Follow TV Tropes

Following

Awesome / SF Debris

Go To

  • His secret to bad Trek films: it's a bad Trek film whenever one of the main characters sings, as seen in Final Frontier, Generations, Insurrection, and Nemesis. TMP is an exception, as singing would "only distract from the boredom".
  • The Crazy Janeway explanation in Star Trek: Nemesis.
  • The musical Montage in the Generations review.
  • His scathing 15 minute video on the flaws of the Prime Directive, ultimately calling it akin to refusing to save a baby from a burning car, and calling yourself a hero for it.
  • His theory during the "Dear Doctor" review of what happened to the two species that Archer and Phlox played God with: the Valakians who were dying came in contact with the Romulans who told them what the federation did to them and made them go through gene therapy to survie and wear protective suits to eventually become the Breen, the Menks were enslaved by the Ferengi, revolted and became the Pakleds. And to drive the knife in further, The Stinger consists of Sisko's infamous guilt-ridden confession for his shady actions in "In the Pale Moonlight" (which included being complicit in the deaths of two people in the name of saving the entire Alpha Quadrant) immediately followed by a cheerful Phlox claiming how he has a new found respect for Archer due to the whole genocide thing. Later on, he brings up their exact same arguments when discussing "A Night In Sickbay", pointing out their hypocrisy. Later still he claims that the reason Phlox never wrote up anti-Borg medical procedures (which would have been invaluable in episodes of TNG where they met the Borg for the first time) was because the Breen found and assassinated him before he could.
      Advertisement:
    • Even better is that in the Dominion War, the Breen joining the side of the Dominion nearly led to the Alpha Quadrant's defeat even after the addition of the Romulans to the war. So congratulations, Archer and Phlox, you cause genocide once and keep on doing it.
  • The extremely thorough look at the missing episodes of Doctor Who and how some of them were recovered over the last five decades.
  • His inspired response to the Fridge Logic of Voyager's plan to literally blow a hole in an event horizon by explaining how an event horizon is not a physical thing, but a mathematical representation of reality. It's not only funny as hell, but teaches viewers about the concept of event horizons in a way they will never forget.
  • The Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan review, featuring numerous quotations from the books on Khan's shelf to explain how having only those books for reading material shaped his worldview. In the conclusion, he fully explains why he hates the argument that The Motion Picture was a better film than Khan because it's "more cerebral." "A story is not less cerebral just because it has action scenes. Otherwise you might as well argue that Henry V is less cerebral than Snow Dogs."
  • Advertisement:
  • The Insurrection review including: detailing how the film is more interesting as a phenomenon (starting off well-received, but later being one of the worst films in the franchise); his discussion of just how beneficial the Ba'ku planet's rings are to the Federation and that this makes the Ba'ku greater villains than the Son'a by not offering it to help billions; and, perhaps most importantly, his plot idea of "The Family Argument", in which half the crew decides to help the Ba'ku, but the other half helps the Son'a.
  • His epic The Reason You Suck Speeches:
    • To Dr. Pulaski, who "endeared" herself to fans in her very first episode.
    • To Lutan from "Code of Honor".
    • One for Lwaxana Troi in "Haven".
      • During that same episode, the one he gives Picard for acting like there was no nonviolent way to save the people of Haven, which he was so desperately hoping for, only to order Tasha to simply stop the Terellian ship with a tractor beam at the last minute.
    • Advertisement:
    • He rips into Zhaan in the episode "The Way We Weren't", bringing up that she doesn't really have a right to complain about Aeryn having shot the old Pilot of Moya years ago, when a) the reason that Zhaan is ON Moya- a former prison ship- is for killing a man in cold blood, and b) she, D'argo, and Rygel had worked together to cut off Pilot's arm (the current Pilot). And then when Zhann realizes she was wrong, he goes out of his way to point it out and praise the subtlety of the scene.
  • His discussion of Nero in Star Trek (2009): By detailing his sympathetic characterization, tragedy, and overwhelming rage detailed in the prequel comics and novelization, Chuck concludes that Nero should have been the strongest movie villain since Khan. Instead, we get the film version, who he describes as "An emo with a trident."
  • "Darmok" from TNG:
    • Using the original (German) version of "99 Luftballons", a beautiful nod to the episode's story.
    • His follow-up video in which he discusses the Tamarian language, using Real Life examples to demonstrate why the concept of incomprehensible language made of metaphors is not as far-fetched as it might seem.
  • Narrating a scene from The Sandman to start out his review of The Man From Earth. Coupled with the use of Baba Yetu in montage near the end.
  • The highly moving editing job on "The Parting of the Ways", comparing the Doctor's dilemma there with the one he'd faced in "Genesis of the Daleks".
  • His "Unimatrix Zero" review is apparently the reason he started this review show. Why? Because this is where the physical evidence that Janeway is crazy is from.
    Chuck: She's getting ASSIMILATED ON PURPOSE! Yes, the process that frequently leaves you missing an eye or limb, that's plan A! That's how bad Janeway wants to have her little army. She's potentially mutilating herself for life, for the chance! And you guys laugh when I say she's crazy! (as Janeway) "Find the biggest nastiest enemy ship we can find, attack it, board and I'll get assimilated. It's all part of my plan, Operation: I-Don't-Need-A-Reason-Just-Obey-Me. Yes sir, this is definitely the best plan I've ever-[A drone installs something into her skull]♪-rrrrrryday it's a gettin' closer, goin' faster than a roller coaster♪"
  • Going point for point between canon Janeway and his evil version in "Latent Image", and giving up when it turns out that canon Janeway actually had a more evil approach to the situation than the parody.
  • The "Tuvix Coda".
  • Calmly dissecting the controversies behind the production of "The City on the Edge of Forever". It's a loaded topic, but Chuck brings up the main talking points without any hysteria or anger, discussing among other things that Harlan Ellison has provided evidence for his position, while Gene Roddenberry spouted some pretty Blatant Lies about Ellison and the script when he was alive, and that the original script does have a couple of advantages over the final episode (though he still thinks they're both great).
  • Refusing to go any easier on Gargoyles just because it's a cartoon intended primarily for children, as that would be tantamount to admitting such a thing can't possibly have the same quality as adult-oriented entertainment. And because the show actually deserves that kind of attention.
  • In "Real Life" of VOY, his understated, absolutely dead serious lambasting of the mockery the episode makes of a horribly tragic situation, which Chuck came close to experiencing himself.
    Chuck: It is the point I mentioned at the beginning, the "makes you cry, but puts a gun to your head to make you do it thing". The Doc's daughter hit her head playing parrises squares, and despite his best efforts, she is dying. Is this effective? Sure. The young actor is quite capable and Picardo is brilliant as always. The problem with this is the way it fumbles about with it. How long did Janeway's stupid Victorian Holonovel run before they shitcanned it, because nobody cared? A season and a half! The Doctor has a family, meant to teach him about relating to patients, but ending with the tragic death of his daughter. 45 minutes. And this life-changing, soul-crushing, "your worst nightmare" event, will never, ever be mentioned again. Not once. Not when parrises squares brought up all the times in the future to tear open that old wound. Nope. You just don't put someone trough the death of their child and have it never matter! That's just cheap! And it is a sign to me that they don't quite grasp what it is they're doing here. I mean, how can this be that dramatic when this great tragedy shows no signs of its effect on him, EVER!? But the only thing that happens this entire episode that will ever matter to anything ever again is Tom flirting with Torres in the mess hall! Really?
  • In his review for "The Bonding" from TNG he shows how Gene Roddenberry's vision for the future (and how he kept the writers in the "Roddenberry Box") is a complete fallacy as it tries to hide behind it. Specifically, how children are forced to repress their emotions from a loved one dying. In addition, he brings up a quote about how Gene essentially was crushing his writers with this rule and how all of them left at the end of the season just because they were tired of having their hands tied.
    "Any emotion, petty or otherwise, is at the core of good drama and creates conflict between characters. But Gene didn't want conflict between characters. 'All the problems of mankind have been solved,' he said. 'Earth is a paradise. Now go write drama.'" — Michael Piller
  • The Grand Finale of Avatar: The Last Airbender. He laments not being able convey the awesomeness of everything happening at once, and says it would be so much easier if he could just put together a montage. If only he could find a song rousing enough...than he sees Iroh set the Fire Nation flag in Ba Sing Se on fire.
    Iroh...that is just what I needed. (Cue Iko Iko by the Belle Stars).
    • He gives Katara a pretty hard time throughout these videos, but toward the end reveals that it's not because he dislikes the character, but that it illustrates how easily her kind of personality could be twisted until she ended up like Hama.
