Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / Unobtainium

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Tirinor Since: Jun, 2020
Aug 22nd 2023 at 2:53:40 AM •••

In the World of Warcraft section under video games they forgot to add in Azerite as it was a wonder material made out of the blood of the titan in Azeroth that could be used for just about anything. From gunpowder, armor, clothes, weaponry, and even engineering devices. In one of the quests you add a small pinch of azerite to gunpowder and the explosive force of the shot from a regular flintlock pistol knocks your character onto their ass. Also the various machines that both the Alliance and Horde use in the Fourth War in BFA use Azerite.

MasterJoseph Frolaytia X Qwenthur of Literature/HeavyObject Since: Mar, 2018
Frolaytia X Qwenthur of Literature/HeavyObject
Jul 11th 2021 at 9:18:33 AM •••

Can someone alphabetize this page?

IPP Wick Check created.
Bhorius Since: Oct, 2014
Mar 31st 2018 at 6:37:08 AM •••

This page appears impossible to internally link properly. The only thing that I found working was copy-pasting a full link (with http and everything), which, as expected, results in the whole thing looking like an external link instead. See edit history of this page. Any ideas why and how to work around this?

Edited by Bhorius Hide / Show Replies
jormis29 Since: Mar, 2012
Mar 31st 2018 at 3:50:54 PM •••

Tvtropes uses curly braces to link single word links so {{Unobtainium}} works

Working on cleaning up List of Shows That Need Summary
Bhorius Since: Oct, 2014
Apr 4th 2018 at 8:07:44 AM •••

I see, thanks. Should have thought about it considering I did something similar on the same page earlier, my bad

Herbarius Since: Nov, 2009
Apr 13th 2010 at 5:54:32 PM •••

About antimatter: "a microscopic amount = tactical nuclear weapon yield"

I would strongly debate that. I once heard, all particle accelerators on Earth combined couldn't even produce enough antimatter to ignite a match with its matter/antimatter reaction.

So, ...

the amount of antimatter all particle accelerators on Earth combined could produce = a microscopic amount

not able to ignite a match <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< tactical nuke

Edited by Herbarius Hide / Show Replies
robert Since: Jan, 2001
Apr 13th 2010 at 11:20:59 PM •••

You can have a microscopic amount of antimatter, which is still vastly more than has ever been produced on earth, and hence has a tactical nuclear yield.

Cattle die, kinsmen die. You yourself will surely die. Only word-fame dies not, for one who well achieves it.
88.118.69.71 Since: Dec, 1969
May 5th 2010 at 2:04:14 PM •••

Isn't this a bit wrong? I suppose unobtainium should be some exotic meterial like "red mercury" 106th element instead of stuff that is expensive but available.

DSFARGEG Since: Jan, 2001
Jan 8th 2012 at 2:28:17 AM •••

Red mercury was fictional, references were created by the US/UK as a red herring to throw off other nations' development of fission, primarily the USSR.

GeekProphet Since: Oct, 2012
Sep 4th 2017 at 11:45:54 AM •••

A single kilogram of antimatter and the kilogram of matter it is mixed with together produce about 43 megatons of explosive force. The amount mentioned in the note is, 1 x 10 ^9 grams, or 1 x 10 ^ 12 less than this, or about equal to 1/5th of a stick of dynamite, nowhere near the power of even the very smallest of tactical nukes.

Edited by GeekProphet
Yugnat Since: Nov, 2012
May 22nd 2016 at 4:20:21 PM •••

"[...] the Trope Namer is the mineral sought by the mining company in Avatar."

...Actually, if Wikipédia is to be trusted (and it does provides references, so I suppose it can be), the term may date back to as far as the1950s. Should this be corrected ?

86.53.55.184 Since: Dec, 1969
Jun 3rd 2010 at 2:38:42 AM •••

Are positrons classifie as Unobtanium? (They're antimatter, of course, so they're sort of covered already.)

The Asimov Robot books refer to them all the time, but I don't remember one where the story hung on a problem with them. So I guess they're not a Plot Device but (to use my favourite WS Gilbert quote) 'coroborative detail intended to add artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative'.

[Prepares for flames from Asimov fans. Actually I like a lot of (early) asimov but I'm ambivalent about the robots.]

Hide / Show Replies
joeyjojo Since: Jan, 2001
Aug 31st 2010 at 7:30:51 AM •••

If any thing they are technobabble. it's not the positrons that are important it's the fact it's an artificial brain. the positrons are not a substance in the story just buzz word Prefix. I can say this as fan: If he was writing the books today he would be calling them higginstronic neuralnets or Quantum cyberbranes

Edited by joeyjojo hashtagsarestupid
joeyjojo Since: Jan, 2001
Aug 31st 2010 at 7:30:51 AM •••

If any thing they are technobabble. it's not the positrons that are important it's the fact it's an artificial brain. the positrons are not a substance in the story just buzz word Prefix. I can say this as fan: If he was writing the books today he would be calling them higginstronic neuralnets or Quantum cyberbranes

Edited by joeyjojo hashtagsarestupid
Top