Follow TV Tropes


Headscratchers / Moonraker

Go To

The book:

The film:

  • Drax's evil scheme could have been pulled off without the use of spaceships. Firstly, it would have been much cheaper to build his Ark underground, environmentally sealed, than to build a space station in orbit. Secondly, Drax could have used aircraft to deliver the toxin. Why? Because he runs an aerospace company, and he had a radar jamming system for his space station. And even if it couldn't be fitted on a plane, stealth wasn't a complete unknown back then. Putting stuff into space is insanely expensive, up to $10,000 to put one kilogram into orbit, which is why you didn't take your last holiday at Utopia Planetia, Mars. But I guess this was all discarded in favour of footage of space shuttles docking, undocking, and performing course corrections.
    • Two reasons:
      • Expense is nothing to a man willing to ship a French mansion to California stone by stone and rebuild it there.
      • And Drax was insane.
      • Insane, but also a genius. The cost of transporting a mansion from France to the US is infinitely smaller than the cost of putting a giant space station in orbit, building half a dozen space shuttles to supply it, and, say, getting enough people and supplies up there to repopulate the planet. And what about when they have to land? There are only a few airports in the world that have a runway long enough to accommodate a space shuttle, and there would have to be people on the ground waiting for their arrival. So why not have everyone on the ground? Drax could have built a secret city underneath the Amazon and just used the shuttles to distribute the virus (meaning Bond would have to go up and shoot them down). It's just a blatant cash-in on Star Wars, and by God it shows.
      • If you're going to end human civilization, do you care about your unpaid credit card bills? Drax can spend himself bankrupt ten times over if he wants to; its not like his creditors are ever going to collect, and once everybody but the Ark contingent is dead he has the entire wealth of the planet to loot.
    • Advertisement:
    • Maybe Drax didn't have the idea until he had already built a space shuttle program and working space station, and at that point it would have been cheaper to put everything in orbit rather than build an underground ark.
    • The space station could serve future purposes; given that he wants to remake human society, one of his pet peeves might be that we should be devoting more time and money to space travel, and his new world will do that. Plus, the man has a God Complex; he probably couldn't resist the idea of raining down death from the Heavens. As for money, he is planning to annihilate the human race. If he succeeds (or if he fails and is caught), money isn't going to be all that important anymore (it would also be harder to get caught, for various reasons).
      • His speech on the space station begins by calling it "the untainted cradle of the heavens." He may have some kind of attachment to the idea of space as being pure and untouched by the forces that plague Earth. Considering his complete insanity (to the point of delaying the execution of those who trouble him so he can specifically do it in complex and "amusing" manners), it's a very symbolic measure. He finishes the speech by saying that people will look up and "find that there is law and order in the heavens." The man has a severe god complex, and (as said above) it makes him feel like he's ruling over the planet as he looks down upon it.
      • As for 'why no lasers elsewhere in the series', we do see them. The laser Goldfinger uses to almost execute Bond. The miniature laser in Bond's watch that can cut steel. Lasers of various sizes and shapes, but much more powerful than real-life ones per unit size, are in multiple Bond movies. People just don't use laser rifles on the ground because bullets work just as well down here and are way cheaper.
    • Advertisement:
    • It's a lot more fun living out your god complex from a space station orbiting the planet with everyone down below looking up at you every time they look into the sky than in a cave somewhere.

  • So in Moonraker, lasers are small and lethal enough to be used as an infantry and anti-air (anti-space?) weapon. We also have shuttles that can be launched in under an hour, and marines trained in space-borne operations. Why didn't this show up anywhere else in the franchise?
    • Pure Fan Wank here; the training of the space marines ran parallell to the whole space shuttle programme and Moonraker was the first time we saw them being used. Despite their critical role in saving the world, the political fallout from the massive loss of life and the cost of continuing the operation meant that funding was withdrawn from the project. Hence no space marines to take out the satellites in GoldenEye and Die Another Day.
    • Update: The US is actively pursuing "Space Marine" technology, including supersonic suborbital shuttles that can be launched from the (as of 2013) existing space ports, crashed into godknowswhere, the Space Marines relying on conventional transportation once the mission is over. The point being: "surprise! America is here!" super shock & awe. In theory anyway.
      • The satellites in those films were unmanned and their purpose was known so you didn't need the marines. As for the lack of lasers they probably fall into the awesome but impractical category. A normal rifle has a much better rate of fire. They were probably given to the marines as they fire in space and are less likely to puncture the hull. That doesn't explain why they aren't used as AA weapons in the future on Earth..
      • Rifles are actually able to fire in space perfectly fine, as the propellant includes its own oxidizer.
      • You still couldn't use them as if you were on the space station they'd puncture the hull, and send you flying if you were in space with a thruster pack. And I thought bullets had to be sealed to fire in space.

