Reviews Comments: Points for originality, but suffers from ironic lack of ambiguity
Points for originality, but suffers from ironic lack of ambiguity
I'm going to begin by praising the film's courage to do something completely different. In almost every Western film ever, the person who defies tradition is always seen as the hero. So, when Pixar decided that defying tradition was a villainous act, that was a good way for me to learn something new from this film. Where I think the film suffers is as follows: it subverted the black-and-white thinking of previous films, such as the Little Mermaid as one reviewer below commented...but ironically, it just ends up being black-and-white thinking the other way! In my opinion, that doesn't work. Both Elinor and Merida were behaving very badly. They both have to learn to make some compromises. The problem, however, is that since the film focuses on Merida's actions, most of the character development is on Merida's part and on Merida's flaws. The only change Elinor has to make is that she ends up allowing Merida to choose her own husband. I'm not diminishing Elinor's part in solving the conflicts of the film; my problem is with the "pacing". We get oodles and oodles of scenes of Merida learning she was wrong, but Elinor admits she was wrong only once. It's admittedly quite an admission, but it's still a lopsided picture the film is presenting us with. I'm really referring to a mathematical balance, not an "argument balance." The audience walks away with the impression of Merida as a brat, because instead of portraying tradition as an ambiguous affair as opposed to the tradition-defying heroes of the past, Pixar presents us with a very black-and-white picture, but the other way around! The lesson audiences walk away with, if not the lesson Pixar intended, is clear-cut: If you defy tradition for any reason, you're childish and you need to have your will and your spirit crushed. It's sort of like if I decided Superman wasn't perfect, but I worship Lex Luthor instead. That only provides an illusion of complexity; my point of view is still narrow, I've merely exchanged one set of blinders for another one. I'm not criticizing the main premise of this movie. It needed to be done, and it was a courageous step to take. I merely have a problem with the way it was executed.
Personally I don't mind the personalities regarding Merida and Elinor since I do like the fact that they're flawed but at the same time, you do strike plenty of good points.
comment #15224 MovieBrat 6th Jul 12
Some good points, but one thing I wanted to mention: while we don't get as much focus on Elinor and Merida is the one who changes most, Elinor does change more beyond just letting her choose her own fate—it's very clear by the way she acts and dresses at the end of the movie that she has become more loose, relaxed, and fun-loving, not as uptight and all about propriety as she was at the start. Also, I think you downplay too much the importance of someone as hidebound by tradition as Elinor agreeing to let her daughter break it. But as I said, you still have some good points.
comment #15399 Ingonyama 16th Jul 12
I think you missed the subtle slow changes in Elinor simply because she didn't have any lines as a bear. Watch the bear's facial expressions during the stream scene and Merida's speech to the leaders and you'll notice how she slowly comes to the realization that she was wrong to control her daughter too much. I think Merida's changes were just more overt in the dialogue.
comment #15714 green4tato 8th Aug 12
In order to post comments, you need to