Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / LightsOut2016

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* FanPreferredCutContent: Some consider the original ending (which takes place after the theatrical ending scene) where the villain makes one final attack on the siblings to be canon, given that it avoids the UnfortunateImplications about [[spoiler:suicide being a solution to problems]] without requiring the need for a sequel.

to:

* FanPreferredCutContent: Some consider the original ending (which takes place after the theatrical ending scene) where the villain makes one final attack on the siblings to be canon, given that it avoids the UnfortunateImplications about implication of [[spoiler:suicide being a solution to problems]] without requiring the need for a sequel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Ban evader reversion


** Good theory, but unlikely. In the film, she sees Diana and does the sequence of flipping the light on and off to see that she's only there when the light is off, and Diana moves closer to her at the end of the scene, which plainly frightens her. She wastes no time telling Paul there's something strange going on and beats it out of there. In the short, which one would logically assume takes place after this encounter if she was the same character, she's clearly confused by the apparition, gives no sign of having seen it before, and once again experiments with the light. If she was the same character, especially since she was so frightened in the warehouse, her reactions probably would have been very different.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Good theory, but unlikely. If the film, she sees Diana and does the sequence of flipping the light on and off to see that she's only there when the light is off, and Diana moves closer to her at the end of the scene, which plainly frightens her. She wastes no time telling Paul there's something strange going on and beats it out of there. In the short, which one would logically assume takes place after this encounter if she was the same character, she's clearly confused by the apparition, gives no sign of having seen it before, and once again experiments with the light. If she was the same character, especially since she was so frightened in the warehouse, her reactions probably would have been very different.

to:

** Good theory, but unlikely. If In the film, she sees Diana and does the sequence of flipping the light on and off to see that she's only there when the light is off, and Diana moves closer to her at the end of the scene, which plainly frightens her. She wastes no time telling Paul there's something strange going on and beats it out of there. In the short, which one would logically assume takes place after this encounter if she was the same character, she's clearly confused by the apparition, gives no sign of having seen it before, and once again experiments with the light. If she was the same character, especially since she was so frightened in the warehouse, her reactions probably would have been very different.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Good theory, but unlikely. If the film, she sees Diane and does the sequence of flipping the light on and off to see that she's only there when the light is off, and Diane moves closer to her at the end of the scene, which plainly frightens her. She wastes no time telling Paul there's something strange going on and beats it out of there. In the short, which one would logically assume takes place after this encounter if she was the same character, she's clearly confused by the apparition, gives no sign of having seen it before, and once again experiments with the light. If she was the same character, especially since she was so frightened in the warehouse, her reactions probably would have been very different.

to:

** Good theory, but unlikely. If the film, she sees Diane Diana and does the sequence of flipping the light on and off to see that she's only there when the light is off, and Diane Diana moves closer to her at the end of the scene, which plainly frightens her. She wastes no time telling Paul there's something strange going on and beats it out of there. In the short, which one would logically assume takes place after this encounter if she was the same character, she's clearly confused by the apparition, gives no sign of having seen it before, and once again experiments with the light. If she was the same character, especially since she was so frightened in the warehouse, her reactions probably would have been very different.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Good theory, but unlikely. If the film, she sees Diane and does the sequence of flipping the light on and off to see that she's only there when the light is off, and Diane moves closer to her at the end of the scene, which plainly frightens her. She wastes no time telling Paul there's something strange going on and beats it out of there. In the short, which one would logically assume takes place after this encounter if she was the same character, she's clearly confused by the apparition, gives no sign of having seen it before, and once again experiments with the light. If she was the same character, especially since she was so frightened in the warehouse, her reactions probably would have been very different.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving to Trivia


* AuthorsSavingThrow: David Sandburg intended it to be just one standalone story with no thought toward sequels, but then started writing one entirely because of [[spoiler:the FocusGroupEnding inadvertently giving the message that depressed people should kill themselves.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: Which is better? The feature length film or the original short? Those who prefer the movie, love how it expands upon the original concept and gives us entertaining and interesting characters. Those who prefer the short, think the film stretches the premise thin and think giving Diana a backstory at all is completely unnecessary and diminishes the mystery of her presence in the original short.

to:

* BrokenBase: Which is better? The feature length film or the original short? Those who prefer the movie, love how it expands upon the original concept and gives us entertaining and interesting characters. Those who prefer the short, think the film stretches the premise thin and think giving Diana a backstory at all is completely unnecessary and diminishes the mystery of her presence in the original short.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: Which is better? The feature length film or the original short? Those who prefer the movie, l ove how it expands upon the original concept and gives us entertaining and interesting characters. Those who prefer the short, think the film stretches the premise thin and think explaining Diana's backstory at all is completely unnecessary and diminishes the mystery of her presence in the original short.

to:

* BrokenBase: Which is better? The feature length film or the original short? Those who prefer the movie, l ove love how it expands upon the original concept and gives us entertaining and interesting characters. Those who prefer the short, think the film stretches the premise thin and think explaining Diana's giving Diana a backstory at all is completely unnecessary and diminishes the mystery of her presence in the original short.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BrokenBase: Which is better? The feature length film or the original short? Those who prefer the movie, l ove how it expands upon the original concept and gives us entertaining and interesting characters. Those who prefer the short, think the film stretches the premise thin and think explaining Diana's backstory at all is completely unnecessary and diminishes the mystery of her presence in the original short.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing Flame Bait


* UnfortunateImplications: If you want to take the interpretation of Sophie's depression manifesting into the ghostly Diana then the ending where [[spoiler: she kills herself to get rid of Diana, gives off the unintentional message that if you suffer from depression and you're hurting your family, you should just kill yourself, because they'll be better off without you.]] [[http://www.avclub.com/review/scariest-thing-about-lights-out-what-it-says-about-239598 This hasn't gone unnoticed.]] David Sandberg has revealed that [[spoiler:this is actually a FocusGroupEnding, as originally her suicide didn't actually help, which audiences complained [[SenselessSacrifice made it feel pointless]]. He actually suffers from depression himself, and has lived through a friend committing suicide, and was horrified to realize how people were taking the revised ending.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FanPreferredCutContent: Some consider the original ending (which takes place after the theatrical ending scene) where the villain makes one final attack on the siblings to be canon, given that it avoids the UnfortunateImplications about [[spoiler:suicide being a solution to problems]].

to:

* FanPreferredCutContent: Some consider the original ending (which takes place after the theatrical ending scene) where the villain makes one final attack on the siblings to be canon, given that it avoids the UnfortunateImplications about [[spoiler:suicide being a solution to problems]].problems]] without requiring the need for a sequel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Moe}}: Between his ExtremelyProtectiveChild moments toward mom, bonding moments with his older sister, and the scene where Becca finds him asleep in a bathtub with a flashlight in his first night away from the HauntedHouse, Martin inspires a lot of warmth and protectiveness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FanPreferredCutContent: Some consider the original ending (which takes place after the theatrical ending scene) where the villain makes one final attack on the siblings to be canon, given that it avoids the UnfortunateImplications about [[spoiler:suicide being a solution to problems]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheWoobie:
** Martin, a sweet kid whose lost his father, has to live with Diana and a mother going crazy and is desperate to get out of that house for just a night at the beginning of the film.
** Sophie, given how long she's been tormented by Diana, losing both her husbands and having her children driven away from her as well.
** Rebecca, in the backstory. She lost her father when she was a kid, was tormented by Diana without anyone believing her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Fanon}}: Fans of the film and original short tend to theorize that [[spoiler: Escher is the character of the 2013 short since we don't see her again]]. Considering that most (if not ''all'') of Sandberg's shorts have Lotta be TheChewToy of them, it wouldn't be surprising.

to:

* {{Fanon}}: Fans of the film and original short tend to theorize that [[spoiler: Escher Esther is the character of the 2013 short since we don't see her again]]. Considering that most (if not ''all'') of Sandberg's shorts have Lotta be TheChewToy of them, it wouldn't be surprising.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments: Just about every scene between Rebecca and Martin, with the trust, care and protectiveness that they show each other.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OneSceneWonder: Creator/BillyBurke as Paul, who shows signs of being a caring parent and concerned spouse, then puts up a decent chase before becoming the first victim.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: Diana is played by professional stunt Alicia Vela Bailey. One year after this movie, she'll be the stunt for [[Film/WonderWoman another character with the same name.]] Both films would even end up tied together when Film/Shazam2019 featured a cameo of Mrs. Glover now working as a foster care counselor.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: Diana is played by professional stunt Alicia Vela Bailey. One year after this movie, she'll be the stunt for [[Film/WonderWoman [[Film/WonderWoman2017 another character with the same name.]] Both films would even end up tied together when Film/Shazam2019 featured a cameo of Mrs. Glover now working as a foster care counselor.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CompleteMonster: [[EnfantTerrible Diana Walter]], a sociopath since the day she was born, is sent to a mental institution after she played mind games with her father, ultimately causing him to [[DrivenToSuicide kill himself]]. While there, she manipulates a depressed Sophie [[FalseFriend into becoming friends with her]], and became physically abusive towards her, going as far as to break her legs when she heard that Sophie might be getting released. As a [[LivingShadow ghost]], she latches herself onto Sophie, enslaving her in the process. Wanting Sophie to herself, she murders both of her husbands when they attempted to heal their wife's mind, and she stalks and terrorizes Sophie’s children Rebecca and [[WouldHurtAChild Martin]], eventually opting to kill them in utter defiance of Sophie's demands. When two police officers are alerted on a potential break in, they go to investigate; Diana savagely murders both of the officers, and attempts to kill Rebecca in front of Sophie. Self-serving and hostile, Diana sought complete control over Sophie's body, and would murder anyone who came in her way.