  • The falling out the airplane stunt early in film.... completely ridiculous and totally unnecessary. It looks as if it was added in post-production because the rest of the film was so terrible.
    • But all of the later Roger Moore films featured an over-produced teaser with eye-popping stunts. It's in line with those.
    • Likewise, James Bond in space shooting lasers.

  • Countdown to a space shuttle launch is 48 HOURS. Far be it for me to expect realism in a Bond film, but the speed at which the troops responded to Bond's signal was ridiculous.
    • I don't particularly care for this movie either, but... It should be pointed out that this film was released in 1979 (so it was filmed / developed in the '77-78 time frame). At the time, NASA's position on the Space Shuttle included the following (all figures from Dennis Jenkins's "Space Shuttle: The History of the National Space Transportation System The First 100 Missions, 3rd Edition", ISBN 978-0963397454):
      • The expected manifest showed that [circa 1974], with the requested fleet of 5 orbiters (never happened), there would be ~60 missions per year. To be clear, each orbiter was expected to fly once a month.
      • Actual best 12 month period was 12 launches — and one of those was the Challenger accident. Admittedly, there were only four orbiters, but obviously the flight rate was far lower than expected.
      • The turnaround time (landing -> takeoff) was expected to be 14 calendar days, based on 2 shift operation.
      • Actual best turnaround time was ~50 days (pre-Challenger — afterwords, the time spent in turnaround only increased)
      • The cost / pound to orbit was expected to be $175 / pound (based on a total cost per flight of $10.5 million, FY 1972 $).
      • Actual cost / pound (FY 2000 $) was $8000 / pound (based on total cost per flight of $357 million).
      • Thus, judged by the standards of its time, the movie wasn't quite as silly as it seems today. For example, it would be perfectly reasonable to expect a shuttle to be launched within 2-4 days in an emergency situation. And it might be feasible for a sufficiently wealthy person to purchase a space shuttle (or 12, which is what Drax did — he only stole the shuttle that started the whole movie because one was damaged / destroyed or lost [don't remember which]). And constructing an elaborate space station is much more reasonable at $175 / pound to LEO.
      • One of the ideas early in the shuttle program was that in an event of an emergency in orbit you could have a shuttle ready to launch in two to 3 days to launch a rescue mission.
      • Also remember that the world of James Bond is more advanced than ours. Many of the films have technology that we still don't have decades later.
      • Drax's explanation for stealing a Moonraker was that the intended one had developed a flaw during construction, and so had proven unusable. To further defend Moonraker, given the above: Drax ran an international Mega-Corp that was making space shuttles - if any one private person could get his hand on space shuttles in the world presented in the James Bond movies, it'd be that kind of person.
    • Which raises another question. Why did Drax steal the Moonraker back, thus attracting the suspicion of the CIA and the SIS? Why not just repair the fault, after all there's not as if there's any particular timetable he has to follow. And what would have happened to the two mooks in the shuttle if Drax hadn't have ordered them to retrieve the Moonraker?
      • The mooks are likely astronauts who joined him in the space station, and they were obviously hiding in there only after Drax found out about the flaw (or more likely, after the Moonraker was arranged to be shipped. As to the timetable thing- yes, he did have one. He would have needed one because the longer he put it off, the greater the chance either his secret launching pad, his space station, or worst of all his Weapon of Mass Destruction would be found out, not to mention his whole plan involved gathering the best of humanity at their physical peak, so the longer he waited the more likely they would succumb to age or injury, not to mention anyone involved might get cold feet and rat the whole thing out. Above all there is his controlling nature, which means faced with the choice of seizing control of the situation or accepting the hand fate dealt him, he'd go with the former. The "attracting suspicion" argument has the same flaw as the "how much did this cost" argument- its a moot point, when within days he expects to succeed in his plan to wipe out mankind. And he's too smug and elitist to even contemplate the possibility that he might not succeed.

