MisterBibs: Okay, I don't know what SCP Foundation is, so I made a hottip that people can use. Feel free to edit it if I've gotten it wrong. I know, I know, I'm 'ruining the bit' by explaining it, but the article doesnt directly state what the article is.

Fishmonger and all his works have been completely disowned by the Foundation. Orwellian Editing of SCP-4445-J to reflect this has been authorized.

Nothing of value has been lost.

A large edit was made to the main article clarifying, expanding on, or deleting inaccurate bits. Some links led to articles not described by the trope. This is likely because the article described was deleted and replaced or rewritten. The edit was autoreverted however. Was this automatic or am I missing something?

Also: Why isn't there a "add to watchlist" button on the discussion page? =\ I know it's not directly related to the Foundation or anything, but I accidentally dropped this page from my watchlist and I'm not sure how to get it back; figured my best shot would be starting another thread.

~EDIT~ And it didn't work. =( Help?

For the record, PerogiXW, I don't have any problem with erasing references to purged SCPs, nor do I assume that SCP wiki as a whole has anything against TV Tropes. That's just silly, not to mention baseless. I took issue with pig_catapult's attempt to erase any and all references to Fishmonger just because of his feelings toward the writer. That and the way he approached it, treating as an extension of the SCP wiki (see edit comments and the discussion elsewhere on this page). The sheer presumptuousness of it rubbed me the wrong way. He has since backed off his position and apologized, so I have no problem with him. And, again, because it bears reiterating, I don't have issues with anyone else at the SCP wiki (except for Bright, but that has nothing to do with the topic at hand).

Edit: As far as the "no authority" thing, I actually agree with you. He has as much authority as any other troper. But, like I said, he went a bit beyond that, seemingly presuming that he could actually make his changes stick just because. But, like I said, he clarified his position and apologized, so water under the bridge.

Since I can't find the discussion page for it, I'll just say it here: Whoever keeps putting SCP-426 on the HONF page for the SCP-Foundation needs to stop. General consensus is that the thing is too funny to qualify for it. I know the top of the page has the Subjective template, but you can't pass off everything as subjective.

Passing along the message that someone apparently deleted the Crowning Moment of Heartwarming page. I honestly don't remember having ever read it, but if there was such a page, there is no longer one now, and someone over at the Foundation's chat is concerned about this.

Since I have yet to navigate the application process for the mothership site and therefore can't ask this there, I hoped I might be able to ask here:

Regarding the various "proposals" for the SCP-001 slot, are these all considered "canon" SCPs, insofar as any SCP can be considered canon? Or are they just a lot of ideas being bounced around, but not actually being given the slot?

I suppose I'm curious because I can see that there's some sort of system in place for this SCP slot, but I can't quite divine what it is.

>>The GOC killed God, causing Nietzsche's God is Dead. Irony points for using mages.

Maybe I'm just missing something incredibly obvious (it's been known to happen), but what is this referring to? Not the Nietzsche bit, but the GOC killing God. I don't really keep up with current events on the SCP site, I just like reading the SPC series entries, so if this is some sort of recent development that might explain why I don't get the reference. That, or I'm just blanking on what GOC refers to.

Can we have a more out-of-universe description of SCP Foundation? This one doesn't exactly give a good picture of what it is.

I am thinking of getting an account on the scp website and writing a few scps. anone have any idea how I should do it?

The images on 106 always freaked me out, so I set Firefox to block images from the website so that I could read the page. I tested it out using four separate SC Ps with images, and they didn't load. Then I went to 106, and the images still loaded. What the hell, Firefox? Either I just don't know how computers work, or someone on the website is a technical genius who really wants people to see those pictures.