Given Corrine's actions in subsequent books, one could try to sympathize with her actions in the first. She essentially loses her husband and finds herself with four children to take care of—and she has no money. She could have taken other options, but it seems as if she's trying to avoid her children being split up (and the foster system of the day wasn't exactly great). As we never get her POV, part of her actions could be due to Olivia's influence. And it's clear that Olivia is very persuasive. While it almost certainly doesn't justify trying to poison her children, it does paint her actions into a greyer light than first seems.
On the flipside, it's also not hard to view Corrine as a superficial Drama Queen who never really loved her children. She's nice to them in the beginning because she has a life of leisure—with her husband paying for everything and children attending to her. But as soon as the luxuries are gone, she latches onto comfort rather than helping her children out. After all, there are plenty of valuables in Foxworth Hall that she could have stolen or sold off to get enough money to set herself and her children up. Her attempts at redemption could also be read as Never My Fault.
As cruel as she was did Olivia approve of Corrine poisoning her children? As Cathy points out, she did warn them against eating the donuts and agreed with Cathy that Cory needed to go to a doctor. Thou Shall Not Kill, after all. However, it could have been Olivia trying to shut Cathy up. And there was really nothing stopping her from delivering the donuts, especially when Corrine leaves.
Did Malcolm actually know about the children? During the Christmas party, its mentioned that he looks straight in Cathy and Chris direction. Then he adds a very specific codicil in his will forbidding Corrine from having children period. Was that because he saw Cathy and Chris? On the other hand, the will, with the codicil, was read well over a year after the Christmas party and the codicil was likely just a form of punishing Corrine.
Fans are split on whether the eventual BrotherSister Incest could have actually happened due to the Westermack Effect.note While not an often brought up subject this is one that you can often find heavy debate within psychology and neurological fields. For trope purposes we will reference it, but a troper should not be surprised if they see someone from one of these fields not take the effect seriously. Let alone other people. Another area in this discussion is about the Situational Sexuality that was brought on by the fact that they're trapped together for so long.
The entire Chris and Cathy rape scene was one that was this already when it was written and has only gotten worse with more time. As described on page, Chris aggressively starts the encounter despite Cathy originally not reciprocating. Where this gets complicated is that as soon as it's over, Cathy claims she could have stopped him if she wanted to and continues on with Chris for more episodes within the series. To many a modern reader this is nothing but victim blaming with the "Not If They Enjoyed It" Rationalization. Where the opposition to this comes from is because the two characters we are talking about aren't what most would call well adjusted or socially conforming. Cathy perhaps a little more so than Chris, but to some levels it applies to both. In the next book in the series some regard Cathy a Designated Hero who does whatever she wants as long as she likes the results. From that perspective it is not hard to assume someone like Cathy wouldn't regard the incident as serious as some readers would, but those same readers would likely not call Cathy any kind of healthy role model.
It is not"Not If They Enjoyed It" Rationalization. It hurts, and Cathy doesn't come. The books are very clear on this point, both at the time and after. When Cory is sick and Cathy is praying for him to get better, she says "And it wasn't any pleasure, God, not really, not any." And this is not retconed either; later books back this up. In the next book, they're making out when Chris is begging Cathy to let him fuck her, he says, "Let me just once give you the pleasure I didn't before, just once to last us both all our lives through."
What is truly controversial about this scene is that it averts Rape Is a Special Kind of Evil. Rape happens, and it's bad, but it is not a crowing evil amongst other things.
The movie's faithfulness to the book. Some find it was much better representation of the book than the 87 movie and that what was changed had little to no effect on the mood of the story. Others feel its 90 minute time frame was too short to fully capture the book's spirit to its full potential and its approach to handling the taboo topics, like the incest, were done too delicately.
The movie compared to the 87 movie. Some endorse this movie for being more serious than the 87 film and not backing off of the taboo topics. Others feel that the original's narmy tone made it more memorable and despite not going into the taboo topics, had a more grim and edgy tone than the 2014 film.
Corrine Foxworth is a greedy mother who doesnt care at all about her children. Before the story began, Corrine ran away from her parents to marry her uncle and later had children with him. When she later hears the news of her dying father's inheritance money, the now-penniless Corrine takes her children to her fathers mansion after her husbands sudden death. Because the only way she can inherit her fathers money is if she never had any children that he knew of, Corrine conspires with her abusive mother, Olivia Foxworth, to kill her children by locking them in a room, forbidding them from ever leaving, and slowly killing them off by both feeding them only cookies laced with an arsenic sugar, and simply starving them for months. While at the mansion, Corrine proceeds to indulge in her new lifestyle, and later decides to marry a young lawyer, showing that she never really cared for her previous husband. When her youngest child, Cory, starts getting sick from the cookies, Corrine feigns sadness and calls an ambulance. Instead, she disposes of Cory's body, hoping no one will find it. When her children manage to escape the attic and arrive at her new wedding, Corrine pretends that she doesnt know them. Corrine is a horrible excuse of a mother fueled by greed and a desire to live a rich and luscious life.
The aforementioned Olivia Foxworth is a brutish religious fanatic who tortures and abuses her grandchildren for whatever she perceives as "sinful." She whips her daughter, Corrine, for running away with her husbands brother, and locks her grandchildren up for being Corrines incestuous offspring. She helps Corrine with her plan to kill the children by feeding them cookies with arsenic sugar every day until they start feeling sick, as well as starving them. She does this not for her husband's inheritance money, but to make them suffer. Shes particularly cruel to her grandchildren, Cathy and Chris: when she sees them sleeping together in a bed, she smashes Cathys music box right in front of her; when she catches them innocently bathing together, she proceeds to lock Chris in a closet and abuse Cathy, chopping off a part of her hair. She then locks her grandchildren in the attic for months, which is far more cramped and unsafe to live in compared to their previous room. Sociopathic and cruel, Olivia proved to be just as evil as her daughter.