Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / AChildCalledIt

Go To

OR

Added: 190

Changed: 15

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BlatantLies: It is scary the lies the police believed, one example being Catherine telling them that David's injuries are self-inflicted due to his jealousy over his infant brother. This is despite the fact that many of the injuries are in places a child cannot feasibly reach on their own, and the school had been documenting signs of abuse well before Richard was born.

to:

* BlatantLies: It is scary the lies the police believed, one example being Catherine telling them that David's injuries are self-inflicted due to his jealousy over his infant brother. This is despite the fact that many of the injuries are in places a child cannot feasibly reach on their own, and the school had been documenting signs of abuse well before Richard Russel was born.



* DeniedFoodAsPunishment: Starving David for weeks on end and then giving him food not even the ''dogs'' eat is one of Catherine's methods. One particular moment near the end also sees her taking the boys out to McDonalds while David is left in the parked car with the knowledge that they're all eating without him.

to:

* DeniedFoodAsPunishment: Starving David for weeks on end and then giving him food not even the ''dogs'' eat is one of Catherine's methods. One particular moment near the end also sees her taking the boys out to McDonalds [=McDonalds=] while David is left in the parked car with the knowledge that they're all eating without him.


Added DiffLines:

* DontCelebrateJustYet: The second book in the series details various David's troubles in the foster care system; despite being free of his mother's abuse, he still has many other hardships.

Added: 1569

Changed: 1155

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It was published in 1995, followed by ''The Lost Boy,'' which chronicled Dave's teen years, ending with ''A Man Named Dave,'' about his adulthood. It was later followed up by a biography his brother wrote about how ''he'' became the Scapegoat after David was taken away. Another brother has claimed that ''A Child Called "It"'' is a lie and that David was taken into care for starting a fire and shoplifting.

to:

It was published in 1995, followed by ''The Lost Boy,'' which chronicled Dave's teen years, ending with ''A Man Named Dave,'' about his adulthood.
It was later followed up by a biography his brother Richard wrote about how ''he'' became the Scapegoat after David was taken away. Another away, ''A Brother's Journey.''

In the years following its publication, the books' veracity has been called into question. David and Richard Pelzers' other relatives have stated that the books weren't accurate, with another
brother has claimed stating that ''A Child Called "It"'' is a lie and that David was taken into care for starting a fire and shoplifting.
shoplifting..
Critics have also called the books into question, noting that despite Catherine's abuse of David being known as "the worst case of child abuse in the country," there are very no outside sources describing the events described apart from the books themselves.



* AffectionateNickname: David's father called him "Tiger," eventually using it as an attempt to comfort him during the abuse. Sadly, it didn't last.



* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Zigzagged. The rest of David's RealLife family (namely, his maternal grandmother and younger brother Stephen) have stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration, or, at worst, downright untrue. David's counterargument is claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "semi-retarded" and is blindly devoted to their mother. His brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. That being said, there are several discrepancies between both books, such as when he recalls being stabbed in the stomach while Richard says that it was in the heart, plus the fact that several incidents could have been made up or exxagerated, as it's unlikely someone, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them. That being said, it's nearly impossible to tell who is ''truly'' lying, as the parties refuting David's claims are unreliable for different reasons; [[UnreliableNarrator His maternal grandmother lived in a different state when the abuse was occurring and had no contact with David's immediate family, casting doubt to her claiming the abuse didn't happen.]] Stephen is also the only one of the siblings to publicly defend their mother, which would make his own claims one hell of a CassandraTruth if he was ever proven right, and, [[JerkassHasAPoint while what he said horrifically ableist and mean, David's statement does hint that Stephen has his own unresolved codependency issues]] towards their mother [[UnreliableNarrator that are clouding his judgement.]]
* BlatantLies: It is scary the lies the police believed.
* DeniedFoodAsPunishment: Starving David for weeks on end and then giving him food not even the ''dogs'' eat is one of Catherine's methods.

to:

* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Zigzagged. The rest of David's RealLife family (namely, his maternal grandmother and younger brother Stephen) have stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration, or, at worst, downright untrue. David's counterargument is claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "semi-retarded" and is blindly devoted to their mother. His brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. That being said, there are several discrepancies between both books, such as when he recalls being stabbed in the stomach while Richard says that it was in the heart, plus the fact that several incidents could have been made up or exxagerated, as it's unlikely someone, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them. That being said, it's nearly impossible to tell who is ''truly'' lying, as the parties refuting David's claims are unreliable for different reasons; [[UnreliableNarrator His maternal grandmother lived in a different state when the abuse was occurring and had no contact with David's immediate family, casting doubt to her claiming the abuse didn't happen.]] Stephen is also the only one of the siblings to publicly defend their mother, which would make his own claims one hell of a CassandraTruth if he was ever proven right, and, [[JerkassHasAPoint while what he said horrifically ableist and mean, David's statement does hint that Stephen has his own unresolved codependency issues]] towards their mother [[UnreliableNarrator that are clouding his judgement.]]
]] It is likely that the real truth will never be known.
* BlatantLies: It is scary the lies the police believed.
believed, one example being Catherine telling them that David's injuries are self-inflicted due to his jealousy over his infant brother. This is despite the fact that many of the injuries are in places a child cannot feasibly reach on their own, and the school had been documenting signs of abuse well before Richard was born.
* CutHimselfShaving:
** David tells his school nurse that various bruises are from walking into a door. She reveals she has a ''file'' of his excuses and points out he used that one a week ago.
** Catherine yanks David's arm out of his socket, and when she takes him to the [=ER=] she says he fell out of bed. Goes a step further than usual examples, however, as Catherine actually ''pushed David out of his bed in the middle of the night'' so they could both truthfully say it happened.
* DeniedFoodAsPunishment: Starving David for weeks on end and then giving him food not even the ''dogs'' eat is one of Catherine's methods. One particular moment near the end also sees her taking the boys out to McDonalds while David is left in the parked car with the knowledge that they're all eating without him.



* FatBastard: Later books describe Catherine as being overweight.



%%* ItIsDehumanizing

to:

%%* ItIsDehumanizing* ItIsDehumanizing: David's mother takes to calling him "It" both to his face and in casual conversation. It first appears when she tears up a letter the teacher wrote praising David's participation in school, and screams that he's "an 'it.'"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not enough context (ZCE)


* ItIsDehumanizing

to:

* %%* ItIsDehumanizing
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* ANounReferredToAsX: ''A Child Called It'' and ''A Man Named Dave''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Cautious editing


* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Zigzagged. The rest of David's RealLife family (namely, his maternal grandmother and younger brother Stephen) have stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration, or, at worst, downright untrue. David's counterargument is claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "semi-retarded" and is blindly devoted to their mother. His brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. That being said, there are several discrepancies between both books, such as when he recalls being stabbed in the stomach while Richard says that it was in the heart, plus the fact that several incidents could have been made up or exxagerated, as its unlikely someone, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them. That being said, its nearly impossible to tell who is ''truly'' lying, as the parties refuting David's claims are unreliable for different reasons; [[UnreliableNarrator His maternal grandmother lived in a different state when the abuse was occurring and had no contact with David's immediate family, so she has no real leg to stand on when claiming the abuse didn't happen.]] Stephen is also the only one of the siblings to publicly defend their mother, which would make his own claims one hell of a CassandraTruth if he was ever proven right, and, [[JerkassHasAPoint while what he said horrifically ableist and mean, David's statement does hint that Stephen has his own codependency issues towards their mother that are unresolved and clouding his judgement.]]

to:

* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Zigzagged. The rest of David's RealLife family (namely, his maternal grandmother and younger brother Stephen) have stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration, or, at worst, downright untrue. David's counterargument is claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "semi-retarded" and is blindly devoted to their mother. His brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. That being said, there are several discrepancies between both books, such as when he recalls being stabbed in the stomach while Richard says that it was in the heart, plus the fact that several incidents could have been made up or exxagerated, as its it's unlikely someone, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them. That being said, its it's nearly impossible to tell who is ''truly'' lying, as the parties refuting David's claims are unreliable for different reasons; [[UnreliableNarrator His maternal grandmother lived in a different state when the abuse was occurring and had no contact with David's immediate family, so she has no real leg casting doubt to stand on when her claiming the abuse didn't happen.]] Stephen is also the only one of the siblings to publicly defend their mother, which would make his own claims one hell of a CassandraTruth if he was ever proven right, and, [[JerkassHasAPoint while what he said horrifically ableist and mean, David's statement does hint that Stephen has his own unresolved codependency issues issues]] towards their mother [[UnreliableNarrator that are unresolved and clouding his judgement.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PoliceAreUseless: No matter how often Catherine is suspected of abuse by the school, the police always buy her lies. Also, in ''The Lost Boy,'' David runs away from home and is taken in by the police. He tries to tell them what's happening, and they call his father...who tells them that David is a liar and just ran away because he wasn't allowed to go bike-riding. ''And the police believe it.'' Justified, in that child protective laws were far less strict back in the 70s, [[AdultFear and even to this day claims of child abuse are often swept under the rug.]]

to:

* PoliceAreUseless: No matter how often Catherine is suspected of abuse by the school, the police always buy her lies. Also, in ''The Lost Boy,'' David runs away from home and is taken in by the police. He tries to tell them what's happening, and they call his father...who tells them that David is a liar and just ran away because he wasn't allowed to go bike-riding. ''And the police believe it.'' Justified, in that child protective laws were far less strict back in the 70s, [[AdultFear and even to this day claims of child abuse are often swept under the rug.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Zigzagged. The rest of David's RealLife family (namely, his maternal grandmother and younger brother Stephen) have stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration, or, at worst, downright untrue. David's counterargument is claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "semi-retarded" and is blindly devoted to their mother. His brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. That being said, there are several discrepancies between both books, such as when he recalls being stabbed in the stomach while Richard says that it was in the heart, plus the fact that several incidents could have been made up or exxagerated, as its unlikely someone, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them. That being said, its nearly impossible to tell who is ''truly'' lying, as the parties refuting David's claims are unreliable for different reasons; [[UnreliableNarrator His maternal grandmother lived in a different state when the abuse was occurring and had no contact with David's immediate family, so she has no real leg to stand on when claiming the abuse didn't happen.]] Stephen is also the only one of the siblings to publicly defend their mother, which would make his own claims one hell of a CassandraTruth if he was ever proven right, and, [[JerkassHasAPoint while ''horrifically'' ableist and spiteful, David's statement does hint that Stephen has his own codependency issues towards their mother that are unresolved and clouding his judgement.]]

to:

* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Zigzagged. The rest of David's RealLife family (namely, his maternal grandmother and younger brother Stephen) have stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration, or, at worst, downright untrue. David's counterargument is claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "semi-retarded" and is blindly devoted to their mother. His brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. That being said, there are several discrepancies between both books, such as when he recalls being stabbed in the stomach while Richard says that it was in the heart, plus the fact that several incidents could have been made up or exxagerated, as its unlikely someone, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them. That being said, its nearly impossible to tell who is ''truly'' lying, as the parties refuting David's claims are unreliable for different reasons; [[UnreliableNarrator His maternal grandmother lived in a different state when the abuse was occurring and had no contact with David's immediate family, so she has no real leg to stand on when claiming the abuse didn't happen.]] Stephen is also the only one of the siblings to publicly defend their mother, which would make his own claims one hell of a CassandraTruth if he was ever proven right, and, [[JerkassHasAPoint while ''horrifically'' what he said horrifically ableist and spiteful, mean, David's statement does hint that Stephen has his own codependency issues towards their mother that are unresolved and clouding his judgement.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Zigzagged. The rest of David's RealLife family (namely, his maternal grandmother and younger brother Stephen) have stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration, or, at worst, downright untrue. David's counterargument is claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "semi-retarded" and is blindly devoted to their mother. His brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. That being said, there are several discrepancies between both books, such as when he recalls being stabbed in the stomach while Richard says that it was in the heart, plus the fact that several incidents could have been made up or exxagerated, as its unlikely someone, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them. That being said, its nearly impossible to tell who is ''truly'' lying, as the parties refuting David's claims are unreliable for different reasons; [[UnreliableNarrator His maternal grandmother lived in a different state when the abuse was occurring and had no contact with David's immediate family, so she has no real leg to stand on when claiming the abuse didn't happen.]] Stephen is also the only one of the siblings to publicly defend their mother, which would make his own claims one hell of a CassandraTruth if he was ever proven right, and, while horrifically ableist and spite-fueled, David's statement does hint that Stephen has his own codependency issues towards their mother that are unresolved and clouding his judgement.

to:

* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Zigzagged. The rest of David's RealLife family (namely, his maternal grandmother and younger brother Stephen) have stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration, or, at worst, downright untrue. David's counterargument is claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "semi-retarded" and is blindly devoted to their mother. His brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. That being said, there are several discrepancies between both books, such as when he recalls being stabbed in the stomach while Richard says that it was in the heart, plus the fact that several incidents could have been made up or exxagerated, as its unlikely someone, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them. That being said, its nearly impossible to tell who is ''truly'' lying, as the parties refuting David's claims are unreliable for different reasons; [[UnreliableNarrator His maternal grandmother lived in a different state when the abuse was occurring and had no contact with David's immediate family, so she has no real leg to stand on when claiming the abuse didn't happen.]] Stephen is also the only one of the siblings to publicly defend their mother, which would make his own claims one hell of a CassandraTruth if he was ever proven right, and, [[JerkassHasAPoint while horrifically ''horrifically'' ableist and spite-fueled, spiteful, David's statement does hint that Stephen has his own codependency issues towards their mother that are unresolved and clouding his judgement.]]



* KarmaHoudini: Despite her abusive nature, Catherine never gets any comeuppance for abusing poor David. [[Main/JustifiedTrope Justified]] since child abuse laws were nonexistent in the 70s. This is, however, assuming that David was telling the truth and wasn't lying.
* ANounReferredToAsX: ''A Child Called It'' and ''A Man Named Dave''

to:

* KarmaHoudini: Despite her abusive nature, Catherine never gets any comeuppance for abusing poor David. [[Main/JustifiedTrope Justified]] since child abuse laws were nonexistent in the 70s. This is, however, assuming that David was telling the truth and wasn't lying.
70s.
* ANounReferredToAsX: ''A Child Called It'' and ''A Man Named Dave''Dave''.



* ParentalNeglect: David's mother may be horrifyingly abusive, but David's father isn't totally innocent himself. He doesn't lift a finger to stop his wife abusing his son and finally runs off.
* PoliceAreUseless: No matter how often Catherine is suspected of abuse by the school, the police always buy her lies. Also, in ''The Lost Boy,'' David runs away from home and is taken in by the police. He tries to tell them what's happening, and they call his father...who tells them that David is a liar and just ran away because he wasn't allowed to go bike-riding. ''And the police believe it.'' Although, the police believing it becomes much easier to swallow if you believe that David was lying...

to:

* ParentalNeglect: David's mother may be horrifyingly abusive, but David's father isn't totally innocent himself. He doesn't lift a finger to stop his wife abusing his son and finally eventually runs off.
* PoliceAreUseless: No matter how often Catherine is suspected of abuse by the school, the police always buy her lies. Also, in ''The Lost Boy,'' David runs away from home and is taken in by the police. He tries to tell them what's happening, and they call his father...who tells them that David is a liar and just ran away because he wasn't allowed to go bike-riding. ''And the police believe it.'' Although, the police believing it becomes much easier to swallow if you believe Justified, in that David was lying...child protective laws were far less strict back in the 70s, [[AdultFear and even to this day claims of child abuse are often swept under the rug.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Zigzagged. The rest of David's RealLife family (namely, his maternal grandmother and younger brother Stephen) have stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration, or, at worst, downright untrue. David's counterargument is claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "semi-retarded" and is blindly devoted to their mother. His brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. That being said, there are several discrepancies between both books, such as when he recalls being stabbed in the stomach while Richard says that it was in the heart, plus the fact that several incidents could have been made up or exxagerated, as its unlikely someone, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them. That being said, its nearly impossible to tell who is ''truly'' lying, as the parties refuting David's claims are unreliable for different reasons; [[UnreliableNarrator His maternal grandmother lived in a different state when the abuse was occurring and had no contact with David's immediate family, so she has no real leg to stand on when claiming the abuse didn't happen. Stephen is also the ''only'' sibling to publically defend their mother, and, while horrifically ableist and spite-fueled, David's statement does hint that Stephen has his own codependency issues towards their mother that are unresolved and clouding his judgement.]]

to:

* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Zigzagged. The rest of David's RealLife family (namely, his maternal grandmother and younger brother Stephen) have stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration, or, at worst, downright untrue. David's counterargument is claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "semi-retarded" and is blindly devoted to their mother. His brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. That being said, there are several discrepancies between both books, such as when he recalls being stabbed in the stomach while Richard says that it was in the heart, plus the fact that several incidents could have been made up or exxagerated, as its unlikely someone, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them. That being said, its nearly impossible to tell who is ''truly'' lying, as the parties refuting David's claims are unreliable for different reasons; [[UnreliableNarrator His maternal grandmother lived in a different state when the abuse was occurring and had no contact with David's immediate family, so she has no real leg to stand on when claiming the abuse didn't happen. ]] Stephen is also the ''only'' sibling only one of the siblings to publically publicly defend their mother, which would make his own claims one hell of a CassandraTruth if he was ever proven right, and, while horrifically ableist and spite-fueled, David's statement does hint that Stephen has his own codependency issues towards their mother that are unresolved and clouding his judgement.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Some of the wording here is strange, and seems to imply that David's brother Richard is the one that has cerebral palsy, when, in reality, it was his younger brother Stephen, who has not written a book and defended their mother in an interview. Its also never been confirmed whether David and Richard are being dishonest, so I feel its not right to claim the trope as being played straight when no one actually knows the truth and the troper who wrote this is stating things incorrectly. I also find it in poor taste to claim that an abuse survivor is lying when its never been confirmed on the main trope page; leave that to WMG.


* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Zigzagged, as the actual truth behind the stories are basically down to he-said-she-said between the author and his family. The rest of David's family have repeatedly stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration. David's only counterargument thus far has amounted to [[{{Hypocrite}} claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "retarded"]]... Except that his brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. (An upbringing spent in the thrall of a vicious, cruel manipulator like Catherine wouldn't ever warp a young person's sense of loyalty or fealty to truth, would it?) However, there are several discrepancies between books, such as [[SarcasmMode minor things]] like where he was stabbed, plus the fact that several incidents were obviously made up as no one, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them.

to:

* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Zigzagged, as the actual truth behind the stories are basically down to he-said-she-said between the author and his family. Zigzagged. The rest of David's RealLife family (namely, his maternal grandmother and younger brother Stephen) have repeatedly stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration. exaggeration, or, at worst, downright untrue. David's only counterargument thus far has amounted to [[{{Hypocrite}} counterargument is claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "retarded"]]... Except that his "semi-retarded" and is blindly devoted to their mother. His brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. (An upbringing spent in the thrall of a vicious, cruel manipulator like Catherine wouldn't ever warp a young person's sense of loyalty or fealty to truth, would it?) However, That being said, there are several discrepancies between both books, such as [[SarcasmMode minor things]] like where when he recalls being stabbed in the stomach while Richard says that it was stabbed, in the heart, plus the fact that several incidents were obviously could have been made up or exxagerated, as no one, its unlikely someone, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them.them. That being said, its nearly impossible to tell who is ''truly'' lying, as the parties refuting David's claims are unreliable for different reasons; [[UnreliableNarrator His maternal grandmother lived in a different state when the abuse was occurring and had no contact with David's immediate family, so she has no real leg to stand on when claiming the abuse didn't happen. Stephen is also the ''only'' sibling to publically defend their mother, and, while horrifically ableist and spite-fueled, David's statement does hint that Stephen has his own codependency issues towards their mother that are unresolved and clouding his judgement.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: The rest of David's family have repeatedly stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration. David's only counterargument thus far has amounted to [[{{Hypocrite}} claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "retarded"]]... Except that his brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. (An upbringing spent in the thrall of a vicious, cruel manipulator like Catherine wouldn't ever warp a young person's sense of loyalty or fealty to truth, would it?) However, there are several discrepancies between books, such as [[SarcasmMode minor things]] like where he was stabbed, plus the fact that several incidents were obviously made up as no one, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them...

to:

* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Zigzagged, as the actual truth behind the stories are basically down to he-said-she-said between the author and his family. The rest of David's family have repeatedly stated that the books are, at best, a major exaggeration. David's only counterargument thus far has amounted to [[{{Hypocrite}} claiming his brother's cerebral palsy discounts what he says because he's "retarded"]]... Except that his brother Richard has ''also'' written several books chronicling the abuse he suffered in earnest after David was removed by child protective services. (An upbringing spent in the thrall of a vicious, cruel manipulator like Catherine wouldn't ever warp a young person's sense of loyalty or fealty to truth, would it?) However, there are several discrepancies between books, such as [[SarcasmMode minor things]] like where he was stabbed, plus the fact that several incidents were obviously made up as no one, especially not a little boy, would be able to survive them...them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* KarmaHoudini: Despite her abusive nature, Catherine never gets any comeuppance for abusing poor David. [[Main/Justified Trope Justified]] since child abuse laws were nonexistent in the 70s. This is, however, assuming that David was telling the truth and wasn't lying.

to:

* KarmaHoudini: Despite her abusive nature, Catherine never gets any comeuppance for abusing poor David. [[Main/Justified Trope [[Main/JustifiedTrope Justified]] since child abuse laws were nonexistent in the 70s. This is, however, assuming that David was telling the truth and wasn't lying.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AbusiveParents: ''Catherine, Catherine,'' '''Catherine!''' She's incredibly emotionally and physically abusive as well as neglectful.

to:

* AbusiveParents: ''Catherine, Catherine,'' '''Catherine!''' She's incredibly Catherine fits this trope to a T, being a ''very'' emotionally and physically abusive as (as well as neglectful.neglectful) one.



* AxCrazy: Oh my good lord, Catherine!

to:

* AxCrazy: Oh my good lord, Catherine!Catherine, again.



** Catherine of course!
** Also possibly Dave himself, if his book really is a lie, as this would mean he lied about his mother stabbing and starving him just for attention and money. However, even if the book is true, one cannot deny that his response to his brother calling him out was absolutely disgusting.
* KarmaHoudini: Catherine, BIG TIME. She ''never'' gets any comeuppance for abusing poor David since child abuse laws were nonexistent in the 70s. This is assuming that David is telling the truth.

to:

** Catherine of course!
No prizes for guessing [[Main/AbusiveParents who it is]].
** Also possibly Possibly Dave himself, if his book really is a lie, as this would mean he lied about his mother stabbing and starving him just for attention and money. However, even if the book is true, one cannot deny that his response to his brother calling him out was absolutely disgusting.
* KarmaHoudini: Catherine, BIG TIME. She ''never'' Despite her abusive nature, Catherine never gets any comeuppance for abusing poor David David. [[Main/Justified Trope Justified]] since child abuse laws were nonexistent in the 70s. This is is, however, assuming that David is was telling the truth.truth and wasn't lying.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ParentalNeglect: David's mother may be horrifyingly abusive, but David's father isn't totally innocent. He doesn't lift a finger to stop his wife abusing his son and finally runs off.

to:

* ParentalNeglect: David's mother may be horrifyingly abusive, but David's father isn't totally innocent.innocent himself. He doesn't lift a finger to stop his wife abusing his son and finally runs off.

Added: 503

Changed: 661

Removed: 269

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AbusiveParents:
** ''Catherine, Catherine,'' '''Catherine!''' She's incredibly emotionally and physically abusive as well as neglectful.
** David's father isn't totally innocent either, as he neglects his son and finally runs off, claiming he can't handle watching his wife abuse David.

to:

* AbusiveParents:
**
AbusiveParents: ''Catherine, Catherine,'' '''Catherine!''' She's incredibly emotionally and physically abusive as well as neglectful.
** David's father isn't totally innocent either, as he neglects his son and finally runs off, claiming he can't handle watching his wife abuse David.
neglectful.



* PoliceAreUseless: No matter how often Catherine is suspected of abuse by the school, the police always buy her lies. Also, in ''The Lost Boy,'' David runs away from home and is taken in by the police. He tries to tell them what's happening, and they call his father...who tells them that David is a liar and just ran away because he wasn't allowed to go bike-riding. ''And the police believe it.'' Although, the police believing it becomes much easier to swallow after all of Pelzer's family came out and said he was lying...

to:

*ParentalNeglect: David's mother may be horrifyingly abusive, but David's father isn't totally innocent. He doesn't lift a finger to stop his wife abusing his son and finally runs off.
* PoliceAreUseless: No matter how often Catherine is suspected of abuse by the school, the police always buy her lies. Also, in ''The Lost Boy,'' David runs away from home and is taken in by the police. He tries to tell them what's happening, and they call his father...who tells them that David is a liar and just ran away because he wasn't allowed to go bike-riding. ''And the police believe it.'' Although, the police believing it becomes much easier to swallow after all of Pelzer's family came out and said he if you believe that David was lying...

Top