Tropes
Media
Browse
Indexes
Forums
Videos
Join
Login
Tropes
Media
Browse
Indexes
Forums
Videos
Ask The Tropers
Trope Finder
Media Finder
Trope Launch Pad
Tech Wishlist
Reviews
Tools
Cut List
New Edits
Edit Reasons
Launches
Images List
Crowner Activity
Un-typed Pages
Recent Page Type Changes
Changelog
Tips
Creating New Redirects
Cross Wicking
Tips for Editing
Text Formatting Rules
Glossary
Edit Reasons
Handling Spoilers
Word Cruft
Administrivia
FAQ
Tropes HQ
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
DMCA Notice
Privacy Policy
Report Bug
Go Ad-Free
Changelog
Show Spoilers
Night Vision
Sticky Header
Highlight Links
Follow TV Tropes
SugarWiki
DarthWiki
YMMV
WMG
Trivia
You need to
login
to do this.
Get Known
if you don't have an account
Markup View
Author: MorganWick
Jul 22nd 2012
at
2:23:55 AM
"This a general supertrope for characters who are strangers to the other characters and the audience, such that their relationships to the other characters (and their place in the plot, specifically, friend or foe) are unclear, particularly when first introduced." The name makes me think first and foremost of someone who is unknown ''to the characters'', and doesn't seem to include characters who are known to other characters but not the audience, though it can certainly be read that way if you squint. The Mark Twain story in question is of the former type, and so it's useless to say "well this is the trope namer" as a defense. MysteryCharacter might work better. The laconic might be more problematic. It makes me think of a side, possibly represented by a MagnificentBastard or TheChessmaster, who's neutral to all sides of a conflict and instead manipulates those sides from the shadows to further unknown ends. I think we have that, though I'm too lazy to look it up, but I'm not even sure it's on the list or whether it even belongs there. At least the laconic won't be relevant after the trope is launched, though. The description is so wordy it obfuscates the trope; the ''second'' time I read it I wondered if something like [[StarWars Luke's father]] would count. It tries too hard to break it down mechanistically and actually comes close to over-emphasizing the audience angle, if such is even possible. I think a good chunk can be excised to an analysis page.
Show Spoilers
Night Vision
Sticky Header
Wide Load
Important Links
Ask The Tropers
Trope Finder
Media Finder
Trope Launch Pad
Tech Wishlist
Reviews
Go Ad Free!
Crucial Browsing
Genre
Action Adventure
Comedy
Commercials
Crime & Punishment
Drama
Horror
Love
News
Professional Wrestling
Speculative Fiction
Sports Story
War
Live Blogs
Media
All Media
Animation (Western)
Anime
Comic Book
Fan Fics
Film
Game
Literature
Music And Sound Effects
New Media
Print Media
Radio
Sequential Art
Tabletop Games
Television
Theater
Videogame
Webcomics
Narrative
Universal
Applied Phlebotinum
Characterization
Characters
Characters As Device
Dialogue
Motifs
Narrative Devices
Paratext
Plots
Settings
Spectacle
Other Categories
British Telly
The Contributors
Creator Speak
Creators
Derivative Works
Language
Laws And Formulas
Show Business
Split Personality
Stock Room
Trope
Tropes
Truth And Lies
Truth In Television
Topical Tropes
Betrayal
Censorship
Combat
Death
Family
Fate And Prophecy
Food
Holiday
Memory
Money
Morality
Politics
Religion
School
Resources
Tools
Wiki Tools
Cut List
New Edits
Edit Reasons
Isolated Pages
Launches
Images List
Recent Videos
Crowner Activity
Un-typed Pages
Recent Page Type Changes
Templates
Trope Entry
Works
Character Sheet
Playing With
Fandom
Tips
Creating New Redirects
Cross Wicking
Tips for Editing
Text Formatting Rules
Glossary
Edit Reasons
Handling Spoilers
Word Cruft
Administrivia
FAQ
Changelog
Report Bug
Trope Repair Shop
Image Pickin'
Advertisement:
Top