Reviews: The Killing Joke

sort by: type:
The story of One Bad Day
When I first read the Killing Joke, I must admit I didn't get it. But then upon rereading I came to realize why this is considered a well known story. Every moment of the story is filled with a certain energy that just fits the mood.

When the Joker is out and about there is something just so creepy and disturbing about him every time he appears on screen. I can feel the exhaustion and impatience of Batman when he's out looking for him, the horror in Barbara's eyes and the utter shock of Jim Gordon. And finally, the odd but sad tone of the flashbacks of The Joker's one bad day.

The story simply put is Joker's last chance, and Batman knows he's reaching the end of that line as well and everything that happens really puts it into perspective about how that last chance ain't going to happen, with the final joke summing up the entire story.

Now to cover something more controversial, the crippling of Barbara Gordon, I did not live at the time this happened so my opinion is miffed, but I must say while horrific for the time and still referenced today, it gave Barbara a far bigger role in the universe as Oracle, the one who saw all and knew all, rending what Joker did moot. Horrific? Yes. Ultimately the end. Far from it.

I'd recommend reading this just to get a idea of where the original idea of Joker's "One bad day" philosophy came from.
  comments: 0
An unforgivable masterpiece... but a masterpiece nonetheless.
Where to begin with this slim little 46-page comic? It might be the most iconic Joker comic today, and its presence is guaranteed on most "Best Batman stories" lists. The late Heath Ledger's endorsement alone probably sent thousands running to order it online.

First off... this isn't a pretty story. Some fans rightfully chew out Barbara's crippling as one of the most gruesome scenes in comic-book history, and for no other reason than to generate drama - to say nothing of Jim Gordon's torture. The only defense I have on that count is that this book was written in an age where such things had not become a trope in and of themselves, at least where comics were concerned.

And actually, that's something that plagues most of the book. Most every Joker story since 1988 has relentlessly picked this story's bones clean, with ever-escalating degrees of violence and nihilism and Foe Yay dialogue with Batman that becomes less and less subtle every time. It was interesting, even revolutionary, the first time (perhaps second, if you think The Dark Knight Returns is what really got the ball rolling) around, but the thirtieth? Given that most Batman fans will have read at least one post-1988 Joker story beforehand, no wonder so many of them call this comic overrated when they finally read it.

But that's not to say this book isn't worth reading in and of itself. Alan Moore is rightfully called one of the masters of the comic-book medium, and even if you don't care for the book's content, the execution alone is a work of art. It's rich with Watchmen influences: Moore's trademark nine-panel grids, laconic (or even silent) scenes, and symbolism galore. Some of the dialogue might sound a bit hokey, but other bits - especially the Joker's first scene - are goldmines of Gallows Humor that most writers today couldn't dream of matching.

And if nothing else: pretty pretty Brian Bolland art. Bolland is one of the few artists who can blend Uncanny Valley levels of realism with the cartoonish energy of Batman's world near-seamlessly. Every page is lush with detail, and his Joker in particular can go from terrifying to tragic to downright likable in the same page, or even the same panel.

I suppose I should conclude with something about the ending. I think that...
  comments: 1