Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
''The Report'' is a 2018 thriller written and directed by Scott Z. Burns and produced by Creator/StevenSoderbergh.
to:
''The Report'' is a 2018 2019 thriller written and directed by Scott Z. Burns and produced by Creator/StevenSoderbergh.
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
* KnowNothingKnowItAll: It's pretty clear that Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessel have no clue what they’re talking about and that their “improved” interrogation techniques are nothing of the sort. Tellingly, when Ali Soufan asks them whether they have ever participated in an interrogation of terrorists, criminals, or literally ''anyone'', Mitchell responds that he has never attended a real interrogation, yet continues to espouse how the [=EITs=] are a godsend.
to:
* KnowNothingKnowItAll: It's pretty clear that Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessel have no clue what they’re they're talking about and that their “improved” "improved" interrogation techniques are nothing of the sort. Tellingly, when Ali Soufan asks them whether they have ever participated in an interrogation of terrorists, criminals, or literally ''anyone'', Mitchell responds that he has never attended a real interrogation, yet continues to espouse how the [=EITs=] are a godsend.
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* NeverMyFault: The CIA seems to have a terminal case of this. The film implies that the reason the CIA began to use torture was to cover up the fact that 9/11 could have been prevented by them. When it becomes clear [[InterrogatedForNothing the [=EITs=] don’t work]], they continue it anyway and act like it works so they don’t have to admit that they screwed up, and when Jones gets too close to releasing the report, they treat him like an ObstructiveBureaucrat for daring to point out the flaws and basic inhumanity of their methods.
to:
* NeverMyFault: The CIA seems to have a terminal case of this. The film implies that the reason the CIA began to use torture was to cover up the fact that 9/11 could have been prevented by them. When it becomes clear [[InterrogatedForNothing the [=EITs=] don’t don't work]], they continue it anyway and act like it works so they don’t don't have to admit that they screwed up, and when Jones gets too close to releasing the report, they treat him like an ObstructiveBureaucrat for daring to point out the flaws and basic inhumanity of their methods.
Changed line(s) 30 (click to see context) from:
* OnlySaneMan: During the torture of Zubaydah, FBI Agent Ali Soufan is the only one to realize that Mitchell and Jessel have no clue what they are talking about and that the [=EITs=] are [[InterrogatedForNothing ineffective]]. After he gets kicked off, Raymond Nathan takes up the role by being the only one to be horrified by Zubaydah’s treatment.
to:
* OnlySaneMan: During the torture of Zubaydah, FBI Agent Ali Soufan is the only one to realize that Mitchell and Jessel have no clue what they are talking about and that the [=EITs=] are [[InterrogatedForNothing ineffective]]. After he gets kicked off, Raymond Nathan takes up the role by being the only one to be horrified by Zubaydah’s Zubaydah's treatment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
'''The Report''' is a 2018 thriller written and directed by Scott Z. Burns and produced by Creator/StevenSoderbergh.
to:
Changed line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) from:
!!Tropes Associated With The Report Include:
to:
!!Tropes
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* TortureIsIneffective: Brutally deconstructed — the movie makes the point that not only does torture ''[[InterrogatedForNothing not]]'' work, it also makes it harder to prosecute the suspects who are submitted to torture due to the illegality of the practice, along with damaging the US's global position (as someone points out, captured American personnel are at greater risk for being tortured themselves if captured when their government is known to do the same).
to:
* TortureIsIneffective: Brutally deconstructed — the The movie makes the point that not only does torture ''[[InterrogatedForNothing not]]'' work, it also makes it harder to prosecute the suspects who are submitted to torture due to the illegality of the practice, along with damaging the US's global position (as someone points out, captured American personnel are at greater risk for being tortured themselves if captured when their government is known to do the same).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 31 (click to see context) from:
%%* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: Feinstein again.