  • Drax leaves a lot of people behind in the Jungle Launch base. Just what exactly do these people think are going to happen to them?
    • Maybe they didn't know what he had planned or maybe he told them it was a bluff or he told them he wasn't going to gas the Amazon, or perhaps they had a bunker. Whatever Drax told them his later comments plus the fact one of them was wearing glasses indicates he was planning to kill them too.
    • Two words, comparmentalized information. The ground crews only need to know that they need to launch 6 shuttles on such-and-such date. It appears that the nerve-gas bombs were already in the station when the manned shuttles arrived. Plus, would you tell them everything?
      • Drax would have needed people on the ground to enable the shuttles to safely land again, presumably that was these people's job.
    • Drax probably left out the whole "hey, I'm gonna gas the whole planet!" part of his scheme to them. And it's not like Bond villains typically shy away from You Have Outlived Your Usefulness.

  • What happened to all of the "perfect specimens" Drax picked for the space station? Everyone in white (and especially all the females) sort of disappear after Drax gives his speech and never show up again. Wikipedia mentions that they're all killed. Did they all just get left on the station as it exploded?
    • Yep pretty much, it sounds bad I know but remember they were cool with killing everyone on Earth.

  • At the beginning of the movie the Moonraker shuttle is being flown from the U.S. to England. After the Moonraker is hijacked, the jet carrying it crashes in the Yukon. Problem: the Yukon is the westernmost part of Canada, just east of Alaska. How exactly did a plane traveling from the U.S. to England end up there? Even assuming the flight started in California where the Moonraker was built, there's no reason for it to ever be over the Yukon.
    • Sorry but no. If you travel from San Jose to London, you will fly over the Yukon, because the shortest distance between the two cities is to fly close to the Arctic Circle. Flying directly west to east adds between 1,000 and 2,000 miles to the trip - and the Earth is rotating away from you the whole time - which it also is doing if you travel north by northeast rather than east by northeast, but the closer you are to the poles, the less there is a change of distance as the Earth rotates.
      • Why does rotation matter? The earth rotates near the equator at 1,000 mph, much faster than commercial jet craft, so airplanes must move along with the rotation of the earth or else nothing would be able to fly Eastwards over half the planet. Plus, they are in the atmosphere, which clearly rotates with the earth because the wind isn't flying past us at 1,000 mph.
  • Where did Drax's guards in the space station fit into the whole "Kill everyone on Earth then repopulate the planet" scheme? Did they get a survival bonus or something?
    • Possibly any guards who didn't meet Drax's genetic standards would've been sterilized. They're spy-movie mooks; he could've insisted they get cyanide tooth-implants and then secretly thrown in a vasectomy while they were anesthetized.
    • Who says those guards weren't to his genetic standards? Maybe a few of them were lacking in the apearance department (I don't remember their faces), but as soldiers, and ones Drax trusted to protect his utopia, they had to be pretty physically capable.
  • Okay, I'll buy that Drax has a sophisticated radar jamming system that can hide his space station, without anyone noticing that someone is jamming them. But what about people just plain seeing it? The modern ISS is much smaller than Drax's station, and is visible to the naked eye (it's the 3rd brightest object in the sky, after the sun and moon). Admittedly you have to know where and when to look, and it only looks like a really bright star, but it's there. Any commercial telescope can see the station for what it is. Even back in the 70's, there were thousands of dedicated amateur stargazers and astronomers constantly watching the sky, never mind NASA and the military. How could the station have possibly been built without being almost immediately noticed?
    • You answered your own question. In order to spot something that size with the naked eye, you already have to know when and where to look. Even if somebody does happen to spot it by chance while out stargazing, and even if they are enough of an amateur astronomer that they could go 'Wait a minute, that's not on the right schedule to be the Skylab/Sputnik/etc.', why should they immediately leap to the conclusion its a supervillain's unknown orbital space lair? They'd just go 'Oh, it must be another classified spy satellite. I wonder if its ours, or the Russians'?'
    • As for the possibility that the space station's size would be noticed from the ground as unusually large and bright, its important to remember that angular diameter is directly proportional to the size of the object in question and inversely proportional to the distance between the object and the observer. Or, in plain English, the further away something is from you the smaller it will look, even if its actual size when viewed up close is pretty huge. Since we're never told exactly at what altitude Drax's station is orbiting at, we can't make any assumptions about how it would look from the ground... or, for that matter, whether it would be visible to the naked eye at all. For another example of this phenomenon, consider why the sun and the moon look about the same size in the sky when the sun has approximately 400 times the diameter of the moon. Answer 
  • Is Jaws supposed to be a good guy just because he found a woman and decided to turn against his master only when he realized it was in his own self-interest? I mean, this is a guy who was morally ok with biting a woman to death just a few days earlier. Clearly not a decent human being.
    • He was a good guy when he decided to help James Bond save his girlfriend and the rest of the world. It's called a Heel–Face Turn- he doesn't have to be a decent human being, but that doesn't mean he isn't doing the right thing.
    • Don't forget that by Drax's standards, Jaws would have to go. And that's how Bond gets him to change sides
  • Why did Drax steal a shuttle instead of simply extending his timetable? He's managed to build a fleet of private shuttles. He's managed to build a huge space station. He did that completely undetected even though it would require years worth of trips back and forth for the construction. Why risk something as public as the theft of a multi-billion dollar spacecraft when there was no time crunch to his plan?
    • This Troper once read in a book that the closest real-life equivalent to the poison Drax wanted to use was Richin - which doesn't exactly have a long shelf life from what he's found. It could be that he was originally planning on using his own fleet of shuttles, but the shelf life for the poison Drax had was either the same length as/shorter than that of Ricin, and he couldn't get his hands on more.
  • Do none of Drax's guards have families? Friends? Lovers? A favorite bartender? I'm reminded of Avengers: Age of Ultron where Quicksilver and the Scarlet Witch were fine with terrorism but drew the line at destroying the world. Does Drax employ psychological screening to find the most sociopathic henchmen possible?
    • Probably. I imagine you don't end up working as a foot soldier in the private army of a guy who plans to blow up the entire world and repopulate it while ruling over everything as a god-emperor without some tendencies towards sociopathy.
    • That, or standard cult brainwashing. If they thought they were at their version of the rapture, you think scientologists or members of the WBC would care much about their non-cult family members?

