Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 7 (click to see context) :
** It would be hard for it not to.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Prior to 2005, the rights to do a film of the book were held by [[Creator/JimHenson The Jim Henson Company]] and Creator//AndrewKlavan was attached as the screenwriter. Whether this would have resulted in a better film is anyone's guess.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Prior to 2005, the rights to do a film of the book were held by [[Creator/JimHenson The Jim Henson Company]] and Creator//AndrewKlavan Creator/AndrewKlavan was attached as the screenwriter. Whether this would have resulted in a better film is anyone's guess.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6,7 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Prior to 2005, the rights to do a film of the book were held by [[Creator/JimHenson The Jim Henson Company]] and [[WebVideo/AndrewKlavanOnTheCulture Andrew Klavan]] was attached as the screenwriter. Whether this would have resulted in a better film is anyone's guess.
** It would be hard for it not to.
** It would be hard for it not to.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Prior to 2005, the rights to do a film of the book were held by [[Creator/JimHenson The Jim Henson Company]] and [[WebVideo/AndrewKlavanOnTheCulture Andrew Klavan]] Creator//AndrewKlavan was attached as the screenwriter. Whether this would have resulted in a better film is anyone's guess.
** It would be hard for it notto.to.
----
** It would be hard for it not
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Prior to 2005, the rights to do a film of the book were held by [[Creator/JimHenson The Jim Henson Company]] and [[AndrewKlavanOnTheCulture Andrew Klavan]] was attached as the screenwriter. Whether this would have resulted in a better film is anyone's guess.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Prior to 2005, the rights to do a film of the book were held by [[Creator/JimHenson The Jim Henson Company]] and [[AndrewKlavanOnTheCulture [[WebVideo/AndrewKlavanOnTheCulture Andrew Klavan]] was attached as the screenwriter. Whether this would have resulted in a better film is anyone's guess.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Prior to 2005, the rights to do a film of the book were held by [[JimHenson The Jim Henson Company]] and [[AndrewKlavanOnTheCulture Andrew Klavan]] was attached as the screenwriter. Whether this would have resulted in a better film is anyone's guess.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Prior to 2005, the rights to do a film of the book were held by [[JimHenson [[Creator/JimHenson The Jim Henson Company]] and [[AndrewKlavanOnTheCulture Andrew Klavan]] was attached as the screenwriter. Whether this would have resulted in a better film is anyone's guess.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Prior to 2005, the rights to do a film of the book were held by [[JimHenson The Jim Henson Company]] and [[AndrewKlavanOnTheCulture Andrew Klavan]] was attached as the screenwriter. Whether this would have resulted in a better film is anyone's guess.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Prior to 2005, the rights to do a film of the book were held by [[JimHenson The Jim Henson Company]] and [[AndrewKlavanOnTheCulture Andrew Klavan]] was attached as the screenwriter. Whether this would have resulted in a better film is anyone's guess.guess.
** It would be hard for it not to.
** It would be hard for it not to.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Director David L. Cunningham, who hated the finished product, claims that this is a large reason why the movie turned out so utterly different from the book.
to:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Director David L. Cunningham, who hated the finished product, claims that this is a large reason why the movie turned out so utterly different from the book.book.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Prior to 2005, the rights to do a film of the book were held by [[JimHenson The Jim Henson Company]] and [[AndrewKlavanOnTheCulture Andrew Klavan]] was attached as the screenwriter. Whether this would have resulted in a better film is anyone's guess.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Prior to 2005, the rights to do a film of the book were held by [[JimHenson The Jim Henson Company]] and [[AndrewKlavanOnTheCulture Andrew Klavan]] was attached as the screenwriter. Whether this would have resulted in a better film is anyone's guess.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Director David L. Cunningham, who hated the finished product, claims that this is why the movie turned out so utterly different from the book.
to:
* ExecutiveMeddling: Director David L. Cunningham, who hated the finished product, claims that this is a large reason why the movie turned out so utterly different from the book.
