Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / RedDeadRedemption

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Rated M For Manly is about works, not characters or moments


*** If you are [[RatedMForManly knife fighting wolves]], John yells out "How do you think I got these scars?!" I've taken this to either mean he was attacked by a wolf, or got the scars in a knife fight.

to:

*** If you are [[RatedMForManly knife fighting wolves]], wolves, John yells out "How do you think I got these scars?!" I've taken this to either mean he was attacked by a wolf, or got the scars in a knife fight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removal of What An Idiot potholes per Wick Cleaning Projects


** Why would Allende give two shits that America wants Bill Williamson behind bars? He probably had no idea who Bill was initially, other than he was some tough looking renegade Yankee who could hold a gun. The fact that America wanted him behind bars probably didn't phase him in the slightest, and it didn't hurt that he was actually ''winning'' the war against the rebels. It wasn't until John Marston entered Mexico, demanding Bill Williamson, and working for the rebels (and securing victories with them) that Allende kinda saw what was coming and attempted to have Marston killed. Of course, this probably also delves into WhatAnIdiot for him, because Marston didn't exactly come to Mexico to fight a war. All Allende had to do was give Williamson to Marston during their first meeting, tell him to go away with Williamson and Allende could've still likely won.

to:

** Why would Allende give two shits that America wants Bill Williamson behind bars? He probably had no idea who Bill was initially, other than he was some tough looking renegade Yankee who could hold a gun. The fact that America wanted him behind bars probably didn't phase him in the slightest, and it didn't hurt that he was actually ''winning'' the war against the rebels. It wasn't until John Marston entered Mexico, demanding Bill Williamson, and working for the rebels (and securing victories with them) that Allende kinda saw what was coming and attempted to have Marston killed. Of course, this probably also delves into WhatAnIdiot IdiotBall territory for him, because Marston didn't exactly come to Mexico to fight a war. All Allende had to do was give Williamson to Marston during their first meeting, tell him to go away with Williamson and Allende could've still likely won.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Even if Fordham wasn't a particularly nice person, it could well be that he's the FBI equivalent of a ByTheBookCop and would consider going after John (especially as he's just been on his ranch since returning there) to be out of line.

Added: 1758

Changed: 13

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[spoiler: The problem I had with Ross was the fact that he went back on his word of letting John live his life with his family in peace and sent an entire company of U.S soldiers to kill him. Sure Ross says that the ways of the Wild West and all the chaos it produced needs to be removed and anyone who once caused such chaos needs to go too but John by the time Ross comes after him is totally reformed and is now a peaceful rancher who only needs his family and hard work to live a meaningful life, John's gunslinging days are behind him. Also Ross using the argument that everyone eventually pays for what they have done and John needs to pay for what he did during his criminal past is contradicted by him promising John a pardon from his crimes. And all of this for what, just so Ross can take the credit for taking down Dutch and Williamson when John did that? Ross is a lying, cheating, glory-hogging, degenerate son of a bitch.]]

to:

* [[spoiler: The problem I had with Ross was the fact that he went back on his word of letting John live his life with his family in peace and sent an entire company of U.S soldiers to kill him. Sure Ross says that the ways of the Wild West and all the chaos it produced needs to be removed and anyone who once caused such chaos needs to go too but John by the time Ross comes after him is totally reformed and is now a peaceful rancher who only needs his family and hard work to live a meaningful life, John's gunslinging days are behind him. Also Ross using the argument that everyone eventually pays for what they have done and John needs to pay for what he did during his criminal past is contradicted by him promising John a pardon from his crimes. And all of this for what, just so Ross can take the credit for taking down Dutch and Williamson when John did that? Ross is a lying, cheating, glory-hogging, degenerate son of a bitch.]]


Added DiffLines:

** The thing that has to be remembered about Ross is that, for all his failings and unlikeable qualities, he is a lawman. His job, for better and for worse, is to uphold the laws of the United States and to bring in those who break them. And the thing that has to be remembered about John Marston is that he spent a lot of time breaking those laws, and in serious ways; for all the romanticising he and his compatriots get throughout these games, at no point should it be forgotten that they are still violent outlaws, robbers and murderers who take what they want at the point of a gun and are perfectly willing to kill those who get in their way, innocent or not. That John has turned his life around to a degree is admirable, but it doesn't change the the fact that he's still guilty as sin of a lot of horrible crimes. That Ross betrays his promise to leave John and his family alone is underhanded and even despicable of him, but it doesn't necessarily make him wrong -- because in any meaningful concept of justice, John still has to answer in some way for what he's done. That people think that John should be allowed to go back to his peaceful family life and not receive any kind of comeuppance for the things he's done is an example of ProtagonistCentredMorality; it's only because we've spent so much time in his shoes that we come to think that, and that Ross is the villain. Give us that same story from the outside, however, and we'd likely be outraged at the idea of a violent criminal never having to face justice for his crimes. Edgar Ross is many things, two-faced and duplicitous among them. But he's not entirely wrong to go after John Marston, because whether you like it or not John Marston had ''some'' form of justice coming his way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** That's a different time and place, though. Jessie James rose to infamy in the defeated Confederacy in the immediate aftermath of the Civil War, and was seen by those who admired him as a rebel fighting an unjust and oppressive occupying force in the relatively wild and lawless days of Reconstruction and the expansion out west. By the time Jack Marston puts a bullet into Edgar Ross, however, Jessie James is long dead, Reconstruction is long over, the West has long been tamed, and men like John Marston are widely seen not as romantic heroes defying the oppressive federal order but, well, as unrepentant outlaws, thieves and murderers. Jack Marston is entering a world where the heroes will not be the outlaws but the lawmen, not just in westerns but in real life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


*** [[CompletelyMissingThePoint Which is the entire point of his character.]] Ross believes that John is nothing more than a no good outlaw, no matter what he does or says. And that all his past actions makes him irredeemable.
*** I understand that Ross isn't supposed to be a trustworthy character, the fact that he kidnaps John's family is proof enough of that, I just found it despicable that he condemns the Wild West and the kind of men like John Marston that it produced and preaching that civilization is the only viable alternative to the hell that is the Wild West when he commits actions that you would expect out of an outlaw. Surely Ross sees the hypocrisy of committing criminal deeds as an ends justifies the needs method of achieving civilization, gunning down bandits, or generally just people that refuse to listen to the government, and blackmailing all to produce civilization. It's the hypocrisy of Edgar Ross's character that sickens me, "Everyone pays for what they have done in time, even you John.", the irony of the situation is that John would never have taken up the gun ever again had Ross not blackmailed him and [[spoiler: faced down an entire company of U.S soldiers before being gunned down by them]] had Ross not forced his hand, so John's crimes are Ross's by extension. [[spoiler: Jack Marston rightfully puts an end to Ross and his hypocrisy when he guns him down and makes him pay for the crimes committed against the Marston family, but it still leaves a bitter taste because at the end of the day his death won't bring John back and Ross won because John will be remembered in official history as an outlaw.]]
*** What do you expect? Ross is a Knight Templar, he believes that the outlaws of the Old West are scum, and thus tries to modernise the West. Even if that means kidnapping a retired Outlaw's family and threatening them to get him to do their dirty work. Gotta break a few eggs to make an omelette. So what if John is reformed? He doesn't care. In his eyes he's an outlaw and always will be. Might as well get him to off his old comrades then kill him and take all the glory.

to:

