Follow TV Tropes


Context YMMV / TheTamingOfTheShrew

Go To

1* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation:²** Rather than being "tamed" by Petruchio's bullying ways, could it be that Kate is ''charmed'' by it — that she genuinely finds him lovable for being a man after her own heart, nagging, and unpleasant, and boorish — someone who doesn't flee from her outbursts but instead answers in kind, and with spirit, too? It is possible to stage the play with both obviously having fun during their initial rows. (As for the later part, the ending speech is easily filed away as her playing along to win both of them the wager's money.)²** There is a theory that Kate doesn't genuinely submit to Petruchio but is putting on an act and merely becomes shrewd to get her way with her husband. Supporting this is how Kate doesn't gradually become submissive but, almost in exasperation, just starts agreeing with him in a completely unrealistic way, and [[SilkHidingSteel this behavior gets Petruchio to do what]] ''she'' wants. (Thus learning the very lesson he's trying to teach: one catches more flies with honey than with vinegar.)²** Another one: Petruchio is lampooning society (specifically gender roles) throughout the play; the "taming" is really him trying to get Kate to play along with him without having to drop the joke by telling her in front of other people.²** Another: Petruchio's act is meant to show Kate how ridiculous her behavior must seem. She eventually catches on to this and the rest of the play is a prank on everybody else.²** Yet another, for the last monologue, though it requires some side gags: Kate gets in on the bet and delivers the last monologue to get her and Petruchio the money.²** Yet another one is that Kate intended to be a "good" wife all along, but just wanted a strong husband. Once she realized that her act wasn't scaring Petruchio away, he earned her respect.²** Another one: It's a SpoofAesop ("It's only okay to be rude to people if they're weaker than you are," which is essentially the lesson Kate learns in the end).²** Gregory Doran's 2003 RSC production played Petruchio as a genuine madman driven to distraction by his father's death and Kate as a troubled woman who loves him enough to accept him the way he is, turning the whole play into a story about mutual support under difficult circumstances. ²** In terms of more minor characters, the 1992 RSC production drastically reimagined Tranio as a manipulator trying to steal Bianca for himself. In the end Lucentio wins thanks to some words of warning from Biondello, but a BittersweetEnding ensues as Bianca still loves Tranio. ²** Yet another alternative: Petruchio is playing a game of [[MyRuleFuIsStrongerThanYours contract chicken]] with Kate. Back in the day, the standard marital exchange was that the man would provide for and protect his wife, and the woman would respect/obey her husband and put out for him. Kate is refusing to show respect for Petruchio, so he is simply declining to fulfill his side of the "contract". In his estimation, it's only a matter of time before she blinks, and she will before he does. Once she shows signs that she understands it now, he softens considerably toward her.²** There is also another theory (link [[ here]]) that Kate and Petruchio are doing a rudimentary [=BDSM=] routine. It helps that immediately after Kate finished her final speech about being a slave and submitting utterly (DoesThisRemindYouOfAnything), they went straight to bed.²** Tranio doesn't hesitate a bit to go along with Lucentio's plan to wed Bianca. UndyingLoyalty between a servant and master who have been friends since boyhood? Or is he merely a crafty ServileSnarker who sees in his boss's marriage to a wealthy girl a chance for a nice payday? Some productions have even played Tranio as in love with ''Lucentio'', making his willingness to please his master [[SubordinateExcuse even more interesting...]]²** The 2015 Stratford Shakespeare Festival's performance featured a rather... brutal Kate. From chasing a Bianca with bound hands with a sword to bashing Bianca's face into a pillar, she really does deserve what she got.²*** That brutality wasn't spared on Petruchio either. There was some pretty physical wrestling going on between the two during the meeting scene. We're talking full-on headlocks and leg holds, like she was trying to crush his head between her thighs while hanging sideways off his neck.²** Another rather more sinister possibility is that Kate actually believes what she's saying becase she's suffering from some sort of StockholmSyndrome and that Petruchio's "taming" methods look very much like now-recognized forms of psychological torture.²** There is also an interpretation which plays up the FramingDevice where the story is actually a play ''[[PlayWithinAPlay in-universe]]'', and one presumably being performed by male actors for a male audience. In this interpretation, the fact that no real woman has ever responded to things in the way that Kate does is the ''point'', and the joke is that the play is absurd but the guy it's being put on for is too dumb to notice.²** Surprisingly, both male and female readers, viewers and audience members have viewed Kate as a woman who needs to learn humility. To be fair, they have a point; at one stage Kate hits a music teacher over the head with a lute simply because he told her she played some notes wrong and tried to show her how to do them properly, and at another stage she strikes Petruchio just for making a crude - but fairly benign - joke about her.