if you get rid of the facts.
edited 2nd Aug '12 9:17:53 AM by shimaspawn
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
I haven't been to a Popeye's since I moved from Oklahoma. I miss it though.
There's a lack of fried-chicken joints up here. Even KFC is hard to find. I won't be going to the kiss-in though, because the only Chick-fil-A in town is in Western's food court, and you have to be a student to get in.
"I don't know how I do it. I'm like the Mr. Bean of sex." -DrunkscriblerianGoing back to what Lance was bringing up, how HIV/AIDS sufferers are now no longer barred from entering the country:
It was initially implimented because of the medical costs predicted.
Now, the cost is still an issue, but they're putting the morality of the situation first.
I don't have a television, so I am asking my fellow tropers, how big of a deal is the media making this out to be if at all?
"Psssh. Even if you could catch a miracle on a picture any person would probably delete it to make space for more porn." - AszurThis is big news for the LGBT community. Families can be united now, people can get better medical treatment.
AIDS/HIV is still stigmatized to be a homosexual problem or an African problem. The more we talk about it and explain it's a human problem.
If we can discuss how the virus works, treat more people, then the more doors we open to united the demographics
"Psssh. Even if you could catch a miracle on a picture any person would probably delete it to make space for more porn." - AszurI've only really seen the Rachel Maddow show run anything on it. Not to say nobody else has noticed, but It's not really a thing yet, AFAIK.
Just to have a lighthearted ending to Chik-Fil-A For now before we continue onto more pressing topics
edited 2nd Aug '12 10:39:40 AM by Lanceleoghauni
"Coffee! Coffeecoffeecoffee! Coffee! Not as strong as Meth-amphetamine, but it lets you keep your teeth!"

They are.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. 130 S.Ct. 876 at 913 (2010).
edited 2nd Aug '12 9:08:00 AM by Vericrat
Much to my BFF's wife's chagrin, No Pants 2013 became No Pants 2010's at his house.