to:
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* TortureAlwaysWorks: Brutally deconstructed — the movie makes the point that not only does torture ''[[InterrogatedForNothing not]]'' work, it also makes it harder to prosecute the suspects who are submitted to torture due to the illegality of the practice.
to:
* TortureAlwaysWorks: TortureIsIneffective: Brutally deconstructed — the movie makes the point that not only does torture ''[[InterrogatedForNothing not]]'' work, it also makes it harder to prosecute the suspects who are submitted to torture due to the illegality of the practice.practice, along with damaging the US's global position (as someone points out, captured American personnel are at greater risk for being tortured themselves if captured when their government is known to do the same).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* BlatantLies: the whole justification for the CIA's use of torture is shown to be built on the false identification of one prisoner as a high-ranking member of Al Quaeda.
to:
* BlatantLies: the The whole justification for the CIA's use of torture is shown to be built on the false identification of one prisoner as a high-ranking member of Al Quaeda.
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
* KnowNothingKnowItAll: Its pretty clear that Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessel have no clue what they’re talking about and that their “improved” interrogation techniques are nothing of the sort. Tellingly, when Ali Soufan asks them whether they have ever participated in an interrogation of terrorists, criminals, or literally ''anyone'', Mitchell responds that he has never attended a real interrogation, yet continues to espouse how the [=EITs=] are a godsend.
to:
* KnowNothingKnowItAll: Its It's pretty clear that Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessel have no clue what they’re talking about and that their “improved” interrogation techniques are nothing of the sort. Tellingly, when Ali Soufan asks them whether they have ever participated in an interrogation of terrorists, criminals, or literally ''anyone'', Mitchell responds that he has never attended a real interrogation, yet continues to espouse how the [=EITs=] are a godsend.
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* NeverMyFault: The CIA seems to have a terminal case of this. The film implies that the reason the CIA began to use torture was to cover up the fact that 9/11 could have been prevented by them, when it becomes clear [[InterrogatedForNothing the [=EITs=] don’t work]], they continue it anyway and act like it works so they don’t have to admit that they screwed up, and when Jones gets too close to releasing the report, they treat him like an ObstructiveBureaucrat for daring to point out the flaws and basic inhumanity of their methods.
to:
* NeverMyFault: The CIA seems to have a terminal case of this. The film implies that the reason the CIA began to use torture was to cover up the fact that 9/11 could have been prevented by them, when them. When it becomes clear [[InterrogatedForNothing the [=EITs=] don’t work]], they continue it anyway and act like it works so they don’t have to admit that they screwed up, and when Jones gets too close to releasing the report, they treat him like an ObstructiveBureaucrat for daring to point out the flaws and basic inhumanity of their methods.
Changed line(s) 31 (click to see context) from:
* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: Feinstein again.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Now a Useful Note, which cannot be listed as a trope.
Changed line(s) 35 (click to see context) from:
* TheWarOnTerror: Analyzes the fallout and cost of how the CIA fought it.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11,12 (click to see context) from:
* AmoralAttorney: CIA General Counsel John Yoo, who approved the use of torture and infamously determined that the President could legally order a child's testicles to be crushed "to stop a plane from crashing into a building".
* BittersweetEnding: [[spoiler: Daniel avoids prosecution and is able to complete and release the report, which led to the [=McCain=]-Feinstein bill outlawing the practices described being passed and signed. However, the report is heavily redacted and not only were none of the people involved prosecuted, many were ''promoted''.]]
* BittersweetEnding: [[spoiler: Daniel avoids prosecution and is able to complete and release the report, which led to the [=McCain=]-Feinstein bill outlawing the practices described being passed and signed. However, the report is heavily redacted and not only were none of the people involved prosecuted, many were ''promoted''.]]
to:
* AmoralAttorney: CIA General Counsel John Yoo, who approved the use of torture and infamously determined that the President could legally order [[GroinAttack a child's testicles to be crushed crushed]] "to stop a plane from crashing into a building".
* BittersweetEnding:[[spoiler: Daniel [[spoiler:Daniel avoids prosecution and is able to complete and release the report, which led to the [=McCain=]-Feinstein bill outlawing the practices described being passed and signed. However, the report is heavily redacted and not only were none of the people involved prosecuted, many were ''promoted''.]]
* BittersweetEnding:
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* CIAEvilFBIGood: the FBI is portrayed as being more concerned with legality and prisoner care, in contrast with the CIA who are looking for excuses to torture prisoners.
to:
* CIAEvilFBIGood: the The FBI is portrayed as being more concerned with legality and prisoner care, in contrast with the CIA who are looking for excuses to torture prisoners.
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* GovernmentProcedural: the movie delves deep into the nitty-gritty of how Senate investigations operate.
to:
* GovernmentProcedural: the The movie delves deep into the nitty-gritty of how Senate investigations operate.
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* NeverMyFault: The CIA seems to have a terminal case of this. The film implies that the reason the CIA began to use torture was to cover up the fact that 9/11 could have been prevented by them, when it becomes clear the [=EITs=] don’t work they continue it anyway and act like it works so they don’t have to admit they screwed up, and when Jones gets too close to releasing the report they treat him like an ObstructiveBureaucrat for daring to point out the flaws and basic inhumanity of their methods.
to:
* NeverMyFault: The CIA seems to have a terminal case of this. The film implies that the reason the CIA began to use torture was to cover up the fact that 9/11 could have been prevented by them, when it becomes clear [[InterrogatedForNothing the [=EITs=] don’t work work]], they continue it anyway and act like it works so they don’t have to admit that they screwed up, and when Jones gets too close to releasing the report report, they treat him like an ObstructiveBureaucrat for daring to point out the flaws and basic inhumanity of their methods.
Changed line(s) 29,30 (click to see context) from:
* OnceMoreWithClarity: Early in the movie, Jones leaves the facility he works at, and it's implied he stole (or "relocated"; see InsistentTerminology above) something from there. When we see the scene later in the movie, we see it was [[spoiler:the report inside the CIA condemning the "enhanced interrogation techniques" they were using]].
* OnlySaneMan: During the torture of Zubaydah, FBI Agent Ali Soufan is the only one to realize that Mitchell and Jessel have no clue what they are talking about and that the [=EITs=] are ineffective. After he gets kicked off, Raymond Nathan takes up the role by being the only one to be horrified by Zubaydah’s treatment.
* OnlySaneMan: During the torture of Zubaydah, FBI Agent Ali Soufan is the only one to realize that Mitchell and Jessel have no clue what they are talking about and that the [=EITs=] are ineffective. After he gets kicked off, Raymond Nathan takes up the role by being the only one to be horrified by Zubaydah’s treatment.
to:
* OnceMoreWithClarity: Early in the movie, Jones leaves the facility he works at, and it's implied that he stole (or "relocated"; see InsistentTerminology above) something from there. When we see the scene later in the movie, we see it was [[spoiler:the report inside the CIA condemning the "enhanced interrogation techniques" they were using]].
* OnlySaneMan: During the torture of Zubaydah, FBI Agent Ali Soufan is the only one to realize that Mitchell and Jessel have no clue what they are talking about and that the [=EITs=] areineffective.[[InterrogatedForNothing ineffective]]. After he gets kicked off, Raymond Nathan takes up the role by being the only one to be horrified by Zubaydah’s treatment.
* OnlySaneMan: During the torture of Zubaydah, FBI Agent Ali Soufan is the only one to realize that Mitchell and Jessel have no clue what they are talking about and that the [=EITs=] are
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* TortureAlwaysWorks: Brutally deconstructed - the movie makes the point that not only does torture ''not'' work, it also makes it harder to prosecute the suspects who are submitted to torture due to the illegality of the practice.
to:
* TortureAlwaysWorks: Brutally deconstructed - — the movie makes the point that not only does torture ''not'' ''[[InterrogatedForNothing not]]'' work, it also makes it harder to prosecute the suspects who are submitted to torture due to the illegality of the practice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
* IDidWhatIHadToDo: One CIA Agent that approaches Jones claims this about the EITs, and insults him for trying to expose them.
to:
* IDidWhatIHadToDo: One CIA Agent that approaches Jones claims this about the EITs, [=EITs=], and insults him for trying to expose them.
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
* KnowNothingAtAll: Its pretty clear that Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessel have no clue what they’re talking about and that their “improved” interrogation techniques are nothing of the sort. Tellingly, when Ali Soufan asks them whether they have ever participated in an interrogation of terrorists, criminals, or literally ''anyone'', Mitchell responds that he has never attended a real interrogation, yet continues to espouse how the EITs are a godsend.
to:
* KnowNothingAtAll: KnowNothingKnowItAll: Its pretty clear that Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessel have no clue what they’re talking about and that their “improved” interrogation techniques are nothing of the sort. Tellingly, when Ali Soufan asks them whether they have ever participated in an interrogation of terrorists, criminals, or literally ''anyone'', Mitchell responds that he has never attended a real interrogation, yet continues to espouse how the EITs [=EITs=] are a godsend.
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
* NeverMyFault: The CIA seems to have a terminal case of this. The film implies that the reason the CIA began to use torture was to cover up the fact that 9/11 could have been prevented by them, when it becomes clear the EITs don’t work they continue it anyway and act like it works so they don’t have to admit they screwed up, and when Jones gets too close to releasing the report they treat him like an ObstructiveBureaucrat for daring to point out the flaws and basic inhumanity of their methods.
to:
* NeverMyFault: The CIA seems to have a terminal case of this. The film implies that the reason the CIA began to use torture was to cover up the fact that 9/11 could have been prevented by them, when it becomes clear the EITs [=EITs=] don’t work they continue it anyway and act like it works so they don’t have to admit they screwed up, and when Jones gets too close to releasing the report they treat him like an ObstructiveBureaucrat for daring to point out the flaws and basic inhumanity of their methods.
Changed line(s) 30 (click to see context) from:
* OnlySaneMan: During the torture of Zubaydah, FBI Agent Ali Soufan is the only one to realize that Mitchell and Jessel have no clue what they are talking about and that the EITs are ineffective. After he gets kicked off, Raymond Nathan takes up the role by being the only one to be horrified by Zubaydah’s treatment.
to:
* OnlySaneMan: During the torture of Zubaydah, FBI Agent Ali Soufan is the only one to realize that Mitchell and Jessel have no clue what they are talking about and that the EITs [=EITs=] are ineffective. After he gets kicked off, Raymond Nathan takes up the role by being the only one to be horrified by Zubaydah’s treatment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* IDidWhatIHadToDo: One CIA Agent that approaches Jones claims this about the EITs, and insults him for trying to expose them.
Added DiffLines:
* KnowNothingAtAll: Its pretty clear that Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessel have no clue what they’re talking about and that their “improved” interrogation techniques are nothing of the sort. Tellingly, when Ali Soufan asks them whether they have ever participated in an interrogation of terrorists, criminals, or literally ''anyone'', Mitchell responds that he has never attended a real interrogation, yet continues to espouse how the EITs are a godsend.
Added DiffLines:
* NeverMyFault: The CIA seems to have a terminal case of this. The film implies that the reason the CIA began to use torture was to cover up the fact that 9/11 could have been prevented by them, when it becomes clear the EITs don’t work they continue it anyway and act like it works so they don’t have to admit they screwed up, and when Jones gets too close to releasing the report they treat him like an ObstructiveBureaucrat for daring to point out the flaws and basic inhumanity of their methods.
Added DiffLines:
* OnlySaneMan: During the torture of Zubaydah, FBI Agent Ali Soufan is the only one to realize that Mitchell and Jessel have no clue what they are talking about and that the EITs are ineffective. After he gets kicked off, Raymond Nathan takes up the role by being the only one to be horrified by Zubaydah’s treatment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
alphabetizing tropes
* CIAEvilFBIGood: the FBI is portrayed as being more concerned with legality and prisoner care, in contrast with the CIA who are looking for excuses to torture prisoners.
Deleted line(s) 16 (click to see context) :
* CIAEvilFBIGood: the FBI is portrayed as being more concerned with legality and prisoner care, in contrast with the CIA who are looking for excuses to torture prisoners.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15,16 (click to see context) from:
* DeadlyEuphemism: "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques" is explicitly used as a way of redefinition techniques that would otherwise be called "torture".
* CIAEvilFBIGood: the FBI is portrayed as being more concerned with legality and prisoner care, in contrast with the CIA who are located for excuses to torture prisoners.
* CIAEvilFBIGood: the FBI is portrayed as being more concerned with legality and prisoner care, in contrast with the CIA who are located for excuses to torture prisoners.
to:
* DeadlyEuphemism: "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques" is explicitly used as a way of redefinition redefining techniques that would otherwise be called "torture".
* CIAEvilFBIGood: the FBI is portrayed as being more concerned with legality and prisoner care, in contrast with the CIA who arelocated looking for excuses to torture prisoners.
* CIAEvilFBIGood: the FBI is portrayed as being more concerned with legality and prisoner care, in contrast with the CIA who are
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* ColdBloodedTorture: its use by the CIA is the focus of the investigation.
to:
* ColdBloodedTorture: its Its use by the CIA is the focus of the investigation.
Added DiffLines:
* HowWeGotHere: The film opens with Jones meeting up with Cyrus Clifford, a lawyer. We then get to see the events that led to Jones seeking out Clifford in the first place.
* InsistentTerminology: When Clifford asks Jones if he stole documents, Jones replies that he "relocated" them.
* InsistentTerminology: When Clifford asks Jones if he stole documents, Jones replies that he "relocated" them.
Added DiffLines:
* MarriedToTheJob: Jones admits he became this over the five years he worked on the torture report; he had a relationship early on, but it ended because of his work. Later, one of his co-workers quits because she's afraid of the same thing happening to her.
Added DiffLines:
* OnceMoreWithClarity: Early in the movie, Jones leaves the facility he works at, and it's implied he stole (or "relocated"; see InsistentTerminology above) something from there. When we see the scene later in the movie, we see it was [[spoiler:the report inside the CIA condemning the "enhanced interrogation techniques" they were using]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* AmoralAttorney: CIA General Counsel John Yoo, who approved the use of torture and infamously determined that the President could legally order a child's testicles to be crushed "to stop a plane from crashingly into a building".
to:
* AmoralAttorney: CIA General Counsel John Yoo, who approved the use of torture and infamously determined that the President could legally order a child's testicles to be crushed "to stop a plane from crashingly crashing into a building".building".
* BittersweetEnding: [[spoiler: Daniel avoids prosecution and is able to complete and release the report, which led to the [=McCain=]-Feinstein bill outlawing the practices described being passed and signed. However, the report is heavily redacted and not only were none of the people involved prosecuted, many were ''promoted''.]]
* BittersweetEnding: [[spoiler: Daniel avoids prosecution and is able to complete and release the report, which led to the [=McCain=]-Feinstein bill outlawing the practices described being passed and signed. However, the report is heavily redacted and not only were none of the people involved prosecuted, many were ''promoted''.]]
Added DiffLines:
* ColdBloodedTorture: its use by the CIA is the focus of the investigation.
Added DiffLines:
* ObstructiveBureaucrat: John Brennan is portrayed as becoming this once he's confirmed as CIA director, downplaying the investigation, insisting on heavy redactions to the report, and spying on the investigators.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* CIABadFBIGood: the FBI is portrayed as being more concerned with legality and prisoner care, in contrast with the CIA who are located for excuses to torture prisoners.
to:
* CIABadFBIGood: CIAEvilFBIGood: the FBI is portrayed as being more concerned with legality and prisoner care, in contrast with the CIA who are located for excuses to torture prisoners.
Added DiffLines:
* TakeThat: ''Film/ZeroDarkThirty'' and ''Series/TwentyFour'' are both portrayed as media glorifying the use of torture.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* CIABadFBIGood: the FBI is portrayed as being more concerned with legality and prisoner care, in contrast with the CIA who are located for excuses to torture prisoners.
Deleted line(s) 16 (click to see context) :
* FBIGoodCIABad: the FBI is portrayed as being more concerned with legality and prisoner care, in contrast with the CIA who are located for excuses to torture prisoners.
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* JurisdictionalFriction: When then-Attorney General Eric Holder opens an investigation into the CIA's use of torture, it ends the Agency's cooperation with the Senate investigation. In addition, it causes all Republican Senators and their staffers to pull out. This substantially hampers the ability of the investigation to do its work.
to:
* JurisdictionalFriction: JurisdictionFriction: When then-Attorney General Eric Holder opens an investigation into the CIA's use of torture, it ends the Agency's cooperation with the Senate investigation. In addition, it causes all Republican Senators and their staffers to pull out. This substantially hampers the ability of the investigation to do its work.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* AmoralAttorney: CIA General Counsel John Yoo, who approved the use of torture and infamously determined that the President could legally order a child's testicles to be crushed "to stop a plane from crashingly into a building".
* BlatantLies: the whole justification for the CIA's use of torture is shown to be built on the false identification of one prisoner as a high-ranking member of Al Quaeda.
* DeadlyEuphemism: "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques" is explicitly used as a way of redefinition techniques that would otherwise be called "torture".
* BlatantLies: the whole justification for the CIA's use of torture is shown to be built on the false identification of one prisoner as a high-ranking member of Al Quaeda.
* DeadlyEuphemism: "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques" is explicitly used as a way of redefinition techniques that would otherwise be called "torture".
* FBIGoodCIABad: the FBI is portrayed as being more concerned with legality and prisoner care, in contrast with the CIA who are located for excuses to torture prisoners.
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* HistoricalDomainCharacter: Pretty much everybody, but most notably Senator Dianne Feinstein and then-CIA director James Brennan.
to:
* HistoricalDomainCharacter: Pretty much everybody, but most notably Senator Senators Dianne Feinstein and Sheldon Whitehouse and then-CIA director James Brennan.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* JurisdictionalFriction: When then-Attorney General Eric Holder opens an investigation into the CIA's use of torture, it ends the Agency's cooperation with the Senate investigation. In addition, it causes all Republican Senators and their staffers to pull out. This substantially hampers the ability of the investigation to do its work.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* SpiritualAntithesis: to ''Film/ZeroDarkThirty''. Both fact-based procedurals that take diametrically opposite views on torture.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6,7 (click to see context) from:
It tells the [[BasedOnATrueStory true story]] of the 2012 Senate investigation into the CIA's use of torture in the wake of 9/11. Creator/AdamDriver stars as Daniel J. Jones, an idealistic staffer for California Senator Dianne Feinstien (Creator/AnnetteBening) tasked with leading the investigation and uncovering the evidence and discover the lengths to which the government went to shield themselves from accountability.
to:
It tells the [[BasedOnATrueStory true story]] of the 2012 Senate investigation into the CIA's use of torture in the wake of 9/11. Creator/AdamDriver stars as Daniel J. Jones, an idealistic staffer for California Senator Dianne Feinstien Feinstein (Creator/AnnetteBening) tasked with leading the investigation and uncovering the evidence and discover the lengths to which the government went to shield themselves from accountability.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14,15 (click to see context) from:
* HistoricalDomainCharacter: Pretty much everybody, but most notably Senator Dianne Feinstien and then-CIA director James Brennan.
* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: Feinstien again.
* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: Feinstien again.
to:
* HistoricalDomainCharacter: Pretty much everybody, but most notably Senator Dianne Feinstien Feinstein and then-CIA director James Brennan.
* ReasonableAuthorityFigure:Feinstien again.Feinstein again.
* TortureAlwaysWorks: Brutally deconstructed - the movie makes the point that not only does torture ''not'' work, it also makes it harder to prosecute the suspects who are submitted to torture due to the illegality of the practice.
* ReasonableAuthorityFigure:
* TortureAlwaysWorks: Brutally deconstructed - the movie makes the point that not only does torture ''not'' work, it also makes it harder to prosecute the suspects who are submitted to torture due to the illegality of the practice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 9 (click to see context) :
[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/img_20190822_100931.jpg]]
[[caption-width-right:350:How Far Would You Go to Find the Truth?]]
[[caption-width-right:350:How Far Would You Go to Find the Truth?]]
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* DuellingFilms: With ''Film/TheLaundromat'', another fact-based investigative procedural written by Scott Z. Burns.
to:
* DuellingFilms: DuelingMovies: With ''Film/TheLaundromat'', another fact-based investigative procedural written by Scott Z. Burns.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
'''The Report''' is a 2018 thriller written and directed by Scott Z. Burns and produced by Creator/StevenSoderbergh.
It tells the [[BasedOnATrueStory true story]] of the 2012 Senate investigation into the CIA's use of torture in the wake of 9/11. Creator/AdamDriver stars as Daniel J. Jones, an idealistic staffer for California Senator Dianne Feinstien (Creator/AnnetteBening) tasked with leading the investigation and uncovering the evidence and discover the lengths to which the government went to shield themselves from accountability.
The movie also stars Creator/TedLevine, Creator/MichaelCHall, Creator/MauraTierney, Creator/CoreyStoll, and Creator/JonHamm. It premiered at the 2019 Sundance Film Festival ahead of a general release on November 15. The trailer can be seen [[https://youtu.be/x79Gf4cJDDE here]].
!!Tropes Associated With The Report Include:
* {{Determinator}}: Nothing will get in the way of Daniel Jones' quest for the truth.
* DuellingFilms: With ''Film/TheLaundromat'', another fact-based investigative procedural written by Scott Z. Burns.
* GovernmentProcedural: the movie delves deep into the nitty-gritty of how Senate investigations operate.
* HistoricalDomainCharacter: Pretty much everybody, but most notably Senator Dianne Feinstien and then-CIA director James Brennan.
* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: Feinstien again.
* TheWarOnTerror: Analyzes the fallout and cost of how the CIA fought it.
It tells the [[BasedOnATrueStory true story]] of the 2012 Senate investigation into the CIA's use of torture in the wake of 9/11. Creator/AdamDriver stars as Daniel J. Jones, an idealistic staffer for California Senator Dianne Feinstien (Creator/AnnetteBening) tasked with leading the investigation and uncovering the evidence and discover the lengths to which the government went to shield themselves from accountability.
The movie also stars Creator/TedLevine, Creator/MichaelCHall, Creator/MauraTierney, Creator/CoreyStoll, and Creator/JonHamm. It premiered at the 2019 Sundance Film Festival ahead of a general release on November 15. The trailer can be seen [[https://youtu.be/x79Gf4cJDDE here]].
!!Tropes Associated With The Report Include:
* {{Determinator}}: Nothing will get in the way of Daniel Jones' quest for the truth.
* DuellingFilms: With ''Film/TheLaundromat'', another fact-based investigative procedural written by Scott Z. Burns.
* GovernmentProcedural: the movie delves deep into the nitty-gritty of how Senate investigations operate.
* HistoricalDomainCharacter: Pretty much everybody, but most notably Senator Dianne Feinstien and then-CIA director James Brennan.
* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: Feinstien again.
* TheWarOnTerror: Analyzes the fallout and cost of how the CIA fought it.