  • The analysis of "Carbon Creek" according to how much it informs, inspires, and/or entertains, plus doing his research on the invention of velcro. There's a guy who's put some real thought into this.
  • In his review of the Rebuild of Evangelion, he calls out the adults for their rampant hypocrisy in how they deal with Shinji- from the fact that they won't step in to help him when he's getting beat up by a bully but fully expect him to jump in a giant robot and fight against a giant monster to save their lives, to telling him if he doesn't want to be there he can just leave and then forcing him to come back via armed guards, to simply showing how cruel it is to get mad at a 14 year old kid acting like a 14 year old kid. While he makes no bones about how he's not a fan of Shinji, it's refreshing to see someone stick up for the kid and criticize the other characters for how they treat him for a change.
    • In Evangelion review, stating how unnecessary Rei's nude scenes are and how they seem to add nothing to the plot, especially since she's supposed to be a 14 year old girl and it sort of creates a whole mess of Unfortunate Implications.
  • Taking "Up The Long Ladder" to task for the horrific Irish stereotyping which then gives way to an even more horrific moral about forcing people to be "breeding stock," to use the episode's own term.
  • While reviewing the Gargoyles four parter "City of Stone", he notes that he has a problem in how to deal with a certain piece of Foreshadowing given how some viewers may not have seen the show and shouldn't have the reveal spoiled. So he simply notes that somewhere in the review is a hint toward the reveal and leaves it at that. Said hint being his mention of how Puck had previously shown the ability to be seen however he wanted... like he does in "City of Stone" by showing himself as Owen turned to stone.
    • The clue is much simpler: the first word of each video: "Owen", "Is", "Puck". There's no way that was an accident.
    • He does it again in "Eye of the Beholder", where he notes how, for the most part, the irony of everyone's proverbial masks being removed on Halloween-a night of literal masks. The one person whose mask doesn't come off? The last person we see before the episode ends.
  • His positively BRUTAL critique of the DS9 episode "Paradise" and the character Alixus, who may in fact be one of the most evil characters ever seen in any piece of Star Trek media. It really is quite a thing to behold.
  • His intro video to his The Day After review. Shown Their Work at its finest. Particularly the very appropriate usage of "When Johnny Comes Marching Home Again" up until the bombing of Hiroshima.
  • The entire fact that he was able to review the film The Day After, and throw in several of his usual jokes while also making perfectly clear how seriously the subject matter should be taken.
  • The quoting of Nineteen Eighty-Four in "The Big Goodbye".
  • The analysis of nostalgia movies, also called the returns of old favourites presented before the review proper in his look at Back to Earth, complete with ideas why these are so popular, yet polarizing at the same time. According to SF Debris, there are three types of nostalgia films: objectively good ones, then those that deserve two viewings, and finally those that are flawed, but have the eternal flame nostalgia, representing another possible return of your favourite franchise, which doubles as a really sweet heartwarming moment.
  • His review of The Matrix, a highly thoughtful essay on the power of the human brain.
  • He comes up with a great idea for how the Reset Button on "Year of Hell" could still have resulted in lasting consequences: just one room on the ship didn't get the temporal shielding down in time...and Harry Kim was inside. Suddenly the guy they were going to kill off for being too boring has an exciting new role as "a scarred survivor of the war that never was."
  • His Hogfather review once again uses Baba Yetu to awesome effect, this time using it to close out Death's big monologue from Reaper Man.
    • At the end of the review, he gives his heartwarming speech about Terry Pratchett and the legacy he's leaving behind.
  • Reviewing the Doctor Who episode "The End of the World" on the Mayan Apocalypse Day.
  • This one's just plain freaky: due to delays caused by his looking for an episode fitting the request of focusing on a bad character but still being worth a perfect score, he ended up reviewing "Timeless", an episode set fifteen years after the season it was part of, exactly fifteen years after it aired.
  • In his "Skin of Evil" review, coming up with TWO separate scenarios to handle Tasha Yar's death that are far more emotional and meaningful than the way she was initially killed off.
  • The Legend of Korra:
    • For delivering a thorough and devastating rebuttal to Tarrlok's Not So Different claims to Korra.
      Nice try, very nice try. But the difference is that your job is preserve the peace and justice of Republic City. You're performing an injustice by treating the innocent as if they were guilty, and you destroyed the peace by encouraging them to resort to violence, because you had destroyed all non-violent recourse, and you provided a ready made army for the greatest threat to Republic City ever. Your cure is worse than the disease, and you have utterly failed in doing your job! That is the difference. You abuse your power to intimidate people. Korra is doing her job to trying intimidate you into stopping that.
    • Explaining why is it right for the avatar to have spirit-bending and wrong for Amon to do it.
    • Brings up the argument that benders are favored over non-benders in the Avatar world, and points out that that's not true. In the original series, of the leaders of the four nations, not counting air nomads since they were composed only of airbenders, two of them were non-benders. In Legend of Korra, we also saw in the flashbacks that Sokka, a non-bender, was once the representative of the Water Tribe in Republic City.
  • The opening to his 5th Anniversary Clip Show, which is his own rendition of "The World is Awesome" from the Discovery Channel.
  • Simply, the opening of his 5th Anniversary review - "Emanations", the first review he put up on his YouTube channel - features his typical theme ... before turning into a hyper-strung montage of his various Voyager reviews, set to "Highway to Hell".
  • Verbally dissecting the character of Wonder Woman in the failed 2011 pilot, pointing out how exactly she has failed as a character. Going so far as to explain that the only way her character could work would be to act as a sort of Knight Templar antagonist for the actual Wonder Woman. He starts the review by regretting taking it on, as it's not really fair to mock an unfinished product. He's changed his tune by the end of the first act, declaring that no matter what would have been improved in the final version, there is no saving this story.
  • His calling out of the whale probe in Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. He points that saying it's "intelligent" and "not hostile" is pure nonsense. As the thing nearly kills all life on Earth, by BOILING THE OCEANS WHERE THE WHALES LIVE, he points out that really, it's either too dumb to know what it's doing, or it is hostile. He goes on to destroy the arguments of people who defend the whale probe, pointing out that it's callous destruction of life on Earth and everything around it as it travels personifies the absolute worst traits of humanity.
  • His X-Files reviews are simply made of win. They seem exceptionally well-researched, pointing out relevant issues and making interesting analogies between the show's world and Real Life. And they are as hilarious and snarky as anything else SF Debris does. That is a job well done.
  • Some way, some how, he got two completely independent requests to review Puella Magi Madoka Magica on the exact same day. As if that wasn't weird enough, both also contained the specific request that he do separate reviews for every episode rather than just an overview.
  • Coming up with a brilliant alternate ending to Star Trek Into Darkness: Khan gets away with all the Augments, Spock mindmelds with Kirk, and Kirk is left in stasis. Then, the next film will be searching for Khan and his new army, Kirk will become a phantom in Spock's mind acting as both an adviser and a nuisance, while the entire Enterprise crew must combine their wits, skills, and generally everything they've got in order to defeat Khan's army and bring him back alive to save their captain. Tell us that is not awesome.
  • His rant against the "It's only a kid's show" excuse while reviewing "Fear Her", especially the writer saying that it "wasn't meant" for older fans as his defense when there was such a huge backlash to it.
  • The "World of Cardboard" Speech on Homura's behalf in episode 10 of Puella Magi Madoka Magica. This one deserves to be put down for posterity:
    "The difference between an indomitable hero and a tragic victim is the same as the difference between a magical girl and a witch: one has hope, the other, despair. This can be seen as a tragedy, a further sign of darkness, that Homura is forever suffering for a friend who does not remember what she has done for her — the sacrifices that she has made — who has even looked upon her aghast at what she is. But it isn't tragedy, because Homura has never stopped having hope. Her task is not a chore that is to be endured, it is the purest form of love that which is given to another, and with all that one has, knowing that it receives nothing in return. And yet, the basis of that love is not a delusion, but upon emotions that would be reciprocated because in another time, they were. And the absence of them now is not a sign that they did not matter; despite Homura's claims that she's not human anymore, she still does what an emotionless, inhuman being like Kyubey could never comprehend: she fights a losing battle forever and ever for someone she loves, and no pain is too great to ever make her stop fighting."
  • While reviewing "Cold Front", he laments all the potential wasted in the Temporal Cold War story, imagining an ending for it built on the fact that none of the previous Trek series had ever mentioned Archer or any of his crew despite the huge role they played in the Federation's early days. What if to finally win the war they had to take an action that would wipe all memory of them from time, making them heroes that no one would ever know about except the out-of-universe audience?
  • The pop culture-based synopsis of World War II in "The Killing Game". You're caught between laughing your head off and staring in awe. Now with its own video.