²** While Petruchio starts out merely wanting a wife for money, he can be played as genuinely falling for Katherine. Indeed, Creator/RaulJulia played heavily into this opposite Creator/MerylStreep.²* AngstWhatAngst: PlayedForLaughs in the Induction. When the Lord's servants tell Christopher Sly that he's been "in a dream" for fifteen years, he responds, "Fifteen years? By my fay, a goodly nap!" Upon being told that everyone he knew never existed, he adds, "Now, Lord be thanked for my good amends!"²* BrokenBase: Is the play sexist, or is it commenting on sexism? Regardless of how it was intended when written, any decent modern production will aim to represent it as the latter, using whatever subversive methods necessary.²* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: The Induction can certainly come off as this. While such framing devices were actually quite fashionable when the play was written, Shakespeare's is unique in that it doesn't have a conclusion, doesn't inform the rest of the play in any easily discernible way, and disrupts the classic five-act structure the Bard usually adhered to so strictly. Many modern productions [[AdaptedOut leave it out completely.]]²* FairForItsDay: Many complain about the ending, but in its historical context, the character of Kate was pushing the boundaries of what was acceptable female behavior in society. For comparison, most contemporary plays would deal with an unruly wife by simply having the husband [[DomesticAbuse beat her senseless]] for the amusement of the audience. Therefore, some agree that Shakespeare added the themes of female submissiveness to appease his audience. That being said, the example of "The Woman's Prize (The Tamer Tamed)" suggests that less than a decade after Shakespeare's death the play was already starting to look outdated[[note]]while it is not known ''when'' exactly "The Woman's Prize" was written, it must have been before 1625 as the known writer died that year[[/note]].²** As an alternate interpretation of "The Woman's Prize", if "Shrew" is viewed as a comedy/caricature of a domineering woman getting her comeuppance done for comedy, "Prize" could be seen as doubly funny for having the man get his comeuppance in a similar way (especially given male/female roles at the time).²* NightmareFuel: Petruchio psychologically wearing down his bride Katherine, as evidenced by the title. She's DeniedFoodAsPunishment and subjected to a SleepDeprivationPunishment and even TwoPlusTortureMakesFive! Her speech at the end, urging women to submit to their husbands, demonstrates how fully Petruchio has crushed her spirit. The worst part is that, though more recent performances have acknowledged the horror of what Katherine goes through (for example, by depicting playing up the BrokenBird angle during her final monologue), [[ValuesDissonance more traditional versions play the whole thing for laughs!]]²* RuleAbidingRebel: The play is praised by some as a proto-feminist work. Kate's speech at the end is taken by them to be ironic. It is likely not.²* UnintentionallySympathetic: Even some of Shakespeare's contemporaries felt the treatment of Katharina was a bit harsh. This is even more prominent among modern readings, with Kate being popularly interpreted as an abuse victim. ²* ValuesDissonance: Even the most subversive and proto-feminist interpretations can't make all of the sexism palatable to modern audiences. And if you don't read it as subversive--if you take the text at face value, as a story of a domineering man breaking a woman to his will and turning her into a submissive -- the Values Dissonance is cranked UpToEleven. (As noted above, many of the "taming" methods look a lot like what we'd now call psychological torture to some interpreters.)²** The dissonance may not be restricted to just the modern day, though. It only took ten years for there to be written an unofficial sequel to the play called ''The Woman's Prize (The Tamer Tamed)'', where Petruchio gets a helping of his own medicine by his second wife Maria.²* ValuesResonance: Modern series such as the ''[[Literature/FiftyShadesOfGrey Fifty Shades]]'' and ''Submissive'' trilogies (written in the 21st century by women) also tell the story of a domineering man turning a woman into his submissive, and [[AllGirlsWantBadBoys some]] modern female readers apparently love them. The play also pre-dates the S&M fantasy (or at least the recognition thereof) with its dominant vs. submissive roles by several centuries.²** Of course, one key difference between Fifty Shades and this story is that the former has consent - arguably dubious consent but still consent - while the latter does not. A woman agreeing to be a submissive and a woman being forced into it is quite different²* WTHCastingAgency: An example that isn't one specific piece of casting, but the entire basis of a production. A fairly recent show of Shrew gender bent the entire cast. For some this was an interesting take on the gender roles, but for others, basing the whole show around this concept didn't allow the production to truly embrace the subversive nature of other modern productions.²----


How well does it match the trope?

Example of:


Media sources: