Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Now YMMV and not enough context for the revised version of the trope.
Deleted line(s) 13 (click to see context) :
* AmbiguousDisorder: What the client's son suffers from, leading to his parents arguing whether he should get special treatment, or to not further ostracize him from other children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
Directed by Creator/PeterLeto
Written by Creator/MarkGoffman, Creator/ElizabethPeterson, & Creator/ThomasWong
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
A man gets in an argument with his wife about how to best raise their son, and crashes his car, which also takes the life of his spouse. An assemblyman whose main platform is making roads safer (mainly due to connections with a road construction company) takes the man to court on vehicular manslaughter charges, and [=TAC=] steps in to help the accused. Meanwhile, Marissa is acting differently than usual, leading her coworkers to speculate on why.
to:
A man gets in an argument with his wife about how to best raise their son, and crashes his car, which also takes the life of his spouse. An assemblyman whose main platform is making roads safer (mainly due to connections with a road construction company) takes the man to court on vehicular manslaughter charges, and [=TAC=] steps in to help the accused. Meanwhile, Marissa is acting differently than usual, leading her coworkers to speculate on why.
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* AmbiguousDisorder: What the client's son suffers from, leading to his parents to argue whether he should get special treatment or to not further ostracize him from other children.
to:
* AmbiguousDisorder: What the client's son suffers from, leading to his parents to argue arguing whether he should get special treatment treatment, or to not further ostracize him from other children.children.
* FailedASpotCheck: Part of the defense's argument is that, even though there may have been a sign warning of road issues before the client crashed, the client had no reason to consider it pertinent information at the time. They illustrate this point by removing a sign from the courtroom that had been opposite of the jury for the entire trial, and nobody can remember what was written on it...including the judge.
* FailedASpotCheck: Part of the defense's argument is that, even though there may have been a sign warning of road issues before the client crashed, the client had no reason to consider it pertinent information at the time. They illustrate this point by removing a sign from the courtroom that had been opposite of the jury for the entire trial, and nobody can remember what was written on it...including the judge.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
'''Season 1, Episode 7'''
!! Never Saw the Sign
A man gets in an argument with his wife about how to best raise their son, and crashes his car, which also takes the life of his spouse. An assemblyman whose main platform is making roads safer (mainly due to connections with a road construction company) takes the man to court on vehicular manslaughter charges, and [=TAC=] steps in to help the accused. Meanwhile, Marissa is acting differently than usual, leading her coworkers to speculate on why.
----
* AmbiguousDisorder: What the client's son suffers from, leading to his parents to argue whether he should get special treatment or to not further ostracize him from other children.
!! Never Saw the Sign
A man gets in an argument with his wife about how to best raise their son, and crashes his car, which also takes the life of his spouse. An assemblyman whose main platform is making roads safer (mainly due to connections with a road construction company) takes the man to court on vehicular manslaughter charges, and [=TAC=] steps in to help the accused. Meanwhile, Marissa is acting differently than usual, leading her coworkers to speculate on why.
----
* AmbiguousDisorder: What the client's son suffers from, leading to his parents to argue whether he should get special treatment or to not further ostracize him from other children.
