Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** There was a throwaway line after Tony Stark "fires' Iron Man that "maybe we should get somebody more friendly for our company spokesperson. Maybe Bill Cosby." This becomes a lot less funny now that Cosby's sexual assault cases have landed him in prison.
to:
** There was a throwaway line after Tony Stark "fires' "fires" Iron Man that "maybe we should get somebody more friendly for our company spokesperson. Maybe Bill Cosby.Creator/BillCosby." This becomes a lot less funny now that Cosby's sexual assault cases have landed him in prison.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** The conflict between ComicBook/IronMan and ComicBook/CaptainAmerica turns out like this, considering their conflict between their ideals in ''ComicBook/OperationGalacticStorm'' (it actually comes up in the epilogue for that event), and for modern readers, it is very hard to see their interactions without thinking about ''ComicBook/CivilWar''.
to:
** The conflict between ComicBook/IronMan and ComicBook/CaptainAmerica turns out like this, considering their conflict between their ideals in ''ComicBook/OperationGalacticStorm'' (it actually comes up in the epilogue for that event), and for modern readers, it is very hard to see their interactions without thinking about ''ComicBook/CivilWar''.''ComicBook/CivilWar2006''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* HarsherInHindsight: The conflict between ComicBook/IronMan and ComicBook/CaptainAmerica turns out like this, considering their conflict between their ideals in ComicBook/OperationGalacticStorm (it actually comes up in the epilogue for that event), and for modern readers, it is very hard to see their interactions without thinking about ComicBook/CivilWar.
to:
* HarsherInHindsight: HarsherInHindsight:
** The conflict between ComicBook/IronMan and ComicBook/CaptainAmerica turns out like this, considering their conflict between their ideals inComicBook/OperationGalacticStorm ''ComicBook/OperationGalacticStorm'' (it actually comes up in the epilogue for that event), and for modern readers, it is very hard to see their interactions without thinking about ComicBook/CivilWar.''ComicBook/CivilWar''.
** The conflict between ComicBook/IronMan and ComicBook/CaptainAmerica turns out like this, considering their conflict between their ideals in
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
%% * HarsherInHindsight: The conflict between ComicBook/IronMan and ComicBook/CaptainAmerica turns out like this, considering their conflict between their ideals in ComicBook/OperationGalacticStorm (it actually comes up in the epilogue for that event), and for modern readers, it is very hard to see their interactions without thinking about ComicBook/CivilWar.
to:
**There was a throwaway line after Tony Stark "fires' Iron Man that "maybe we should get somebody more friendly for our company spokesperson. Maybe Bill Cosby." This becomes a lot less funny now that Cosby's sexual assault cases have landed him in prison.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* HarsherInHindsight: The conflict between ComicBook/IronMan and ComicBook/CaptainAmerica turns out like this, considering their conflict between their ideals in ComicBook/OperationGalacticStorm (it actually comes up in the epilogue for that event), and for modern readers, it is very hard to see their interactions without thinking about ComicBook/CivilWar.
to:
%% Administrivia/ZeroContextExample entries are not allowed on wiki pages. All such entries have been commented out. Add context to the entries before uncommenting them.
%% * HarsherInHindsight: The conflict between ComicBook/IronMan and ComicBook/CaptainAmerica turns out like this, considering their conflict between their ideals in ComicBook/OperationGalacticStorm (it actually comes up in the epilogue for that event), and for modern readers, it is very hard to see their interactions without thinking about ComicBook/CivilWar.
%% * HarsherInHindsight: The conflict between ComicBook/IronMan and ComicBook/CaptainAmerica turns out like this, considering their conflict between their ideals in ComicBook/OperationGalacticStorm (it actually comes up in the epilogue for that event), and for modern readers, it is very hard to see their interactions without thinking about ComicBook/CivilWar.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* SugarWiki/MomentOfAwesome: Tony Stark taking on Firepower. He doesn't just beat him, he ''[[CurbStompBattle annihilates]]'' him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misuse. I Am Not Shazam is were an audience mistake the title of the work for the name of the character.
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* IAmNotShazam: This story is actually called "Stark Wars" inside the comics. (It was intended as a ''Franchise/StarWars'' pun.) However, Marvel promoted it as the "Armor War" (singular) in their splash ad for the first issue of the arc, and the trade paperback was released as "Armor Wars", even though the individual chapters retained the original "Stark Wars" name in their titles. In any case, by the time "Armor Wars II" appeared in the comic, the "Armor Wars" name had stuck.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* HarsherInHindsight: The conflict between ComicBook/IronMan and ComicBook/CaptainAmerica turns out like this, considering their conflict between their ideals in ComicBook/OperationGalacticStorm (it actually comes up in the epilogue for that event), and for modern readers, it is very hard to see their interactions without thinking about ComicBook/CivilWar.
to:
* HarsherInHindsight: The conflict between ComicBook/IronMan and ComicBook/CaptainAmerica turns out like this, considering their conflict between their ideals in ComicBook/OperationGalacticStorm (it actually comes up in the epilogue for that event), and for modern readers, it is very hard to see their interactions without thinking about ComicBook/CivilWar.ComicBook/CivilWar.
*IAmNotShazam: This story is actually called "Stark Wars" inside the comics. (It was intended as a ''Franchise/StarWars'' pun.) However, Marvel promoted it as the "Armor War" (singular) in their splash ad for the first issue of the arc, and the trade paperback was released as "Armor Wars", even though the individual chapters retained the original "Stark Wars" name in their titles. In any case, by the time "Armor Wars II" appeared in the comic, the "Armor Wars" name had stuck.
*IAmNotShazam: This story is actually called "Stark Wars" inside the comics. (It was intended as a ''Franchise/StarWars'' pun.) However, Marvel promoted it as the "Armor War" (singular) in their splash ad for the first issue of the arc, and the trade paperback was released as "Armor Wars", even though the individual chapters retained the original "Stark Wars" name in their titles. In any case, by the time "Armor Wars II" appeared in the comic, the "Armor Wars" name had stuck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HarsherInHindsight: The conflict between ComicBook/IronMan and ComicBook/CaptainAmerica turns out like this, considering their conflict between their ideals in ComicBook/OperationGalacticStorm (it actually comes up in the epilogue for that event), and for modern readers, it is very hard to see their interactions without thinking about ComicBook/CivilWar.
