^Use ctrl+f and check for "pictured," "image," "quote," and maybe a couple of others.
Infinite Tree: an experimental story
Diagonalizing The Matrix
Generally writing that refers to the page image/quote is bad form (there's something about this buried somewhere in the Tips Worksheet).
Pretentious quote || In-joke from fandom you've never heard of || Shameless self-promotion || Something weird you'll habituate to![]()
I agree with this, I hate it when people just write crap like "the picture explains it all".
^ Those are a problem, yes.
But take a look at Fluffy the Terrible. See the page image? Now look down at the Film section, to the entry on Creepshow. Note how it refers to the page picture? Does it need the picture to be a good example? No. Does the picture need the entry? Not really, although it adds something if you know that that creature was called "Fluffy".
If the page image were to be changed, the entry would need to be amended, or it would be wrong. Changing the page image and not correcting the entry leaves an error on the page. Errors never add to the value of the wiki.
The thing is, how is someone changing the image supposed to know that an example refers to the image? We're specifically told not to do that, so it makes sense that not everyone would go through the examples and check, especially on a long page.
“Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?”^Again, using your browser's "find" function makes the length of the page irrelevant and, if you use enough search terms, makes you almost certain to find any problems.
Infinite Tree: an experimental story

... could people have a scan through the examples to make sure none of them refer to the quote or image you just changed? I've noticed this a couple of times recently - but sadly didn't make a note of which tropes these were, and didn't change them, which makes this whole complaint look a little hypocritical, sorry.