Because most things that people think of- are comprised of multiple qualities rather than single qualities.
Whilst a law is easier to understand because it can encompass more qualities.
It is easier to understand that all things have their opposites, than it is to analyze a fire's qualities to produce a fire without heed for laws.
-nods-
Yeah... y'know.
I've slept in jungles a lot of times.
1.5 imperial gallons of tea were consumed during the writing of this postWell- whoever I was fighting.
No, I think I understand what you're getting at.
That's not quite a tangible law- it's more or less, an accepted connection.
You're saying about how- when you produce light, heat usually follows?
-there is a Rider, out by the lake-
-if you want to place a Tallis out there-
edited 24th Nov '15 2:33:46 PM by RegularDefender
1.5 imperial gallons of tea were consumed during the writing of this postIt'd certainly be possible to use that law to help with other processes... though I'm not sure personally on how tangible it'd be on its' own.
A law of opposites can apply to any situation, it's why its' the most common and widely used...
No, it wasn't monkeys.
It was... -thinks hard- definitely in the East.
I think it was against Korea.
1.5 imperial gallons of tea were consumed during the writing of this postThere is however- a law of, well, it's usually described as unities, or identities.
If I was to remove a hair from your head- it still carries the quality of you, in some regard, yes?
It is using that quality of association with a particular person or thing.
It's a long story.
I could probably show you on a map.
1.5 imperial gallons of tea were consumed during the writing of this post

Hm?
-notices he's holding a knife-
Oh- yeah.
Sometimes I do that.
Force of habit. -puts it away-
1.5 imperial gallons of tea were consumed during the writing of this post