*** [[CompletelyMissingThePoint Which is the entire point of his character.]] character. Ross believes that John is nothing more than a no good outlaw, no matter what he does or says. And that all his past actions makes him irredeemable.
*** I understand that Ross isn't supposed to be a trustworthy character, the fact that he kidnaps John's family is proof enough of that, I just found it that. It's despicable that he condemns the Wild West and the kind of men like John Marston that it produced and preaching that civilization is the only viable alternative to the hell that is the Wild West when he commits actions that you would expect out of an outlaw. Surely Ross sees the hypocrisy of committing criminal deeds as an ends justifies the needs method of achieving civilization, gunning down bandits, or generally just people that refuse to listen to the government, and blackmailing all to produce civilization. It's the hypocrisy of Edgar Ross's character that sickens me, "Everyone pays for what they have done in time, even you John.", the irony of the situation is that John would never have taken up the gun ever again had Ross not blackmailed him and [[spoiler: faced down an entire company of U.S soldiers before being gunned down by them]] had Ross not forced his hand, so John's crimes are Ross's by extension. [[spoiler: Jack Marston rightfully puts an end to Ross and his hypocrisy when he guns him down and makes him pay for the crimes committed against the Marston family, but it still leaves a bitter taste because at the end of the day his death won't bring John back and Ross won because John will be remembered in official history as an outlaw.]]
*** What do you expect? Ross is a Knight Templar, he believes that the outlaws of the Old West are scum, and thus tries to modernise the West. Even if that means kidnapping a retired Outlaw's family and threatening them to get him to do their dirty work. Gotta break a few eggs to make an omelette. So what if John is reformed? He doesn't care. In his eyes he's an outlaw and always will be. Might as well get him to off his old comrades then kill him and take all the glory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I assumed that was pretty much the point. Real Old West gangs were tiny groups. Gangs as we know them number in the hundreds. The entire game is about the Old West dying and the modern world replacing it.[[/folder]]

to:

** I assumed that was pretty much the point. Real Old West gangs were tiny groups. Gangs as we know them number in the hundreds. The entire game is about the Old West dying and the modern world replacing it.it.
** Civilization is moving on, and modern law enforcement is making it's encroach. Border counties like the one Bill's rundown old fort is located in are the last bastions for people like him.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Won't believe the son of an outlaw? Look at people like Jessie James. He was an unrepentant murderer, but people hailed him as a hero and cried out against Robert Ford not being executed as a murderer even though he'd legally killed a criminal wanted dead or alive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It all just boils down to the fact that the government ''doesn't care'' about Bill Williamson. They're already content to let the railroad do what they please out there given the Marshal's comment that they're burning settlements, presumably to force people to sell their land so they can keep laying track. They're not going to send the army to deal with some back water hick who's comandeered a decrepit and abandoned fort. They only sent the army after Dutch because he's leading an Indian rebellion, and as for John, Ross probably spun some yarn about one of Dutch's cohorts being out there and might still be planning on continuing his work.

to:

** It all just boils down to the fact that the government ''doesn't care'' about Bill Williamson. They're already content to let the railroad do what they please out there given the Marshal's comment that they're burning settlements, presumably to force people to sell their land so they can keep laying track. They're not going to send the army to deal with some back water hick who's comandeered a decrepit and abandoned fort.fort out in some shithole border county. They only sent the army after Dutch because he's leading an Indian rebellion, and as for John, Ross probably spun some yarn about one of Dutch's cohorts being out there and might still be planning on continuing his work.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It all just boils down to the fact that the government '''''doesn't care''''' about Bill Williamson. They're already content to let the railroad do what they please out there given the Marshal's comment that they're burning settlements, presumably to force people to sell their land so they can keep laying track. They're not going to send the army to deal with some back water hick who's comandeered a decrepit and abandoned fort. They only sent the army after Dutch because he's leading an Indian rebellion, and as for John, Ross probably spun some yarn about one of Dutch's cohorts being out there and might still be planning on continuing his work.

to:

** It all just boils down to the fact that the government '''''doesn't care''''' ''doesn't care'' about Bill Williamson. They're already content to let the railroad do what they please out there given the Marshal's comment that they're burning settlements, presumably to force people to sell their land so they can keep laying track. They're not going to send the army to deal with some back water hick who's comandeered a decrepit and abandoned fort. They only sent the army after Dutch because he's leading an Indian rebellion, and as for John, Ross probably spun some yarn about one of Dutch's cohorts being out there and might still be planning on continuing his work.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It all just boils down to the fact that the government '''''doesn't care''''' about Bill Williamson. They're already content to let the railroad do what they please out there given the Marshal's comment that they're burning settlements, presumably to force people to sell their land so they can keep laying track. They're not going to send the army to deal with some back water hick who's comandeered a decrepit and abandoned fort. They only sent the army after Dutch because he's leading an Indian rebellion, and as for John, Ross probably spun some yarn about one of Dutch's cohorts being out there and might still be planning on continuing his work.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's pretty clear from his behavior that up until the end, he didn't think Jack actually had the guts to gun him down. He's holding his rifle by the barrel and shooing him away by a pest. By the time he realized Jack was serious, he didn't have time to ready it again, so he went for his pistol.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** How well did that work out for him the first time?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Seconding how reading and writing are both taken for granted in this Information Age of ours. They are in THE WILD WEST, where books are ''expensive'' and the smallest settlements only had ONE {{Schoolmarm}} to teach a few dozen children per day. Any given town/city would have one newspaper company apiece, because populations were much smaller back then. There's a reason most towns/cities have a habit of self-naming their biggest/oldest newspapers after the town--because a few generations earlier, [[RealityEnsues that would be the ONLY newspaper they'd have.]]

to:

** Seconding how reading and writing are both taken for granted in this Information Age of ours. They are in THE WILD WEST, where books are ''expensive'' and the smallest settlements only had ONE {{Schoolmarm}} to teach a few dozen children per day. Any given town/city would have one newspaper company apiece, because populations were much smaller back then. There's a reason most towns/cities have a habit of self-naming their biggest/oldest newspapers after the town--because a few generations earlier, [[RealityEnsues [[SurprisinglyRealisticOutcome that would be the ONLY newspaper they'd have.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The whole point of the game, though, is that (a) "the middle of nowhere" is gradually shrinking as civilization encroaches and (b) the past doesn't let you go so easily. Yeah, John could do that... but Edgar Ross is still going to looking for him, and if not him, then someone else from John's blood-soaked past, and he's still uprooted his family from everything he tried to give them and forced them to change their identities and live a lie and spend their remaining days looking over their shoulders just waiting to see if the past is catch up with them. Or, he could just settle his accounts then and there and give his family a chance to live a better life.

to:

*** The whole point of the game, though, is that (a) "the middle of nowhere" is gradually shrinking as civilization encroaches and (b) the past doesn't let you go so easily. Yeah, John could do that... but Edgar Ross is still going to looking for him, Ross found him once before, and he has the resources of the federal government at his command. And if not him, Ross, then someone else from John's blood-soaked past, past is probably looking to settle accounts, and even if John manages to avoid any and all of them, he's still uprooted his family from everything he tried to give them and forced them to change their identities and live a lie and spend their remaining days looking over their shoulders just waiting to see if the past is catch up with them. Or, he could just settle his accounts then and there and give his family a chance to live a better life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It is amazing considering it's pointed out that the Bank has a single exit on the front of the building and the feds are covering said exit(not to mention are in the room with John when Dutch runs). Somehow it's still Johns fault Dutch escaped.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** And the last bandito, obviously, tried to surrender when his comrades were shot dead by holding his hands up and making the sign of the cross. John could’ve just knocked him out or told him to scram, but he just shoots him anyway with an obvious grin on his face.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[folder: Meta question [=RDR1=] ]]
Anyone think they should remaster this game? With the knowledge of the new characters and some of the new game effects.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In fairness, this isn't entirely down to the players being idiots. Jack does come across as a bit sullen and moaning in his interactions with John, and Abigail is first introduced to us attacking and browbeating her husband. While both clearly have valid reasons for interacting with John in this fashion, after spending however-many hours playing the game as John to rescue them it's perhaps not entirely a mystery while some players might not find this a particularly endearing introduction to the characters. Especially as we're only first introduced to them very deep into the late-game, which doesn't really give the player as much time to establish a bond with them given how important they are to John. As for Bonnie, she's pretty much one of the first characters we meet and she spends most of her interactions with John being charming and flirty with him, which might also explain why some players might like her more. Personally, this player quite likes Abigail, but it's not hard to see why others wouldn't necessarily.

to:

** In fairness, this isn't entirely down to the players being idiots. Jack does come across as a bit sullen and moaning petulant in his interactions with John, and Abigail is first introduced to us attacking and browbeating her husband.husband for taking his sweet time to get there. While both clearly have valid reasons for interacting with John in this fashion, after spending however-many hours playing the game as John to rescue them it's perhaps not entirely a mystery while some players might not find this a particularly endearing introduction to the characters. Especially as we're only first introduced to them very deep into the late-game, which doesn't really give the player as much time to establish a bond with them given how important they are to John. As for Bonnie, she's pretty much one of the first characters we meet and she spends most of her interactions with John being charming and flirty with him, which might also explain why some players might like her more. Personally, this player quite likes Abigail, but it's not hard to see why others wouldn't necessarily.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** If you read the newspaper in the Epilogue, it shows that Javier is among the dead along with [[spoiler:Bill, Dutch, Uncle and John]]. So, it doesn't matter whether he dies (either by John's hand or by the government), the outcome is basically the same.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's anyone's guess, cause either way we never see him again.

to:

** It's John probably doesn't care if Javier survives or not. Once Javier was taken to Ross he was no longer John's problem. So it's anyone's guess, cause either way we never see him again.guess.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's anyone's guess, cause either way we never see him again.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Seconding how reading and writing are both taken for granted in this Information Age of ours. They are in THE WILD WEST, where books are ''expensive'' and the smallest settlements only had ONE {{Schoolmarm}} to teach a few dozen children per day. Any given town/city would have one newspaper company apiece, because populations were much smaller back then. There's a reason most towns/cities have a habit of self-naming their biggest/oldest newspapers after the town--because back in those generations, [[RealityEnsues that was probably the ONLY newspaper they'd have.]]

to:

** Seconding how reading and writing are both taken for granted in this Information Age of ours. They are in THE WILD WEST, where books are ''expensive'' and the smallest settlements only had ONE {{Schoolmarm}} to teach a few dozen children per day. Any given town/city would have one newspaper company apiece, because populations were much smaller back then. There's a reason most towns/cities have a habit of self-naming their biggest/oldest newspapers after the town--because back in those generations, a few generations earlier, [[RealityEnsues that was probably would be the ONLY newspaper they'd have.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Seconding the fact that reading/writing are both taken for granted in the information age. They are in THE WILD WEST, where books are ''expensive'' and the smallest settlements only had ONE {{Schoolmarm}} to teach a few dozen children per day. Any given town/city would have one newspaper company apiece, because populations were much smaller back then. There's a reason most towns/cities have a habit of self-naming their biggest/oldest newspapers after the town--because back in those generations, [[RealityEnsues that was the ONLY newspaper they'd have.]]

to:

** Seconding the fact that reading/writing how reading and writing are both taken for granted in the information age.this Information Age of ours. They are in THE WILD WEST, where books are ''expensive'' and the smallest settlements only had ONE {{Schoolmarm}} to teach a few dozen children per day. Any given town/city would have one newspaper company apiece, because populations were much smaller back then. There's a reason most towns/cities have a habit of self-naming their biggest/oldest newspapers after the town--because back in those generations, [[RealityEnsues that was probably the ONLY newspaper they'd have.]]

Added: 561

Changed: 34

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** There is the fact, that most of us don't get because we these days masters it at a very young age, that learning to read take a hell of a lot of effort and time; time that a struggeling frontier family doesn't have and effort that a woman that have lived a full life without reading or writing would consider wasted.

to:

*** There is the fact, fact that most of us don't get get, because we these days masters it master reading at a very young age, that learning age: Learning to read take takes a hell of a lot of effort and time; time that time, which a struggeling struggling frontier family doesn't have have, and effort that a woman that have lived a full life without reading or writing would consider wasted.wasted.
** Seconding the fact that reading/writing are both taken for granted in the information age. They are in THE WILD WEST, where books are ''expensive'' and the smallest settlements only had ONE {{Schoolmarm}} to teach a few dozen children per day. Any given town/city would have one newspaper company apiece, because populations were much smaller back then. There's a reason most towns/cities have a habit of self-naming their biggest/oldest newspapers after the town--because back in those generations, [[RealityEnsues that was the ONLY newspaper they'd have.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[folder: Javier Possibly Surviving The Events Of [=RDR1=] ]]
* If John chooses to capture Javier, he takes Javier to the jail cell in El Presidio. Javier is then handed to the authorities. John implies that he later got executed, but Javier may have either been pardoned or was able to escape sometime after the Nuevo Paraiso Arc.
[[/folder]]

Top