Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* FridgeHorror: As pointed out in his profile, the proportion of Tennyson's chair to the rest of his body and the fact that we never see him out of it could very well indicate he ''doesn't have legs''. What in the world caused that?
to:
* FridgeHorror: As pointed out in his profile, the proportion of Tennyson's chair to the rest of his body and the fact that we never see him out of it could very well indicate he ''doesn't have legs''. What in the world caused that?that?
** It's possible he had some kind of birth defect that caused him to be born with malformed or missing legs. I'd be less concerned about his legs and more concerned with why he's unable to ''speak''.
** It's possible he had some kind of birth defect that caused him to be born with malformed or missing legs. I'd be less concerned about his legs and more concerned with why he's unable to ''speak''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Of course Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty are right at home in the 22nd Century: part of Moriarty's reasons for villainy in canon is that he's such a brilliant mind that people of his time literally couldn't comprehend his work, and Sherlock is in the same tier of intelligence as him. Both were centuries ahead of their time, so it makes sense they're right at home.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
* The reference to Moriarty being a Star Trek fan makes a lot more sense when one remembers in the original canon, he was an astrophysicist.
** And considering Moriarty "guest starred" on ''Series/StarTrekTheNextGeneration'', here he's just returning the "favor", as it were.
** And considering Moriarty "guest starred" on ''Series/StarTrekTheNextGeneration'', here he's just returning the "favor", as it were.
to:
* The reference to Moriarty being a Star Trek fan makes a lot more sense when one remembers in the original canon, he was an astrophysicist.
**astrophysicist. And considering Moriarty "guest starred" on ''Series/StarTrekTheNextGeneration'', here he's just returning the "favor", as it were.
**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** And considering Moriarty "guest starred" on StarTrekTheNextGeneration, here he's just returning the "favor", as it were.
to:
** And considering Moriarty "guest starred" on StarTrekTheNextGeneration, ''Series/StarTrekTheNextGeneration'', here he's just returning the "favor", as it were.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** And considering Moriarty "guest starred" on StarTrekTheNextGeneration, here he's just returning the "favor", as it were.
to:
** And considering Moriarty "guest starred" on StarTrekTheNextGeneration, here he's just returning the "favor", as it were.were.
* FridgeHorror: As pointed out in his profile, the proportion of Tennyson's chair to the rest of his body and the fact that we never see him out of it could very well indicate he ''doesn't have legs''. What in the world caused that?
* FridgeHorror: As pointed out in his profile, the proportion of Tennyson's chair to the rest of his body and the fact that we never see him out of it could very well indicate he ''doesn't have legs''. What in the world caused that?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* The reference to Moriarty being a Star Trek fan makes a lot more sense when one remembers in the original canon, he was an astrophysicist.
to:
* The reference to Moriarty being a Star Trek fan makes a lot more sense when one remembers in the original canon, he was an astrophysicist.astrophysicist.
** And considering Moriarty "guest starred" on StarTrekTheNextGeneration, here he's just returning the "favor", as it were.
** And considering Moriarty "guest starred" on StarTrekTheNextGeneration, here he's just returning the "favor", as it were.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* In the Episode 'The Crime Machine', Holmes freaked out when Watson got shot in the leg. In the Cannon story, "The Three Garridebs", Watson was shot in the leg and Holmes freaked out there. So, it was really a case of deja'vu for him.
to:
* In the Episode 'The Crime Machine', Holmes freaked out when Watson got shot in the leg. In the Cannon Canon story, "The Three Garridebs", Watson was shot in the leg and Holmes freaked out there. So, it was really a case of deja'vu for him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* In the Episode 'The Crime Machine', Holmes freaked out when Watson got shot in the leg. In the Cannon story, "The Three Garridebs", Watson was shot in the leg and Holmes freaked out there. So, it was really a case of deja'vu for him.
to:
* In the Episode 'The Crime Machine', Holmes freaked out when Watson got shot in the leg. In the Cannon story, "The Three Garridebs", Watson was shot in the leg and Holmes freaked out there. So, it was really a case of deja'vu for him.him.
* The reference to Moriarty being a Star Trek fan makes a lot more sense when one remembers in the original canon, he was an astrophysicist.
* The reference to Moriarty being a Star Trek fan makes a lot more sense when one remembers in the original canon, he was an astrophysicist.