  • During the "Fair Haven" review, he gives a long and devastating takedown of how the "Voyager" writers seemed to have completely skirted past a message about the possibilities of escapism and an audience's emotional identification with simulated entertainment it knows isn't real... on a sci-fi show in a veteran, fandom-heavy franchise.
    • The review was accompanied by a long, detailed examination of the franchise's portrayal of holograms, and how "alive" they can be considered. Which starts off by noting that in "Fair Haven" the portrayal of the titular holographic town as being real enough to be worth risking the whole ship to save conflicts rather badly with Janeway adjusting one of the residents to be a suitable romantic partner, which includes deleting his wife entirely.
  • His entire video on Doctor Who's cancellation. Especially how he explains how Colin Baker had a role in it unintentionally.
    Chuck: The reason Doctor Who was cancelled... (displays picture of the Sixth Doctor's outfit) was this.
    • Saying of an interview with Michael Grade that it feels like the audition for the villain in an Adam Sandler film.
  • His transformation of the titular character of "Jetrel" in Voyager from flat to three-dimensional, and the issues of the episode from black-and-white to highly nuanced, simply by adding a one-minute scene to the episode.
  • Ripping apart the subplot of Torchwood: Miracle Day where a guy who rapes and kills little girls is able to get a sizable fanbase. This gets him to call the main story about death ceasing to exist "the believable plot." Going into details about us culturally, he brings up that we assign considerable weight to sex crimes, possibly more than he should, along with violence against children, and the idea that Oswald Danes could get a fanbase in universe is ludicrous because of it. He points out that even getting out of prison through Loophole Abuse regarding having served his sentence was absurd given how it essentially has the prison warden caving into threats of appeal that Oswald was almost certainly lose.
    • Part 9's "The Reason You Suck" Speech about Gwen's appalling self-centeredness.
    • The final summation of what a grotesque mistake the entire character of Oswald Danes was. As note above, he brings up how throughout the entire review how absurd the reasons for pushing Oswald into the plot were, and while he states he gets the idea of Torchwood being forced to team up with a monster, Owsald is so evil he doesn't why the kept around so much when after all the screen time, all the show does with him is continue to emphasize how horrible and insufferable he is.
    • His criticism of Miracle Day's ending and how it failed to deliver on both the show's main mysteries:
      • The Reveal about the miracle. Over half way through the series, the only leads we get on the source of the miracle beyond something called "The Blessing", which points is just and word could be called anything proves it by calling it "The Walrus Tusk." And that in the end, The Reveal is that the miracle was caused by a giant crack in the Earth that somehow controls the lifespans of every human, even though we have no idea where it came from or it even does that. Ten episodes and The Reveal is something we know "it's this thing there that does stuff and don't know a damn thing about, but how doesn't look cool the way it sucks in rocks sideways." Even the reasoning for how the crack was found doesn't make any sense.
      • Calling out the series attempt at a Sequel Hook with the season failure at resolving the conspiracy plot, revealed everything was a "trial run" for "plan B". He admits the Three Families not being finished after two people were killed in the finale is perfectly reasonably, but this attempted hook only brings up they were only a vaguely defined group of villains that justified the show's plot devices without actually revealing anything about them, and leaving it shows how little the series accomplished.
  • For "Fury" he comes up with a far more moving and meaningful reason for Kes to turn on the Voyager crew, rather than the episode's "Screw it, she's just crazy."
  • His follow-up to his review of TNG's "First Contact" (the episode, not the movie), exploring the philosophical and psychological consequences that would come from making contact with any extraterrestrial species that may exist.
  • In "Shades Of Gray", discussing at least two different Clip Show scenarios which would have been more worthwhile than what we got.
  • His calling out Janeway for her hypocrisy in "Equinox," comparing her treatment and judgement of Captain Ransom to how she would be judged and treated if found by the Enterprise-E and Picard.
  • The mental image of Lauren Faust leaving My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic by flying into the sunset on a pegasus.
  • His full analysis of the Cosmic Retcon in "The Day of the Doctor", and revealing why he thinks it was not only a good decision, but reinforcing of the show's point, and a great example of how to do one correctly, unlike One More Day: The Doctor saving Galifrey when he has the chance is the Doctor being the Doctor, the man who will do everything in his power to avoid hurting innocents, and closing out the era of the Sole Survivor of the Time Lords by finding the best redemption possible.
    • Also, setting the three Doctor's entrance to Aerosmith's "Walk This Way" Badass.
  • In "These Are the Voyages...", Chuck's proposal for a storyline that would've used a 24th century Trek POV without pushing ENT into the background: Have Riker, an Admiral by this time, turn to Archer and his crew for inspiration from archived footage, not a holorecreation, of one of their missions, as he is preparing for a similar mission.
  • His review of Godzilla (1954). He brings up that film itself is more than just a good monster movie, it's analogy for advancements of science that led to the nuclear and hydrogen bomb. Scientists who worked on such projects don't do so because they hope to build weapons, they do so because their work makes scientific achievements that advance the quality of human life, the development of new weapons is, sadly, a consequence of that. He brings up that Godzilla serves as a perfect metaphor that consequence, he's every big as destructive and humans can only prepare for him and deal with the consequences.
  • The episode-long rant about "Peak Performance", where the guest character whose arrogance we're supposed to be irritated by pales in comparison to how the Enterprise crew are at their absolute Roddenberry future utopia smuggest throughout the whole thing, not to mention poking holes in their continuing insistence that Starfleet isn't a military organization, when it truly is.
  • His complete evisceration of the insulting manner in which Doctor Who's "Love & Monsters" portrays fandom.
    • Even though the episode really doesn't deserve it, he takes the trouble to come up with a plausible explanation for "Absorbaloff" being an Appropriated Appelation and his race apparently never having come up with a name for themselves.
  • In "Minefield", he points out yet another instance of The Main Characters Do Everything (Reed gets himself injured while trying to disarm a mine and Archer goes to rescue him and disarm the mine himself despite the ship being crippled in a hostile minefield with a cloaked Romulan ship stalking them, thus if anything happened to Archer, the Captain, they'd be utterly screwed)...and manages to show how that ridiculous situation could be a huge character moment for Archer with just a few tweaks.
  • The introduction to his Transformers review, attacking the viewpoint of fans of the franchise claiming that they own a piece of it. He doesn't own any of the franchise itself, but he does own how it makes him feel, and he's going to have opinions based on that, and trying to deny them is true undeserved entitlement.
  • His review of Godzilla 1985 and his comparison of how this film was localized with Godzilla: King of the Monsters! (1956). While there are legitimate problems that one can have with the changes to the film, the original film's localization was done with the intent of bringing it to western audiences, because very few subtitled foreign films see theaters (even today), while preserving the spirit of the original movie, with the American actor introduced simply being around to make the film more accessible and not take the spotlight from the Japanese characters. The 80s film, however, was made by people in the business of creating exploitation films and they completely butchered the movie, to the point where he considers the possibility that they were intentionally trying to make a bad movie.
  • The explanation from "The Jem'Hadar" about why, despite his laying a lot of stuff at Starfleet's door over the years, he doesn't blame them for starting the Dominion War.
  • In the last 3 minutes of his Dominion War Follow-up he not only explains how this Deep Space Nine arc took a lot of risk and is an example of how their writers were always pushing for more risk than the producers wanted, but also shows how TNG and especially Voyager "played it safe" in terms of writing, and not until Enterprise Season 3 with the Xindi arc when the show was in jeopardy of cancellation were the writers and producers willing to do this. This explains why he seems like a Deep Space Nine Fan Boy, especially compared to all the other Star Trek series.
  • The montage of clips at the beginning of "Datalore" explaining why the review was delayed. Fixing a flooded bathroom has never felt so epic.
  • His attack on the suspension of the Prime Directive in "The Omega Directive", both for what it says about Janeway and the entire Federation:
    • The Prime Directive forbids interfering with pre-warp species, in Janeway's eyes, even if it means preventing their extinction. The Omega Directive overrides it, because Omega could lead to the Federation losing their warp drives. So the Prime Directive is suspended not when a species is threatened with its own extinction, but when they do something that is harmful to the Federation.
    • He delivers another What the Hell, Hero? to Janeway about how she refuses to help the aliens in Omega, even though her actions are leading to death of their species.
    • Goes into a rant about writing Janeway's character went wrong with writers were so in-cohesive with writing Janeway because they always were concerned about writing female traits with her. He compares her to Sisko, who was written as being black as a minor trait compared to everything else about him.
  • In "Similitude" he points out a rather disturbing trend of Phlox's, in a quite classy way: "To lose one cure may be regarded as a misfortune. To lose two looks like carelessness."
  • Overviewing and defending Power Girl in the review of Fearful Symmetry, saying that, at her best, she at least reflects the immigrant experience better than Superman does and is slightly more relatable (near the end, even saying at her best she reminds him more of a Marvel character), but also admits that the crazy backstory that's tied in with Supergirl and the DC alternate universe cosmology leaves her VERY hard to adapt. And then ending off with "I'm shallow, but I'm not THAT shallow."
  • Correctly predicting that in Doctor Who "Missy" is a female regeneration of The Master
  • In his Dragon Age: Origins review, he actually manages to beat the Hopeless Boss Fight against Ser Cauthrien.
    • Tim (The Player Character) cowing a Desire Demon into submission. When it attempts to convince Tim to let her leave and come back in a few years, Tim launches into a tirade about how much effort he's gone to involving fighting a Zombie Apocalypse, preparing a town for said zombies, clearing a castle, clearing the Circle Tower out, being trapped in the Fade and fighting out, and having to deal with Jowan, Tim threatens her to leave, and, since she caused so much trouble, he'll take something while she goes, learning Blood Magic in the process.
    • He also lays into Loghain and Anora, going so far as to edit in their lines so it sounds like he really is having a conversation with them.
    • During the build-up to the Landsmeet, he delivers an in-character Badass Boast to Loghain:
    Teyrn Loghain: The Emperor of Orlais also thought I could not bring him down; expect no more mercy than I showed him!
    Tim/Chuck: An emperor is just a man. You ever stared into the face of a High Dragon? Stared, as the fire went out of its eyes and belly, as you delivered that final blow? My order slays Archdemons. We end Blights. You think I'll cower before your barks and boasts? Return to your palace: prepare the throne for your... new... king.
  • In "Empok Nor", Chuck criticizes a Starfleet security officer for pointing her phaser rifle at her colleague and stating that the safety is on by pointing out that both the NRA (National Rifle Association) and the NSSF (National Shooting Sports Foundation) have rules against this.
  • Using the trailer background music of Alien (with the siren wail-like Previews Pulse) for the trailer to his review of It! The Terror from Beyond Space (which he discusses at length about being its Spiritual Predecessor). Makes the earlier B-Movie scarier than hell...
  • The Voyager finale montage, set to the full version of "Harleys and Indians."
    • Several times he points out how the numerous Padding scenes in the episode could have been used to thematically tie the story together with just a bit more work.
  • A very small moment that often gets overlooked comes in his review of the TNG Episode "The Neutral Zone" in which he says he has nothing against people who preach Marxism despite his own stance on the subject, which is a lot more tolerant and respectful than most idiots who look down on Socialism, Marxism, and Communism as "the ultimate evil."
  • Once you get past the hilarious concept of HOW he structures it, his ultimate breakdown of the issues inherent in "Elaan of Troyius" is a masterclass in trying to think through something complicated.
  • Before the intro to Puella Magi Madoka Magica the Movie: Rebellion, he tells the first part of the tale of the Soldier and Death, a Russian folktale about a man who escaped from the fatal consequences of a Heroic Sacrifice by tricking Death into a magic bag. It turns out to be a rather masterful Chekhov's Gun for Homura's ambush of Madokami, where Madoka is kindly Death, and Akuma Homura being the soldier who both committed the Heroic Sacrifice for her, and then sealed her away to negate all the bad effects of said sacrifice.
  • In his review of "Inquisition", he devotes the coda to a very thorough defense of the existence of Section 31, pointing out that its existence doesn't necessarily conflict with the image of Gene Roddenberry-this is, after all, the same "perfect humanity" that believes it's a nobler thing to allow innocents to die for the sake of a moral principle.
  • In his review of Ghostbusters (1984), he deconstructs the Whole 'Walter Peck was in the right' interpretation with the following evidence:
    • The fact that he refers to Venkman as 'Mr.' instead of 'Dr.' (remember, Venkman has doctorates in Psychology).
    • The fact that as an EPA agent, he has no reason to investigate the Ghostbusters, since any chemical purchases would be for research, and thus no larger than that of a high school. (Had he been with the Nuclear Regulatory Committee, or a fraud investigation firm, then they'd be screwed).
    • The fact that when he comes to shut down the containment grid, he only brings a cop and a guy from Con Ed, when in real life, he should have brought a team in hazmat suits.
  • The opening of his review of The Thing (1982), which consists of him reading a passage from Who Goes There?, the short story that inspired the film.
  • The ending of his review of Titan A.E., a music video of the credits version of "A Whole New World"
  • How is Sparkplug Witwicky, an American working on an Oil Rig, familiar with a South Asian ruby mine? He was once part of a Black-Ops team that raided these same mines as part of an off-the-books operation.
  • Kannazuki no Miko:
    • Calling out the series in his review of episode 10 for the bit of Himeko still longing for Chikane even after Chikane raped her, where he engages in a rant where he makes it clear if it weren't for obligation, he'd have stopped reviewing the series with episode 8.
    • In Episode 11, the anime treating Himiko apologizing to Chikane for being raped by her causes Chuck to launch an epic rant about how the anime is both glorifying domestic abuse and arguing that abuse is okay in lesbian relationships.
  • His VERY thorough discussion on how comics nearly collapsed in The '90s. In 13 parts, and it's great to see all the what ifs and the key points in the drama.
  • While he technically loses in Sid Meier’s Alpha Centauri after the computer realises it can't beat him out right it has to settle for a diplomatic victory. He made YANG of all people resort to diplomacy to win.
  • Man's got a whole new ending logo for himself! It even makes the noises that I presume are what a sun makes.
  • It's clear from Chuck's videos that he loves Deep Space Nine more than any other Star Trek series...but he doesn't hold back in his criticism of "What You Leave Behind", saying Sisko's fight with Dukat and sealing the Pah-Wraiths away was anti-climactic and un-fitting, especially since characters like Kira and even Worf had more of a connection to Dukat than Sisko did.
  • In The Hermit's Journey Volume II, he went over Jake Lloyd's performance and explained why it didn't work and resonate with the audience: he was a nine year old kid with limited experience and George Lucas' way of directing was ill suited to get what was needed. Every other internet critic would've just ridiculed the kid, and they have. A lot. But this time, someone didn't go for a cheap shot and actually examined things.
  • His review of Dragon Age II, like most he's dislikes the conflict between the mages and the Templars. Both sides he feels go to far with their With Us or Against Us attitude, but he still ends up destroying the Templars' argument. Mages are born with power that other people don't, but the aristocracy are born into positions of power as well, yet it is accepted that they wield power despite their only qualifications being born into a noble family. Clearly accepting people being born with magic isn't as big of a step as the Templars are claiming, yet everyone on their side argues for the extreme that mages should be completely subjugated.
  • With The Hermit's Journey complete, it's time to talk about just how much work was put into this three series project. How much time Chuck probably spent trying to get as much details right as humanly possible and presenting them in an honest way. So many other videos about George Lucas will either present him as a flawless man beset by unpleasable fans or the worst person imaginable because of his mistakes with the prequel trilogies and the special editions. And yet, Chuck brought up both the positives and negatives, looked through them both and created a series that truly showed just how important George Lucas was to not only Star Wars, but film in general. He showcased just how Lucas pushed forward and created a revolution in filmmaking that ultimately changed everything even despite his stumblings. Chuck could have approached this as others have, but by going this way, he gave perhaps the best look at George Lucas and his legacy and came to the conclusion that while the negatives were there, the positives ultimately outweighed them.
  • His talk in "Sins of the Father", painting the Romulans as a Magnificent Bastard trying to sabotage the Federation/Klingon alliance after "The Defector". Really painting them as genius manipulators of both Federation and Klingon ethics.
  • His analysis of "Twilight's Kingdom – Part 2". He points out that Twilight's title of Princess is a strong case of "You Can't Go Home Again", and how, while her library was the place where she took her first steps into a larger world, it can only remain in the past, and that she can only go forward. It's time for her to spread her wings, and become what she was always meant to be. What follows immediately afterward is Twilight's fight with Tirek gloriously set to The Touch.
  • From his review of "Only Human', the mental image of the Autobots thwarting 9/11.
  • His My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic "When Turkeys Fly" Thanksgiving Day Special he seemingly selected four random episodes: "The Best Night Ever", "Hearth's Warming Eve", "Pinkie Pride", and "Hearthbreakers", joking that they all have the theme of being about Rainbow Dash. At the end he reveals the real theme: ruining a celebration by trying to make it as you feel it should be than just enjoying it. He then gives a heartfelt speech about how the point to celebrations isn't HOW it is done... but being with those you care for and having fun.

Top

Example of:

/
/

Feedback