  • If Drax hadn't killed her, would Corinne have been part of his Master Race? She was beautiful and she worked for him, and those were apparently the only prerequisites.
    • Further, is it just barely possible that she was supposed to be his mate? It would explain why he killed her in such a horrific way, and it would explain why he didn't have a mate on the space station at the end.
    • For that matter, why didn't Drax have a breeding partner? Did he not consider himself a "perfect" specimen, or was he just planning on doing a lot of bed hopping? Or was he the first gay Bond villain, albeit a deeply closeted one? Did it bother him that his future Master Race wouldn't actually be descended from him?
    • Drax is planning to establish himself as god-emperor over his unquestioningly subservient "master race". Why limit himself to one partner when he can have his choice of any partner he wants whenever he wants? It's almost a mathematical certainty that if he wants it, he's going to be boning down with a different hot girl every single night.

  • When Chang attacks Bond in the glass museum, he uses a bokken, a wooden training sword. Why not use a katana? It would be more effective in killing and wouldn't get broken if his target got his hands on a metal weapon like a sword.
    • Less conspicuous and a decent bokken is, pretty much, a sharpened baseball bat, so I guess that with a good whack or two he could have killed his target, then get rid of the murder weapon easier than with a sword.

  • The 747 crashes because the Moonraker launches off its back by firing its main engines. Leaving aside the minor quibble that the Shuttle's main engines are fuelled from the big External Tank (I suppose Drax could somehow have arranged to have a fuel supply aboard) it's clear that having the engines fire while being carried is A Very Bad Thing and not meant to happen, ever. So why is there an indicator announcing just that in the 747 cockpit?
    • In case if that would happen. It's like ask "Why school need fire alarm, If school might not burn?"

  • What kind of dogs are there that could have chased down Corinne? Dogs do not have that much endurance (Are these genetically engineered super-dogs?) and can only bite, not devour.
    • Doberman could easily catch her especially given their trained to hunt and the camera cut away before we see what exactly happens to her

  • The mid-air parachute sequence. Why did Bond feel that he couldn't even at least attempt to save the guy's life who he stole the parachute from. He was pretty nuetralized. Why would Jaws suddenly fall off Bond once the rip cord was released?
    • Because the guy was trying to kill him. it was kill or be killed. Jaws fell because he lost his grip when the parachute suddenly slowed their fall.


How well does it match the trope?

Example of:


Media sources: