This thread's for the Spider-Man comics and spin-offs, whether they're decades old or brand new.
- Apart from the main Marvel Universe titles, Ultimate Spider-Man, Spider-Man "What If?" stories, crossovers, guest appearances in other books, Alternate Universe tales and things like Marvel's manga adaptations are all on-topic here.
- Spider-Man 'family' books are on-topic (as are their own crossovers, guest appearances etc.) - e.g. Spider-Man 2099, Miles Morales, Spider-Woman, Silk, Spider-Gwen, Venom, Carnage, Black Cat, Red Goblin and Spider-Verse.
- Characters and comics that originated in Spider-Man but are no longer directly connected to the spider-franchise (e.g. Punisher, Silver Sable) are not on-topic, unless you're discussing historical connections and crossovers. If in doubt, check before you write a long post. If this isn't the right place, there's a more general Marvel Comics thread
which covers them.
Technically, Marvel's Infinity Comics (and their predecessors, Infinite Comics) are webcomics, not comic books, but it's fine to talk about their Spider-Man stories here.
Discussions that are only about Spider-Man adaptations in other media (films, video games etc.) are off-topic, but discussing the differences between the adaptations and the original comics is fine - as long as spoilers for the adaptations are tagged.
Please follow the spoiler policy rules
- tag spoilers for the latest issues, for any previews or content leaks, and for off-topic comics. When including spoiler tags, try to write so that tropers can make an informed decision before viewing them (e.g. which series and issue will they spoil?).
Edited by MacronNotes on Jul 10th 2023 at 10:58:13 AM
Morlun is too cowardly to wear a disco collar
Although he did wear a t-shirt once.
Forever liveblogging the AvengersI actually like Morlun, though I understand that some people don’t because he’s heavily tied to the whole Spider-Totem element that JMS introduced, which is controversial (I personally really like it, or rather, I liked it as it was when JMS wrote before Dan Slott ruined both the idea AND Morlun with the Spider-Verse/Inheritor crap).
The first Spiderverse was fine. The whole concept wore out its welcome when it became just a routine yearly thing to do. I also like that one of the Spiderverses had Morlun sidelined the whole time because he'd been shot with an assload of tranquilizer darts, in his ass. I like how another Spiderverse had Morlun as an ally and still required murdering him for victory to be achieved.
Forever liveblogging the AvengersMister Negative and Overdrive being among the few modern (and for that matter, BND Villains) to make a name for themselves as Spidey Rogues is kinda cool to me.
Lots of dudes have tried and failed, but they made it, despite coming from a despised arc.
It'll be interesting to see if one day someone pulls off what they did.
One Strip! One Strip!![]()
And last I checked, even Jolly Jonah isn't an antagonist anymore, now that he's privy to Peter's secret and one of his supporters.
Edited by TrashJack on Oct 23rd 2023 at 7:49:09 AM
"Cynic, n. — A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be." - The Devil's Dictionary![]()
Yeah, Negative and Overdrive’s story is downright inspiring. The start of one of the worst periods in Spider-Man’s history, an era that’s still ongoing, but they were such good points of light in the Post-OMD horror that they became lasting additions. Negative even got to be a member of the Sinister Six even in the Insomniac games, something usually reserved for the biggest of big deals of Spidey’s rogues!
The recent Marvel's Spider-Man was the one that did that.
Probably did it to soften Screwball up a bit, since she's otherwise kinda a glory hog who deliberately endangers people for her show isn't she?
One Strip! One Strip!![]()
![]()
In fairness, I don't think we were supposed to like Insomniac-verse Screwball.
Yeah, I’m totally fine with antagonists becoming good guys as long as its done well and its a natural progression for their character. Jonah and Eddie becoming friends worked okay because it was a natural development for them, especially Jonah.
But that’s the important part, those face turns didn’t happen overnight they happened over long periods of character development and progress, and the characters themselves had traits that made them CAPABLE of getting fluid redemption arcs; Jonah was always a Jerk with a Heart of Gold and even at his most villainous, Eddie had sympathetic qualities and never went over the Moral Event Horizon (which was even why Carnage was created; as a Symbiote villain who could cross the lines Eddie wouldn’t). I may prefer Eddie as a villain and wish he had never been redeemed, but I won’t deny that he’s been developed into that redemption in a fairly fluid and decent way and to make him evil again would be to undo years, maybe decades, of character growth which is unacceptable.
Contrast that with guys like Norman — who got his evil literally shot out of him to railroad him into being a hero — and Otto, who was declaring his intent to secure his legacy by becoming the biggest mass murderer in human history mere months before Dan Slott began his quest to make him into an Anti-Hero.
Edited by immortaleditor on Oct 23rd 2023 at 7:21:59 AM
There's a lot of Spider-Man characters who have a very clear and direct path to follow that they can't and won't because of the nature of serialized storytelling. Take Curt Connors.
As far as I'm concerned he is the kind of character who should be a villain once in any Spider-Man story. He loses his arm, he tries to grow it back via mad science, he turns into The Lizard, Peter defeats him and turns him back to normal, and Curt carries that memory of turning into a monster with him for the rest of his life, but otherwise moves forward. Peter earns the mutual trust and respect of a fellow scientist and proves himself just as capable and intelligent as one, and possibly uses that experience going forward to helping other people who have been transformed into monsters. Like Morbius, maybe John Jameson, and the people transformed during Spider Island.
Or for another villain, Kraven. He had a good death in Kraven's Last Hunt. Resurrecting him, cloning him, replacing him with his kids; all of those ideas are dumb. He's the kind of guy who should have been laid to rest for good. You can maybe have a scene with him and a Peter who's at death's door, alternatively mocking him or encouraging him out of a twisted sense of respect and honor, but once he dies, he ought to stay dead for good.
Norman, well we're talked about Norman a lot. He should have stayed dead after impaling himself on his own glider. Harry should have been the main bad guy of the Clone Saga, and any clone Normans should have died there with him in lieu of Ben and Mayday.
All ideas that didn't happen in the mainline comics, and can't anymore, but that adaptations can take.
A lot of people believe Kraven's Last Hunt is the last story they should do with him.
And...honestly, I really dislike that attitude.
Especially as its the attitude Spencer took to retcon out Squirrel Girl's handling of him.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.Another Spider-Verse event is the making for 2024
, and to kick it off, there is a new Edge of Spider-Verse mini-series in February, introducing a Spider-variant of... Cyclops?
Is his love interest Mary Jean? Madeline Stacy?
Edited by Zarius on Oct 23rd 2023 at 9:51:42 AM
I think reviving Kraven was a bad choice, especially because we had to sacrifice Mattie for it.
I think that it was really weird that Dan Slott apparently didn't have any ideas for the character after reviving him, and brought him back for one story only.
At least they did stuff with Norman and Harry post revivals, Kraven got nothing until Squirrel Girl, and that was a few years later.
Edited by Joshbones on Oct 23rd 2023 at 10:21:21 AM

Edited by lbssb on Oct 23rd 2023 at 6:32:28 AM
Disney100 Marathon | DreamWorks Marathon