Follow TV Tropes


Context Main / SandersonsFirstLaw

Go To

1-> "An author's ability to solve conflict with magic is DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL to how well the reader understands said magic."\˛"Limitations are more important than powers."\˛"Expand what you already have before you add something new."˛-->-- Brandon Sanderson's Laws of Magic˛˛Sanderson's [[TheLawsOfMagic Laws of Magic]] are a set of rules of fiction which are meant to help writers have good magic, but also to integrate that magic in the worldbuilding.˛˛'''[[ The First Law]]''' claims that the better defined and understandable a magic system is, the more an author can use it in their plot. Simplified it can be interpreted as: "The better the reader understands a magic system, the more it can be used to resolve conflict."˛˛This law was laid out and explained in an essay by Creator/BrandonSanderson [[ here]] on the subject of creating magic systems in fiction.˛˛The Law is meant to express two things. First, if MagicAIsMagicA and [[FunctionalMagic it has rules,]] and the more rigidly and clearly these rules are defined and followed, the easier an author can incorporate the magic into a story without causing Fan Backlash or creating a sense of DeusExMachina. The Law is advice to authors on creating and explaining the basic rules for their magic system in story, so that the readers understand what is going on and how/why it works. These rules can be like the ones used in ''Literature/TheDresdenFiles'' by Creator/JimButcher, where magic is very clearly laid out at a "nuts and bolts" level, with set limits and explanations on how it works in its most basic form and never exceeds the boundaries of what is stated. Or the rules can be more amorphous so long as the reader is able to understand just as well whether or not the magic is applicable to a given situation.˛˛The second aspect is that [[NewRulesAsThePlotDemands poorly-explained magic]] should not be used to solve problems, only to create them. Then the protagonists have to solve the problem using more mundane means. This formula is good for building worlds that feel mysterious and dangerous, such as the worlds of [[Literature/TheLordOfTheRings Middle-Earth]] and [[Literature/ASongOfIceAndFire Westeros]].˛˛Sanderson demonstrates the first aspect in his own magic systems, most notably in his ''Franchise/{{Mistborn}}'' books where even when only half of the magic system had been explained, the readers were able to (correctly) [[FridgeBrilliance determine the nature and abilities]] of the ''other'' half based on the information provided.˛˛'''[[ The Second Law]]''' is that Limitations are more important than Powers. This means that powers don't make a character interesting; what matters is what they ''can't'' do. Sanderson uses Franchise/{{Superman}} as an example, pointing out that Superman has flight, super-strength, laser vision, and plenty of other abilities. But what makes Superman interesting are his moral code and his weakness to kryptonite.˛˛Sanderson further subdivides these flaws into Limitations, Weaknesses, and Costs. Limitations are those things which the magic can't do (such as "Superman can't see through lead" or "magic cannot unmake something"). Weaknesses are things the magic is vulnerable to, or ways that using it makes you vulnerable (such as "kryptonite takes away Superman's powers" or "while you're wearing the One Ring, the Ringwraiths can see you"). And costs are ways in which using the magic has a cost, (such as "men who use magic eventually go insane", or "if you run out of spice, you can no longer travel faster than light").˛˛'''[[ The Third Law]]''' tells writers to expand what you already have before you add something new. To do this, there are three directions a writer can take: Extrapolate, Interconnect, or Streamline.˛˛Extrapolating is when you ask the "What happens when...?" question. Sanderson gives examples like “What happens when a wizard converts to Christianity?” “What happens to warfare when magic can create food out of thin air, enabling much more mobile armies?” [[Literature/TheWheelOfTime “What happens to gender dynamics if magic causes all of the men who use it to go insane?”]]˛˛Interconnecting means that, rather than keep all the different kinds of magic as separate "isn't that cool" abilities, a writer should think about how different powers can be part of both the worldbuilding and the story's core themes.˛˛Streamlining is when you look at all your magic and think, "Where can I combine these?" Again, this can be done with the powers themselves, or you can take one aspect of magic and have different cultures understand it different ways.


How well does it match the trope?

Example of:


Media sources: