10:06:51 PM Feb 8th 2014
Would it be an amusing aversion if a work had the drones be a group of Kings(despite still being called drones) surrounding the Queen/Queens(ant colonies are known to have more than one Queen) while the workers and soldiers remain female?
05:59:26 PM Jun 10th 2011
This page seems quite butthurt. I don't understand what the big deal is.... Half of the insects mentioned aren't even insects (charmy and combee certainly don't resemble real world insects in any none superficial way)
08:35:19 PM Apr 30th 2011
I think some of the intro should be YMMV. Sure SOME women and probably all entomologists are bugged by this stuff, but I don't think a lot of this is any worse than rubber forehead aliens, and is done for the same reason-we make stories about things like ourselves, and when they're not actually like ourselves, we anthropomorphize them. There's not much room for biological accuracy in cartoons. You don't want Nemo changing genders because real clownfish do. You don't want Simba mating w/all the females in the pride. You especially don't want Tarzan acting like a real feral child (or the gorillas to react to him as a baby like real gorillas would). Back to insects, it'd be weird to have only female characters and it's nice to have a romance between Flik and Atta even though real workers are sterile females. (Maybe Flik should have been a female worker, and Atta could have been a drone "prince," but then there'd still be complaints about how workers are sterile, and kids know about queen ants, but they've never heard of king ants and they'd be questioning that). Ants don't have personalities at all, for crying out loud. Anything resembling a biologically accurate insect society would just be really alien, and unless they're minor characters, you're not going to relate to it.