I think it is too tall; if the article were longer it might be fine, but it's short.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Huh. Is it shrinkable in any way?
Infinite Tree: an experimental storyIt really only goes really down if you have a wide screen resolution (which I do, but that's besides the point). Perhaps a couple of components and then a full one that can be clicked?
And after I put so much into making it vertical
Fight smart, not fair.I am fine with the long version myself.
I don't think it's too long.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickI think that the length of it is part of what makes it work.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.I tend to agree.
Should I put it back?
Fight smart, not fair.I have no problems with the long version, although if other people prefer it, I'm good with the "post a section of the picture and link to the full version" idea.
Reaction Image RepositoryWhen you say "post a section", are you talking just a random snip of the image or a cut-down version that keeps the scale but only uses a few examples? The latter, to me, seems to be the better way to go, although it'll take some work.
Most likely, just pick six of them and put them on a smaller scale and then make a "Full list here" caption.
Fight smart, not fair.I put it back since most people said it was fine.
Fight smart, not fair.Good lord, that's too long. A long image is okay, but not when it stretches across the entire damn page.
It was fine in the last IP thread.
Fight smart, not fair.
I thought this◊ image was chosen by Image Pickin' last time? Is it really too long?
Fight smart, not fair.