to:

* CompleteMonster: [[EnfantTerrible Diana Walter]], a sociopath since the day she was born, is sent to a mental institution after she played mind games with her father, ultimately causing him to [[DrivenToSuicide kill himself]]. While there, she manipulates a depressed Sophie [[FalseFriend into becoming friends with her]], and became physically abusive towards her, going as far as to break her legs when she heard that Sophie might be getting released. As a [[LivingShadow ghost]], she latches herself onto Sophie, enslaving her in the process. Wanting Sophie to herself, she murders both of her husbands when they attempted to heal their wife's mind, and she stalks and terrorizes Sophie’s children Rebecca and [[WouldHurtAChild Martin]], eventually opting to kill them in utter defiance of Sophie's demands. When two police officers are alerted on a potential break in, they go to investigate; Diana savagely murders both of the officers, and attempts to kill Rebecca in front of Sophie. Self-serving and hostile, Diana sought complete control over Sophie's body, and would murder anyone who came in her way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CompleteMonster: A [[TheSociopath sociopath]] since the day she was born, [[EnfantTerrible Diana]] is sent to a mental institution after she played [[MindScrew mind games]] with her father, ultimately causing him to [[DrivenToSuicide kill himself]]. While there, she manipulates a depressed Sophie [[FalseFriend into becoming friends with her]], and became physically abusive towards her, going as far as to break her legs when she heard that Sophie might be getting released. As a [[LivingShadow ghost]], she latches herself onto Sophie, enslaving her in the process. Wanting Sophie to herself, she murders both of her husbands when they attempted to heal their wife's mind, and she stalks and terrorizes Sophie’s children Rebecca and [[WouldHurtAChild Martin]], eventually opting to kill them in utter defiance of Sophie's demands. When two police officers are alerted on a potential break in, they go to investigate; Diana [[CopKiller savagely murders both of the officers]], and attempts to kill Rebecca in front of Sophie. Self-serving and hostile, Diana sought complete control over Sophie's body, and would murder anyone who came in her way.

to:

* CompleteMonster: A [[TheSociopath sociopath]] [[EnfantTerrible Diana Walter]], a sociopath since the day she was born, [[EnfantTerrible Diana]] is sent to a mental institution after she played [[MindScrew mind games]] games with her father, ultimately causing him to [[DrivenToSuicide kill himself]]. While there, she manipulates a depressed Sophie [[FalseFriend into becoming friends with her]], and became physically abusive towards her, going as far as to break her legs when she heard that Sophie might be getting released. As a [[LivingShadow ghost]], she latches herself onto Sophie, enslaving her in the process. Wanting Sophie to herself, she murders both of her husbands when they attempted to heal their wife's mind, and she stalks and terrorizes Sophie’s children Rebecca and [[WouldHurtAChild Martin]], eventually opting to kill them in utter defiance of Sophie's demands. When two police officers are alerted on a potential break in, they go to investigate; Diana [[CopKiller savagely murders both of the officers]], officers, and attempts to kill Rebecca in front of Sophie. Self-serving and hostile, Diana sought complete control over Sophie's body, and would murder anyone who came in her way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: Diana is played by professional stunt Alicia Vela Bailey. One year after this movie, she'll be the stunt for [[Film/WonderWoman another character with the same name.]]

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: Diana is played by professional stunt Alicia Vela Bailey. One year after this movie, she'll be the stunt for [[Film/WonderWoman another character with the same name.]] Both films would even end up tied together when Film/Shazam2019 featured a cameo of Mrs. Glover now working as a foster care counselor.

Top