Back to Reviews

Reviews Comments: Flanderization Killed The King King Of The Hill whole series review by Mr Mouse

You've heard this accusation before; heck it occupies 90% of the YMMV section of the article, but it rings true to me, so much so that it cannot be said enough; somewhere along King of the Hill's 13 season run, the fine balance between characterization and comedy was disrupted for worse.

When KOTH first started out, it excelled in playing Texas stereotypes against realistic behaviors. As the series progressed, the stereotypes were dialed up slowly but surely but were always counterbalanced by a episode dedicated to bringing back the relatability. This could be in an number of ways, be it by a new face to flesh out others, having mostly right heroes be dead wrong and vice versa, and most importantly, FOR ALL OF IT TO BE RECOGNIZED IN UNIVERSE.

Somewhere along the lines the writers caught whatever the Simpsons writers had that made them lose that respect for whomever wasn't the Creator's Pet (looking at you Lisa) and let the exaggerations seep in more. Episodes stopped being subtly complex stories told in a humorous way to obvious good vs evil idiot plots. Or rather, Hank Hill vs Whomever he didn't like that week.

Now, this really has nothing to do with behaviors and beliefs present within the Texas community, but rather that each and every dissenter was an axe-crazy strawman that would stop at nothing to bring down the community of Arlen, leaving the infallible Hank Hill to step in and set things right.

But this craziness didn't come and go with the one-shot characters and the small number of returning antagonists, no sir; even family members and friends would be swept up in it, turning once multilayered characters meant to represent different types of people into nutjob pinheads defined by nothing but their wacky hijinks. After all, Hank needs some kind of conflict to be the designated hero, and lord knows he can't be wrong when it really matters.

Perhaps it was a blessing in disguise that KOTH died before any further damage could be done. After all, when your series finale ends the shaky father-son dynamic by having Hank finally accepting his son NOT as who he is, but by Bobby becoming what he wished him to be (through some contrived bullshit), then you know your series is just that.



  • Bobbk
  • 31st Oct 12
I couldn't agree more with what you just said.
  • flashsucks
  • 20th Dec 12
Let's just say that the promotion of socio-political commentary over original and entertaining storytelling is a death knell for any series. Look at Family Guy, for example. This show was quite funny and interesting when it wasn't trying to comment on society, ridicule political ideologies, or satirize modern mentalities. In other words, before it didn't turn into a preachy, whiny soapbox for what Mike Judge thought was right or wrong.
  • Descriptor
  • 23rd Jan 13
Actually, the reason it moved to socio-political commentary was because in season 7 the show was taken over by John Altschuler and Dave Krinsky, since Judge had started to lessen his involvement with the series. Although seasons 7 and 8 were still pretty good, it really went downhill in season 9. In other words, don't blame Judge, blame the new guys.

In order to post comments, you need to

Get Known