Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / WordOfGod

Go To



* Due to the ambiguous ending of the episode [[Recap/SouthParkS19E06TweekXCraig Tweek X Craig]], fans were left debating whether or not the two really got together for real or were just faking like they were earlier that episode. The Season 19 Bluray commentary, [[http://cheylouwho.tumblr.com/post/149428485516/here-we-go-the-moment-everyones-been-waiting Matt and Trey have addressed Craig and Tweek as a gay couple]], which is moreso present in [[Recap/SouthParkS21E02PutitDown Put it Down]].

to:

* Due to the ambiguous ending of the episode [[Recap/SouthParkS19E06TweekXCraig [[Recap/SouthParkS19E6TweekXCraig Tweek X Craig]], fans were left debating whether or not the two really got together for real or were just faking like they were earlier that episode. The Season 19 Bluray commentary, [[http://cheylouwho.tumblr.com/post/149428485516/here-we-go-the-moment-everyones-been-waiting Matt and Trey have addressed Craig and Tweek as a gay couple]], which is moreso present in [[Recap/SouthParkS21E02PutitDown [[Recap/SouthParkS21E2PutitDown Put it Down]].


* Due to the ambiguous ending of the episode [[SouthParkS19E06TweekXCraig "Tweek X Craig"]], fans were left debating whether or not the two really got together for real or were just faking like they were earlier that episode. The Season 19 Bluray commentary, [[http://cheylouwho.tumblr.com/post/149428485516/here-we-go-the-moment-everyones-been-waiting Matt and Trey have addressed Craig and Tweek as a gay couple]], which is moreso present in [[SouthParkS21E02PutitDown "Put it Down"]].

to:

* Due to the ambiguous ending of the episode [[SouthParkS19E06TweekXCraig "Tweek [[Recap/SouthParkS19E06TweekXCraig Tweek X Craig"]], Craig]], fans were left debating whether or not the two really got together for real or were just faking like they were earlier that episode. The Season 19 Bluray commentary, [[http://cheylouwho.tumblr.com/post/149428485516/here-we-go-the-moment-everyones-been-waiting Matt and Trey have addressed Craig and Tweek as a gay couple]], which is moreso present in [[SouthParkS21E02PutitDown "Put [[Recap/SouthParkS21E02PutitDown Put it Down"]].Down]].


* Due to the ambiguous ending of the episode [[SouthParkS19E6TweekXCraig TweekxCraig]], fans were left debating whether or not the two really got together for real or were just faking like they were earlier that episode. The Season 19 Bluray commentary, [[http://cheylouwho.tumblr.com/post/149428485516/here-we-go-the-moment-everyones-been-waiting Matt and Trey have addressed Craig and Tweek as a gay couple]].

to:

* Due to the ambiguous ending of the episode [[SouthParkS19E6TweekXCraig TweekxCraig]], [[SouthParkS19E06TweekXCraig "Tweek X Craig"]], fans were left debating whether or not the two really got together for real or were just faking like they were earlier that episode. The Season 19 Bluray commentary, [[http://cheylouwho.tumblr.com/post/149428485516/here-we-go-the-moment-everyones-been-waiting Matt and Trey have addressed Craig and Tweek as a gay couple]].couple]], which is moreso present in [[SouthParkS21E02PutitDown "Put it Down"]].


* The director of the 2008 ''Film/TheIncredibleHulk'' had a rare chance on the DVD commentary to fully explain a cliffhanger ending, as he himself doesn't know whether Bruce has turned evil: if his next appearance is in the ''Avengers'' film he has, and if it's another Hulk film he hasn't.
** Since ''Film/{{The Avengers|2012}}'' has hit the theaters this situation can be solved: [[spoiler:Although there is a lot of tension in the beginning and everybody treads very carefully around the Hulk, he is part of the team and drives into the sunset with Tony Stark.]][[note]] No, not [[HoYay that way]].[[/note]]

to:

* ''Franchise/MarvelCinematicUniverse'':
**
The director of the 2008 ''Film/TheIncredibleHulk'' had a rare chance on the DVD commentary to fully explain a cliffhanger ending, as he himself doesn't know whether Bruce has turned evil: if his next appearance is in the ''Avengers'' film he has, and if it's another Hulk film he hasn't.
**
hasn't. Since ''Film/{{The Avengers|2012}}'' has hit the theaters this situation can be solved: [[spoiler:Although there is a lot of tension in the beginning and everybody treads very carefully around the Hulk, he is part of the team and drives into the sunset with Tony Stark.]][[note]] No, not [[HoYay that way]].[[/note]][[/note]]
** ''Film/BlackPanther2018'' director Creator/RyanCoogler revealed on the commentary that Killmonger's mother was in prison and in fact, died there, hence why he was an orphan. [[spoiler:Furthermore, the plan N'Jobu and Zuri were going over before T'Chaka's visit at the beginning of the film was a plan to spring Killmonger's mom out of prison.]]


A number of people [[FanonDiscontinuity reject]] the notion of Word of God being equal to canon, considering something to be {{canon}} only if it appeared in the original source material. If the creator had wanted a certain fact to be canon, the thinking goes, they should have included it in the work to begin with. Other audience members go even further, considering the uncertainty and ambiguity of canon to be a ''good'' thing and decrying the Word of God as shackling the imagination and interpretations of the fans. This latter attitude has some advocates in literary criticism: Wimsatt and Beardsley's "The Intentional Fallacy" and Barthes' DeathOfTheAuthor essay both argue that the interpretation of a work cannot be limited to attempts to discern the "author's intentions."

to:

A number of people [[FanonDiscontinuity reject]] the notion of Word of God being equal to canon, {{canon}}, considering something to be {{canon}} canon only if it appeared in the original source material. If the creator had wanted a certain fact to be canon, the thinking goes, they should have included it in the work to begin with. Other audience members go even further, considering the uncertainty and ambiguity of canon to be a ''good'' thing and decrying the Word of God as shackling the imagination and interpretations of the fans. This latter attitude has These attitudes have found some advocates acknowledgement in literary criticism: Wimsatt and Beardsley's "The Intentional Fallacy" and Barthes' DeathOfTheAuthor essay both argue that the interpretation of a work cannot be limited to attempts to discern the "author's intentions."


A number of people [[FanonDiscontinuity reject]] the notion of Word of God being equal to canon, considering something to be {{canon}} only if it appeared in the original source material: if the creator had wanted a certain fact to be canon, they should have included it in the work to begin with. Others go even further, considering the uncertainty and ambiguity of canon to be a ''good'' thing and decry the Word of God as shackling the imagination and interpretations of the fans -- a belief supported by some modern literary criticism, notably in Wimsatt and Beardsley's "The Intentional Fallacy" and Barthes' DeathOfTheAuthor essay, both of which argue that the interpretation of a work cannot be limited to attempts to discern the "author's intentions."

to:

A number of people [[FanonDiscontinuity reject]] the notion of Word of God being equal to canon, considering something to be {{canon}} only if it appeared in the original source material: if material. If the creator had wanted a certain fact to be canon, the thinking goes, they should have included it in the work to begin with. Others Other audience members go even further, considering the uncertainty and ambiguity of canon to be a ''good'' thing and decry decrying the Word of God as shackling the imagination and interpretations of the fans -- a belief supported by fans. This latter attitude has some modern advocates in literary criticism, notably in criticism: Wimsatt and Beardsley's "The Intentional Fallacy" and Barthes' DeathOfTheAuthor essay, essay both of which argue that the interpretation of a work cannot be limited to attempts to discern the "author's intentions."


Note that a number of people [[FanonDiscontinuity reject]] the notion of Word of God, considering something to be {{canon}} only if it appeared in the original source material, and that if the creator wanted a certain fact to be canon, they should have included it in the work to begin with. Some people go even further, considering the uncertainty and ambiguity of canon to be a ''good'' thing and decry the Word of God as shackling the imagination and interpretations of the fans -- a belief supported by some modern literary criticism, notably in Wimsatt and Beardsley's "The Intentional Fallacy" and Barthes' DeathOfTheAuthor essay, both of which argue that the interpretation of a work cannot be limited to attempts to discern the "author's intentions."

to:

Note that a A number of people [[FanonDiscontinuity reject]] the notion of Word of God, God being equal to canon, considering something to be {{canon}} only if it appeared in the original source material, and that material: if the creator had wanted a certain fact to be canon, they should have included it in the work to begin with. Some people Others go even further, considering the uncertainty and ambiguity of canon to be a ''good'' thing and decry the Word of God as shackling the imagination and interpretations of the fans -- a belief supported by some modern literary criticism, notably in Wimsatt and Beardsley's "The Intentional Fallacy" and Barthes' DeathOfTheAuthor essay, both of which argue that the interpretation of a work cannot be limited to attempts to discern the "author's intentions."

Added DiffLines:

* Almost ''everything'' we know about the backstory and lore of TabletopGame/SentinelsOfTheMultiverse is this. Christopher and Adam, the games creators, hold a podcast called [[https://theletterspage.libsyn.com/ The Letters Page]] talking about the lore of heroes, villains, environments, and more. New episodes come out twice a week on tuesdays and thursdays.


* Richard O'Brien has stated that it was actually Riff Raff, and not Dr. Frank N. Furter, who did most of the work on Rocky in ''Film/TheRockyHorrorPictureShow''.

to:

* Richard O'Brien Creator/RichardOBrien has stated that it was actually Riff Raff, and not Dr. Frank N. Furter, who did most of the work on Rocky in ''Film/TheRockyHorrorPictureShow''.


*** D.C. Fontana is also considered a Trek creator. She wrote much of the continuity for TOS including Spock's background, plus several episodes. Her animated-series episode ''Yesteryear'' is generally regarded as canon. Her novel ''Vulcan's Glory'', is accepted as canon by many fans, but officially it is not.

to:

*** D.C. Fontana is also considered a Trek creator. She wrote much of the continuity for TOS including Spock's background, plus several episodes. Her animated-series episode ''Yesteryear'' is generally regarded as canon.canon (reinforced by the fact that some of the events of ''Yesteryear'' are directly referenced in TNG episode "[[Recap/StarTrekTheNextGenerationS5E7Unification1 Unification, Part 1]]", and later the city of [=ShiKahr=] is seen in both ''Series/StarTrekEnterprise'' and the CGI-remastered version of the TOS episode "[[Recap/StarTrekS2E1AmokTime Amok Time]]"). Her novel ''Vulcan's Glory'', is accepted as canon by many fans, but officially it is not.


* Dan Norton, the art director of ''[[WesternAnimation/{{Thundercats 2011}} [=ThunderCats (2011)=]]]'' set up a [[http://crewofomens.tumblr.com/ Crew of Omens blog]] to answer fan questions and also uses [[http://dingo107.deviantart.com/ deviantArt]] to post concept art and model sheets, frequently posting fan art on the blog, including both Yaoi and fetish art.

to:

* Dan Norton, the art director of ''[[WesternAnimation/{{Thundercats 2011}} [=ThunderCats (2011)=]]]'' set up a [[http://crewofomens.[[https://web.archive.org/web/20150907022202/http://crewofomens.tumblr.com/ Crew of Omens blog]] to answer fan questions and also uses [[http://dingo107.deviantart.com/ deviantArt]] to post concept art and model sheets, frequently posting fan art on the blog, including both Yaoi and fetish art.


** Since ''Film/{{The Avengers|2012}}'' has hit the theaters this situation can be solved: [[spoiler:Although there is a lot of tension in the beginning and everybody treads very carefully around the Hulk, he is part of the team and drives into the sunset with Tony Stark.]]

to:

** Since ''Film/{{The Avengers|2012}}'' has hit the theaters this situation can be solved: [[spoiler:Although there is a lot of tension in the beginning and everybody treads very carefully around the Hulk, he is part of the team and drives into the sunset with Tony Stark.]]]][[note]] No, not [[HoYay that way]].[[/note]]

Added DiffLines:

* From a Q&A Session during a Game Reboot, ''videogame/LeisureSuitLarry'' creator Al Lowe stated the reason behind skipping number 4 in the series was because of flippant comment that the first 3 games didn't need a sequel. This turned the marketing into making "game 5" and referencing the "lost" 4th game as "Leisure Suit Larry 4: The Missing Floppies" both in-game and out. The new games, and the VGA rereleased 1st game, sold much better than the original trilogy.


* Creator/BrandonSanderson provides a lot of Word of God on his books in the chapter annotations on [http://www.brandonsanderson.com/index.php his site]], in blog entries (also available on his site), in interviews (which are usually linked on the blog), in Q&As during signings, on various social media platforms, and written in personalized signed books. There's enough of it that an entire website [[https://wob.coppermind.net/ Arcanum]] was created to catalogue everything.

to:

* Creator/BrandonSanderson provides a lot of Word of God on his books in the chapter annotations on [http://www.[[http://www.brandonsanderson.com/index.php his site]], in blog entries (also available on his site), in interviews (which are usually linked on the blog), in Q&As during signings, on various social media platforms, and written in personalized signed books. There's enough of it that an entire website [[https://wob.coppermind.net/ Arcanum]] was created to catalogue everything.


* Creator/BrandonSanderson provides a lot of Word of God on his books mostly in the chapter annotations and blog on [[http://www.brandonsanderson.com/index.php his site]] and also in interviews, which are usually linked to on his blog.

to:

* Creator/BrandonSanderson provides a lot of Word of God on his books mostly in the chapter annotations and blog on [[http://www.on [http://www.brandonsanderson.com/index.php his site]] and also site]], in interviews, which blog entries (also available on his site), in interviews (which are usually linked on the blog), in Q&As during signings, on various social media platforms, and written in personalized signed books. There's enough of it that an entire website [[https://wob.coppermind.net/ Arcanum]] was created to on his blog.catalogue everything.

Showing 15 edit(s) of 320

Top