Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 93 (click to see context) from:
to:
* '''Jossed.''' Flux reveals that [[spoiler:The Grand Serpent]] was behind it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG:UNIT's downfall was brought about by [[spoiler:the Master]]]]
[[Recap/DoctorWhoS38E1E2Spyfall "Spyfall"]] reveals that [[spoiler:the Master]] infiltrated [=MI6=] and had apparently been working behind the scenes on Earth for ''years''. It is entirely conceivable that he would take the opportunity to get UNIT out of the way by manipulating people to defund UNIT to make his plans easier.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Or more likely the Daleks don't have the resources to give all their race these powers, just a few among many. And other Daleks have been beaten by conventional forces, in The Daleks Master Plan Ancient Egyptian forces cause trouble for a few Daleks. And even if the Reconnaissance Scout Daleks had additional powers, they are from early in Dalek history, where the casing would have been less advanced.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 87 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG: The reconnaissance scout daleks are less well suited to combat than the standard soldiers]]
to:
[[WMG: The reconnaissance scout daleks Daleks are less well suited to combat than the standard soldiers]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: The reconnaissance scout daleks are less well suited to combat than the standard soldiers]]
*If there were really no drawbacks to all the extra abilities it showed, far more Daleks would have had them, and there have been plenty of times in the past where they would have been applicable. Furthermore, The scout was somehow overpowered by what seemed like medieval armies in the flashback, admittedly at great losses, while Daleks normally issue complete curbstomps to more advanced forces. It seems possible, even likely, that the scout was more susceptible to damage than normal, even before losing its casing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 84,85 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG: The Dalek weapon was recovered from the wreckage of [[Recap/DoctorWhoS9E1DayOfTheDaleks Sir Reginald Styles']] house]]
The Doctor knows where the weapon came from, even describing the event as being "all those years ago". The most recent Dalek attack (in-universe) where a dalek weapon could have feasibly been left behind was the battle at Styles' house depicted in "Day of the Daleks" (Canary Wharf is more recent, though all the Daleks were sucked into the void and there were no Dalek casualties at the hands of Cybermen [[CurbstompBattle for obvious reasons]]) this also fits the Doctor's dialogue as the event itself was 30-40 years prior to the time the episode takes place and nearly a millennium and a half ([[TheNthDoctor and eleven regenerations]]) prior for the Doctor herself.
The Doctor knows where the weapon came from, even describing the event as being "all those years ago". The most recent Dalek attack (in-universe) where a dalek weapon could have feasibly been left behind was the battle at Styles' house depicted in "Day of the Daleks" (Canary Wharf is more recent, though all the Daleks were sucked into the void and there were no Dalek casualties at the hands of Cybermen [[CurbstompBattle for obvious reasons]]) this also fits the Doctor's dialogue as the event itself was 30-40 years prior to the time the episode takes place and nearly a millennium and a half ([[TheNthDoctor and eleven regenerations]]) prior for the Doctor herself.
to:
[[WMG: The Dalek weapon was recovered from the wreckage of [[Recap/DoctorWhoS9E1DayOfTheDaleks Sir Reginald Styles']] house]]
[[Recap/DoctorWhoS21E4ResurrectionOfTheDaleks a London warehouse in 1984]]]]
The Doctor knows where the weapon came from, even describing the event as being "all those years ago". The mostrecent recent(in-universe) Dalek attack (in-universe) where a dalek weapon could have feasibly been left behind was the battle at Styles' house depicted shown in "Day "Resurrection of the Daleks" (Canary Wharf is more recent, though all the Daleks were sucked into the void and there were no Dalek casualties at the hands of Cybermen [[CurbstompBattle for obvious reasons]]) this also fits the Doctor's dialogue as the event itself was 30-40 34-35 years prior to the time the episode takes place and nearly a millennium and a half ([[TheNthDoctor and eleven nine regenerations]]) prior for the Doctor herself.
The Doctor knows where the weapon came from, even describing the event as being "all those years ago". The most
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: The Dalek weapon was recovered from the wreckage of [[Recap/DoctorWhoS9E1DayOfTheDaleks Sir Reginald Styles']] house]]
The Doctor knows where the weapon came from, even describing the event as being "all those years ago". The most recent Dalek attack (in-universe) where a dalek weapon could have feasibly been left behind was the battle at Styles' house depicted in "Day of the Daleks" (Canary Wharf is more recent, though all the Daleks were sucked into the void and there were no Dalek casualties at the hands of Cybermen [[CurbstompBattle for obvious reasons]]) this also fits the Doctor's dialogue as the event itself was 30-40 years prior to the time the episode takes place and nearly a millennium and a half ([[TheNthDoctor and eleven regenerations]]) prior for the Doctor herself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: Side effects may include growing an extra head]]
* [[Franchise/TheHitchhikersGuideToTheGalaxy Zaphod Beeblebrox]] misused the same pills the Doctor had. The party mentioned by the Doctor was the one where Arthur failed to get off with Trillian.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 49 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG:The references in The Battle of Ravskoor Av Kolos were foreshadowing]]
to:
[[WMG:The references in The "The Battle of Ravskoor Av Kolos Kolos" were foreshadowing]]{{Foreshadowing}}]]
Deleted line(s) 80 (click to see context) :
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Typo
Changed line(s) 49 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG:The references in The Battle of Ravskoor Av Kalos were foreshadowing]]
to:
[[WMG:The references in The Battle of Ravskoor Av Kalos Kolos were foreshadowing]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18,20 (click to see context) from:
* '''Confirmed.''' A Dalek is the villain.
* No, '''jossed'''. "Resolution" is the entirety of the title.
* No, '''jossed'''. "Resolution" is the entirety of the title.
to:
* '''Confirmed.''' A Dalek is the villain.
* No, '''jossed'''.'''Jossed'''. "Resolution" is the entirety of the title.
title. Although a Dalek did appear.
* No, '''jossed'''.
Changed line(s) 34,36 (click to see context) from:
* '''Jossed ''and'' confirmed'''. It’s damaged in the present, but wasn’t when it first arrived. How Anglo-Saxons took on a Dalek is anyone’s guess.
** They managed to immobilize the armour and then roasted the mutant inside.
** They managed to immobilize the armour and then roasted the mutant inside.
to:
* '''Jossed ''and'' confirmed'''. It’s damaged in the present, but wasn’t when it first arrived. How Anglo-Saxons took on a Dalek is anyone’s guess.
** They managed to immobilize the armour and then roasted the mutant inside.
arrived.
** They managed to immobilize the armour and then roasted the mutant inside.
Changed line(s) 51 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG:The references in [=TBoRAK=] were foreshadowing]]
to:
[[WMG:The references in [=TBoRAK=] The Battle of Ravskoor Av Kalos were foreshadowing]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 81 (click to see context) from:
to:
* It's quite likely that after the deaths of (at least) dozens of people at the gunstick of the Dalek, and the fact that there was a phone call specifically requesting UNIT earlier that same day due to an incident, '''and''' proof in the form of the remains of the casing that a Dalek was involved, the government will have to... ''reconsider'' defunding UNIT.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
!!Pre-airing theories
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
to:
* No, '''jossed'''. "Resolution" is the entirety of the title.
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
to:
* '''Confirmed''' that it's an archaeological dig, and that the creature is a Dalek, but everything else is jossed.
Changed line(s) 31,32 (click to see context) from:
* '''Jossed ''and'' confirmed'''. It’s damaged in the present but wasn’t when it first arrived. How Anglo-Saxons took on a Dalek is anyone’s guess.
to:
* '''Jossed ''and'' confirmed'''. It’s damaged in the present present, but wasn’t when it first arrived. How Anglo-Saxons took on a Dalek is anyone’s guess.
** They managed to immobilize the armour and then roasted the mutant inside.
** They managed to immobilize the armour and then roasted the mutant inside.
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
to:
* '''Confirmed''': It's specifically a reconnaissance scout, a SuperPrototype as the first kind of Dalek to leave Skaro. As a result, it has abilities beyond that of normal Daleks. However, judging by the one drawing we have of it in its original casing, in its casing it looks the same as a regular Dalek.
Added DiffLines:
!!Post-airing theories
Added DiffLines:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
The released synopsis for the special mentions that all three companions will be appearing. However, the synopsis for "The Battle of Ranskoor Av Kolos" claims there will be a "deadly reckoning". Therefore, it's possible the synopsis could be either misleading or straight-out lying, if one of the companions bites it. It could be similar to Adric in "Time-Flight", where he appeared in a brief vision so his actor was credited to conceal his death in "Earthshock", for one example. Either that, or it's a straight-up case of TrailersAlwaysSpoil and the BBC should be ashamed of themselves for releasing the synopsis so early.
to:
The released synopsis for the special mentions that all three companions will be appearing. However, the synopsis for "The "[[Recap/DoctorWhoS37E10TheBattleOfRanskoorAvKolos The Battle of Ranskoor Av Kolos" Kolos]]" claims there will be a "deadly reckoning". Therefore, it's possible the synopsis could be either misleading or straight-out lying, if one of the companions bites it. It could be similar to Adric in "Time-Flight", "[[Recap/DoctorWhoS19E7TimeFlight Time-Flight]]", where he appeared in a brief vision so his actor was credited to conceal his the character's death in "Earthshock", "[[Recap/DoctorWhoS19E6Earthshock Earthshock]]", for one example. Either that, or it's a straight-up case of TrailersAlwaysSpoil and the BBC Creator/TheBBC should be ashamed of themselves for releasing the synopsis so early.
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: The mention of Kate Stewart and UNIT is {{Foreshadowing}}.]]
Maybe this is the show's way of setting up the return of Kate and/or UNIT in Series 12. Stay tuned...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 31,32 (click to see context) from:
* Jossed ''and'' confirmed. It’s damaged in the present but wasn’t when it first arrived. How Anglo-Saxons took on a Dalek is anyone’s guess.
to:
* Jossed '''Jossed ''and'' confirmed.confirmed'''. It’s damaged in the present but wasn’t when it first arrived. How Anglo-Saxons took on a Dalek is anyone’s guess.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 45,46 (click to see context) from:
* Looking '''jossed'''.
to:
* Looking '''jossed'''.
'''Jossed'''.
Changed line(s) 55 (click to see context) from:
to:
* '''Jossed, but...''' UNIT is said to have been disbanded by the British government due to lack of funding.
Changed line(s) 66 (click to see context) from:
to:
* '''Jossed.''' All three companions are still with the Doctor at the end of the episode.
Added DiffLines:
* '''Jossed (mostly).''' This guess is close to the plot of the episode, and it gets some things right (most notably that the archaeologists "unwittingly weaken the thing's prison"), but most of the details are off.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17,18 (click to see context) from:
* ''''Confirmed.''' A Dalek is the villain.
to:
* ''''Confirmed.'''Confirmed.''' A Dalek is the villain.
