Would Wacky Delly be considered this?

I came here to add the game Passage to the list, but it was already there; so I'll just comment.

I read about the game at the debate whether or not a video game could be art, so I downloaded and ran it - and this is what I saw:

You just keep walking to the right along changing "scenery" and listening to music that even 20 years ago would have been called "poor and annoying". Alternately, you can go down and explore the "maze" of squares and collect treasure (that doesn't seem to do anything); for some reason, if you get the girl, it makes exploring nearly impossible. (Supposedly, your character dies after five minutes [and the girl some time before that]; I got bored WAY before finding out.)

Everybody seems to comment how deep and artistic the game is; it probably does have some kind of a deep meaning, but I just don't get it.

I don't know whether the current page picture, "The Lights Going On and Off," deserves to be called art, but it is definitely striking.

It says that only Real Life section proves how this is Truth In Television. Thing is, shouldn't all examples where the work itself is incomprehensible true art count as proving this. It's about what people think, so if a TV producer/director/writer makes a show that's incomprehensible as "true art", wouldn't this count just as much as a painter making an incomprehensible picture as "true art"? Since this is about real life thoughts and opinions of people. I'm not suggesting to move everything into the "Real Life" section, only that stuff in "Comic Books", "Live Action Television" and so on should count as proof of this subject's truth-ness since it shows what the creator of the works believe regards to the trueness of art.