What's Happening

Troperville

Tools

collapse/expand topics back to Main/PantyShot

Argo5
topic
01:40:04 PM Jun 23rd 2014
Would this trope fit at all with Dresses Gownsand Skirts? I mean they are kind of connected
ickick3
topic
10:28:33 AM Apr 15th 2014
Why is this a trope? Isn't the wiki supposed to be family-friendly? If it is, this doesn't fit in well, along with the rest of the Fanservice tropes.
SeptimusHeap
11:37:17 AM Apr 15th 2014
Because "family friendly" here has a specific meaning (Family Friendly, as well as No Lewdness, No Prudishness) that this page doesn't violate.

Merely talking about sexual topics is not family-unfriendly.
manhandled
topic
07:35:22 PM Apr 14th 2013
"No examples please. This only defines the term."

Hmmm. I'm sure they could use a variation of that message that can explain the context of that example cutout.
Phys101
12:50:52 PM Jun 30th 2013
My impression is that it has something to do with Google's standards for its ads.
MrDeath
09:31:31 AM Jul 1st 2013
That and the examples were getting downright creepy. I mean, not only listing stuff where it was clearly intended, but along the lines of, "If you pause it at exactly 2 minutes, 3.7 seconds into the episode, you can see seven pixels of grey that are probably her panties." and just generally being real obvious that some people were spending way too much time looking for it where it wasn't intended.
Lumine
02:56:23 PM Sep 3rd 2013
I know this is an old(ish) discussion, but there are still some articles with Panty Shots exemples, like the Tales of Darksides Movie, including the EXACT time of the panty shot in question.

What can, or should be done?
Cimerax
05:16:49 PM Mar 26th 2014
Too creepy? Why not set some standards that you have to follow before adding examples? Why even have this page if we can't have examples?
SeptimusHeap
11:09:47 PM Mar 26th 2014
Well, standards are sadly disobeyed rather frequently. Plus, part of the problem was that the list of panty shots gave a creepy vibe.

As for the second question ... the trope is still there.
Schadrach
12:26:14 PM Apr 2nd 2014
Irony: I came to the article hoping for exactly that — an overly precise note as to where a panty shot in a certain work occurs. Less creepy because I'd just made an argument with someone about what the lack of panty shots or shots focusing on boobs, butt, legs, or hips says about the work in question despite the costuming of certain characters (characters in fetishy outfits but without any of the stereotypical "male gaze objectification" shots), and I see an entry on that films page for panty shot that just says "Only if you're looking for it!"

I was actually banking on extreme creepy over-precision, and am disappoint. =/
CloverGoldngreen
topic
09:17:09 AM Dec 23rd 2012
Is anyone else creeped out by panty-shots? This troper can't shake off the feeling that panty-shots are more focused on the panties rather than what's under them, which is a little unsettling. I mean, it's one thing if the focus is on the girl in question and how she looks in her underwear. This troper thinks panty-shots are sleazier than an upskirt shot revealing that the girl in question actually isn't wearing panties.
manhandled
topic
11:01:22 AM Nov 10th 2012
edited by 216.99.32.45
Blanked
FireWalk
topic
12:39:05 PM Feb 20th 2012
  • Mystery Team: "Wait... we're not just taking off clothes?"
Needs Elaboration
OriDoodle
09:52:11 PM Mar 17th 2012
edited by OriDoodle
never mind.
kalpal
03:10:14 AM Jun 10th 2012
That's more of a naked people are funny example, then a panty shot
Gaaron01234
topic
04:32:12 PM Sep 2nd 2011
does it count if the panties aren't visible due to censorship ?

If so, we've got one in Rogue Galaxy. The Player can see between Kisalas Legs While swimming. There's only a Black nothingness thought.
OJtheLION
12:27:48 AM Sep 13th 2011
Don't think so. I thought there was something in YKKTW concern the kind of black holes you can have show up in games sometimes, but I'm not sure if I remembered that properly or nothing came of it. Seems like a substantive enough subject to me, but I am far too lazy to propose it.
coconutie
topic
02:18:38 PM Nov 21st 2010
Ok, ofcourse this is asked before, but I can't find the awnser to my question: Does this trope relate to EVERY panty shot ever or only the one who were merely there for a Fetish Fuel effect? You see, Miyazaki uses realistic pantyshots and not that damned Magic Skirt. And knowing him, he would never show it for ones jerk-off material. So is this only for the sexual part of it? Then I really need to delete the trope at a LOT of places.
Stoogebie
08:50:55 AM Jul 12th 2012
I'm guessing there's a lot of panties being seen here. But yeah, I guess this would be called a Super Trope, or at least a broadly-defined term. It can be played as fanservice or squick, or neither depending on the situation.
Nohbody
topic
04:53:44 PM Jul 10th 2010
edited by Nohbody
Sanity check: Would Freefall strip 1447 qualify for this trope? Given that the sight is only implied (instead of clearly visible to the audience) I'm not entirely sure.
NCZ
10:42:33 AM Jul 11th 2010
If it's acknowledged and deliberate, I'd say it fits.

(man I feel so dirty judging all these examples...)
Nohbody
04:27:24 PM Jul 11th 2010
The lengths one has to go to as a troper, huh? *grin*
BBHood217
10:18:46 AM Jul 27th 2010
My personal rule is that if I don't see it, it doesn't count in my por—book.

But this article's featured picture tells it all: Implication is enough to count. So add away.
192.147.171.163
10:18:19 PM Sep 7th 2010
Maybe this article's featured picture is wrong though. Maybe we need a new one.
NCZ
topic
02:15:20 PM Jul 10th 2010
Sometimes, people scare me.

We should seriously clear this trope up, because many of these are not proper examples. Urgh.
NCZ
02:45:48 PM Jul 10th 2010
Me after removing non-examples: [1]

Holy crap, man. (Now, it's possible that I was disturbed to the point of removing some actual examples, but geez.)
BBHood217
topic
10:18:40 PM Jun 19th 2010
I'm a little peeved that the article's current image doesn't actually feature the trope in question (at least not from the viewer's view anyway). Can't we use an image of someone else who actually demonstrates the trope, like say Kaere from Sayonara Zetsubou Sensei?
BBHood217
10:24:52 AM Jul 27th 2010
I suspect that at this point, Mahoraba's not going away anymore; it's become this article's definite picture, as much as it frustrates me to no end.

So instead of replacing it, can we put in an additional image that, y'know, actually demonstrates the trope in question? I mean, Unwanted Harem has an image of a harem...
BigT
topic
06:49:55 PM Jun 14th 2010
edited by BigT
Johnny E: So, despite my primary reaction to much of this article being to run away very fast, I shall try to put wiki-professionalism ahead of my own mental health - isn't the difference between this and I See London that this version is eroticised to some degree? If not, what is the difference, but if so, an awful lot of the examples seem to be in the wrong place. On the other hand, thanks to Rule34 I'm not even sure The Same But Sexy is a feasible trope distinction.

Me: Not really. The sexualization is a difference, but how it is revealed is also important. This trope is incidental. Having someone drop their pants would not count here, but it would in I See London. Also, the other trope includes seeing parts of the panties that are not covering any naughty bits, like the top of boxers.

Furthermore, I See London is about humiliation. The person is usually embarrassed, or at least is assumed by others that they would be. A Panty Shot is usually not even revealed to the subject at all.
Torchic65101
11:05:41 AM Jan 30th 2014
I believe that they should just have one example for each category.
back to Main/PantyShot

TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy