TV Tropes Org
site search

A review is one person's opinion. TV Tropes doesn't have an opinion. The person who signed the review does.

sort by: type:
correct subject add a review about reviews
Waaay better than Atlas Shrugged
As someone who's long had an interest in Rand's philosophy, even though I strongly disagree with pretty much all of it, I decided to about a year ago to sit down and read through her two most important novels, The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. Suffice it to say that if you're only going to read on of them, read The Fountainhead.

I was pleasantly surprised by the novel, and after reading Atlas Shrugged, I appreciate it even more. Although the later book is generally held as Rand's Magnum Opus, and foremost "masterpiece" by her followers, The Fountainhead is superior in pretty much every way.

While the characters of Atlas are universally pushed into "Brilliant, Unwavering, Ultra-rational Aryan Supermen"-heroes and "Moronic, Pathetic, Repulsive Crybaby"-villains, the people of Fountainhead are generally more complex, interesting and well-written. Though Howard Roark is rather wooden and Mary-Sueish (he's right about everything, never makes any real mistakes, always gets the last word etc.), he's a fountain of emotionality and complexity compared to John Galt. Peter Keating is a character I will always praise Rand for: he's an excellent character, someone who's generally on the side of the "bad guys", but is nevertheless a very sympathetic, conflicted and tragic character with both good and bad sides, and feels like a living breathing person; I actually liked and sympathized with him much more than with Roark. Ellsworth Toohey is infinitely better as a villain than the pathetic pushovers from Atlas; he's an actual threat to Roark, and in some ways just as brilliant and intelligent as he is, and you understand why people like him and want to follow him. Most importantly, characters are allowed to have personalities, quirks and interests unrelated to being mouthpieces for Rand or strawmen to knock over.

There are of course several bad sides to the novel. While nowhere near as as Anvilicious as Atlas, it's still very preachy and overblown at times. Some of Rand's uncomfortable views shine though occasionally; the infamous rape scene between Roark and Dominique, her less than progressive views of the physically and mentally handicapped, references to "leprous savages in the jungle" by the heroes, etc.

Still, it's a mostly enjoyable read, and far better than Rand's more famous novel.
  # comments: 3
flag for mods
Kind Of A Roadblock...
Alright, this is coming from a fan of Ayn Rand and a one-time objectivist who loves these books. They're thought-provoking, and quite good as long as you view them as editorials or debate material by a different means instead of stories. I really enjoyed The Fountainhead, and think others could enjoy it too.

But.

There is a scene in the book where the protagonist rapes a woman and she likes it and ends up falling in love with him.

If you can get past that, you'll find a very compelling book with strong metaphor and a deliciously bitter tone. If you can't get past that, well... I'd stay away.
  # comments: 4
flag for mods
Whether you love it or hate it, it will make you think!
Let's make this clear. Ayn Rand's work is a massive case of Your Mileage May Vary. In essence, her work savagely deconstructs the dominant moral beliefs of much of Western Civilization without any mercy. As she burns Christian and Comtean altruism down to ashes, she erects a competing moral theory that argues morality should be focussed not on society, but on the individual and the individual's life. In short, Rand argues against selflessness, and argues for selfishness.

This in and of itself would make someone hate Ayn Rand. But this is mostly due to mischaracterization. Rand's "selflessness" was Auguste Comte's original definition of Altruism, i.e. "live for others" (the ultimate purpose of every person must be the service of other persons). Rand's "selfishness" is closer to what most people would refer to as "individuation" and "flourishing." But, unfortunately, misinterpretations persist (due in no insignificant part to deliberate misinterpretations by Rand's detractors, as well as the rather hostile behavior of some of her supporters).

Regardless, The Fountainhead is, by literary standards, the most sophisticated of Ayn Rand's works. There are few Author Filibuster moments, and much use of subtle allegory. She writes in a rather strident, bitter tone, which personally I like. It is a truly thrilling and liberating experience to see thousands of years of accepted moral wisdom be dismembered. Her use of architecture as a metaphor for a human being's character is memorable.

Yes, this is, style-wise, an epic novel. The mundane facts of day to day life are disregarded when they get in the way of allegory. Protagonists are, like in Dostoyevsky's novels, embodiments of sets of ideas rather than approximations of how most people act in the real world.

The good thing about this book, even if you disagree with it, is that it will make you think. It will force you to critically examine the moral ideals you are frequently confronted with. Even if you think Objectivism would not work in real life, it is quite probable you will find something admirable and beautiful about Ayn Rand's vision of what life and humanity can be like.
  # comments: 2
flag for mods
back to article
TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy