Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / ReversalOfFortune

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Corrected my correction, as the death penalty was removed for the brothers in 1992 after being affirmed as a possibility in 1987


* CrusadingLawyer: The other case Dershowitz is dealing with in the movie is of two African-Americans on death row for a crime he believes them innocent of, and he's working that case pro bono. In real life, the boys were white, but the trope is better served with the crusader saving poor oppressed minorities rail-roaded by the justice system. The movie doesn't mention that alongside their father they busted an unrelated convicted murder out of prison, and that the escapees killed not 2 people but 6 (the Supreme Court handed down Tison v. Arizona prohibiting the death penalty for them in 1987, but the film claims the "Johnson" brothers are still on death row).

to:

* CrusadingLawyer: The other case Dershowitz is dealing with in the movie is of two African-Americans on death row for a crime he believes them innocent of, and he's working that case pro bono. In real life, the boys were white, but the trope is better served with the crusader saving poor oppressed minorities rail-roaded by the justice system. The movie doesn't mention that alongside their father they busted an unrelated convicted murder out of prison, and that the escapees killed not 2 people but 6 (the Supreme Court handed down Tison v. Arizona prohibiting the death penalty for them in 1987, but the film claims the "Johnson" brothers are still on death row).6.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Corrections to the case of the brothers who broke their father out of prison


* CrusadingLawyer: The other case Dershowitz is dealing with in the movie is of two African-Americans on death row for a crime he believes them innocent of, and he's working that case pro bono. In real life, the boys were white, but the trope is better served with the crusader saving poor oppressed minorities rail-roaded by the justice system. The movie also doesn't mention they busted their father out of prison and he then murdered four people.

to:

* CrusadingLawyer: The other case Dershowitz is dealing with in the movie is of two African-Americans on death row for a crime he believes them innocent of, and he's working that case pro bono. In real life, the boys were white, but the trope is better served with the crusader saving poor oppressed minorities rail-roaded by the justice system. The movie also doesn't mention they busted that alongside their father they busted an unrelated convicted murder out of prison prison, and he then murdered four people.that the escapees killed not 2 people but 6 (the Supreme Court handed down Tison v. Arizona prohibiting the death penalty for them in 1987, but the film claims the "Johnson" brothers are still on death row).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
"Wheter" -> "Whether"


* AffablyEvil: Klaus. Possibly. Wheter he's actually guilty or not is never revealed but being played by Creator/JeremyIrons means he's got plenty of charisma and sinister charm that make him impossible not to enjoy.

to:

* AffablyEvil: Klaus. Possibly. Wheter Whether he's actually guilty or not is never revealed but being played by Creator/JeremyIrons means he's got plenty of charisma and sinister charm that make him impossible not to enjoy.

Added: 1012

Changed: 38

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AffablyEvil: Klaus. Possibly. Wheter he's actually guilty or not is never revealed but being played by Creator/JeremyIrons means he's got plenty of charisma and sinister charm.

to:

* AffablyEvil: Klaus. Possibly. Wheter he's actually guilty or not is never revealed but being played by Creator/JeremyIrons means he's got plenty of charisma and sinister charm.charm that make him impossible not to enjoy.


Added DiffLines:

* AmbiguouslyEvil: Claus. Pretty much everyone, including Dershowitz, thinks he's guilty but Jeremy Irons plays him with just the right mix of charisma and sinister wit that you're left wondering if his claims of innocence are genuine or just another manipulation tactic.


Added DiffLines:

* RightForTheWrongReasons: This is the foundation of Dershowitz's defense and how he convinces others to join. He has no doubt whatsoever that Claus is guilty and never disagrees when others say it but the prosecution broke numerous laws of trial conduct and sets a frightening precedent for other cases of prosecutors acting in a similar way and saying it won't be a rich aristocrat like Claus who suffers next time.


Added DiffLines:

* WickedStepmother: Intially, this was averted as Claus got along very well with Sunny's kids from her previous marriage and his own daughter was welcomed into the family, coming to see them as her siblings. But it was played straight after Sunny's coma where her kids maintain, not unjustifiably, that Claus is responsible.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AffablyEvil: Klaus. Possibly. Wheter he's actually guilty or not is never revealed but being played by Creator/JeremyIrons means he's got plenty of charisma and sinister charm.


Added DiffLines:

* RiddleForTheAges: Wheter Claus really did the deed or not is never revealed. Given that both Sunny and Claus have since passed away, it's unlikely we ever will know either.


Added DiffLines:

* TheUnreveal: The film never reveals if Claus really did poison Sunny or not.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It's about Claus von Bulow (Creator/JeremyIrons), a British aristocrat of Danish-German extraction living in Rhode Island at the time, who was tried and convicted of attempting to kill his wife Sunny (Creator/GlennClose) by injecting her with insulin, which put her into a coma. Von Bulow, who maintained his innocence throughout, hired law professor/lawyer Alan Dershowitz (Ron Silver), who successfully appealed the verdict.

to:

It's about Claus von Bulow (Creator/JeremyIrons), a British aristocrat of Danish-German extraction living in Rhode Island at the time, who was tried and convicted of attempting to kill his wife Sunny (Creator/GlennClose) by injecting her with insulin, which put her into a coma. Von Bulow, who maintained his innocence throughout, hired law professor/lawyer Alan Dershowitz (Ron Silver), (Creator/RonSilver), who successfully appealed the verdict.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No longer a trope


* YouHaveToHaveJews: Andrea, Claus' current girlfriend, claims she's the one who told Claus to "hire the Jew (Dershowitz)" as his lawyer. Claus is less than pleased by her statement, though it's not made clear if it's because what she said was offensive to him or that it wasn't a good idea to reveal this to Dershowitz.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheStoic: Von Bulow is ''extremely'' emotionally reserved, to the point where he often seems callous and uncaring. Flashbacks to his marriage with Sunny make it clear that it's not a front or (in and of itself) anything sinister; Claus just isn't very good at expressing his emotions. Which doesn't stop Dershowitz from calling him out on this a few times.

to:

* TheStoic: Von Bulow is ''extremely'' emotionally reserved, to the point where he often seems callous and uncaring. uncaring to others. Flashbacks to his marriage with Sunny make it clear that it's not a front or (in and of itself) anything sinister; Claus just isn't very good at expressing his emotions. Which doesn't stop Dershowitz from calling him out on this a few times.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* JerkassHasAPoint: When Claus first meets Alan, he tells the lawyer that "My rights have been egregiously violated!" Considering that he's walking free while appealing his conviction, his comment initially seems preposterous, especially since Allen is defending two poor murder suspects on death row. But Alan realizes that Claus isn't wrong; Sunny's family has hired both a private prosecutor and a detective to perform illegal searches to convict Claus, which gives him a strong hook for his defense strategy.

to:

* JerkassHasAPoint: When Claus first meets Alan, he tells the lawyer that "My rights have been egregiously violated!" Considering that he's walking free while appealing his conviction, his comment initially seems preposterous, especially since Allen Alan is defending two poor murder suspects on death row. But Alan realizes that Claus isn't wrong; Sunny's family has hired both a private prosecutor and a detective to perform illegal searches to convict Claus, which gives him a strong hook for his defense strategy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* IdleRich: Invoked by Alan on Claus and Sunny's marriage, saying that a good marriage takes work, and those people don't like to work.

to:

* IdleRich: Invoked by Alan on Claus and Sunny's marriage, saying that a good marriage takes work, and those people don't like to work. Strictly speaking, Claus is an aversion; he works for oil magnate J. Paul Getty and is seen managing mundane business tasks like accounting in a few scenes. He and Sunny certainly live the extravagant lifestyle associated with this trope, though.



* JerkassHasAPoint: When Claus first meets Alan, he tells the lawyer that "My rights have been egregiously violated!" Considering that he's walking free while appealing his conviction his comment initially seems preposterous, but once Alan learns that Sunny's family has hired both a private prosecutor and a detective to perform illegal searches to convict Claus, it gives him a strong hook for his defense strategy.

to:

* JerkassHasAPoint: When Claus first meets Alan, he tells the lawyer that "My rights have been egregiously violated!" Considering that he's walking free while appealing his conviction conviction, his comment initially seems preposterous, but once especially since Allen is defending two poor murder suspects on death row. But Alan learns realizes that Claus isn't wrong; Sunny's family has hired both a private prosecutor and a detective to perform illegal searches to convict Claus, it which gives him a strong hook for his defense strategy.



* TheStoic: Von Bulow, and Dershowitz calls him out on this a few times.

to:

* TheStoic: Von Bulow, Bulow is ''extremely'' emotionally reserved, to the point where he often seems callous and uncaring. Flashbacks to his marriage with Sunny make it clear that it's not a front or (in and of itself) anything sinister; Claus just isn't very good at expressing his emotions. Which doesn't stop Dershowitz calls from calling him out on this a few times.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheReasonYouSuckSpeech: When Dershowitz is telling his former students about working on Von Bulow's case, one of them, Minnie (Felicity Huffman) becomes outraged. [[WhatTheHellHero She's offended Dershowitz would even consider the case because Von Bulow's so obviously guilty.]] This is how Dershowitz responds:

to:

* TheReasonYouSuckSpeech: When Dershowitz is telling his former students about working on Von Bulow's case, one of them, Minnie (Felicity Huffman) (Creator/FelicityHuffman) becomes outraged. [[WhatTheHellHero She's offended Dershowitz would even consider the case because Von Bulow's so obviously guilty.]] This is how Dershowitz responds:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* LaughingMad: Sunny, when she brings up whether she was put in a coma by Claus or not, laughs madly, then invites viewers to enjoy the circus trial.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FramingTheGuiltyParty: When it's realized that Sunny's children framed Claus, Sarah exclaims that means Claus is innocent. Alan and Raj reply that they could have simply framed a guilty man.

to:

* FramingTheGuiltyParty: When it's realized that Sunny's children framed Claus, Sarah Minnie exclaims that means Claus is innocent. Alan and Raj reply that they could have simply framed a guilty man.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MurderByInaction: Sarah's scenario of how Claus killed Sunny is that he noticed she was in yet another drug overdose, and instead of helping, opened the windows wide during winter and let the freezing cold finish her off as he walked the dogs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FramingTheGuiltyParty: When it's realized that Sunny's children framed Claus, one student exclaims that means Claus is innocent. Alan and another student reply that they could have simply framed a guilty man.

to:

* FramingTheGuiltyParty: When it's realized that Sunny's children framed Claus, one student Sarah exclaims that means Claus is innocent. Alan and another student Raj reply that they could have simply framed a guilty man.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FramingTheGuiltyParty: When it's realized that Sunny's children framed Claus, one student exclaims that means Claus is innocent. Alan and another student reply that they could have simply framed a guilty man.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RashomonStyle: We see events happening from the maid's point of view, from Sunny's children's point of view, and from Claus' point of view. As Sunny herself says in the narration, no one will ever really know what happened.

to:

* RashomonStyle: We see events happening from the maid's point of view, from Sunny's children's point of view, and from Claus' point of view. As Sunny herself says in the narration, no one will ever really know what happened.happened, now that Claus himself passed away in 2019.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Alan Dershowitz:''' (''after Von Bulow calls Sunny's second coma "more theatrical" when the team asks him about it'') Theatrical? What is this, a fucking game? This is life and death; you're wife is in a coma. You, you don't even make a pretense of caring, do you?

to:

-->'''Alan Dershowitz:''' (''after Von Bulow calls Sunny's second coma "more theatrical" when the team asks him about it'') Theatrical? What is this, a fucking game? This is life and death; you're your wife is in a coma. You, you don't even make a pretense of caring, do you?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Examples Are Not Arguable. If one of the trope's two main elements is "obviously up for debate", then it's not a valid example.


* AffablyEvil: "Evil" is obviously up for debate but Claus is undoubtedly charming and pleasant throughout.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
factually wrong, he had been "formally" charged and convicted. He hired Dershowitz for the appeal.


* JerkassHasAPoint: When Claus first meets Alan, he tells the lawyer that "My rights have been egregiously violated!" Considering that he's walking free and hasn't yet been formally charged his comment initially seems preposterous, but once Alan learns that Sunny's family has hired both a private prosecutor and a detective to perform illegal searches to convict Claus, it gives him a strong hook for his defense strategy.

to:

* JerkassHasAPoint: When Claus first meets Alan, he tells the lawyer that "My rights have been egregiously violated!" Considering that he's walking free and hasn't yet been formally charged while appealing his conviction his comment initially seems preposterous, but once Alan learns that Sunny's family has hired both a private prosecutor and a detective to perform illegal searches to convict Claus, it gives him a strong hook for his defense strategy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CrusadingLawyer: The other case Dershowitz is dealing with in the movie is of two African-Americans on death row for a crime he believes them innocent of, and he's working that case pro bono.

to:

* CrusadingLawyer: The other case Dershowitz is dealing with in the movie is of two African-Americans on death row for a crime he believes them innocent of, and he's working that case pro bono. In real life, the boys were white, but the trope is better served with the crusader saving poor oppressed minorities rail-roaded by the justice system. The movie also doesn't mention they busted their father out of prison and he then murdered four people.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Alan Dershowitz:''' Look, you're my student, you, you have a choice. You don't have to do anything you don't want to do; that is your choice. The reason I take cases - and here unlike most other lawyers, who are not professors and therefore have to make a living - I take cases because I get pissed off, and I am pissed off here. The family hired a private prosecutor: unacceptable! They conducted a private search! Now if we let them get away with that, rich people won't go to the cops any more. You know what they're going to do? They're going to get their own lawyers to collect evidence, and then they are going to choose which evidence they feel like passing on to the DA. And the next victim isn't going to be rich, like Von Bülow, but it's going to be some poor [[YiddishAsASecondLanguage schnook]] in Detroit who can't afford, or who can't find, a decent lawyer. I think it's a little more complicated than your simple moral superiority, hmm?

to:

-->'''Alan Dershowitz:''' Look, you're my student, you, you have a choice. You don't have to do anything you don't want to do; that is your choice. The reason I take cases - and here here, I'm unlike most other lawyers, who are not professors and therefore have to make a living - I take cases because 'cause I get pissed off, and I am pissed off here. The family hired a private prosecutor: unacceptable! They conducted a private search! Now if we let them get away with that, rich people won't go to the cops any more. You know what they're going to do? They're going to get their own lawyers to collect evidence, and then they are going to choose which evidence they feel like passing on to the DA. And the next victim isn't going to be rich, like Von Bülow, but it's going to be some poor [[YiddishAsASecondLanguage schnook]] in Detroit who can't afford, or who can't find, a decent lawyer. ({{Beat}}) I think it's a little more complicated than your simple moral superiority, hmm?no?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* JerkassHasAPoint: When Claus first meets Alan, he tells the lawyer that "My rights have been egregiously violated!" Considering that he's walking free and hasn't yet been formally charged his comment initially seems preposterous, but once Alan learns that Sunny's family has hired both a private prosecutor and a detective to perform illegal searches to convict Claus, it gives him a strong hook for his defense strategy.

Added: 514

Changed: 428

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[quoteright:300:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/reversal_of_fortune.jpg]]



''Reversal Of Fortune'' is a 1990 drama BasedOnATrueStory, directed by Barbet Schroeder. It's about Claus von Bulow (Creator/JeremyIrons), a British aristocrat of Danish-German extraction living in Rhode Island at the time, who was tried and convicted of attempting to kill his wife Sunny (Creator/GlennClose) by injecting her with insulin, which put her into a coma. Von Bulow, who maintained his innocence throughout, hired law professor/lawyer Alan Dershowitz (Ron Silver), who successfully appealed the verdict.

to:

''Reversal Of of Fortune'' is a 1990 drama BasedOnATrueStory, directed by Barbet Schroeder. Schroeder.

It's about Claus von Bulow (Creator/JeremyIrons), a British aristocrat of Danish-German extraction living in Rhode Island at the time, who was tried and convicted of attempting to kill his wife Sunny (Creator/GlennClose) by injecting her with insulin, which put her into a coma. Von Bulow, who maintained his innocence throughout, hired law professor/lawyer Alan Dershowitz (Ron Silver), who successfully appealed the verdict.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* StoppedCaring: Sunny, because she's dead. Instead, she laughs about the circus her death caused.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* YouHaveToHaveJews: Andrea, Claus' current girlfriend, claims she's the one who told Claus to "hire the Jew (Dershowitz)" as his lawyer.

to:

* YouHaveToHaveJews: Andrea, Claus' current girlfriend, claims she's the one who told Claus to "hire the Jew (Dershowitz)" as his lawyer. Claus is less than pleased by her statement, though it's not made clear if it's because what she said was offensive to him or that it wasn't a good idea to reveal this to Dershowitz.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** He later gives a short one to von Bulow himself.
--->'''Alan Dershowitz:''' One thing, Claus. Legally, this was an important victory. Morally - you're on your own.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AdaptationDistillation: While the book the movie is based on (written by Dershowitz) covers both the appeal and the second trial (where Von Bulow was found not guilty), the movie concentrates only on the appeal, some names were changed, and some details were compressed (as well as invented), but overall, it's pretty faithful to what happened during the appeal process.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** While driving him to see David Marriot, Sarah asks Dershowitz if he thinks he's Series/PerryMason.


Added DiffLines:

-->'''Alan Dershowitz:''' (''after Von Bulow calls Sunny's second coma "more theatrical" when the team asks him about it'') Theatrical? What is this, a fucking game? This is life and death; you're wife is in a coma. You, you don't even make a pretense of caring, do you?
-->'''Claus Von Bulow:''' 'Course I care, Alan. It's just, I don't wear my heart on my sleeve.

Top