I'm not going to be an ass for disagreeing, but you only watched 1/3 of his channel. Atrocities mark less than half of what he does. Oh yeah, mosbros is definitely better, with having 3 separate moments in his first top 20 alone where he uses the same joke each time, dreaming of better episodes. as for the length of a top ten video, that's about the length for an average countdown. You've, never seen countdowns made by Angry Joe have you? 45 minutes is the norm for a in-depth top 10. You do have a point with looped footage, but I personally prefer it over just seeing an avatar for every time he needs to make a point. I'll also disagree with Jontron being a good critic, mainly because I believe he's straight up unpleasable, but it's more to do why I dislike the Grumps in general. Mr. Enter is an acquired taste, and you need to watch more than 3 videos to get a proper opinion on him. Try watching ones on otherwise good shows, or Admirable Animations. Not flagging this review though, seriously, I understand Spongebat's review getting flagged, but why the other one?
"I need to watch more than 3 videos" Nope. I don't need to watch 3 more than episodes of a show so know i don't like it. OH what else is there he has. MLP reviews? that does not appeal to me because i don't like MLP so i could care less about that. And if i didn't think he was entertaining in Animated Atrocities, why should his admireable animations be any less entertaining.
Lol, my review is getting flagged. Someone sure does not like his idol to be put in a negative light judging by the negative reviews being flagged.
WHO THE HELL IS FLAGGING NEGATIVE REVIEWS!!!!!???!?? STOP!!!
Ohhhh, all bold caps. That will certainly persuade them to stop, good thinking!
I don't flag for your negative review of Mr. Enter. I flagged you for your horrible elaboration, and little to no backup for your points
What do you want to me to explain? I don't like his voice, i don't like how sometimes he adds filler like in the Breadwinners review, which had an embarrasing amount of filler https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFgY8iq0BZo
7:07-10:10. Why is that necessary? That does nothing but waste time. the amount of times he loops his footage? The points where he just seems to attack the writers on whatever projected stuff he puts rather than just being bad writers?
"the amount of times he loops his footage?"
He loops footage because he's talking about a specific part. It would be silly to talk about something and not show us what he's talking about.
"The points where he just seems to attack the writers on whatever projected stuff he puts rather than just being bad writers?"
Now that I agree with you. That's just unnecessary.
This flagging of reviews is getting quite ridiculous even if I don't agree with what they're saying. Even the review called Just Unpleasant was flagged and I don't see how that would be a "horrible elaboration" under your logic.
I love how Awesomekid42 accuses you of failing to elaborate, and then they fail to elaborate why they feel this way.
Then they accuse you of not backing up your points, without backing up any of their points.
@Elmo
I was pointing out what was and wasn't there. I'm not a reviewer, I'm a commenter.
Just because you're a commenter and not a reviewer doesn't mean that your comment isn't completely useless.
How is Luigikart supposed to take the advice 'You should elaborate more on some points!' when you can't even be bothered to type any of the points you think he didn't elaborate on? How can he back up his arguments when you can't name a single argument he made that he didn't back up?
@ Elmo
So I'm supposed to explain about what's not there? That's like going into great detail of why there aren't wings on my back.
But if you insist:
"He is just boring to watch. That is the worst part of him. He is not entertaining. "
No explanation there
"Mr. Enter just seems to just be ranting and somehow trying to make a point of writers having pyschological problems"
No examples whatsoever.
"First off, his voice is unappealing"
No explanation how. That and that's an incredibly stupid reason to judge his reviewing skills for.
"embarrasing straight minutes of filler that had nothing to do with the show he is reviewing."
He's criticizing the channel and company that made it. That's relevant.
Enough for you?
"So I'm supposed to explain about what's not there?" he said incredulously, before giving four examples of things that weren't there.
Yes, that is enough for me. I mean your points are debatable and I'm not sure how Luigikart is supposed to provide examples, but you actually came up with reasons why you didn't like the review instead of just calling it bad and flagging it, so yes. Enough for me.
well here i am. Now i will explain your grieves.
"No explanation how. That and that's an incredibly stupid reason to judge his reviewing skills for" Well yes, it is a valid critisim. I will say his voice is dull and boring. When someone is going to be ranting or reviewing for 10 or so minutes, his or her voice is an important aspect. If i don't like his voice, then i am less likely to tune in. Take Linkara. Linkara to be has this nasally voice, which makes him sound whiny when he yells. Whiny voices don't appeal to me, so i tune out.
Again, there have been many points in the Spongebob reviews where he tries to project some pyschological image, such as the Squid baby one, and the One Coarse Meal review. Oh and the One Coarse meal where he outrights calls them "Terrible people" just cause they are bad writers. Oh and Squid's visit where he theorizes that "the writers must have some trauma"
He's criticizing the channel and company that made it. That's relevant. Again it is a "breadwinner review" not a review of Nickolodean in general. it could have been cut without any consqueneces. that is filler And even then i spotted only a minute or 1 and half minutes if i was being generous of critcizing the network. The rest of those 2 mintues was pointless *oh i give up* bs, a montage and then *oh no i can't give up*
"He is just boring to watch. That is the worst part of him. He is not entertaining." Again, i explained why i don't find him entertaining. His dull voice, his lack of comedy or funny jokes and the mean-spirited, Filler, ranting "again with the unecessary nickoldeon rant in the Breadwinners"
Is that all you want? or shall i elberate more?
@Luigikart
If you think the voice is a tune out, that's fine. But they don't choose what their natural voice sounds like. That's now their fault, nor does it change how well they review.
Ok. Fair enough about that point.
The rant was his two-cents about how nickelodeon was, and Breadwinner was an example of that. Also, several reviewers go into something less related to the thing they're reviewing to describe something bigger. Linkara did about Frank Miller in his 300th episode, Nostalgia Critic did about M. Night. Shymalan and Adam Sandler in the Signs and 8 Crazy nights review respectively, and Angry Joe did about the Kinect in his 'Worst Games of 2013' countdown.
Dull voice isn't his fault, lack of comedy or jokes you haven't elaborated on, and the ranting I already explained above.
Also, before anybody accuses me of anything, this isn't as a Mr. Enter fan. I've literally only watched one full review of his at the time I wrote this comment.
The NC doesn't loop footage. Chick doesn't loop footage. JesuOtaku doesn't loop footage. Countless other reviewers don't loop footage. Enter should not loop footage.
You know what else that NC, Chick, and Jesu do? THEY SHOW THEIR FACE. Try making a detailed review without ever showing your face, let alone doing it in Window's Movie Maker. You know what else the NC does, during his reviews, parts of them bear little to no relevance to the actual movie at hand. the Fuckitall commercial anyone? Yes Mr. Enter is low budget, but that has little to do with anything. and Shota, why are you even here? Why not just make a review and be on your merry way? Are you worried that it'll get flagged? Why? It won't hurt you. I'd rather see looped footage than an author Avatar for 2/3 of the video. *cough*Mobros Studios*cough*
Also " Nope. I don't need to watch 3 more than episodes of a show so know i don't like it." Then why did you file this review under a "whole series review?" Unless you actually DO watch ALL of the videos, you can't really do that.
@Shota Hey, instead of trolling Mr. Enter's TV Tropes page waiting for someone to come up with a negative review SOLELY to agree with them, why don't you post your own review? You seem to have a strong enough opinion on the guy. Unless, you know, you don't have anything better to do than wait here for the slight chance that someone will say something negative about Mr. Enter JUST to agree with them. I dunno, just a thought.
Accusing Shota of 'trolling' Mr Enter by commenting once or twice on negative reviews of him is kind of a weak argument considering you two have been commenting almost non-stop on every single review of the guy.
I have no opinion of Mr Enter but I'm sick of seeing these comment pages spring back to life again and again because you can't just agree to disagree. At the very least, limit the discussion to ONE of these reviews.
I do not need to post my own review- a few others already posted reviews that sum up my opinion of him completely, and the additional replies to them further explain more of my opinion.
And if you get ridicule for posting anything in caps or bolds, why does Tvtropes even allow you to do that in the first place??
You're right Shota, agreeing with even the most illiterate and broken negative reviews from obvious trolls sums up your opinion of completely blind hatred especially when you don't add any details beyond "Thank you." And you only get ridiculed for bold/caps because that's literally all you post here.
Yes, because having your own opinion is trolling. Nobody at all could dislike this man's videos honestly!
"They say I'm old fashioned, and live in the past, but sometimes I think progress progresses too fast."
No, but waiting on the TV Tropes page of someone you dislike just in the scant hope that someone else writes a negative review merely for the purpose of saying you agree with them. Well, that's more along the lines of "pathetic" rather than trolling. you know, kinda like throwing a spastic tantrum because someone gives a negative review to a show that you like and getting yourself blocked.
While not the words I'd choose, 'Throwing a spastic tantrum because someone gives a negative review to a show that you like' is a pretty accurate description of how Mr Enter's fans have reacted to any and all negative reviews of him on TV Tropes.
Leave a Comment:
The Linkara of Animation.
Well, then. After hearing about him, I decided to look into him. I wish i didn't. First off, his voice is unappealing, just like Linkara. I know this might seem harsh, but if i am willing to listen to any reviewer for 10 or so minutes, they need a good voice. Cinema Snob had a good voice as does Jontron. Linkara and Mr. Enter don't. Also, he is not any more funny than the animated atrocities episodes he reviews and his reviews have as much filler as the epsiodes he reviews. Breadwinners is the biggest example. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFgY8iq0BZo
from 7:07 to 10:10, it is just 3 embarrasing straight minutes of filler that had nothing to do with the show he is reviewing. Unlike say the likes of Jontron, he is not funny enough to pull off filler. Also, Often for whatever reason, at times he loops footage. Take Mobrostudios Spongebob reviews. He makes his points better and faster and he attempts to be funny. Oh he has an appealing voice.
Mr. Enter just seems to just be ranting and somehow trying to make a point of writers having pyschological problems. Again compared to Jontron's Sonic Team skits. In the Sonic Team skits, it is clear that it is just a joke and not mean-spirited. Also, it over-the-top so it ends up being funny. Also, Jontron has the right mind to not call out any specific person. I can't quite say the same for Mr. Enter. Mr. Enter prefers to project these pyschological problems that the writer supposedly had without any over-the-topness nor any hint that it was a joke. This is unecessary and it makes him feel mean-sprited and a jerkass to people who are just merely bad writers for no reason.
And finally: He is just boring to watch. That is the worst part of him. He is not entertaining.
There are more entertaining critics out there like Jontron, AVGN, Nostalgia Critic, and oh there is Mobrostudios who did pretty funny top twenty Spongebob reviews that made their points better than Mr. Enter did.
Last thing: a 43 minute video for a top ten? Really? then again, it is a trend that i am sick of which Angry Joe, who i like is guilty of. Either put parts in your top ten videos or make them shorter.