Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / TheHouseOfRothschild

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A most unusual film for its era, directly addressing antisemitism in a manner that Hollywood otherwise simply never did: the Rothschilds live in a ghetto, they are persecuted and oppressed, and Meyer talks about how Jews are forced to work as merchants and moneylenders because Christian Europe won't let them own land or work a trade. American cinema wouldn't take the subject of antisemitism up so directly again until ''Film/GentlemansAgreement'' and ''Film/{{Crossfire}}'', both from 1947. UsefulNotes/NaziGermany, meanwhile, made an [[SpiritualAntithesis antisemitic movie]] in 1940, ''Die Rothschilds''. The Nazis would also wholesale steal clips from the film to use in their infamous propaganda piece, ''Der ewige Jude''/''The Eternal Jew'' from the same year.

to:

A most unusual film for its era, directly addressing antisemitism in a manner that Hollywood otherwise simply never did: the Rothschilds live in a ghetto, they are persecuted and oppressed, and Meyer talks about how Jews are forced to work as merchants and moneylenders because Christian Europe won't let them own land or work a trade. American cinema wouldn't take the subject of antisemitism up so directly again until ''Film/GentlemansAgreement'' and ''Film/{{Crossfire}}'', both from 1947. UsefulNotes/NaziGermany, meanwhile, made an [[SpiritualAntithesis antisemitic movie]] in 1940, ''Die Rothschilds''. The Nazis would also wholesale steal clips from the film to use in their infamous propaganda piece, ''Der ewige Jude''/''The ''The Eternal Jew'' from the same year.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A most unusual film for its era, directly addressing antisemitism in a manner that Hollywood otherwise simply never did: the Rothschilds live in a ghetto, they are persecuted and oppressed, and Meyer talks about how Jews are forced to work as merchants and moneylenders because Christian Europe won't let them own land or work a trade. American cinema wouldn't take the subject of antisemitism up so directly again until ''Film/GentlemansAgreement'' and ''Film/{{Crossfire}}'', both from 1947. UsefulNotes/NaziGermany, meanwhile, made an [[SpiritualAntithesis antisemitic movie]] in 1940, ''Die Rothschilds''.

to:

A most unusual film for its era, directly addressing antisemitism in a manner that Hollywood otherwise simply never did: the Rothschilds live in a ghetto, they are persecuted and oppressed, and Meyer talks about how Jews are forced to work as merchants and moneylenders because Christian Europe won't let them own land or work a trade. American cinema wouldn't take the subject of antisemitism up so directly again until ''Film/GentlemansAgreement'' and ''Film/{{Crossfire}}'', both from 1947. UsefulNotes/NaziGermany, meanwhile, made an [[SpiritualAntithesis antisemitic movie]] in 1940, ''Die Rothschilds''.
Rothschilds''. The Nazis would also wholesale steal clips from the film to use in their infamous propaganda piece, ''Der ewige Jude''/''The Eternal Jew'' from the same year.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A most unusual film for its era, directly addressing antisemitism in a manner that Hollywood otherwise simply never did: the Rothschilds live in a ghetto, they are persecuted and oppressed, and Meyer talks about how Jews are forced to work as merchants and moneylenders because Christian Europe won't let them own land or work a trade. American cinema wouldn't take the subject of antisemitism up so directly again until ''Film/GentlemansAgreement'' in 1947. UsefulNotes/NaziGermany, meanwhile, made an [[SpiritualAntithesis antisemitic movie]] in 1940, ''Die Rothschilds''.

to:

A most unusual film for its era, directly addressing antisemitism in a manner that Hollywood otherwise simply never did: the Rothschilds live in a ghetto, they are persecuted and oppressed, and Meyer talks about how Jews are forced to work as merchants and moneylenders because Christian Europe won't let them own land or work a trade. American cinema wouldn't take the subject of antisemitism up so directly again until ''Film/GentlemansAgreement'' in and ''Film/{{Crossfire}}'', both from 1947. UsefulNotes/NaziGermany, meanwhile, made an [[SpiritualAntithesis antisemitic movie]] in 1940, ''Die Rothschilds''.

Added: 4

Changed: 200

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A most unusual film for its era, directly addressing antisemitism in a manner that Hollywood otherwise simply never did: the Rothschilds live in a ghetto, they are persecuted and oppressed, and Meyer talks about how Jews are forced to work as merchants and moneylenders because Christian Europe won't let them own land or work a trade. American cinema wouldn't take the subject of antisemitism up so directly again until ''Film/GentlemansAgreement'' in 1947.

to:

A most unusual film for its era, directly addressing antisemitism in a manner that Hollywood otherwise simply never did: the Rothschilds live in a ghetto, they are persecuted and oppressed, and Meyer talks about how Jews are forced to work as merchants and moneylenders because Christian Europe won't let them own land or work a trade. American cinema wouldn't take the subject of antisemitism up so directly again until ''Film/GentlemansAgreement'' in 1947.
1947. UsefulNotes/NaziGermany, meanwhile, made an [[SpiritualAntithesis antisemitic movie]] in 1940, ''Die Rothschilds''.






* HistoricalVillainUpgrade: The Rothschilds in the film, believe supporting the fight against Napoleon will contribute to amelioration of Jews. In actual fact, it was Napoleon who was most responsible for Jewish emancipation, and was indeed a heroic figure for many 19th Century European Jews from Heinrich Heine to UsefulNotes/SigmundFreud, and the film's allegory of making Napoleon a proto-Hitler as in a looming European dictator is entirely off-base (the fact that it was the British who broke the treaty with Napoleonic France and declared war first is naturally unaddressed).

to:

* HistoricalVillainUpgrade: The Rothschilds in of the film, film believe supporting the fight against Napoleon UsefulNotes/NapoleonBonaparte will contribute to amelioration improving the life of Jews. Jews in Europe. In actual fact, it was Napoleon who was most responsible for Jewish emancipation, and was indeed a heroic figure for many 19th Century European Jews from Heinrich Heine to UsefulNotes/SigmundFreud, and the film's allegory of making Napoleon a proto-Hitler proto-UsefulNotes/AdolfHitler as in a looming European dictator is entirely off-base (the fact that it was the British who broke the treaty with Napoleonic France and declared war first is naturally unaddressed).



* ANaziByAnyOtherName: Possibly the first example of this trope. It isn't random that Count Ledrantz, the most antisemitic character in the film, is a German. And just to make it more obvious, Ledrantz stirs up a pogrom in Frankfurt, with Germans throwing rocks through the windows of Jewish businesses.

to:

* ANaziByAnyOtherName: Possibly the first example of this trope. It isn't random that Count Ledrantz, the most antisemitic character in the film, is a German. And just to make it more obvious, Ledrantz stirs up a pogrom in Frankfurt, with Germans throwing rocks through in the windows of Jewish businesses.



* TitleDrop: The Duke of Wellington gives a celebratory toast for the house of Rothschild.

to:

* TitleDrop: The Duke of Wellington gives a celebratory toast for the house of Rothschild.Rothschild.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* GreedyJew: Deconstructed. Meyer's speech to his sons advises them to amass their fortunes as a matter of survival in an anti-Semitic Europe.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[quoteright:350:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/987ec3e4_de89_47f9_925b_b236ecd9ab70.jpeg]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HistoricalDomainCharacter: Most of them. Nathan Rothschild really did bankroll the Duke of Wellington's campaigns in France.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AllJewsAreCheapskates: Even a movie about antisemitism can't resist this joke. A cabbie complains about the small tip he got from Nathan, saying that even Nathan's daughter Julie tips him more. Nathan shoots back that Julie has a rich father, but he doesn't.


Added DiffLines:

* KissingCousins: Mentioned in one scene where Nathan expresses reluctance to approve Julie's relationship with Capt. Fitzroy, stating that Rothschilds marry "other Rothschilds". TruthInTelevision, as the real Rothschild family had a habit of doing this to keep the money within the family.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* InstantMessengerPigeon: Eventually it's revealed that this is how Nathan is getting early intelligence about how the army's doing in France. He has people send him messages from the front by homing pigeon.


Added DiffLines:

* SplashOfColor: The last scene, a royal reception in which the Prince Regent makes Nathan a baron, was shot in color. This was one of the first-ever uses of the three-strip Technicolor process that soon became the industry standard.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Nathan's brothers try to get him to switch sides and back Napoleon, pointing out that the Allies have abandoned them and Napoleon will give them much better financial terms. Nathan refuses, stating that the Rothschilds have always been for peace not war, and he won't make money by bankrolling a war.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheClan: The Rothschilds, a single family in 1780, have become this by 1812, with five Rothschilds having established successful families in five different European cities, hence the ''house'' of Rothschild. The film sticks with Nathan and the London Rothschilds, however.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ANaziByAnyOtherName: Possibly the first example of this trope. It isn't random that Count Ledrantz, the most antisemitic character in the film, is a German. And just to make it more obvious, Ledrantz stirs up a pogrom in Frankfurt, with Germans throwing rocks through the windows of Jewish businesses.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HistoricalHeroUpgrade: It gives one to UsefulNotes/TheDukeOfWellington. Regardless of his relations with the Rothschilds during UsefulNotes/TheNapoleonicWars, the real Duke in his time as Prime Minister was a proven anti-semite (after the film), who vocally opposed a bill to give rights to Jews by insisting that England was "a Christian country" and any attempt to give rights of voting and other liberties to Jews would change the character of England. Incidentally, the Duke's own descendant, Arthur Wellesley, the Fifth of his Name, was a noted member of the British far-right and a Nazi-sympathizer in the decade of this film's release.
* HistoricalVillainUpgrade: The Rothschilds in the film, believe supporting the fight against Napoleon will contribute to amelioration of Jews. In actual fact, it was Napoleon who was most responsible for Jewish emancipation, and was indeed a heroic figure for many 19th Century European Jews from Heinrich Heine to UsefulNotes/SigmundFreud, and the film's allegory of making Napoleon a proto-Hitler as in a looming European dictator is entirely off-base (the fact that it was the British who broke the treaty with Napoleonic France and declared war first is naturally unaddressed).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CorruptBureaucrat: The tax collector who initially threatens to exact an exorbitant 20,000 gulden judgment on Meyer, but then agrees to charge him only 2000 in tax in return for a bribe of 5000. Meyer is humiliated by the whole thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CannotKeepASecret: The Duke of Wellington cheerfully admits this, saying "I can't keep a secret" when giving Nathan an advance tip about the mammoth French loan.
* IdenticalGrandson: George Arliss plays both Meyer Rothschild and his son Nathan.



* SplitScreen: Used for each of the other four Rothschild brothers as they receive word of the mammoth French loan.

to:

* SplitScreen: Used for each of the other four Rothschild brothers as they receive word of the mammoth French loan.loan.
* TimeSkip: 32 years between the introductory scene in 1780 and 1812, when the Rothschilds have established their banks and are backing the war against Napoleon.
* TitleDrop: The Duke of Wellington gives a celebratory toast for the house of Rothschild.

Added: 652

Changed: 433

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It is a fictionalized re-telling of the rise of the Rothschilds, who pioneered international banking in Europe. The film opens in 1780 as family patriarch Meyer Rothschild (George Arliss) has established a prosperous trading business, but is still forced to live in a ghetto in Frankfurt, where he has to bribe anti-Semitic tax collectors. He manages to pay off the tax man but suffers a dreadful reversal when ten thousand gulden is stolen by bandits before he can receive it. A bitter Meyer tells his five sons to establish banking houses throughout Europe, to reduce the need for risky cash transfers, and also to enrich themselves as much as possible, because Jews need money to protect themselves in an anti-Semitic Europe.

to:

It is a fictionalized re-telling of the rise of the Rothschilds, who pioneered international banking in Europe. The film opens in 1780 as family patriarch Meyer Rothschild (George Arliss) has established a prosperous trading business, but is still forced to live in a ghetto in Frankfurt, where he has to bribe anti-Semitic antisemitic tax collectors. He manages to pay off the tax man but suffers a dreadful reversal when ten thousand gulden is stolen by bandits before he can receive it. A bitter Meyer tells his five sons to establish banking houses throughout Europe, to reduce the need for risky cash transfers, and also to enrich themselves as much as possible, because Jews need money to protect themselves in an anti-Semitic antisemitic Europe.



A most unusual film for its era.

to:

A most unusual film for its era.era, directly addressing antisemitism in a manner that Hollywood otherwise simply never did: the Rothschilds live in a ghetto, they are persecuted and oppressed, and Meyer talks about how Jews are forced to work as merchants and moneylenders because Christian Europe won't let them own land or work a trade. American cinema wouldn't take the subject of antisemitism up so directly again until ''Film/GentlemansAgreement'' in 1947.

Creator/BorisKarloff plays Count Ledrantz, an antisemitic noble who works against the Rothschilds. Creator/LorettaYoung plays Nathan's daughter Julie, who falls in love with a Gentile army officer. Music/AlfredNewman composed the score.

----
!!Tropes:

* ReasonableAuthorityFigure: The Duke of Wellington, who gives the Rothschilds tremendous credit for their financial support in the campaign against Napoleon. When Nathan Rothschild isn't invited to a celebratory dinner, the Duke gets angry, and pays a visit to Nathan's house instead.
* SplitScreen: Used for each of the other four Rothschild brothers as they receive word of the mammoth French loan.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
More to come


It is a fictionalized re-telling of the rise of the Rothschilds, who pioneered international banking in Europe. The film opens in 1780 as family patriarch Meyer Rothschild (George Arliss) has established a prosperous trading business, but is still forced to live in a ghetto in Frankfurt, where he has to bribe anti-Semitic tax collectors. He manages to pay off the tax man but suffers a dreadful reversal when ten thousand gulden is stolen by bandits before he can receive it. A bitter Meyer tells his five sons to establish banking houses throughout Europe, to reduce the need for risky cash transfers, and also to enrich themselves as much as possible, because Jews need money to protect themselves in an anti-Semitic Europe.

to:

It is a fictionalized re-telling of the rise of the Rothschilds, who pioneered international banking in Europe. The film opens in 1780 as family patriarch Meyer Rothschild (George Arliss) has established a prosperous trading business, but is still forced to live in a ghetto in Frankfurt, where he has to bribe anti-Semitic tax collectors. He manages to pay off the tax man but suffers a dreadful reversal when ten thousand gulden is stolen by bandits before he can receive it. A bitter Meyer tells his five sons to establish banking houses throughout Europe, to reduce the need for risky cash transfers, and also to enrich themselves as much as possible, because Jews need money to protect themselves in an anti-Semitic Europe.Europe.

Cut forward 32 years, and the Rothschild sons, led by the eldest, Nathan (also played by Arliss) have succeeded in founding five famous banking houses. The Rothschilds, working together, issue loans to the anti-Napoleon alliance, and the emperor of the French is defeated and exiled to Elba. Still, however, the Rothschilds are shunned and discriminated against by European high society, much to Nathan's bitterness.

A most unusual film for its era.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This is a work in progress. This article will be completed in a few hours.

Added DiffLines:

''The House of Rothschild'' is a 1934 film directed by Alfred L. Werker.

It is a fictionalized re-telling of the rise of the Rothschilds, who pioneered international banking in Europe. The film opens in 1780 as family patriarch Meyer Rothschild (George Arliss) has established a prosperous trading business, but is still forced to live in a ghetto in Frankfurt, where he has to bribe anti-Semitic tax collectors. He manages to pay off the tax man but suffers a dreadful reversal when ten thousand gulden is stolen by bandits before he can receive it. A bitter Meyer tells his five sons to establish banking houses throughout Europe, to reduce the need for risky cash transfers, and also to enrich themselves as much as possible, because Jews need money to protect themselves in an anti-Semitic Europe.

Top