Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / SupermanVsTheElite

Go To

OR

Added: 264

Changed: 65

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OneSceneWonder: Adult Vera. She only appears briefly to hand secret info to Lois.

to:

* OneSceneWonder: OneSceneWonder:
**
Adult Vera. She only appears briefly to hand secret info to Lois.Lois.
** Pa Kent only shows up briefly to give Clark advice but makes an impression thanks to Creator/PaulEiding’s warm performance. It’s also the first time Jonathan Kent had any lines in a DCUOM film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Dewicked trope.


* EvilIsSexy: Menagerie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EvilIsSexy: Menagerie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MisaimedFandom: There are people who genuinely think [[spoiler:the part where Superman fakes dropping his moral code to scare the shit out of the Elite and the rest of the world]] is downright the most badass thing Superman has ever done, despite the ''point'' of the scene being that [[spoiler:you do ''not'' want a Superman that acts like that normally.]]

Added: 4

Changed: 8

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


----



* {{Anvilicious}}: Like the story it's based on, the film seemingly hand-waved the ideal that killing is wrong regardless of how justified within the first half, but later on when Superman pretends to adopt the take-no-prisoners approach, everyone's initial reaction was "This isn't right". The true anvil was that society does not always know what's best for it and that they need guidance, not the threat of punishment to progress.

to:

* {{Anvilicious}}: Like the story it's based on, the film seemingly hand-waved the ideal that killing is wrong regardless of how justified within the first half, but later on when Superman pretends to adopt the take-no-prisoners approach, everyone's initial reaction was "This isn't right". right." The true anvil was that society does not always know what's best for it and that they need guidance, not the threat of punishment to progress.



--->'''Superman:''' You can't murder people and call yourselves heroes!
--->'''Manchester Black:''' Why not? Your government does it all the time.

to:

--->'''Superman:''' You can't murder people and call yourselves heroes!
--->'''Manchester
heroes!\\
'''Manchester
Black:''' Why not? Your government does it all the time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* CompleteMonster: [[NuclearNasty Atomic Skull]], a psychopath with a grudge against Superman, starts to murder civilians to lure Superman out. Atomic Skull is about to kill 2 women and [[WouldHurtAChild a baby]] when Superman attacks him. Superman defeats Atomic Skull and he is arrested, later escaping and starting to kill more civilians. Superman and the Elite team up to defeat the Atomic Skull, but not before he kills Professor Baxter, a prominent Superman supporter. Atomic Skull is so vile, that he helps [[KnightTemplar the Elite]] gain support for their brutal tactics from the public.

to:

* CompleteMonster: [[NuclearNasty [[NuclearMutant Atomic Skull]], a psychopath with a grudge against Superman, starts to murder civilians to lure Superman out. Atomic Skull is about to kill 2 women and [[WouldHurtAChild a baby]] when Superman attacks him. Superman defeats Atomic Skull and he is arrested, later escaping and starting to kill more civilians. Superman and the Elite team up to defeat the Atomic Skull, but not before he kills Professor Baxter, a prominent Superman supporter. Atomic Skull is so vile, that he helps [[KnightTemplar the Elite]] gain support for their brutal tactics from the public.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Superman doesn't exactly do his ThouShaltNotKill code any favours. He refused to kill Atomic Skull, even when it was clear the villain was an unrepentant psychopath who couldn't be imprisoned solely because he didn't want to get his hands dirty. This is pretty out of character for him, as it's been shown in previous stories that Superman would in fact kill under these specific circumstances (Doomsday is a prime example). Later on, he sidesteps his no-kill policy with Manchester Black by lobotomising him against his will, which in ''ComicBook/SupermanRedSon'' was shown as a sign that Superman was on a slippery slope to becoming a tyrant.

to:

* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Superman doesn't exactly do his ThouShaltNotKill code any favours. He refused to kill Atomic Skull, even when it was clear the villain was an unrepentant psychopath who couldn't be imprisoned solely because he didn't want to get his hands dirty. This is pretty out of character for him, as it's been shown in previous stories that Superman would in fact kill under these specific circumstances (Doomsday is a prime example). Later on, he sidesteps his no-kill policy with Manchester Black by lobotomising him against his will, which in ''ComicBook/SupermanRedSon'' was shown as a sign that Superman was on a slippery slope to becoming a tyrant.tyrant[[note]] In the comic, he didn't actually lobotomize Black, but the film omits this detail.[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Superman doesn't exactly do his ThouShaltNotKill code any favours. He refused to kill Atomic Skull, even when it was clear the villain was an unrepentant psychopath who couldn't be imprisoned solely because he didn't want to get his hands dirty. This is pretty out of character for him, as it's been shown in previous stories that Superman would in fact kill under these specific circumstances (Doomsday is a prime example). Later on, he sidesteps his no-kill policy with Manchester Black by lobotomising him against his will, which in''ComicBook/SupermanRedSon'' was shown as a sign that Superman was on a slippery slope to becoming a tyrant.

to:

* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Superman doesn't exactly do his ThouShaltNotKill code any favours. He refused to kill Atomic Skull, even when it was clear the villain was an unrepentant psychopath who couldn't be imprisoned solely because he didn't want to get his hands dirty. This is pretty out of character for him, as it's been shown in previous stories that Superman would in fact kill under these specific circumstances (Doomsday is a prime example). Later on, he sidesteps his no-kill policy with Manchester Black by lobotomising him against his will, which in''ComicBook/SupermanRedSon'' in ''ComicBook/SupermanRedSon'' was shown as a sign that Superman was on a slippery slope to becoming a tyrant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AccidentalInnuendo: Black has a lot, since he pretty much is able to say 'wanker' whenever he wants. 'Wanker' being a British slur for someone who masturbates.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GifKfwDWq9Q main theme]] is appropriately heroic.

to:

** The [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GifKfwDWq9Q main theme]] is appropriately heroic.heroic, based on the ''WesternAnimation/SupermanDoomsday'' [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HrFrAspWF8 score]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Anvilicious: Like the story it's based on, the film seemingly hand-waved the ideal that killing is wrong regardless of how justified within the first half, but later on when Superman pretends to adopt the take-no-prisoners approach, everyone's initial reaction was "This isn't right". The true anvil was that society does not always know what's best for it and that they need guidance, not the threat of punishment to progress.

to:

* Anvilicious: {{Anvilicious}}: Like the story it's based on, the film seemingly hand-waved the ideal that killing is wrong regardless of how justified within the first half, but later on when Superman pretends to adopt the take-no-prisoners approach, everyone's initial reaction was "This isn't right". The true anvil was that society does not always know what's best for it and that they need guidance, not the threat of punishment to progress.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InferredHolocaust: By killing the dictators of Bialya and Pokolistan, the Elite could have created a power vacuum similar to that of Iraq after Saddam Hussein was executed. Now, there could be several would-be dictators ready to being their conquest, leading to a war potentially worse than the previous one.

to:

* InferredHolocaust: By killing the dictators of Bialya and Pokolistan, the Elite could have created a power vacuum similar to that of Iraq after Saddam Hussein was executed. Now, there could be several would-be dictators ready to being begin their conquest, leading to a war conquest and potentially create a war worse than the previous one.one, turning the two countries into a living example of the flaws in the Elite's approach.

Top