Yesterday I added Jules from Pulp Fiction to this page because I've always considered him to be THE textbook example of a True Neutral character, but it has since been removed. Any reason?

From the Futurama section:

• In addition, most of the main cast aside from Bender (Chaotic Evil), Farnsworth (Chaotic Neutral), Fry (Neutral Good), Leela (Lawful Good) and Hermes (Lawful Neutral) can be placed into here.

Isn't that just a very long way of saying "Amy"? And I'd say she was more Neutral Good as well.

While I'm thinking about it, how is Discworld Death (who literally cannot disobey the rules, and when he bends them, does it for the side of Good) "sometimes" True Neutral? And especially how is he Type 3: Animals?

Actually, I've been looking at the Types and it seems to me that there's too many. Aren't the following basically the same?

1. Cowards and compromisers; 6. Don't care about anything; 7. Fence-Riding Bastards; 9. Focused on own goals; 10. Trend-followers; and 12. Want to be left alone. All basically characters who think taking a side is more trouble than it's worth. (Possibly 13, although the description is a little confused: they "aren't dedicated to either side", but they "aren't neutral in the sense of not taking a side". In fact, 13 is probably Chaotic Neutral.)

2. Above Good And Evil; 5. Completely amoral force of nature.

3. Animals; 11. Robots. Characters who simply don't have the ability to make moral choices (possibly also 8. Characters with low intelligence, although I'm not sure it belongs here at all; a stupid character can want to do good [or evil] even if he doesn't know how.)

It seems to me that there's a different category for every reason to be True Neutral, rather than just every way True Neutral people might act.

How is this trope subjective? The other alignment tropes definitely are, but the way this is formatted seems pretty objective, especially since there are a number of types True Neutral characters can be narrowed down to.