Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Creator / JackKirby

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing links


*** ComicBook/{{Medusa|MarvelComics}}



*** ComicBook/{{Karnak}}
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->--'''[[http://comicsalliance.com/recap-smallville-episode-10-11-icarus/ David Uzumeri]]'''

to:

-->--'''[[http://comicsalliance.-->-- '''[[http://comicsalliance.com/recap-smallville-episode-10-11-icarus/ David Uzumeri]]'''



*** ',ComicBook/TheEternals''

to:

*** ',ComicBook/TheEternals''''ComicBook/TheEternals''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BeautyEqualsGoodness: Played with. The dichotomy between good and evil as portrayed in works like ''ComicBook/NewGods'' and ''ComicBook/TheEternals'' would at first glance make it seem like this was a trope Jack wanted to enforce; the benevolent New Gods of New Genesis and the Eternals were beautiful and youthful while inhabitants of Apokolips and the Deviants were monstrous and hideous. However, Kirby would greatly subvert this by showing how there are some on Apokolips who were conventionally attractive and yet wholly evil, and some of the Eternals weren't boy scouts themselves. In fact, some of Kirby's greatest heroes, such as the ever-lovin' blue-eyed Thing, were ugly-looking monsters but with hearts of gold. Orion, TheHero of ''New Gods'', is famously disfigured and hideous in his true form, which he hides using {{Glamour}} as a way to symbolize his internal conflicts with suppressing his natural barbarism.


Added DiffLines:

* WorldOfHam: Jack Kirby comics could give professional wrestlers a run for their money with how melodramatic his casts could be.

Added: 391

Changed: 162

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AuthorAppeal: AncientAstronauts, the ReluctantWarrior, ugly looking heroes, complicated machines (with tiny spherical dots laid on top) and kid gangs are the clearest examples.

to:

* AuthorAppeal: AuthorAppeal:
**
AncientAstronauts, the ReluctantWarrior, ugly looking heroes, complicated machines (with tiny spherical dots laid on top) and kid gangs are the clearest examples.examples.
** In [[https://kirbymuseum.org/blogs/effect/2012/06/ an interview]], he proudly admitted that the reason he created Big Barda was because he found taller women very attractive (his wife was an inch or two taller than he was).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The One-Above-All, the {{omnipotent}} but mostly unseen [[ThePowerOfCreation creator]] {{God}} of the entire Marvel Omniverse, is widely believed to be an avatar of Kirby.

to:

** The One-Above-All, the {{omnipotent}} but mostly unseen [[ThePowerOfCreation creator]] {{God}} of the entire Marvel Omniverse, is widely believed to be an avatar of Kirby. During Mark Waid's run on ''Fantastic Four'', The One-Above-All appeared to the FF as Kirby.

Added: 397

Removed: 946

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Mix And Match is now a disambig.


* GenreMashup: Kirby was fond of reimagining occult and magical concepts with technological and science-fiction flourishes. Dr. Doom's costume simultaneously has a medieval and modern motif (a Renaissance-hood, cape, gold clasps for both, a green surcoat, and a medieval belt covering over absolutely modern robotic armor) and according to Kirby was intended to make him look like the Grim Reaper.



* MixAndMatch:
** Kirby was fond of reimagining occult and magical concepts with technological and science-fiction flourishes. Dr. Doom's costume simultaneously has a medieval and modern motif (a Renaissance-hood, cape, gold clasps for both, a green surcoat, and a medieval belt covering over absolutely modern robotic armor) and according to Kirby was intended to make him look like the Grim Reaper.
** Magneto likewise has a pulp fiction leotard and cape number but has a helmet with a Dark Ages-style horn, that makes him look like a feudal baron straight from the feudal era (this was Pre-Claremont, where Magneto was still an obnoxious asshole).
** The Norse Gods are simultaneously SufficientlyAdvancedAlien and HighFantasy beings, Wakanda is likewise a traditional African community and a modern science-fiction utopia, and the Fourth World of Apokolips and New Genesis takes this to the zenith, with everything have a techno-occult motif.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Kirby is also well known (alongside ''ComicBook/{{Superman}}'' creators [[Creator/JerrySiegelAndJoeShuster Siegel and Shuster]]) as the poster boy for the creators' rights movements of TheSeventies and TheEighties. An embodiment of how talented artists were treated by the companies which became multibillion dollar industries because of their creations, while leaving the original creators with pittance on the basis of dubious "work for hire" contract policies by which artists were paid for no more than the "page rate" for the comics that they drew. Consequently, despite their characters becoming iconic, Kirby and the other artists of his generation made absolutely no royalties of any kind and were denied any chance to share in the successes of their creations. Also, he was the center of the art controversy during the mid 1980s when Marvel's image was tarnished by their shameful claim that he and the other artists had no rights to their own original artwork. Public pressure eventually forced Marvel into coughing up a pension for his widow, and the Kirby estate attempted to regain Kirby's share of the copyright on his Marvel Comics characters. This effort eventually ended in a settlement with Marvel’s new parent company, Disney, in the fall of 2014. The parties reached the settlement the day before the first hearing was set to take place at the Supreme Court. The monetary terms of the settlement [[UndisclosedFunds have never be publicly disclosed]] but it’s widely assumed that the estate were the “winners” due to the last minute nature of the settlement and the fact that litigation was initiated by Marvel when it was still its own independent company. In all likelihood, Disney forked over a substantial amount of money to not risk a potential ruling that could have sent the entire entertainment industry spiraling into chaos. His children were also to extract proper credit on adaptations from Disney, with his name having been displayed every one his work even remotely inspired since ''Film/ThorRagnarok'' came out in 2017.

to:

Kirby is also well known (alongside ''ComicBook/{{Superman}}'' creators [[Creator/JerrySiegelAndJoeShuster Siegel and Shuster]]) as the poster boy for the creators' rights movements of TheSeventies and TheEighties. An embodiment of how talented artists were treated by the companies which became multibillion dollar industries because of their creations, while leaving the original creators with pittance on the basis of dubious "work for hire" contract policies by which artists were paid for no more than the "page rate" for the comics that they drew. Consequently, despite their characters becoming iconic, Kirby and the other artists of his generation made absolutely no royalties of any kind and were denied any chance to share in the successes of their creations. Also, he was the center of the art controversy during the mid 1980s when Marvel's image was tarnished by their shameful claim that he and the other artists had no rights to their own original artwork. Public pressure eventually forced Marvel into coughing up a pension for his widow, and the Kirby estate attempted to regain Kirby's share of the copyright on his Marvel Comics characters. This effort eventually ended in a settlement with Marvel’s new parent company, Disney, in the fall of 2014. The parties reached the settlement the day before the first hearing was set to take place at the Supreme Court. The monetary terms of the settlement [[UndisclosedFunds have never be been publicly disclosed]] but it’s widely assumed that the estate were the “winners” due to the last minute last-minute nature of the settlement and the fact that litigation was initiated by Marvel when it was still its own independent company. In all likelihood, Disney forked over a substantial amount of money to not risk a potential ruling that could have sent the entire entertainment industry spiraling into chaos. His children were also to extract proper credit on adaptations from Disney, with his name having been displayed every one his work even remotely inspired since ''Film/ThorRagnarok'' came out in 2017.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Kirby is also well known (alongside [[Franchise/{{Superman}} Siegel and Shuster]]) as the poster boy for the creators' rights movements of TheSeventies and TheEighties. An embodiment of how talented artists were treated by the companies which became multibillion dollar industries because of their creations, while leaving the original creators with pittance on the basis of dubious "work for hire" contract policies by which artists were paid for no more than the "page rate" for the comics that they drew. Consequently, despite their characters becoming iconic, Kirby and the other artists of his generation made absolutely no royalties of any kind and were denied any chance to share in the successes of their creations. Also, he was the center of the art controversy during the mid 1980s when Marvel's image was tarnished by their shameful claim that he and the other artists had no rights to their own original artwork. Public pressure eventually forced Marvel into coughing up a pension for his widow, and the Kirby estate attempted to regain Kirby's share of the copyright on his Marvel Comics characters. This effort eventually ended in a settlement with Marvel’s new parent company, Disney, in the fall of 2014. The parties reached the settlement the day before the first hearing was set to take place at the Supreme Court. The monetary terms of the settlement [[UndisclosedFunds have never be publicly disclosed]] but it’s widely assumed that the estate were the “winners” due to the last minute nature of the settlement and the fact that litigation was initiated by Marvel when it was still its own independent company. In all likelihood, Disney forked over a substantial amount of money to not risk a potential ruling that could have sent the entire entertainment industry spiraling into chaos. His children were also to extract proper credit on adaptations from Disney, with his name having been displayed every one his work even remotely inspired since ''Film/ThorRagnarok'' came out in 2017.

to:

Kirby is also well known (alongside [[Franchise/{{Superman}} ''ComicBook/{{Superman}}'' creators [[Creator/JerrySiegelAndJoeShuster Siegel and Shuster]]) as the poster boy for the creators' rights movements of TheSeventies and TheEighties. An embodiment of how talented artists were treated by the companies which became multibillion dollar industries because of their creations, while leaving the original creators with pittance on the basis of dubious "work for hire" contract policies by which artists were paid for no more than the "page rate" for the comics that they drew. Consequently, despite their characters becoming iconic, Kirby and the other artists of his generation made absolutely no royalties of any kind and were denied any chance to share in the successes of their creations. Also, he was the center of the art controversy during the mid 1980s when Marvel's image was tarnished by their shameful claim that he and the other artists had no rights to their own original artwork. Public pressure eventually forced Marvel into coughing up a pension for his widow, and the Kirby estate attempted to regain Kirby's share of the copyright on his Marvel Comics characters. This effort eventually ended in a settlement with Marvel’s new parent company, Disney, in the fall of 2014. The parties reached the settlement the day before the first hearing was set to take place at the Supreme Court. The monetary terms of the settlement [[UndisclosedFunds have never be publicly disclosed]] but it’s widely assumed that the estate were the “winners” due to the last minute nature of the settlement and the fact that litigation was initiated by Marvel when it was still its own independent company. In all likelihood, Disney forked over a substantial amount of money to not risk a potential ruling that could have sent the entire entertainment industry spiraling into chaos. His children were also to extract proper credit on adaptations from Disney, with his name having been displayed every one his work even remotely inspired since ''Film/ThorRagnarok'' came out in 2017.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Kirby is also well known (alongside [[Franchise/{{Superman}} Siegel and Shuster]]) as the poster boy for the creators' rights movements of TheSeventies and TheEighties. An embodiment of how talented artists were treated by the companies which became multibillion dollar industries because of their creations, while leaving the original creators with pittance on the basis of dubious "work for hire" contract policies by which artists were paid for no more than the "page rate" for the comics that they drew. Consequently, despite their characters becoming iconic, Kirby and the other artists of his generation made absolutely no royalties of any kind and were denied any chance to share in the successes of their creations. Also, he was the center of the art controversy during the mid 1980s when Marvel's image was tarnished by their shameful claim that he and the other artists had no rights to their own original artwork. Public pressure eventually forced Marvel into coughing up a pension for his widow, and the Kirby estate attempted to regain Kirby's share of the copyright on his Marvel Comics characters. This effort eventually ended in a settlement with Marvel’s new parent company, Disney, in the fall of 2014. The parties reached the settlement the day before the first hearing was set to take place at the Supreme Court. The monetary terms of the settlement [[UndisclosedFunds have never be publicly disclosed]] but it’s widely assumed that the estate were the “winners” due to the last minute nature of the settlement and the fact that litigation was initiated by Marvel when it was still its own independent company. In all likelihood, Disney forked over a substantial amount of money to not risk a potential ruling that could have sent the entire entertainment industry spiraling into chaos. His children were also to extract proper credit on adaptations from Disney, with his name having been displayed every one his work even remotely inspired since ''Film/ThorRagnarok'' came out in 2017.

to:

Kirby is also well known (alongside [[Franchise/{{Superman}} Siegel and Shuster]]) as the poster boy for the creators' rights movements of TheSeventies and TheEighties. An embodiment of how talented artists were treated by the companies which became multibillion dollar industries because of their creations, while leaving the original creators with pittance on the basis of dubious "work for hire" contract policies by which artists were paid for no more than the "page rate" for the comics that they drew. Consequently, despite their characters becoming iconic, Kirby and the other artists of his generation made absolutely no royalties of any kind and were denied any chance to share in the successes of their creations. Also, he was the center of the art controversy during the mid 1980s when Marvel's image was tarnished by their shameful claim that he and the other artists had no rights to their own original artwork. Public pressure eventually forced Marvel into coughing up a pension for his widow, and the Kirby estate attempted to regain Kirby's share of the copyright on his Marvel Comics characters. This effort eventually ended in a settlement with Marvel’s Marvel’s new parent company, Disney, in the fall of 2014. The parties reached the settlement the day before the first hearing was set to take place at the Supreme Court. The monetary terms of the settlement [[UndisclosedFunds have never be publicly disclosed]] but it’s widely assumed that the estate were the “winners” due to the last minute nature of the settlement and the fact that litigation was initiated by Marvel when it was still its own independent company. In all likelihood, Disney forked over a substantial amount of money to not risk a potential ruling that could have sent the entire entertainment industry spiraling into chaos. His children were also to extract proper credit on adaptations from Disney, with his name having been been displayed every one his work even remotely inspired since ''Film/ThorRagnarok'' came out in 2017.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Kirby is also well known (alongside [[Franchise/{{Superman}} Siegel and Shuster]]) as the poster boy for the creators' rights movements of TheSeventies and TheEighties. An embodiment of how talented artists were treated by the companies which became multibillion dollar industries because of their creations, while leaving the original creators with pittance on the basis of dubious "work for hire" contract policies by which artists were paid for no more than the "page rate" for the comics that they drew. Consequently, despite their characters becoming iconic, Kirby and the other artists of his generation made absolutely no royalties of any kind and were denied any chance to share in the successes of their creations. Also, he was the center of the art controversy during the mid 1980s when Marvel's image was tarnished by their shameful claim that he and the other artists had no rights to their own original artwork. Public pressure eventually forced Marvel into coughing up a pension for his widow, and the Kirby estate attempted to regain Kirby's share of the copyright on his Marvel Comics characters, an effort which ended with a 2014 settlement. The settlement was reached the business day before the Supreme Court was set to hear the case and the details have never [[UndisclosedFunds been disclosed]].

to:

Kirby is also well known (alongside [[Franchise/{{Superman}} Siegel and Shuster]]) as the poster boy for the creators' rights movements of TheSeventies and TheEighties. An embodiment of how talented artists were treated by the companies which became multibillion dollar industries because of their creations, while leaving the original creators with pittance on the basis of dubious "work for hire" contract policies by which artists were paid for no more than the "page rate" for the comics that they drew. Consequently, despite their characters becoming iconic, Kirby and the other artists of his generation made absolutely no royalties of any kind and were denied any chance to share in the successes of their creations. Also, he was the center of the art controversy during the mid 1980s when Marvel's image was tarnished by their shameful claim that he and the other artists had no rights to their own original artwork. Public pressure eventually forced Marvel into coughing up a pension for his widow, and the Kirby estate attempted to regain Kirby's share of the copyright on his Marvel Comics characters, an characters. This effort which eventually ended with in a 2014 settlement. The settlement was with Marvel’s new parent company, Disney, in the fall of 2014. The parties reached the business settlement the day before the Supreme Court first hearing was set to hear take place at the case and Supreme Court. The monetary terms of the details have never settlement [[UndisclosedFunds been disclosed]].
have never be publicly disclosed]] but it’s widely assumed that the estate were the “winners” due to the last minute nature of the settlement and the fact that litigation was initiated by Marvel when it was still its own independent company. In all likelihood, Disney forked over a substantial amount of money to not risk a potential ruling that could have sent the entire entertainment industry spiraling into chaos. His children were also to extract proper credit on adaptations from Disney, with his name having been displayed every one his work even remotely inspired since ''Film/ThorRagnarok'' came out in 2017.

Top