Snowballs already have a WAY better chance in Hell than she does of seeing to Oval Office. She pissed off a ton of people when she didn't finish out her term as governor. She says dumbass things regularly. Her show sucks (which I guess goes without saying). More people would vote for someone else over her than vice versa.
I wouldn't actually be extremely surprised if, given the choice between the two, people would rather have Dubya back than have her *.
On the subject of subsidies, they also devastate poorer countries, and Europe, China and India are all guilty of it as well. But its off topic and I've discussed this in an old thread already.
The term "Great Man" is disturbingly interchangeable with "mass murderer" in history books.Agreed. Isn't it cheaper to make biofuel out of algae?
Share it so that people can get into this conversation, 'cause we're not the only ones who think like this.But think of the poor starving farmers!! Anyway, I'm rooting for Palin to win the Republican nomination in 2012, since that would guarantee that whoever the Democrats field will win, even if they're clinically dead (with apologies to Al Gore).
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
This post was thumped by the Stick of Off-Topic Thumping.
Stay on topic, please.
On topic, please.
Edit: I did warn ya.
edited 31st Jan '11 2:24:39 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
This post was thumped by the Stick of Off-Topic Thumping.
Stay on topic, please.
No, they were about farm subsidies. Which makes for a good topic but not this one.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"I don't support one-party rule, so I don't approve of that logic.
Currently taking a break from the site. See my user page for more information.![]()
It's not one-party rule, it just means that the Republicans don't succeed this time through. The Republicans would still have a better win/loss record, and it would mean the effective end of Palin's political career (the Republicans don't stand with losers), killing two birds with one stone.
My browser doesn't consider Palin a word. Obama, McCain, oh! McCain's not a word either! Barack Obama? Huh, I guess only the president gets to be a word.
edited 31st Jan '11 6:13:56 PM by Ultrayellow
Except for 4/1/2011. That day lingers in my memory like...metaphor here...I should go.I always considered it funny that the party based on Christian values, that their latest candidate has the Name of Cain.
edited 1st Feb '11 12:06:45 PM by NickTheSwing

Agreed guys, but you realize that Archer Daniels Midland and the rest of the agricorp lobby will bury anyone in the continental U.S. who even suggests such a policy?
Share it so that people can get into this conversation, 'cause we're not the only ones who think like this.