Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** No, because the box doesn't generate a new human cookie every time a person changes into a different animal. If it did, Horatio's threat to destroy Owen's human cookie would have been meaningless.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Page is now a redirect to the Hair Colors index.
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* CaptainObviousReveal: Even before the rules of the magic animal crackers are firmly established, it's fairly easy to figure out that [[spoiler:Old Blue and Zena are actually Owen's uncle and aunt in animal form just by [[YouGottaHaveBlueHair their designs]] and actions alone.]]
to:
* CaptainObviousReveal: Even before the rules of the magic animal crackers are firmly established, it's fairly easy to figure out that [[spoiler:Old Blue and Zena are actually Owen's uncle and aunt in animal form just by [[YouGottaHaveBlueHair their designs]] designs and actions alone.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: "[[https://youtu.be/aoYC_ZNT4PU Could've Been Mine]]" is a catchy and epic jazz fusion song with the energy of some of Disney's most bombastic {{Villain Song}}s. In the song, Horatio establishes his GreenEyedMonster motivations while hamming it up in an almost Creator/TimCurry-esque way, despite being voiced by Creator/IanMcKellen. He also gets some hilarious dialogue with his henchman Mario Zucchini in the song. Also, the creator hired a real barbershop quartet just for ''one quick gag'' in the song, where the quartet repeats one of Horatio's lines and he gets frustrated with them.
to:
* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: "[[https://youtu.be/aoYC_ZNT4PU Could've Been Mine]]" is a catchy and epic jazz fusion song with the energy of some of Disney's most bombastic {{Villain Song}}s. In the song, Horatio establishes his GreenEyedMonster motivations while hamming his voice actor, Creator/IanMcKellen, [[EvilIsHammy hams it up up]] in an almost Creator/TimCurry-esque way, despite being voiced by Creator/IanMcKellen.way. He also gets some hilarious dialogue with his henchman Mario Zucchini in the song. Also, In addition, the creator creators hired a real barbershop quartet just for ''one quick gag'' in the song, where the quartet repeats one of Horatio's lines and he gets frustrated with them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AdaptationDisplacement: Not a lot of people are aware that this was based off of a graphic novel.
to:
* AdaptationDisplacement: Not a lot of people are aware that this was based off of on a graphic novel.novel. Granted, not many people are aware that the film was released, either...
Changed line(s) 6,7 (click to see context) from:
* CaptainObviousReveal: Even before the rules of the magic animal crackers are firmly established, it's fairly easy to infer that [[spoiler:the dog and cat duo Old Blue and Zena are actually Owen's uncle and aunt well before the movie even starts dropping hints toward their true identities just by [[YouGottaHaveBlueHair their designs]] and their actions alone.]]
* CriticalDissonance: One look at Rotten Tomatoes tells the tale. The audience rating stands at 83% as of August 9, 2020. The Tomatometer, being based on critics' reviews, stands at 64%.
* CriticalDissonance: One look at Rotten Tomatoes tells the tale. The audience rating stands at 83% as of August 9, 2020. The Tomatometer, being based on critics' reviews, stands at 64%.
to:
* CaptainObviousReveal: Even before the rules of the magic animal crackers are firmly established, it's fairly easy to infer figure out that [[spoiler:the dog and cat duo Old [[spoiler:Old Blue and Zena are actually Owen's uncle and aunt well before the movie even starts dropping hints toward their true identities in animal form just by [[YouGottaHaveBlueHair their designs]] and their and actions alone.]]
* CriticalDissonance: One look at Rotten Tomatoes tells the tale. The audience rating stands at83% as of August 9, 2020. The Tomatometer, being based on critics' reviews, 83, while the critical rating stands at 64%.
* CriticalDissonance: One look at Rotten Tomatoes tells the tale. The audience rating stands at
Changed line(s) 17,18 (click to see context) from:
* SlowPacedBeginning: It takes around ''half an hour'' before the titular snack is used for the first time.
* SoOkayItsAverage: The movie generally got a luke-warm reception, saying that the concept is good and the animation servicable, but the story was uninspired.
* SoOkayItsAverage: The movie generally got a luke-warm reception, saying that the concept is good and the animation servicable, but the story was uninspired.
to:
* SlowPacedBeginning: It takes around ''half an hour'' a solid ''30 minutes'' before the titular snack is snacks are used for the first time.
* SoOkayItsAverage: The movie generally got a luke-warm reception, saying that while the concept is good and the animationservicable, but is serviceable, the story was is rather bland and uninspired.
* SoOkayItsAverage: The movie generally got a luke-warm reception, saying that while the concept is good and the animation
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Thought this was a YMMV trope.
Deleted line(s) 14 (click to see context) :
* PainfulRhyme: In the "Welcome" song, Horatio rhymes "decorum" with "perform" by mispronouncing the latter word as "perforum."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* PainfulRhyme: In the "Welcome" song, Horatio rhymes "decorum" with "perform" by mispronouncing the latter word as "perforum."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The "wanting to take over the world" thing really only amounts to one line. Maybe he was just saying things in desparation caused by a VillainousBreakdown.
** Or maybe he didn't mean he literally intended to TakeOverTheWorld, but ''figuratively'' take it over (as in, becoming such a famous celebrity that everyone in the world would know him,) which is in line with what his goal was all along.
** Or maybe he didn't mean he literally intended to TakeOverTheWorld, but ''figuratively'' take it over (as in, becoming such a famous celebrity that everyone in the world would know him,) which is in line with what his goal was all along.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FridgeLogic: Chesterfield explains near the end that since Horatio's henchmen [[spoiler:ate broken cookies to become MixAndMatchCritters, their human cookies are also broken, and the henchmen can't return to their original forms until Chesterfield figures out which cookie pieces go together.]] However, Owen had just [[spoiler:given Horatio, who was previously a hybrid creature, a whole hamster cookie, turning Horatio into a hamster]]. Wouldn't that mean that [[spoiler:Horatio now had a whole human cookie again, and that they could fix the henchmen's human cookies by giving them whole animal cookies too?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Requires a 20-year waiting period.
Changed line(s) 16,17 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Many agree that the movie tried to focus on too many characters and subplots at the same time, and the movie would've been a lot better if it just focused on a handful of characters.
%%* ValuesDissonance: A film depicting circus animals positively does not bode in an age where the general public now considers making animals perform to be a form of abuse. The director is actually aware of this, assuaging concerned audience members by letting them know that leaflets explaining the real-world working condition of circuses would be distributed in theaters showing the movie.
%%* ValuesDissonance: A film depicting circus animals positively does not bode in an age where the general public now considers making animals perform to be a form of abuse. The director is actually aware of this, assuaging concerned audience members by letting them know that leaflets explaining the real-world working condition of circuses would be distributed in theaters showing the movie.
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Many agree that the movie tried to focus on too many characters and subplots at the same time, and the movie would've been a lot better if it just focused on a handful of characters.
%%* ValuesDissonance: A film depicting circus animals positively does not bode in an age where the general public now considers making animals perform to be a form of abuse. The director is actually aware of this, assuaging concerned audience members by letting them know that leaflets explaining the real-world working condition of circuses would be distributed in theaters showing the movie.characters.
%%* ValuesDissonance: A film depicting circus animals positively does not bode in an age where the general public now considers making animals perform to be a form of abuse. The director is actually aware of this, assuaging concerned audience members by letting them know that leaflets explaining the real-world working condition of circuses would be distributed in theaters showing the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Many agree that the movie tried to focus on too many characters and subplots at the same time, and the movie would've been a lot better if it just focused on a handful of characters.
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Many agree that the movie tried to focus on too many characters and subplots at the same time, and the movie would've been a lot better if it just focused on a handful of characters.characters.
%%* ValuesDissonance: A film depicting circus animals positively does not bode in an age where the general public now considers making animals perform to be a form of abuse. The director is actually aware of this, assuaging concerned audience members by letting them know that leaflets explaining the real-world working condition of circuses would be distributed in theaters showing the movie.
%%* ValuesDissonance: A film depicting circus animals positively does not bode in an age where the general public now considers making animals perform to be a form of abuse. The director is actually aware of this, assuaging concerned audience members by letting them know that leaflets explaining the real-world working condition of circuses would be distributed in theaters showing the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Requires a 20-year waiting period.
Changed line(s) 16,17 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Many agree that the movie tried to focus on too many characters and subplots at the same time, and the movie would've been a lot better if it just focused on a handful of characters.
* ValuesDissonance: A film depicting circus animals positively does not bode in an age where the general public now considers making animals perform to be a form of abuse. The director is actually aware of this, assuaging concerned audience members by letting them know that leaflets explaining the real-world working condition of circuses would be distributed in theaters showing the movie.
* ValuesDissonance: A film depicting circus animals positively does not bode in an age where the general public now considers making animals perform to be a form of abuse. The director is actually aware of this, assuaging concerned audience members by letting them know that leaflets explaining the real-world working condition of circuses would be distributed in theaters showing the movie.
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Many agree that the movie tried to focus on too many characters and subplots at the same time, and the movie would've been a lot better if it just focused on a handful of characters. \n* ValuesDissonance: A film depicting circus animals positively does not bode in an age where the general public now considers making animals perform to be a form of abuse. The director is actually aware of this, assuaging concerned audience members by letting them know that leaflets explaining the real-world working condition of circuses would be distributed in theaters showing the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: "[[https://youtu.be/aoYC_ZNT4PU Could've Been Mine]]" is a catchy and epic jazz fusion song with the energy of some of Disney's most bombastic {{Villain Song}}s. In the song, Horatio establishes his GreenEyedMonster motivations while hamming it up in an almost Creator/TimCurry-esque way, despite being voiced by Creator/IanMcKellen. He also gets some hilarious dialogue with his henchman Mario Zucchini in the song.
to:
* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: "[[https://youtu.be/aoYC_ZNT4PU Could've Been Mine]]" is a catchy and epic jazz fusion song with the energy of some of Disney's most bombastic {{Villain Song}}s. In the song, Horatio establishes his GreenEyedMonster motivations while hamming it up in an almost Creator/TimCurry-esque way, despite being voiced by Creator/IanMcKellen. He also gets some hilarious dialogue with his henchman Mario Zucchini in the song. Also, the creator hired a real barbershop quartet just for ''one quick gag'' in the song, where the quartet repeats one of Horatio's lines and he gets frustrated with them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: "[[https://youtu.be/aoYC_ZNT4PU Could've Been Mine]]" is a catchy and epic jazz fusion song with the energy of some of Disney's most bombastic {{Villain Song}}s. In the song, Horatio establishes his GreenEyedMonster motivations while hamming it up in an almost Creator/TimCurry-esque way, despite being voiced by Creator/IanMcKellen. He also gets some hilarious dialogue with his henchman Mario Zucchini in the song.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 8 (click to see context) :
* CaptainObviousReveal: Even before the rules of the magic animal crackers are firmly established, it's fairly easy to infer that [[spoiler:the dog and cat duo Old Blue and Zena are actually Owen's uncle and aunt well before the movie even starts dropping hints toward their true identities just by [[YouGottaHaveBlueHair their designs]] and their actions alone.]]
* CriticalDissonance: One look at Rotten Tomatoes tells the tale. The audience rating stands at 83% as of August 9, 2020. The Tomatometer, being based on critics' reviews, stands at 64%.
* CriticalDissonance: One look at Rotten Tomatoes tells the tale. The audience rating stands at 83% as of August 9, 2020. The Tomatometer, being based on critics' reviews, stands at 64%.
Deleted line(s) 8 (click to see context) :
* CriticalDissonance: One look at Rotten Tomatoes tells the tale. The audience rating stands at 83% as of August 9, 2020. The Tomatometer, being based on critics' reviews, stands at 64%.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Many agree that the movie tried to focus on too many characters and subplots at the same time, and the movie would've been a lot better if it really just focused on a handful of characters.
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Many agree that the movie tried to focus on too many characters and subplots at the same time, and the movie would've been a lot better if it really just focused on a handful of characters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CriticalDissonance: One look at Rotten Tomatoes tells the tale. The audience rating stands at 83% as of August 9, 2020. The Tomatometer, being based on critics' reviews, stands at 64%.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Did Horatio really want to take over the world? Or did the egotistical BigHam look around and notice that, by becoming a monster, he finally had what he wanted... all eyes on him in fear and awe... and decide to grab the VillainBall with both hands and run for the end zone?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: Many agree that the movie tried to focus on too many characters and subplots at the same time, and the movie would've been a lot better if it really just focused on a handful of characters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: Chesterfield. Especially for being voiced by Creator/DannyDeVito.
to:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: EnsembleDarkhorse:
** Chesterfield. Especially for being voiced byCreator/DannyDeVito.Creator/DannyDeVito.
** Brock is quite well-liked, again [[Creator/PatrickWarburton his actor]] helps. Also, he's prominently featured in [[spoiler:a memorable scene of him turning into a mandrill]]. Plenty found him more interesting as an antagonist than Horatio.
** Chesterfield. Especially for being voiced by
** Brock is quite well-liked, again [[Creator/PatrickWarburton his actor]] helps. Also, he's prominently featured in [[spoiler:a memorable scene of him turning into a mandrill]]. Plenty found him more interesting as an antagonist than Horatio.
Added DiffLines:
* TheScrappy: It's widely agreed that [[BigBad Horatio]] is the weakest part of the film, considering how quickly he changes from someone [[GreenEyedMonster who is merely jealous of his brother's successes]] to a bland TakeOverTheWorld villain. It's obvious that the writers ''tried'' to make him interesting, but his development was just too flat for many.
* SignatureScene: The scene where Owen first eats a cracker, turning into a hamster. Considering how much it's featured in advertising, it's easily the most well-known scene from the movie.
* SlowPacedBeginning: It takes around ''half an hour'' before the titular snack is used for the first time.
* SignatureScene: The scene where Owen first eats a cracker, turning into a hamster. Considering how much it's featured in advertising, it's easily the most well-known scene from the movie.
* SlowPacedBeginning: It takes around ''half an hour'' before the titular snack is used for the first time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* EnsembleDarkhorse: Chesterfield. Especially for being voiced by Creator/DannyDeVito.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* PopularWithFurries: ''Duh''. Long before the movie became more accessible, it was a CultClassic within the UsefulNotes/FurryFandom, for [[{{Animorphism}} obvious]] [[TransformationFiction reasons]].
to:
* PopularWithFurries: ''Duh''. Long before the movie became more accessible, it was a CultClassic within the UsefulNotes/FurryFandom, for [[{{Animorphism}} obvious]] [[TransformationFiction reasons]]. And apparently, the fandom has ApprovalOfGod, make of that what you will.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* JustHereForGodzilla: Many people couldn't care less about the plot, only watching the movie to see people turning into animals.
Added DiffLines:
* PopularWithFurries: ''Duh''. Long before the movie became more accessible, it was a CultClassic within the UsefulNotes/FurryFandom, for [[{{Animorphism}} obvious]] [[TransformationFiction reasons]].
* SoOkayItsAverage: The movie generally got a luke-warm reception, saying that the concept is good and the animation servicable, but the story was uninspired.
* SoOkayItsAverage: The movie generally got a luke-warm reception, saying that the concept is good and the animation servicable, but the story was uninspired.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Where's your proof that some people don't like the idea?
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* AudienceAlienatingPremise: Just the idea of an animal crackers movie didn't really flick for some people.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
That's not why the film hasn't been released.
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesDissonance: Arguably, one of the biggest reason the film hasn't had a proper release yet is that a film depicting circus animals positively does not bode in an age where the general public now considers making animals perform to be a form of abuse. The director was actually aware of this, assuaging concerned audience members by letting them know that leaflets explaining the real-world working condition of circuses would be distributed in theaters showing the movie.
to:
* ValuesDissonance: Arguably, one of the biggest reason the film hasn't had a proper release yet is that a A film depicting circus animals positively does not bode in an age where the general public now considers making animals perform to be a form of abuse. The director was is actually aware of this, assuaging concerned audience members by letting them know that leaflets explaining the real-world working condition of circuses would be distributed in theaters showing the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
* EarWorm: Horatio's VillainSong, "Should've Been Mine".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* EarWorm: Horatio's VillainSong, "Should've Been Mine".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* {{Moe}}: Binkley, for being an {{Adorkable}} genius with a wispy voice, and Mackenzie, just for being a CheerfulChild.
to:
* {{Moe}}: Binkley, for being an {{Adorkable}} genius with a wispy voice, and Mackenzie, just for being a CheerfulChild.CheerfulChild.
* ValuesDissonance: Arguably, one of the biggest reason the film hasn't had a proper release yet is that a film depicting circus animals positively does not bode in an age where the general public now considers making animals perform to be a form of abuse. The director was actually aware of this, assuaging concerned audience members by letting them know that leaflets explaining the real-world working condition of circuses would be distributed in theaters showing the movie.
* ValuesDissonance: Arguably, one of the biggest reason the film hasn't had a proper release yet is that a film depicting circus animals positively does not bode in an age where the general public now considers making animals perform to be a form of abuse. The director was actually aware of this, assuaging concerned audience members by letting them know that leaflets explaining the real-world working condition of circuses would be distributed in theaters showing the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*AdaptationDisplacement: Not a lot of people are aware that this was based off of a graphic novel.
*AudienceAlienatingPremise: Just the idea of an animal crackers movie didn't really flick for some people.
*{{Moe}}: Binkley, for being an {{Adorkable}} genius with a wispy voice, and Mackenzie, just for being a CheerfulChild.
*AudienceAlienatingPremise: Just the idea of an animal crackers movie didn't really flick for some people.
*{{Moe}}: Binkley, for being an {{Adorkable}} genius with a wispy voice, and Mackenzie, just for being a CheerfulChild.
