Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / TanksButNoTanks

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Flying Tanks'' from Hexage, yeah it's TheFuture but the titular flying tanks aren't {{Hover Tank}}s. They're simply fighter-bomber aircraft with heavy armor alongside a main gun, [[HomingProjectile homing missiles]] or other special weapons, and lots of bombs to drop on someone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Ironically despite being BackedByThePentagon, ''Film/{{Transformers}}'' has a tank filled with M60 Pattons which were phased out in the 90's instead of more appropriate M1 Abrams tanks. Brawl is also a fictional mock-up of an Abrams [[PropRecycling the same one]] used in ''Film/{{xXx State Of The Union}}'' with the addition of the two missile pods and the mine pushers.

to:

* Ironically despite being BackedByThePentagon, ''Film/{{Transformers}}'' ''Film/{{Transformers|2007}}'' has a tank filled with M60 Pattons which were phased out in the 90's '90s instead of more appropriate M1 Abrams tanks. Brawl is also a fictional mock-up of an Abrams [[PropRecycling the same one]] used in ''Film/{{xXx State Of The Union}}'' with the addition of the two missile pods and the mine pushers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The remake of the World War II film ''Die Brücke'' used Swiss Panzer 68s as stand-ins for the M4 Shermans. While the tanks look suitably "old", they do not look like Shermans, and Shermans also didn't have multiple countermeasure pods and other, "modern" stuff attached to them. What's even more ridiculous: later in the movie, an M4 Sherman can be seen. Why the heck didn't they use it in the first place?

to:

* The remake of the World War II film ''Die Brücke'' ''Film/{{The Bridge|1959}}'' used Swiss Panzer 68s as stand-ins for the M4 Shermans. While the tanks look suitably "old", they do not look like Shermans, and Shermans also didn't have multiple countermeasure pods and other, "modern" stuff attached to them. What's even more ridiculous: later in the movie, an M4 Sherman can be seen. Why the heck didn't they use it in the first place?



* ''Film/SavingPrivateRyan'' had 2/3 scale mock-ups of Tiger tanks based on the chassis of Soviet T-34s and almost genuine (see below) Marder III tank destroyers (confusingly referred to as "panzers" by the Americans, but then, see RealLife below to see why they're not wrong). A 20mm flak gun deserves mention as well; often encountered during the war, never before seen in a movie. The half-tracks were mostly Czechoslovakian copies of the German [=Sdkf 250=] built after the war and the assault guns were based on post-war British [[AwesomePersonnelCarrier FV432]] chassis. The vehicles representing Marder [=IIIs=] were modified Czechoslovakian Panzer 38(t)s (one of them a Swedish licence-built model). This was in fact the vehicle that the Marder III was based on in the first place, for bonus recursive accuracy points. While the Marders may seem tactically out-of-place (poorly-armoured tank destroyers have no business taking on infantry units in urban settings, after all), tank destroyers and artillery vehicles were occasionally deployed in the infantry support role when more conventional tanks or dedicated ''Sturmgeschutz'' armoured vehicles were not available. All said, it is reasonably justifiable, especially considering that the ''Heer'' units just behind the beaches had an absolute parking lot of old armoured vehicles and a Marder (of any type) would be one of the BETTER ones available.

to:

* ''Film/SavingPrivateRyan'' had 2/3 scale mock-ups of Tiger tanks based on the chassis of Soviet T-34s and almost genuine (see below) Marder III tank destroyers (confusingly referred to as "panzers" by the Americans, but then, see RealLife below to see why they're not wrong). A 20mm flak gun deserves mention as well; often encountered during the war, never before seldom seen in a movie.movies. The half-tracks were mostly Czechoslovakian copies of the German [=Sdkf 250=] built after the war and the assault guns were based on post-war British [[AwesomePersonnelCarrier FV432]] chassis. The vehicles representing Marder [=IIIs=] were modified Czechoslovakian Panzer 38(t)s (one of them a Swedish licence-built model). This was in fact the vehicle that the Marder III was based on in the first place, for bonus recursive accuracy points. While the Marders may seem tactically out-of-place (poorly-armoured tank destroyers have no business taking on infantry units in urban settings, after all), tank destroyers and artillery vehicles were occasionally deployed in the infantry support role when more conventional tanks or dedicated ''Sturmgeschutz'' armoured vehicles were not available. All said, it is reasonably justifiable, especially considering that the ''Heer'' units just behind the beaches had an absolute parking lot of old armoured vehicles and a Marder (of any type) would be one of the BETTER ones available.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The French [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMX-10_RC AMX-10 RC]] is, as far as the French are concerned, a tank - despite being a six-wheeled vehicle. It's seen over four decades of active use in armoured reconnaissance and infantry support roles.

Added: 96

Changed: 8

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The remake of the Second World War film ''Die Brücke'' used Swiss Panzer 68s as stand-ins for the M4 Shermans. While the tanks look suitably "old", they do not look like Shermans, and Shermans also didn't have multiple countermeasure pods and other, "modern" stuff attached to them. What's even more ridiculous: later in the movie, an M4 Sherman can be seen. Why the heck didn't they use it in the first place?

to:

* The remake of the Second World War II film ''Die Brücke'' used Swiss Panzer 68s as stand-ins for the M4 Shermans. While the tanks look suitably "old", they do not look like Shermans, and Shermans also didn't have multiple countermeasure pods and other, "modern" stuff attached to them. What's even more ridiculous: later in the movie, an M4 Sherman can be seen. Why the heck didn't they use it in the first place?place?
* In ''Film/IsParisBurning'', an American [=M24=] Chaffee was mocked up as a German ''Panther''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/TankGirl'': Tank Girl's tank is very much fictional, but the tank used in the film is basically an M3 or M5 Stuart light tank, with lots of greebles and a (fake) bigger gun tube.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Then there's the matter of RealLife politics, where vehicles you'd ideally want for realism simply can't be obtained at all since they're currently being used or held by an unfriendly power. It's easily forgotten today that prior to Soviet collapse, getting realistic Soviet or Eastern Bloc military vehicles for filming many a UsefulNotes/ColdWar thriller was darn near impossible unless you were an Eastern Bloc filmmaker. Whereas today, you can just phone the Russians and ask them nicely (and offer to pay cash up front).

to:

Then there's the matter of RealLife politics, where vehicles you'd ideally want for realism simply can't be obtained at all since they're currently being used or held by an unfriendly power. It's easily forgotten today that prior to Soviet collapse, getting realistic Soviet or Eastern Bloc military vehicles for filming many a UsefulNotes/ColdWar thriller was darn near impossible unless you were an Eastern Bloc filmmaker. Whereas today, today (well, prior to 2022), you can just phone the Russians and ask them nicely (and offer to pay cash up front).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The Rhino in the ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAuto'' franchise has always been referred to as a tank. However, its earliest designs (the ones that appeared in ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoIII'', ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoSanAndreas'', and ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoViceCity'') have wheels rather than tracks presumably because of engine limitations, making it look more like an APC or tank destroyer. Most of the "3D-era" games also use a cartoony and fictional model that, if anything, bears more of a resemblance to the German Fuchs APC than a real tank (the pre-release model was, in fact, just a Fuchs with a turret slapped on, and the resemblance is still there in the front of the release model); ''San Andreas'' would remodel it to more closely resemble the M1 Abrams, but ''[[VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoLibertyCityStories Liberty City Stories]]'' on through ''[[VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoChinatownWars Chinatown Wars]]'' would go back to ''[=GTA3=]''[='=]s model.

to:

* The Rhino in the ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAuto'' franchise has always been referred to as a tank. However, its earliest designs (the ones that appeared in ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoIII'', ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoSanAndreas'', and ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoViceCity'') have wheels rather than tracks presumably because of engine limitations, making it look more like an APC or tank destroyer. Most of the "3D-era" games also use a cartoony and fictional model that, if anything, bears more of a resemblance to the German Fuchs APC than a real tank (the pre-release model was, in fact, just a Fuchs with a turret slapped on, and the resemblance is still there in the front of the release model); ''San Andreas'' would remodel it to more closely resemble the M1 Abrams, but ''[[VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoLibertyCityStories Liberty City Stories]]'' on through later games would go back to ''[=GTA3=]''[='=]s model until ''[[VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoChinatownWars Chinatown Wars]]'' would go back to ''[=GTA3=]''[='=]s model.finally gave it a model with actual treads.

Added: 465

Changed: 1726

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


NOTE: This is NOT to be confused with [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7kX9-QC5j4 This game right here]].

to:

NOTE: This is NOT to be confused with [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7kX9-QC5j4 This this game right here]].



** The first game used upgunned M2 Bradley [=IFVs=] as the Brotherhood of Nod's "Light tank" (although Nod's modifications appears to have removed the infantry-carrying capacity[[note]]the game has the mechanical ability to let combat vehicles carry infantry -- it is used by the APC -- and at least part of the dev team were aware that Bradleys were [=IFVs=] as ''GDI'' is seen using them as exactly that in one cinematic[[/note]], so by some definitions they ''would'' be tanks). ''Renegade'' changed them into small (and quite low-profile) tanks.

to:

** The first game used upgunned M2 Bradley [=IFVs=] as the Brotherhood of Nod's "Light tank" (although Nod's modifications appears appear to have removed the infantry-carrying capacity[[note]]the game has the mechanical ability to let combat vehicles carry infantry -- it is used by the APC -- and at least part of the dev team were aware that Bradleys were [=IFVs=] as ''GDI'' is seen using them as exactly that in one cinematic[[/note]], so by some definitions they ''would'' be tanks). ''Renegade'' ''Renegade'', due to its art-style shift to match the more-futuristic ''[[VideoGame/CommandAndConquerTiberianSun Tiberian Sun]]'', changed them into proper small (and quite low-profile) tanks.



** ''VideoGame/CommandAndConquerRedAlert2'' provides the Allied Prism Tank (an artillery vehicle) and Yuri's Gattling (sic) Tank (an anti-personnel and anti-air light vehicle), the latter of which precedes ''Generals'''s mistake with China's Gattling (sic) Tanks[[note]]admittedly, the Red Alert timeline diverged after the term tank was introduced but before its definition was nailed down, so it does have a possible excuse[[/note]].
* The Basilisk the Aldecaldos can get their hands on in ''VideoGame/Cyberpunk2077'' is, as several characters note, an floating armored cargo transport with some self-defense weaponry that's also obsolete outside third-rate militaries, but considering the [[NormalFishInATinyPond things it's going against aren't more dangerous than some desert raiders and their vehicles]], everyone treats it as they would a normal tank.

to:

** ''VideoGame/CommandAndConquerRedAlert2'' provides the Allied Prism Tank (an artillery vehicle) and and, in the expansion, Yuri's Gattling (sic) Tank (an anti-personnel and anti-air light vehicle), the latter of which precedes ''Generals'''s mistake with China's Gattling (sic) Gatling Tanks[[note]]admittedly, the Red Alert timeline diverged after the term tank was introduced but before its definition was nailed down, so it does have a possible excuse[[/note]].
* The Basilisk the Aldecaldos can get their hands on in ''VideoGame/Cyberpunk2077'' is, as several characters note, an a floating armored cargo transport with some self-defense weaponry that's also obsolete outside third-rate militaries, but considering the [[NormalFishInATinyPond things it's going against aren't more dangerous than some desert raiders and their vehicles]], everyone treats it as they would a normal tank.



* ''VideoGame/CallOfDuty'' has an early level where you need to take out "Flak Panzers" that are really Möbelwagens. Not an example itself due to details mentioned in the Real Life folder, but what makes it become this trope is they are all armed Flakvierling 38s when in reality only one prototype used one of these before the Germans decided on the FlaK 43.
** ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyWorldAtWar'' features several destroyed Tiger II tanks in the level set in Stalingrad 1942 [[AnachronismStew a full 2 years before the real Tiger II entered service]]. It was not even on the drawling board in 1942. A later level has the player control of what is called in-game a [=T-34-85=] despite A) you are playing a rifleman, and a ''private'' at that; and B) the tank has a [[KillItWithFire flamethrower]], meaning it is an [=OT-34-85=].

to:

* ''VideoGame/CallOfDuty'' ''VideoGame/CallOfDuty'':
** The original ''VideoGame/CallOfDuty1''
has an early level where you need to take out "Flak Panzers" that are really Möbelwagens. Not an example itself due to details mentioned in the Real Life folder, but what makes it become this trope is they are all armed Flakvierling 38s when in reality only one prototype used one of these before the Germans decided on the FlaK [=FlaK=] 43.
** ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyWorldAtWar'' features several destroyed Tiger II tanks in the level set in Stalingrad 1942 [[AnachronismStew a full 2 years before the real Tiger II entered service]]. It was not even on the drawling board in 1942. A later level has the player control of what is called in-game a [=T-34-85=] despite A) you are playing a rifleman, and a ''private'' at that; and B) the tank has a [[KillItWithFire flamethrower]], meaning it is an [=OT-34-85=].



* The Rhino in the ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAuto'' franchise has always been referred to as a tank. However, its earliest designs (the ones that appeared in ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoIII'', ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoSanAndreas'', and ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoViceCity'') have wheels rather than tracks, making it look more like an APC or tank destroyer.

to:

* The Rhino in the ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAuto'' franchise has always been referred to as a tank. However, its earliest designs (the ones that appeared in ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoIII'', ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoSanAndreas'', and ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoViceCity'') have wheels rather than tracks, tracks presumably because of engine limitations, making it look more like an APC or tank destroyer.destroyer. Most of the "3D-era" games also use a cartoony and fictional model that, if anything, bears more of a resemblance to the German Fuchs APC than a real tank (the pre-release model was, in fact, just a Fuchs with a turret slapped on, and the resemblance is still there in the front of the release model); ''San Andreas'' would remodel it to more closely resemble the M1 Abrams, but ''[[VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoLibertyCityStories Liberty City Stories]]'' on through ''[[VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoChinatownWars Chinatown Wars]]'' would go back to ''[=GTA3=]''[='=]s model.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The first game used upgunned M2 Bradley [=IFVs=] as the Brotherhood of Nod's "Light tank". ''Renegade'' changed them into small (and quite low-profile) tanks.

to:

** The first game used upgunned M2 Bradley [=IFVs=] as the Brotherhood of Nod's "Light tank".tank" (although Nod's modifications appears to have removed the infantry-carrying capacity[[note]]the game has the mechanical ability to let combat vehicles carry infantry -- it is used by the APC -- and at least part of the dev team were aware that Bradleys were [=IFVs=] as ''GDI'' is seen using them as exactly that in one cinematic[[/note]], so by some definitions they ''would'' be tanks). ''Renegade'' changed them into small (and quite low-profile) tanks.

Added: 247

Changed: 629

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Averted by ''VideoGame/GhostReconAdvancedWarfighter'', which correctly differentiates tanks, APC's, IFV's, and mobile artillery.

to:

* Averted by ''VideoGame/GhostReconAdvancedWarfighter'', which correctly differentiates tanks, APC's, IFV's, [=APCs=], [=IFVs=], and mobile artillery.



** ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyWorldAtWar'' features several destroyed Tiger II tanks in the level set in Stalingrad 1942 [[AnachronismStew a full 2 years before the real Tiger II entered service]] It was not even on the drawling board in 1942. A later has the player control a what is called in-game a [=T-34-85=] despite A. you are playing a rifleman and a ''Private'' at that and B. The Tank has a [[KillItWithFire flamethrower]] meaning it is an [=OT-34-85=].
** ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyBlackOpsIII'' has one in the level Demon Within where [[spoiler: The player is in the DyingDream of Sarah Hall ]] and gets transported to the [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarII Battle Of The Bulge]] and faces off against a Tiger II one point [[spoiler: Hall]] refers to it as if it were a standard Tiger tank but at the same time references its nickname the King Tiger.
* In ''VideoGame/{{Vietcong}}'', [[spoiler:The old French armored cars are called "tanks" for some reason.]] Not to mention the [=T-34-76s=] used by the NVA, when they should be using [=T-34-85s=], and M50 Ontos tank destroyers in the second game.

to:

** ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyWorldAtWar'' features several destroyed Tiger II tanks in the level set in Stalingrad 1942 [[AnachronismStew a full 2 years before the real Tiger II entered service]] service]]. It was not even on the drawling board in 1942. A later level has the player control a of what is called in-game a [=T-34-85=] despite A. A) you are playing a rifleman rifleman, and a ''Private'' ''private'' at that that; and B. The Tank B) the tank has a [[KillItWithFire flamethrower]] flamethrower]], meaning it is an [=OT-34-85=].
** ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyBlackOpsIII'' has one in the level Demon Within where [[spoiler: The [[spoiler:the player is in the DyingDream of Sarah Hall ]] Hall]] and gets transported to the [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarII Battle Of The of the Bulge]] and faces off against a Tiger II II. At one point [[spoiler: Hall]] [[spoiler:Hall]] refers to it as if it were a standard Tiger tank but at the same time references its nickname nickname, the King Tiger.
** ''VideoGame/CallOfDutyModernWarfareII''[='=]s version of the Ground War multiplayer mode includes two tracked vehicles, the IAV from [[VideoGame/CallOfDutyModernWarfare2019 the 2019 game]] as the "Light Tank", and a newly-added "Heavy Tank". Despite its name, the Light Tank is not a tank, but rather a Bradley with an autocannon, while the Heavy Tank, while actually visibly being a tank, is a weird mixture of a vaguely T-90-ish turret on the body of a Merkava.
* In ''VideoGame/{{Vietcong}}'', [[spoiler:The [[spoiler:the old French armored cars are called "tanks" for some reason.]] Not to mention the [=T-34-76s=] used by the NVA, when they should be using [=T-34-85s=], and M50 Ontos tank destroyers in the second game.



** ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoV'' has The Rhino being modeled on an actual tank, however it still falls into this trap thanks to the description from an in-game website mistaking which tank was modeled for the game. The website unmistakably describes an [=M1=] Abrams with references to a weight of 60 tons, a 1,500hp turbine engine, a 120mm cannon and the line [[{{Irony}} "One of the few vehicles still manufactured in America"]]. The Rhino is actually modeled on the Leopard [=2A4=], which despite having the 120mm cannon [[note]] which was developed for the Leopard tank first then used on the Abrams [[/note]] is different in every other detail in the description. The Leopard 2 uses a 1,479hp [=V12=] Diesel engine, has a weight of 68 tons, and is made in Germany.

to:

** ''VideoGame/GrandTheftAutoV'' has The the Rhino being modeled on an actual tank, however it still falls into this trap thanks to the description from an in-game website mistaking which tank was modeled for the game. The website unmistakably describes an [=M1=] Abrams with references to a weight of 60 tons, a 1,500hp turbine engine, a 120mm cannon and the line [[{{Irony}} "One of the few vehicles still manufactured in America"]]. The Rhino is actually modeled on the Leopard [=2A4=], which despite having the 120mm cannon [[note]] which cannon[[note]]which was developed for the Leopard tank first then used on the Abrams [[/note]] Abrams[[/note]] is different in every other detail in the description. The Leopard 2 uses a 1,479hp [=V12=] Diesel engine, has a weight of 68 tons, and is made in Germany.



** This was actually a common occurrence in real life, since most Allied soldiers were ignorant of the different German tank models or how common each type was, and if they saw a panzer approaching they would be quick to see it as whatever they were most afraid of, which was the Tiger. As Nick Moran points out in "Myths of American Armor", the later Panzer IVs (specifically the H and J models) had blocky shapes, plus extra turret skirts and long guns with a large muzzle brake which made them look superficially similar to a Tiger at a distance, and if a guy sees that through his telescope he’s going to think "TIGER!" and start frantically reacting instead of sitting there counting the number of road wheels on it to make sure.

to:

** This was actually a common occurrence in real life, since most Allied soldiers were ignorant of the different German tank models or how common each type was, and if they saw a panzer Panzer approaching they would be quick to see it as whatever they were most afraid of, which was the Tiger. As Nick Moran points out in "Myths of American Armor", the later Panzer IVs [=IVs=] (specifically the H and J models) had blocky shapes, plus extra turret skirts and long guns with a large muzzle brake which made them look superficially similar to a Tiger at a distance, and if a guy sees that through his telescope he’s going to think "TIGER!" and start frantically reacting instead of sitting there counting the number of road wheels on it to make sure.



** This is also true of the Merkava IV [[MilitaryMashupMachine Tank]][[CombatMedic bulance]], which is a tank equipped to be an ambulance. Since it still retains its original armament it isn't protected by the Geneva conventions, and can therefore be engaged by the enemy. Admittedly, its thick armour and a 120mm cannon don't exactly mean it's a sitting duck...But given that the type of enemies that the IDF would fight aren't exactly mindful of the Geneva Convention, it is an example of CombatPragmatism at its finest.

to:

** This is also true of the Merkava IV [[MilitaryMashupMachine Tank]][[CombatMedic bulance]], which is a tank equipped to be an ambulance. Since it still retains its original armament it isn't protected by the Geneva conventions, and can therefore be engaged by the enemy. Admittedly, its thick armour and a 120mm cannon don't exactly mean it's a sitting duck... But given that the type of enemies that the IDF would fight aren't exactly mindful of the Geneva Convention, Convention anyway, it is an example of CombatPragmatism at its finest.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Not helping matters, of course, is that the lines between "tank" and "not a tank" have become blurred to varying degrees at varying times, even as far back as World War One. The very first tank, for example, did not have a fully rotating turret, but instead a pair of sponson half-turrets, one on each side. Many of the tanks in World War One only had machine guns rather than any cannon-sized weapons. Tank destroyers in the Second World War varied from not having any turret to having a fully rotating turret but no roof, or even a fully rotating turret with an unenclosed roof. In modern times, Infantry Fighting Vehicles are both more heavily armed and heavily armored than any of the tanks in the First World War, looking similar to tanks but having much smaller cannons and less protection.

to:

Not helping matters, of course, is that the lines between "tank" and "not a tank" have become blurred to varying degrees at varying times, even as far back as World War One. The very first tank, for example, did not have a fully rotating turret, but instead a pair of sponson half-turrets, one on each side. Many of the tanks in World War One only had machine guns rather than any cannon-sized weapons. Tank destroyers in the Second World War varied from not having any turret to having a fully rotating turret but no roof, or even a fully rotating turret with an unenclosed roof. In modern times, Infantry Fighting Vehicles are both more heavily armed and heavily armored than any of the tanks in the First World War, War or interwar era and a good number of tanks (especially light tanks) in World War II, looking similar to tanks but having much smaller cannons and less protection.
protection than main battle tanks.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Film/TransformersRevengeOfTheFallen'' also runs into this in the final battle with footage being shown of [=M1A2=] Abrams being transported on Marine hovercraft only for the NEST team being seen supported by [=M1A1=] Abrams and M2 Bradley [=IFVs=] (the latter of which are are used by the Army, The Marines still the M113 APC).

to:

** ''Film/TransformersRevengeOfTheFallen'' also runs into this in the final battle with footage being shown of [=M1A2=] Abrams being transported on Marine hovercraft only for the NEST team being seen supported by [=M1A1=] Abrams and M2 Bradley [=IFVs=] (the latter of which are are only used by the Army, The the Marines still use the M113 APC).lighter LAV-25).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Film/TransformersRevengeOfTheFallen'' also runs into this in the final battle with footage being shown of [=M1A2=] Abrams being transported on Marine hovercraft only for the NEST team being seen supported by [=M1A1=] Abrams and M2 Bradley IFVs (the latter of which are are used by the Army, The Marines still the M113 APC).

to:

** ''Film/TransformersRevengeOfTheFallen'' also runs into this in the final battle with footage being shown of [=M1A2=] Abrams being transported on Marine hovercraft only for the NEST team being seen supported by [=M1A1=] Abrams and M2 Bradley IFVs [=IFVs=] (the latter of which are are used by the Army, The Marines still the M113 APC).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[{{Pun}} Tank Goodness somebody noticed!]]

to:

TankGoodness somebody [[{{Pun}} Tank Goodness somebody noticed!]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Remove chained sinkhole.


TankGoodness [[{{Pun}} somebody noticed!]]

to:

TankGoodness [[{{Pun}} Tank Goodness somebody noticed!]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/SeventyOneIntoTheFire'', a Korean war film, curiously have the North Korean forces using an American M4AE8 Sherman tank against the ROK troops and the student soldiers. It's somewhat plausible that they could be using captured enemy equipment against their former owners, but it is more likely that on a meta level, they were standing-in for the more commonly used Russian T-34/85 medium tanks.

to:

* ''Film/SeventyOneIntoTheFire'', a Korean war film, curiously have the North Korean forces using an American M4AE8 [=M4AE8=] Sherman tank against the ROK troops and the student soldiers. It's somewhat plausible that they could be using captured enemy equipment against their former owners, but it is more likely that on a meta level, they were standing-in for the more commonly used Russian T-34/85 medium tanks.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Note on top of all of the above that non-tank [=AFVs=] are usually both significantly more numerous and cheaper than actual tanks. The US Army's inventory as of 2022 for example included 6,000 tanks and nearly 20,000 non-tank armored combat vehicles.[[note]]Among them 5,700 M2/M3 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, 5,000 M113 armored personnel carriers, 4,400 Strykers (usually either [=APCs=] or [=IFVs=] depending on variant), 2,900 M1117 [=APCs=]/armored cars, and 1,000 M109 self-propelled guns. Plus thousands of engineering vehicles that use APC or tank chasses...[[/note]] While the United States Marine Corps had no tanks at all, but 2,200 non-tank armored vehicles.[[note]]~1,000 LAV [=IFVs=] and 1,200 AAV-7 [=APCs=].[[/note]] The Russian Army in the same year had, on active-duty, some 3,000 tanks and 15,000 non-tank armored combat vehicles.[[note]]Including 4,100 BMP [=IFVs=], 3,000 self-propelled guns of various types, 2,500 BTR [=IFVs=]/[=APCs=] (depending on variant), 3,600 MT-LB [=APCs=], 1,000 BRDM-2 [=APCs=], 900 Shturm self-propelled missile launchers, and a smattering of other types.[[/note]] So on and so forth. Thus they're both easier to get and take up a lot of screen time in newsreels.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Series/AlloAllo: In this [=WW2=]- set comedy series, Lieutenant Gruber's Little Tank is in reality an Sd Kfz 222 armoured car, and an absolutely genuine period vehicle dating from TheThirties that would have been built between 1937-1942, and seen service with German forces in [=WW2=]. It is possible the vehicle used in the series was captured by British forces in North Africa, and the museum where it resides loaned it to the Creator/{{BBC}}} for filming.

to:

* Series/AlloAllo: In this [=WW2=]- set comedy series, Lieutenant Gruber's Little Tank is in reality an Sd Kfz 222 armoured car, and an absolutely genuine period vehicle dating from TheThirties that would have been built between 1937-1942, and seen service with German forces in [=WW2=]. It is possible the vehicle used in the series was captured by British forces in North Africa, and the museum where it resides loaned it to the Creator/{{BBC}}} Creator/{{BBC}} for filming.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Series/AlloAllo: In this [=WW2=]- set comedy series, Lieutenant Gruber's Little Tank is in reality an Sd Kfz 222 armoured car, and an absolutely genuine period vehicle dating from TheThirties that would have been built between 1937-1942, and seen service with German forces in [=WW2=]. It is possible the vehicle used in the series was captured by British forces in North Africa, and the museum where it resides loaned it to the Creator/{{BBC}}} for filming.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The designation does get confusing with the Swedish Stridsvagn 103, which is also unofficially known as the S-tank even though its configuration (no turret and hull-mounted main gun) was more like an older tank destroyer or self-propelled gun. Officially it is still classified as a main battle tank. As two users from [[http://bbs.stardestroyer.net a certain forum]] put it:

to:

* The designation does get confusing with the Swedish Stridsvagn 103, which is also unofficially known as the S-tank even though its configuration (no turret and hull-mounted main gun) was more like an older tank destroyer or self-propelled gun. Officially it is still classified as a main battle tank.tank[[note]]this probably has to do with that in terms of its intended role in Swedish doctrine, its closest equivalent ''was'' a main battle tank, and units with them were organised with that in mind.[[/note]]. As two users from [[http://bbs.stardestroyer.net a certain forum]] put it:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Ironically despite being BackedByThePentagon, ''Film/{{Transformers}}'' has a tank filled with M60 Pattons which were phased out in the 90's instead of more appropriate M1 Abrams tanks. Brawl is also a fictional mock-up of an Abrams [[PropRecycling the same one]] used in ''Film/xXxStateOfTheUnion'' with the addition of the two missile pods and the mine pushers.

to:

* Ironically despite being BackedByThePentagon, ''Film/{{Transformers}}'' has a tank filled with M60 Pattons which were phased out in the 90's instead of more appropriate M1 Abrams tanks. Brawl is also a fictional mock-up of an Abrams [[PropRecycling the same one]] used in ''Film/xXxStateOfTheUnion'' ''Film/{{xXx State Of The Union}}'' with the addition of the two missile pods and the mine pushers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Critical Research Failure is a disambiguation page


* An odd example occurs in ''Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico'' when the Mecha pilots battle alien-possessed WWII German Tiger tanks from an abandoned tank factory [[CriticalResearchFailure in Kursk, Russia]].

to:

* An odd example occurs in ''Anime/MartianSuccessorNadesico'' when the Mecha pilots battle alien-possessed WWII German Tiger tanks from an abandoned tank factory [[CriticalResearchFailure in Kursk, Russia]].Russia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** ''VideoGame/Battlefield4'' continues the above, with in-game spotting callouts usually alternating betweeen "light tank" and "light armor".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* While it being a sci-fi series featuring highly futuristic vehicles blurs the line somewhat, the ''VideoGame/BlasterMaster'' series goes ''hard'' on the "every armored vehicle is a tank" doctrine. The various SOPHIA models piloted over the course of the series are for the most part military-grade [=ATVs=] with a cannon mounted on top; very few have threads, and ''none'' have a proper turret. The ''VideoGame/BlasterMasterZero'' trilogy gets even worse with the introduction of the Metal Attacker Series, which are all classified as tanks despite including a tractor with a gatling gun, a locomotive-themed DrillTank, a speedy bunny-shaped vehicle that doesn't even have a proper ranged weapon, and ''a space fighter''. It even gets lampshaded upon encountering the EIR (the aforementioned bunny) with Jason completely surprised to discover that a "tank" specialized in high speed melee combat is a thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The 1992 Treaty On Conventional Armed Forces in Europe attempted to formalize the classifications a bit. An APC is a self-propelled armored vehicle with an integrated gun of less than 20 mm, an IFV was one with a gun of 20 mm or more (and usually also missiles), and a "battle tank" was one with an integrated gun of 75 mm or more. Both [=IFVs=] and [=APCs=] were further distinguished from battle tanks by the requirement that they're "designed and equipped primarily to transport a combat infantry squad", and that a battle tank had to be at least 16.5 tons while the APC and IFV classification had no weight limit. Self-propelled guns, weirdly, were not classified, though the battle tank classification did have its own requirements of "360-degree traverse gun" and "high self-protection" to seemingly avoid self-propelled guns being classified as such (as they tend to have non-rotating guns and thin armor comparable or inferior to [=APCs=]/[=IFVs=]).

to:

* The 1992 Treaty On Conventional Armed Forces in Europe attempted to formalize the classifications a bit. An APC is was said to be a self-propelled armored vehicle with an integrated gun of less than 20 mm, an IFV was one with a gun of 20 mm or more (and usually also missiles), and a "battle tank" was one with an integrated gun of 75 mm or more. Both [=IFVs=] and [=APCs=] were further distinguished from battle tanks by the requirement that they're "designed and equipped primarily to transport a combat infantry squad", and that a battle tank had to be at least 16.5 tons while the APC and IFV classification had no weight limit. Self-propelled guns, weirdly, were not classified, though the battle tank classification did have its own requirements of "360-degree traverse gun" and "high self-protection" to seemingly avoid self-propelled guns being classified as such (as they tend to have non-rotating guns and thin armor comparable or inferior to [=APCs=]/[=IFVs=]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The 1992 Treaty On Conventional Armed Forces in Europe attempted to formalize the classifications a bit. An APC is a self-propelled armored vehicle with an integrated gun of less than 20 mm, an IFV was one with a gun of 20 mm or more (and usually also missiles), and a "battle tank" was one with an integrated gun of 75 mm or more. Both [=IFVs=] and [=APCs=] were further distinguished from battle tanks by the requirement that they're "designed and equipped primarily to transport a combat infantry squad", and that a battle tank had to be at least 16.5 tons while the APC and IFV classification had no weight limit. Self-propelled guns, weirdly, were not classified, though the battle tank classification did have its own requirements of "360-degree traverse gun" and "high self-protection" to seemingly avoid self-propelled guns being classified as such (as they tend to have non-rotating guns and thin armor comparable or inferior to [=APCs=]/[=IFVs=]).

Top